Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 230 views

    Group Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-262129248
    This rubric evaluates group presentations on several criteria: time limit, cooperation within the group, content and organization, use of sources and documentation, visuals, and formatting/mechanics. Groups can earn up to 4 points for each criteria, with higher scores given for exemplary performance in keeping within time limits, demonstrating cooperation through transitions between speakers, presenting clear and well-organized content that addresses all key elements, citing multiple relevant sources properly, using visuals that enhance the presentation, and having formatting and spelling/grammar that supports readability. The total possible score is 24 points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Group Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-262129248
    230 views1 page
    This rubric evaluates group presentations on several criteria: time limit, cooperation within the group, content and organization, use of sources and documentation, visuals, and formatting/mechanics. Groups can earn up to 4 points for each criteria, with higher scores given for exemplary performance in keeping within time limits, demonstrating cooperation through transitions between speakers, presenting clear and well-organized content that addresses all key elements, citing multiple relevant sources properly, using visuals that enhance the presentation, and having formatting and spelling/grammar that supports readability. The total possible score is 24 points.

    Original Title

    group presentation rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric evaluates group presentations on several criteria: time limit, cooperation within the group, content and organization, use of sources and documentation, visuals, and formatting/mechanics. Groups can earn up to 4 points for each criteria, with higher scores given for exemplary performance in keeping within time limits, demonstrating cooperation through transitions between speakers, presenting clear and well-organized content that addresses all key elements, citing multiple relevant sources properly, using visuals that enhance the presentation, and having formatting and spelling/grammar that supports readability. The total possible score is 24 points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    230 views1 page

    Group Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-262129248
    This rubric evaluates group presentations on several criteria: time limit, cooperation within the group, content and organization, use of sources and documentation, visuals, and formatting/mechanics. Groups can earn up to 4 points for each criteria, with higher scores given for exemplary performance in keeping within time limits, demonstrating cooperation through transitions between speakers, presenting clear and well-organized content that addresses all key elements, citing multiple relevant sources properly, using visuals that enhance the presentation, and having formatting and spelling/grammar that supports readability. The total possible score is 24 points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Transcendentalism / Anti-Transcendentalism

    Group: ________________________

    Members: _________________________________

    Group Presentation Rubric

    Time Limit

    Cooperation

    Content and
    Organization

    Sources and
    Documentation

    Visuals

    Formatting and
    Mechanics

    Exemplary (4 pts.)

    Accomplished (3 pts.)

    Developing (2 pts.)

    Beginning (1 pt.)

    Student's part of the presentation


    is within the allotted time limit.
    Whole group presentation is
    within 2 minutes +/-of allotted
    time.
    Presenters worked as part of a
    team, providing effective
    transitions to next/ previous
    speaker or making references to
    previous/next topics.

    Student's part of the presentation


    is within 1 minute +/- of the
    allotted time limit. Whole group
    presentation is within 3 minutes
    +/- of allotted time.

    Student's part of the presentation


    is within 2 minutes +/- of the
    allotted time limit. Whole group
    presentation is within 4 minutes
    +/- of allotted time.

    Student's part of the presentation


    is too long or too short. Whole
    group presentation is 5 or more
    minutes above or below the
    allotted time.

    Evidence of team work;


    transitions made to next/
    previous speaker or topics.

    Some evidence of team work;


    some transitions made to next/
    previous speaker or topics.

    No evidence of team work; no


    transitions made to
    next/previous speaker or topics.

    Material mostly related to topic;


    content was presented in mostly
    logical sequence; flowed
    together fairly well; fairly strong
    opening and closing. One or two
    key elements may be missing.

    Material somewhat related to


    topic; content was presented in
    inadequate sequence; flowed
    together poorly; weak opening
    or closing. More than two key
    elements are missing.

    Material unrelated to topic; little


    thought given to sequence of
    content; repetitive; transitions
    choppy; lacked opening or
    closing. Presentation lacks
    several key elements or contains
    inaccuracies.

    2-3 sources are used, mentioned,


    and properly cited in MLA
    format, including most pictures
    and chosen song.

    Only 1-2 sources are used OR


    mentioned/cited inappropriately.

    No sources are used or


    mentioned and not cited.

    A few visuals are not attractive


    but all support the
    theme/content of the
    presentation.

    All visuals are attractive but a


    few do not seem to support the
    theme/content of the
    presentation.

    Visuals are unattractive AND


    detract from the content of the
    presentation.

    Background, font formats, and


    graphics generally support the
    readability and content of the
    presentation; only 1-2
    misspellings or grammatical
    errors.

    Some interference of
    background, font formats, or
    graphics with readability and
    content of the presentation;
    several misspellings or
    grammatical errors.

    Background, font formats, or


    graphics make reading and
    understanding the material
    difficult OR detract from the
    presentation; many misspellings
    or grammatical errors.

    Material clearly related to topic;


    content was presented in logical
    sequence; flowed together well;
    strong opening and closing. All
    key elements are included.
    Several sources (3 +) are used,
    mentioned, and properly cited in
    MLA format, including all
    pictures and chosen song.
    Visuals are attractive and
    effectively enhance the
    presentation; show considerable
    originality; illustrate important
    points.
    Background, font formats
    (colors, size, type), and graphics
    significantly enhance the
    presentation; no misspellings or
    grammatical errors.

    Total = 24

    Score

    You might also like