- Early Medieval Archaeology, Early Medieval And Medieval Settlement (Archaeology), Hillforts and Enclosures, Great Moravia, Great Morava Archeology, Power Centres, and 6 moreField Archaeology, Settlement archaeology, Early Medieval Burials, Fortifications, Fortified Settlements (Archaeology), and Fortified Residenceedit
The author evaluates the available information about the fortifications of the Mikulčice acropolis, the main area of the Early Medieval agglomeration. He gives a new perspective on the structure and dating of the fortification based on... more
The author evaluates the available information about the fortifications of the Mikulčice acropolis, the main area of the Early Medieval agglomeration. He gives a new perspective on the structure and dating of the fortification based on analyzing the documentation of all conducted excavations. Great Moravian rampart is composed of a stone face wall, clay-wood core strengthened by grates and a stone substructure ringed by stake palisades, in front of, and in some places partially under, the face wall. The substructure’s role was most likely to bear the face wall’s weight and to strengthen the artificial slope under it against water erosion by the nearby river. The defensive wall was built in a relatively short time as a singular structure, probably in the last third of the 9th century.
Research Interests:
The author presents the preliminary results of the excavation of the Mikulčice acropolis fortifi cation near Church II. Any rampart is the largest such structure built by the Mojmír dynasty. The importance of this particular... more
The author presents the preliminary results of the excavation of the Mikulčice acropolis fortifi cation near Church II.
Any rampart is the largest such structure built by the Mojmír dynasty. The importance of this particular fortification
lies in the fact that it is the rampart of the main area of one of the top Great Moravian centers of power that protected,
among other things, a number of religious buildings and a district with the only properly documented stone palace
of a Great Moravian ruler. Great Moravian rampart is composed of a stone face wall, clay-wood core strengthened
by grates and a stone substructure ringed by stake palisades, in front of, and in some places partially under, the face
wall. The substructure’s role was most likely to bear the face wall’s weight and to strengthen the artificial slope under
it against water erosion by the nearby river. The conclusion poses the main issues and unknowns that remain to be
discovered and answered about the Mikulčice fortification.
Any rampart is the largest such structure built by the Mojmír dynasty. The importance of this particular fortification
lies in the fact that it is the rampart of the main area of one of the top Great Moravian centers of power that protected,
among other things, a number of religious buildings and a district with the only properly documented stone palace
of a Great Moravian ruler. Great Moravian rampart is composed of a stone face wall, clay-wood core strengthened
by grates and a stone substructure ringed by stake palisades, in front of, and in some places partially under, the face
wall. The substructure’s role was most likely to bear the face wall’s weight and to strengthen the artificial slope under
it against water erosion by the nearby river. The conclusion poses the main issues and unknowns that remain to be
discovered and answered about the Mikulčice fortification.
Research Interests:
Archaeological sources provide a wide range of information to help understand the social structure of human society in the past. In this paper, the authors deal with the information potential of grave pit modifications and wooden... more
Archaeological sources provide a wide range of information to help understand the social structure of human society in the past. In this paper, the authors deal with the information potential of grave pit modifications and wooden structures in graves at burial sites in the central region of Great Moravia (southeast Moravia, southwest Slovakia). The goal at this point is to define the basic hypotheses and describe the methodological basis along with the research methodology. The authors treat the sources holistically, which means that one of the methodological foundations is the claim that the properties of the whole are not a simple sum of its parts. This means that all recognized elements of the funeral rite and their mutual relations and functions are the center of attention of this research. The primary basis for the research is the assumption that the presence of various wooden structures or wooden burial receptacles in the graves of the Great Moravian period is a common cultural occurrence. It further tests the hypothesis that there was intent behind choosing of these different wooden structures and grave pit modifications and their usage, as well as a potential differentiation based on age or gender in the frequency, quality and selection of these modifications/arrangements and structures.
Research Interests: Early Medieval Archaeology, Death and Burial (Archaeology), Early Middle Ages (History), Burial Practices (Archaeology), Coffins, and 9 moreArchaeology of burials, Burial Customs, Graveyards, Christianisation of Central and Eastern Europe in the Early Middle Ages, Great Moravia, Graves, Great Moravia Archeology, Wooden Artefacts, and Great Morava Archeology
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
The article is part of the study of “non-residential” parts of early medieval central agglomerations in Bohemia and Moravia (Czech Republic). It is a new summary of our knowledge of the suburbium around the Great Moravian hillfort at... more
The article is part of the study of “non-residential” parts of early medieval central agglomerations in Bohemia and Moravia (Czech Republic). It is a new summary of our knowledge of the suburbium around the Great Moravian hillfort at Mikulčice. The suburbium consist of various kinds of settlements closely surrounding the fortified heart of the agglomeration. This area can be seen as a circle with a radius of 700 m around the centre of the agglomeration. In the 9th century there were eight separate areas here with evidence of dwellings, economic (artisan and in part
also agricultural), sacred and funeral activities.
also agricultural), sacred and funeral activities.
Research Interests:
The author presents a revised interpretation of the area of the NE gateway of the acropolis of the Great Moravian power centre Mikulčice-Valy and the adjacent fortifi cation. The work is a response to a previously published picture of the... more
The author presents a revised interpretation of the area of the NE gateway of the acropolis of the Great Moravian power centre Mikulčice-Valy and the adjacent fortifi cation. The work is a response to a previously published picture of the overall fi nd situation of this area (by B. Kavánová 2003), which, according to the author, does not match the information available in the original documentation. The interpretation procedures clearly presented in the aforementioned monograph cannot be substantiated due to inadequate fi eld work methods, the extent of the documentation compiled and the way in which this documentation is selected and designed. This work also provides a critique of the interpretation of the stratigraphic situation and the dating means and methods used. According to this revised interpretation, it is not possible to concur regarding the relevance of the evidence on which B. Kavánová bases her hypothesis that there was more than one phase to the rampart. Due to this unsubstantiated interpretation, the chronology given for other settlement structures therefore lacks credibility. The text also includes a reconstruction of the passage through the fortifi cation when the aforementioned gate was in use.
Research Interests: Research Methodology, Archaeological Method & Theory, Early Medieval Archaeology, Fortified Settlements (Archaeology), Fortifications, and 10 moreMethodology of Archeological Research, Early Medieval Fortifications, Hillforts and Enclosures, Great Moravia, Methodology Archaeology, Early Medieval Period, Great Moravia Archeology, Archaeological Interpretation, Great Morava Archeology, and Early Medieval Gates
Based on an analysis of the field situation, within all available documentation and data, this article revises the original interpretation of the “circular pagan shrine” in southern part of the Northern suburbium of the Early Medieaval... more
Based on an analysis of the field situation, within all available documentation and data, this article revises the original interpretation of the “circular pagan shrine” in southern part of the Northern suburbium of the Early Medieaval hillfort Mikulčice – Valy. There is realized an correction of previous assumption that this was a cultic feature and also casts doubt upon its intentionality and dating of this feature to the end of the Great Moravian Period. According to the new theory this was an irregular recessed area, formed partly on the bank of the northern suburbium and partly over a silted-up Early Mediaeval channel, probably fluvial. The revision of the documentation and published arguments has shown that there is absolutely no relevant proof that this feature (building) served a cultic purpose.
Podstatou článku je revize publikovaných závěrů, týkajících se tzv. kruhového kultovního objektu v Severním podhradí mikulčického hradiště, dokládajícího údajnou pohanskou recidivu v období po rozpadu velkomoravského státního útvaru. Má se jednat o tzv. "kruhový pohanský kultovní objekt" s údajně dřevěným kůlem pro modlu a "zajímavými stopami ohňů", ležící na "jižním mysu" Severního podhradí mikulčického hradiště, datovaný do konce velkomoravského období. Ačkoliv terénní výzkum tohoto objektu proběhl již v 70. letech, teprve o mnoho let později byly výsledky výzkumu poměrně jednoznačně funkčně i chronologicky interpretovány vedoucím mikulčického výzkumu Z. Klanicou (1985a, b; 1997; 2007a) a následně logicky přejímány i jinými autory. Bohužel jsou však tyto citace opřeny právě o statě Z. Klanici, který nikde nepublikoval podrobnější rozbor archeologické situace tohoto objektu. Dle konfrontace publikovaných závěrů s dostupnými daty, především z originální dokumentace, je nutné interpretaci popisovaného objektu jako pohanského kultovního kruhového příkopu s hořícími ohni a dřevěnou stélou považovat za neudržitelnou. Žádná kůlová jáma evokující pohanskou stélu nebyla v úrovni objektu zaznamenána. Jáma 932, kterou připomíná Z. Klanica, leží stratigraficky pod domnělým kultovním objektem, a to v přímé superpozici. Stejně tak nebyly reálně terénním výzkumem registrovány ani žádné výrazné koncentrace uhlíků, jež by měly dokládat přítomnost pohanských kultovních ohňů. Objekt neleží na nijak exponovaném místě charakteru "mysu", jak ho nazývá Z. Klanica. Jedná se o přirozené ohbí toku řeky. Pro kultovní funkci neexistuje vůbec žádný doklad, nálezová situace dokonce hovoří pro neintencionální původ tohoto žlábku.
Podstatou článku je revize publikovaných závěrů, týkajících se tzv. kruhového kultovního objektu v Severním podhradí mikulčického hradiště, dokládajícího údajnou pohanskou recidivu v období po rozpadu velkomoravského státního útvaru. Má se jednat o tzv. "kruhový pohanský kultovní objekt" s údajně dřevěným kůlem pro modlu a "zajímavými stopami ohňů", ležící na "jižním mysu" Severního podhradí mikulčického hradiště, datovaný do konce velkomoravského období. Ačkoliv terénní výzkum tohoto objektu proběhl již v 70. letech, teprve o mnoho let později byly výsledky výzkumu poměrně jednoznačně funkčně i chronologicky interpretovány vedoucím mikulčického výzkumu Z. Klanicou (1985a, b; 1997; 2007a) a následně logicky přejímány i jinými autory. Bohužel jsou však tyto citace opřeny právě o statě Z. Klanici, který nikde nepublikoval podrobnější rozbor archeologické situace tohoto objektu. Dle konfrontace publikovaných závěrů s dostupnými daty, především z originální dokumentace, je nutné interpretaci popisovaného objektu jako pohanského kultovního kruhového příkopu s hořícími ohni a dřevěnou stélou považovat za neudržitelnou. Žádná kůlová jáma evokující pohanskou stélu nebyla v úrovni objektu zaznamenána. Jáma 932, kterou připomíná Z. Klanica, leží stratigraficky pod domnělým kultovním objektem, a to v přímé superpozici. Stejně tak nebyly reálně terénním výzkumem registrovány ani žádné výrazné koncentrace uhlíků, jež by měly dokládat přítomnost pohanských kultovních ohňů. Objekt neleží na nijak exponovaném místě charakteru "mysu", jak ho nazývá Z. Klanica. Jedná se o přirozené ohbí toku řeky. Pro kultovní funkci neexistuje vůbec žádný doklad, nálezová situace dokonce hovoří pro neintencionální původ tohoto žlábku.
Research Interests: Research Methodology, Archaeological Method & Theory, Early Medieval Archaeology, Pagan/Christian Relations in the Early Middle Ages, Power Centres, and 14 morePaganism and Christianism, Hillfort, Hillforts and Enclosures, Slavs pagan studies, Christianisation of Central and Eastern Europe in the Early Middle Ages, Great Moravia, Pagan Monumets, Desacralisation, Pagan Cult Sites, Slavic Paganism, Early Medieval Central Places, Great Moravia Archeology, Archaeological Interpretation, Pagan Cults, Great Morava Archeology, and Cultic Features
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Authors draw attention to certain problems which should not be missed especially concerning the last step of archaeological methodology i.e. in attempting to interpret discovered archaeological sources with respect to a living culture,... more
Authors draw attention to certain problems which should not be missed especially concerning the last step of archaeological
methodology i.e. in attempting to interpret discovered archaeological sources with respect to a living culture,
i.e. a historical society. This article outlines several possibilities that may explain the so-called burials in settlement
contexts. All of the examples discussed were encountered in the area of Mikulčice – a Great Moravian power centre.
The authors also introduce several possible interpretations of these field situations with respect to the living culture.
They consider (similarly to other researchers) the possibilities and difficulties of chronological, social, economic, political
as well as symbolic interpretations of material sources. In concluding this work, the authors emphasize that
all examples discussed, point to the necessity of carefully distinguishing between archaeological and empirical facts
on the one hand, and cultural facts that are not available to archaeologists, on the other hand. In light of the proposed
conclusions, the revision of „old“ excavations in the area of early Medieveal fortified agglomeration Mikulčice-Valy
demonstrates the need for acquiring new data of a quality matching the current methodological requirements.
methodology i.e. in attempting to interpret discovered archaeological sources with respect to a living culture,
i.e. a historical society. This article outlines several possibilities that may explain the so-called burials in settlement
contexts. All of the examples discussed were encountered in the area of Mikulčice – a Great Moravian power centre.
The authors also introduce several possible interpretations of these field situations with respect to the living culture.
They consider (similarly to other researchers) the possibilities and difficulties of chronological, social, economic, political
as well as symbolic interpretations of material sources. In concluding this work, the authors emphasize that
all examples discussed, point to the necessity of carefully distinguishing between archaeological and empirical facts
on the one hand, and cultural facts that are not available to archaeologists, on the other hand. In light of the proposed
conclusions, the revision of „old“ excavations in the area of early Medieveal fortified agglomeration Mikulčice-Valy
demonstrates the need for acquiring new data of a quality matching the current methodological requirements.
Research Interests: Stratigraphy, Research Methodology, Archaeological Method & Theory, Early Medieval Archaeology, Early Medieval And Medieval Settlement (Archaeology), and 16 moreArchaeological Methodology, Fortified Settlements (Archaeology), Settlement archaeology, Chronology, early Middle Ages, Power Centres, Methodology of Archeological Research, Archaeology of death and burial, Hillforts and Enclosures, Great Moravia, Graves, Methodology Archaeology, Archaeology, Theory, Methodology, Archaeological Interpretation, Great Morava Archeology, and Early Mediaeval Power Centres
Cílem příspěvku je upozornit na několik zásadních, v podstatě obecně známých problémů, které komplikují či limitují snahy o podrobnější chronologizaci materiální kultury raného středověku, resp. jednotlivých terénních situací (např.... more
Cílem příspěvku je upozornit na několik zásadních, v podstatě obecně známých problémů, které komplikují či limitují snahy o podrobnější chronologizaci materiální kultury raného středověku, resp. jednotlivých terénních situací (např. časové podchycení vývoje a především případných strukturálních změn v mocenských centrech – hradištích). Celá problematika je orientována na archeologii Velké Moravy, která se ve smyslu tradiční periodizace zhruba kryje se středo hradištním obdobím.
Research Interests:
A part of a polycultural site in Mikulčice – „Podbřežníky“ (area of 2685 m2) was excavated in the upcountry of the Great Moravian fort in Mikulčice-Valy (straight line distance 3,2 km SE) in 2006–2007. Besides prehistoric finds from... more
A part of a polycultural site in Mikulčice – „Podbřežníky“ (area of 2685 m2) was excavated in the upcountry
of the Great Moravian fort in Mikulčice-Valy (straight line distance 3,2 km SE) in 2006–2007. Besides prehistoric
finds from Bronze and Iron Age, forty seven Early Medieval features were also excavated. These include seven
Slavonic sunken-featured dwellings from Early Slavonic period to the Great Moravian era and a dense concentration
of storage pits. Our conception of this settlement acting as a sort of „satellite village“ with a duty of supplying food
to the nearby large fort Mikulčice-Valy was advanced by the discovery of relics indicating the presence of specialized
craft activities (bronze and ironmongery).
of the Great Moravian fort in Mikulčice-Valy (straight line distance 3,2 km SE) in 2006–2007. Besides prehistoric
finds from Bronze and Iron Age, forty seven Early Medieval features were also excavated. These include seven
Slavonic sunken-featured dwellings from Early Slavonic period to the Great Moravian era and a dense concentration
of storage pits. Our conception of this settlement acting as a sort of „satellite village“ with a duty of supplying food
to the nearby large fort Mikulčice-Valy was advanced by the discovery of relics indicating the presence of specialized
craft activities (bronze and ironmongery).
Research Interests:
This work deals with the description and definition of two ceramic groups, typical of the Great Moravian supreme quality ceramic production – Blučina and Mikulčice ceramic group. In addition to the typological and technological divide... more
This work deals with the description and definition of two ceramic groups, typical of the Great Moravian supreme quality ceramic production – Blučina and Mikulčice ceramic group. In addition to the typological and technological divide these two groups of pottery, the hypothesis is presented, which is based on the analysis of the representation of these groups within several settlement complexes of early medieval centre of power Mikulčice (including their stratigraphic analysis), about the dynamic development of ceramics Mikulčice group, the top of which falls within the " younger " Moravian phase and is apparently interrupted by a sudden and violent demise of the Great Moravian Empire in the early 10th cent. This sudden destruction is evident in Mikulčice hillfort in many archaeological situations. In the book it is also documented common chronological occurrence of the two ceramic groups and submitted the question of their origin, meaning, existence, function and geographic expansion. Mikulčice ceramic group is also hypothetically introduced as a potential source of chronologically sensitive material, according to which contexts can be dated back to the culminating phase of the Great Moravian Empire until its extinction.