In this article we outline some of the key characteristics of the social structure of the Climax Copper Age in the eastern Balkans and the contributions of the Varna cemetery to those developments. We continue by examining the... more
In this article we outline some of the key characteristics of the social structure of the Climax Copper Age in the eastern Balkans and the contributions of the Varna cemetery to those developments. We continue by examining the implications of the new series of 21 AMS dates from the Oxford Radiocarbon Laboratory, which represent the first dates for the Varna Eneolithic cemetery on the Bulgarian Black Sea coast. Representing the first phase of the AMS dating project for the Varna I cemetery, these dates have been selected to provide a range of different grave locations, ranges of grave goods, and age/gender associations. We conclude by addressing the question of the unexpectedly early start of the cemetery, as well as its apparently short duration and relatively rapid demise.
Research Interests: Geography, Archaeology, Bulgarian, Bulgaria, Bayesian Models, and 15 moreMaterial Culture, Mortuary archaeology, European Archaeology, Social Structure, Copper, Social Context, Radiocarbon Dating, Chalcolithic, Cemeteries, Late Chalcolithic, Grave Goods, European, Social Interpretation, Climax, and Gold Metallurgy
Research Interests:
The currently prevailing view of the Trypillia mega-sites of the fourth millennium BC has been the dominant model for over 40 years: they were extralarge settlement examples of the Childean 'Neolithic package' of permanent settlement,... more
The currently prevailing view of the Trypillia mega-sites of the fourth millennium BC has been the dominant model for over 40 years: they were extralarge settlement examples of the Childean 'Neolithic package' of permanent settlement, domesticated plants and animals, and artifact assemblages containing polished stone tools and pottery. Trypillia mega-sites have therefore been viewed as permanent, long-term settlements comprising many thousands of people. This view of these extraordinary sites has been identical whatever the various opinions on their urban or other status. In recent mega-site publications, a maximalist gloss has been put on this standard view-with population estimates as high as 46,000 people (Rassmann et al. in J Neolit Archaeol 16: 96-134, 2014). However, doubts about the standard view have been emerging over the past two decades. As a result of the last six years' intensive investigations, a tipping point has been reached, with as many as nine lines of independent evidence combining to create such doubts that the only logical response is to replace the standard model (not to mention the maximalist model) with a version of the minimalist model that envisions a less permanent, more seasonal settlement mode, or a smaller permanent settlement involving coeval dwelling of far fewer people (the 'middle way'). In this article, I seek to construct an evidential basis for the alternatives to the standard view of Trypillia mega-sites.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
For over a century, excavations on Trypillia sites in Ukraine and Moldova, as well as on Cucuteni sites in Romania, have revealed few obvious signs of architectural differentiation among the huge numbers of domestic houses. Now, for the... more
For over a century, excavations on Trypillia sites in Ukraine and Moldova, as well as on Cucuteni sites in Romania, have revealed few obvious signs of architectural differentiation among the huge numbers of domestic houses. Now, for the first time, a new generation of geophysical prospection methods used to investigate mega-sites has revealed uncommonly large Trypillia structures which merit the name 'mega-structures'. The first three such mega-structures were identified in geophysical prospection in 2009 at the mega-site of Nebelivka, Kirovograd Domain, Ukraine. This article provides a preliminary report on the excavation of the largest mega-structure in the summer 2012 season. This building, covering an area of 600m², must rank as one of the largest structures ever built in prehistoric Europe.
Research Interests:
The first phase of the Trypillia mega-sites' methodological revolution began in 1971 with aerial photography, magnetic prospection, and archaeological excavations of huge settlements of hundreds of hectares belonging to the Trypillia... more
The first phase of the Trypillia mega-sites' methodological revolution began in 1971 with aerial photography, magnetic prospection, and archaeological excavations of huge settlements of hundreds of hectares belonging to the Trypillia culture in Ukraine. Since 2009, we have created a second phase of the methodological revolution in studies of Trypillia mega-sites, which has provided more significant advances in our understanding of these large sites than any other single research development in the last three decades, thanks partly to the participation of joint Ukrainian-foreign teams. In this paper, we outline the main aspects of the second phase, using examples from the Anglo-Ukrainian project 'Early urbanism in prehistoric Europe: the case of the Trypillia mega-sites', working at Nebelivka (also spelled 'Nebilivka'), and the Ukrainian-German project 'Economy, demography and social space of Trypillia mega-sites', working at Taljanky ('Talianki'), Maydanetske ('Maydanetskoe'), and Dobrovody, as well as the smaller site at Apolianka.
My inspiration for an undergraduate dissertation (1972) on the origins of the Vinča group and, then, a PhD on the group as a whole (1976) came from a 1971 trip to the Belo Brdo tell. The PhD was transformed by new analyses to become the... more
My inspiration for an undergraduate dissertation (1972) on the origins of the Vinča group and, then, a PhD on the group as a whole (1976) came from a 1971 trip to the Belo Brdo tell. The PhD was transformed by new analyses to become the 1981 BAR publication-a processually-oriented work which, in an unexpected way, remains the only general synthesis of the Vinča group until this very day. In this self-critical and-reflexive paper, based upon the keynote speech I was invited to present to the Tübingen 2019 'LBK-Vinča' Conference, I look backwards to those aspects of the synthesis which remain relevant; examine those parts which have been overtaken by more recent research; and consider why it is that the synthesis has yet to be superceded. It is interesting that landscape studies and especially settlement studies remain some of the most relevant parts of my research. Although new fieldwork has led to incrementally better distribution maps, the basic premises remain true of the changes in settlement structure from Starčevo to Vinča. The remote sensing revolution, the Bayesian analyses of unimaginably large numbers of AMS dates and the contextual recording of finds have made the greatest impacts on Vinča research. Site planning and site size studies have progressed enormously. The analyses of site densities of figurines still poses important research questions but lacks the current contextual detail of figurine deposition. Apart from congenital idleness, I cannot imagine why no other specialist has written a new synthesis of the Vinča group. It is not that no new 'cultural syntheses' have appeared in the Balkans-syntheses are not yet a threatened species. Admittedly, a rather large amount of new material has appeared in the last 50 yearstogether with a tendency to paint pictures on smaller canvases. Yet my hope for the next 50 years is that several new general syntheses will be written on the Vinča group.
Research Interests:
The environmental context of cultural transformation'-frames the central issue of this paper e how were Neolithic and Chalcolithic landscapes in the Aegean, Balkan and Carpathian (ABC) zones shaped and transformed by climatic and... more
The environmental context of cultural transformation'-frames the central issue of this paper e how were Neolithic and Chalcolithic landscapes in the Aegean, Balkan and Carpathian (ABC) zones shaped and transformed by climatic and anthropogenic impacts? The difficulties in interpreting proxy records for the middle, transitional stage of the Holocene aridification sequence, falling between the early wet stage and the late arid stage, have been created by the conjoint influence of two kinds of impact e climatic and anthropogenic. An unhelpful influence in this debate stems from Willis and Bennett's (1994) hypothesis of minimal human impact on the pre-Bronze Age landscapes of South East Europe. In this paper, two questions are posed: (1) what were the effects of the claimed global changes in Holocene climate at the regional and local scale in the ABC zones?; and (2) can we recognise human impact in these proxy records prior to the Bronze Age of our study regions? Following a discussion of general long-term climatic trends and RCCs (episodes of rapid climatic change), I base a discussion of the so-called 8200BP 'event' and pre-Bronze Age human impacts on a suite of 24 well-dated proxy records e mostly pollen sequences. The principal findings are that there is little evidence for impact from the 8200BP 'event' in these records, while there is substantial evidence for pre-Bronze Age human impacts on the landscapes of the Aegean, Balkan and Carpathian regions.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
The Trypillia megasites of the Ukrainian forest steppe formed the largest fourth-millenniumbcsites in Eurasia and possibly the world. Discovered in the 1960s, the megasites have so far resisted all attempts at an understanding of their... more
The Trypillia megasites of the Ukrainian forest steppe formed the largest fourth-millenniumbcsites in Eurasia and possibly the world. Discovered in the 1960s, the megasites have so far resisted all attempts at an understanding of their social structure and dynamics. Multi-disciplinary investigations of the Nebelivka megasite by an Anglo-Ukrainian research project brought a focus on three research questions: (1) what was the essence of megasite lifeways? (2) can we call the megasites early cities? and (3) what were their origins? The first question is approached through a summary of Project findings on Nebelivka and the subsequent modelling of three different scenarios for what transpired to be a different kind of site from our expectations. The second question uses a relational approach to urbanism to show that megasites were so different from other coeval settlements that they could justifiably be termed ‘cities'. The third question turns to the origins of sites that were indee...
Research Interests: Geography, Archaeology, Experimental Archaeology, Ukrainian, Palynology, and 13 moreUrbanism, Neolithic & Chalcolithic Archaeology, Geophysical Survey, Ukraine, GIS and Landscape Archaeology, Archaeological Excavation, Mesopotamia, Cucuteni-Tripolye culture, Cucuteni-Trypillian culture, Human Settlement, Human Settlement Planning, Trypillia Culture, and Mega-Sites
Research Interests:
The first phase of the Trypillia mega-sites' methodological revolution began in 1971 with aerial photography, magnetic prospection, and archaeological excavations of huge settlements of hundreds of hectares belonging to the Trypillia... more
The first phase of the Trypillia mega-sites' methodological revolution began in 1971 with aerial photography, magnetic prospection, and archaeological excavations of huge settlements of hundreds of hectares belonging to the Trypillia culture in Ukraine. Since 2009, we have created a second phase of the methodological revolution in studies of Trypillia mega-sites, which has provided more significant advances in our understanding of these large sites than any other single research development in the last three decades, thanks partly to the participation of joint Ukrainian-foreign teams. In this paper, we outline the main aspects of the second phase, using examples from the Anglo-Ukrainian project ‘Early urbanism in prehistoric Europe: the case of the Trypillia mega-sites', working at Nebelivka (also spelled ‘Nebilivka’), and the Ukrainian-German project ‘Economy, demography and social space of Trypillia mega-sites', working at Taljanky (‘Talianki’), Maydanetske (‘Maydanets...
Research Interests: History, Geography, Archaeology, Landscape Archaeology, Neolithic Archaeology, and 15 morePrehistoric Settlement, Neolithic Europe, German, Prehistory, European Archaeology, Settlement archaeology, Houses, Settlement, Eneolithic, Excavation, Human Settlement, Mega, Archaeological Method, Routledge, and mega site
So far, most research into deliberate fragmentation has focussed on two poles of identity formation – persons and things – to the detriment of places. However, an integrated theory of fragmentation cannot be developed without considering... more
So far, most research into deliberate fragmentation has focussed on two poles of identity formation – persons and things – to the detriment of places. However, an integrated theory of fragmentation cannot be developed without considering the fragmentation of places. The building blocks of such a consideration already exist, awaiting consolidation. Archaeologists have long recognized that ‘raw materials’ have been extracted from places and moved across the landscape for ‘local’ use. In contrast to the economising tendency in processualist exchange studies, interpretative approaches have highlighted the active role of material culture, incorporating power strategies, aesthetic and spiritual dimensions in these discourses on the exotic. However, we have overlooked the basic fact that such practices relied on the literal fragmentation of places in the landscape and their deliberate re-use in other places. While this is a different form of fragmentation from those employed with bodies and objects, place-fragmentation carries significant theoretical implications, which will be explored in this chapter in the context of examples of the fragmentation of different raw materials. It gives me great pleasure to dedicate this essay to Ryszard Grygiel and Peter Bogucki.
Research Interests:
For over a century, excavations on Trypillia sites in Ukraine and Moldova, as well as on Cucuteni sites in Romania, have revealed few obvious signs of architectural differentiation among the huge numbers of domestic houses. Now, for the... more
For over a century, excavations on Trypillia sites in Ukraine and Moldova, as well as on Cucuteni sites in Romania, have revealed few obvious signs of architectural differentiation among the huge numbers of domestic houses. Now, for the first time, a new generation of geophysical prospection methods used to investigate mega-sites has revealed uncommonly large Trypillia structures which merit the name 'mega-structures'. The first three such mega-structures were identified in geophysical prospection in 2009 at the mega-site of Nebelivka, Kirovograd Domain, Ukraine. This article provides a preliminary report on the excavation of the largest mega-structure in the summer 2012 season. This building, covering an area of 600m², must rank as one of the largest structures ever built in prehistoric Europe.
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Geography, Archaeology, Geology, Archaeobotany, Palynology, and 13 moreEcology, Neolithic & Chalcolithic Archaeology, Plant Science, Palaeontology, Hungarian Archaeology, Human impacts on ancient environments, Neolithic, Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, Hungary, Vegetation history, Human impact, Pollen analysis, and Great Hungarian Plain
Summary. What can students of the past do to establish the predominant land-use and settlement practices of populations who leave little or no artefactual discard as a testament to their lifeways? The traditional answer, especially in... more
Summary. What can students of the past do to establish the predominant land-use and settlement practices of populations who leave little or no artefactual discard as a testament to their lifeways? The traditional answer, especially in Eastern Europe, is to invoke often ...
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Archaeology, Earth Sciences, Geology, Geochemistry, Mineralogy, and 15 moreGeoarchaeology, Bulgaria, Neolithic Archaeology, Archaeomineralogy, Neolithic Europe, Neolithic, Balkans, Neolithic Axes, History and archaeology, Lithics Nephrite Jadeitite Neolithic Prehistory, Nephrite, Amphiboles, PIXE, Micro PIXE, and Stone personal ornaments
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Regularities in the construction of settlement space are the norm for human communities, but the symbolic significance of the size of the deviations permissible from agreed spatial norms have received diametrically opposed... more
Regularities in the construction of settlement space are the norm for human communities, but the symbolic significance of the size of the deviations permissible from agreed spatial norms have received diametrically opposed interpretations. 11te dialectic between spatial regularities and variations is explored in the context of completely excavated village plans of tell settlements in Bulgaria. Directional trends are discerned in superimposed occupation horizons, with the aid of analytical techniques such as builtjunbuilt space ratio, minimum interbuilding distance, and accessanalyses. The complexity of differentiation of house attributes and control over space is seen as a result of differential reproductive success, which led to the emergence of more successful lineages. The Varna cemetery-a unique display of corporate wealth in the eastern Balkans-reveals comparable trends in increasing formalisation in mortuary space. It is su,lJl5ested that this was the result of competition over the social reproduction of alltances, a competition related to the social inequalities created on tell settlements.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Although commentators have discussed myriad themes presented in the rich and extensive oeuvre of Childe, one of the topics that has been, in my view, seriously neglected is the topic of settlement types. In this article, I seek to make... more
Although commentators have discussed myriad themes presented in the rich and extensive oeuvre of Childe, one of the topics that has been, in my view, seriously neglected is the topic of settlement types. In this article, I seek to make good this omission, starting from a consideration of The Danube in Prehistory. The basis of Childe's ideas on settlement types in the Neolithic and Copper Age of eastern Europe was a binary classification into 'tells' and 'flat sites' that, in turn, reflected a division between permanent and shifting cultivation and greater and lesser cultural complexity. However, the introduction into this debate of questions of trade, surplus production, and Neolithic 'self-sufficiency', as well as metallurgy and ritual, meant that the initial binary classification left a series of contradictions that Childe struggled to transcend in the last decade of his life.