- King's College London, Social Science, Health and Medicine, Department Memberadd
- Sociology of Children and Childhood, Child and adolescent mental health, Anthropology of Children and Childhood, Children's Literature & Culture, Children and Families, Self and Identity, and 19 moreFilosofía, Antropología, Critical Psychology, Estudios Culturales, Medical Sociology, Medical Anthropology, STS (Anthropology), Anthropology of Pharmaceuticals, Lacanian psychoanalysis, Psychoanalysis, Child Clinical Psychology, Sociology of Mental Health & Illness, Social Studies Of Science, Critical Social Psychology, science and technology studies (STS), ADHD (Psychology), Medicalization, Sociology of Health and Illness, and Science and Technology Studiesedit
- Psicólogo infanto-juvenil, PhD en Sociología, Departamento de Salud Global & Medicina Social, King's College London /... morePsicólogo infanto-juvenil, PhD en Sociología, Departamento de Salud Global & Medicina Social, King's College London // Clinical Psychologist, PhD in Sociology, Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College Londonedit
Research Interests:
This article draws upon findings from fieldwork conducted with Chilean mental health practitioners and school staff to explore how children’s mental health diagnoses can be used in the school setting as a particular rationale to mobilise... more
This article draws upon findings from fieldwork conducted with Chilean mental health practitioners and school staff to explore how children’s mental health diagnoses can be used in the school setting as a particular rationale to mobilise and convey new forms of care practices (Mol, The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice, 2008). Inspired by the framing of care as an interrelational, interdependent and more‐than‐human affair promoted by Science and Technology Studies, and drawing from conceptual tools offered by post‐humanist approaches, we focus our examination on the diagnosis of attention deficit‐hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Following the diagnosis since its formulation by clinicians in the public sector to its enactment in an urban school in Santiago, Chile, we explore how certain caring/uncaring practices are enacted in relation to the diagnosis, reconfiguring the classroom by incorporating (non)human actors to care for the diagnosed child. However, care is ambivalent, and the diagnosis can be put into action for other purposes as it interweaves with educational policies and other agendas. Thus, to produce policies that truly foster inclusion, attention must be given to the micropolitical level where disabilities and disorders are enacted, developing appropriate ethico‐political and affective sensitivities to care accordingly.
Research Interests:
Este artículo propone una visión alternativa a las críticas tradicionales respecto a la medicalización de la infancia y a como esta ocurre en las instituciones escolares. Considerando que los procesos de medicalización deben ser... more
Este artículo propone una visión alternativa a las críticas tradicionales respecto a la medicalización de la infancia y a como esta ocurre en las instituciones escolares. Considerando que los procesos de medicalización deben ser entendidos en relación a otras fuerzas y dinámicas con las cuales interctuan y se co-afecta, se propone que los efectos clasificatorios y de segregación que se desprenden del uso de diagnósticos y psicotecnologías se relaciona, en gran parte, a la adopción de estas categorías y tecnologías por un modelo educacional regido por lógicas de competencia y responsabilización. Para explorar otros devenires posibles de la medicalización, se analiza un caso en donde esta es puestas en juego en relación a otras dinámicas.
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Sociology, Medical Sociology, Medical Anthropology, Sociology of Children and Childhood, Child and adolescent mental health, and 15 moreChildren and Families, ADHD, Public Health, Medicine, Sociology of Health and Illness, Psychostimulants, Critical Neuroscience, Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Family and Community Medicine, Global Mental Health Issues, Contemporary Sociology, Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, and Medical and Health Sciences
Research Interests:
This article draws upon findings from ethnographic fieldwork conducted in a Chilean school to explore how the effects of globally circulating ADHD medications emerge within the localized contexts of everyday users. An analysis of... more
This article draws upon findings from ethnographic fieldwork conducted in a Chilean school to explore how the effects of globally circulating ADHD medications emerge within the localized contexts of everyday users. An analysis of observations of children on ADHD medications within classroom settings is developed which challenges the assumption, pervasive within biomedical paradigms, that the effects of such medications can be understood as resulting directly from their chemical properties and biological modes of action. Our case study highlights the significance of multiple, interacting determinants of drug effects in an everyday setting, focusing in particular on classroom dynamics, teacher-student relations, and the agency of children taking the medications. We conclude that while ADHD medications may act in part by altering physiological processes, an adequate account of their effects requires that analytic attention extends to the sociomaterial contexts in which medications and ...
Research Interests: Medical Sociology, Medical Anthropology, Ethnography, Child and adolescent mental health, ADHD, and 15 moreChile, Global Mental Health, Anthropology of Pharmaceuticals, Educación, Child Behavior, Agency, Humans, Child, Etnografía, Female, Male, Medicalization, Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity, and Central nervous system stimulants
Research Interests: Sociology of Children and Childhood, ADHD (Psychology), Child and adolescent mental health, Critical Social Psychology, Critical Discourse Analysis, and 9 moreChildhood studies, Diagnosis, Análisis Crítico Del Discurso, Infancia, PSicologia Social Crítica, DSM problems, Trastorno de deficit de atención e hiperactividad, Niñez, and Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Anthropology and Ethos
This paper is a theoretical reflection based on the results of two research projects conducted between the years 2010 and 2012 in Chile. Using a theoretical framework inspired by Michel Foucault’s work, and considering findings by the New... more
This paper is a theoretical reflection based on the results of two research projects conducted between the years 2010 and 2012 in Chile. Using a theoretical framework inspired by Michel Foucault’s work, and considering findings by the New Social Studies of Childhood, we stress the relation between biomedical and ‘psy discourses’ and the way children build their identities in relation to labels given to them by these discourses. Using the case of children diagnosed with ADHD, we show how diagnosed children resist being reduced to what specialized discourses coming from biomedicine say about them, especially considering that the diagnostic process does not consider as relevant children’s impressions or opinions about their behaviour. Children resist the biomedical diagnosis by developing new ways to build their identity, which challenge thel descriptions of how ‘ADHD kids’ act and think.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
DOSSIÊ TEMÁTICO: A medicalização da educação no Brasil e no Chile: diferentes perspectivas MEDICALIZACIÓN Y NEOLIBERALISMO: IMAGINANDO OTROS FUTUROS EN LOS COLEGIOS MEDICALISATION IN NEOLIBERAL CONTEXTS: IMAGINING OTHER FUTURES IN... more
DOSSIÊ TEMÁTICO: A medicalização da educação no Brasil e no Chile: diferentes perspectivas
MEDICALIZACIÓN Y NEOLIBERALISMO: IMAGINANDO OTROS FUTUROS EN LOS COLEGIOS
MEDICALISATION IN NEOLIBERAL CONTEXTS: IMAGINING OTHER FUTURES IN SCHOOLS
MEDICALIZAÇÃO E NEOLIBERALISMO: IMAGINANDO OUTROS FURUROS NAS ESCOLAS
Este artículo propone una visión alternativa a las críticas tradicionales respecto a la medicalización de la infancia y a cómo esta ocurre en las instituciones escolares. Considerando que los procesos de medicalización deben ser entendidos en relación a otras fuerzas y dinámicas con las cuales interactúan y se co-afecta, se propone que los efectos clasificatorios y de segregación que se desprenden del uso de diagnósticos y psicotecnologías se relaciona, en gran parte, a la adopción de estas categorías y tecnologías por un modelo educacional regido por lógicas de competencia y responsabilización. Para explorar otros devenires posibles de la medicalización, se analiza un caso en donde esta es puestas en juego en relación a otras dinámicas.
Abstract: This article advances an alternative to traditional approaches to the medicalization of childhood in the school setting. Considering that processes of medicalization must be understood in relation to other forces and dynamics set in motion with which they interact and mutually affect each other, this article advances the idea that the use of diagnoses and psychotechnologies for purposes of classification and segregation are, to a large extent, linked to their implementation by an educational model ruled by principles of competition and accountability. To explore other potential unfoldings of medicalisation, I analyse a case where medicalisation processes enter the arena but concerning other dynamics and forces. Resumo: Este artigo propõe uma visão alternativa às críticas tradicionais a respeito da medicalização da infância e a como esta ocorre nas instituições escolares. Considerando que os processos de medicalização devem ser entendidos em relação a outras forças e dinâmicas com as quais interagem e se co-afetam, propõe-se que os efeitos classificatórios e de segregação que se desprendem do uso de diagnósticos e psicotecnologias se relaciona, em grande parte, à adoção destas categorias e tecnologias
MEDICALIZACIÓN Y NEOLIBERALISMO: IMAGINANDO OTROS FUTUROS EN LOS COLEGIOS
MEDICALISATION IN NEOLIBERAL CONTEXTS: IMAGINING OTHER FUTURES IN SCHOOLS
MEDICALIZAÇÃO E NEOLIBERALISMO: IMAGINANDO OUTROS FURUROS NAS ESCOLAS
Este artículo propone una visión alternativa a las críticas tradicionales respecto a la medicalización de la infancia y a cómo esta ocurre en las instituciones escolares. Considerando que los procesos de medicalización deben ser entendidos en relación a otras fuerzas y dinámicas con las cuales interactúan y se co-afecta, se propone que los efectos clasificatorios y de segregación que se desprenden del uso de diagnósticos y psicotecnologías se relaciona, en gran parte, a la adopción de estas categorías y tecnologías por un modelo educacional regido por lógicas de competencia y responsabilización. Para explorar otros devenires posibles de la medicalización, se analiza un caso en donde esta es puestas en juego en relación a otras dinámicas.
Abstract: This article advances an alternative to traditional approaches to the medicalization of childhood in the school setting. Considering that processes of medicalization must be understood in relation to other forces and dynamics set in motion with which they interact and mutually affect each other, this article advances the idea that the use of diagnoses and psychotechnologies for purposes of classification and segregation are, to a large extent, linked to their implementation by an educational model ruled by principles of competition and accountability. To explore other potential unfoldings of medicalisation, I analyse a case where medicalisation processes enter the arena but concerning other dynamics and forces. Resumo: Este artigo propõe uma visão alternativa às críticas tradicionais a respeito da medicalização da infância e a como esta ocorre nas instituições escolares. Considerando que os processos de medicalização devem ser entendidos em relação a outras forças e dinâmicas com as quais interagem e se co-afetam, propõe-se que os efeitos classificatórios e de segregação que se desprendem do uso de diagnósticos e psicotecnologias se relaciona, em grande parte, à adoção destas categorias e tecnologias
Research Interests:
Este artículo propone un abordaje complejo y posthumanista a los diversos modos mediante los cuales niñas, niños y psicofármacos se co-afectan, determinando diversos devenires ontológicos a partir de esta interacción, en el nicho provisto... more
Este artículo propone un abordaje complejo y posthumanista a los diversos modos mediante los cuales niñas, niños y psicofármacos se co-afectan, determinando diversos devenires ontológicos a partir de esta interacción, en el nicho provisto por dos escuelas ubicadas en la zona oriente de Santiago de Chile. A partir de los resultados de una praxiografía que se extendió por ocho meses con niñas y niños de 9 y 10 años, se sostiene que es necesario pensar esta relación entre niñas, niños y psicofármacos desde coordenadas distintas a las provistas por las tesis de la medicalización. Esto, en tanto ellas reducen y achatan la noción de subjetividad a una posesión interna del individuo, y a una separación radical con el mundo, sostenida en una discutible idea de excepcionalismo humano. En respuesta a esta idea de subjetividad, se propone otra que permite un abordaje diferente al problema, en tanto es una subjetividad entendida en sus aspectos procesales, dinámicos, y últimamente sostenido en base a entramados con el mundo y con la medicación.
Research Interests:
This article draws upon findings from ethnographic fieldwork conducted in a Chilean school to explore how the effects of globally circulating ADHD medications emerge within the localized contexts of everyday users. An analysis of... more
This article draws upon findings from ethnographic fieldwork conducted in a Chilean school to explore how the effects of globally circulating ADHD medications emerge within the localized contexts of everyday users. An analysis of observations of children on ADHD medications within classroom settings is developed which challenges the assumption, pervasive within biomedical paradigms, that the effects of such medications can be understood as resulting directly from their chemical properties and biological modes of action. Our case study highlights the significance of multiple, interacting determinants of drug effects in an everyday setting, focusing in particular on classroom dynamics, teacher–student relations, and the agency of children taking the medications. We conclude that while ADHD medications may act in part by altering physiological processes, an adequate account of their effects requires that analytic attention extends to the sociomaterial contexts in which medications and users are embedded.
Research Interests: Medical Sociology, Medical Anthropology, Sociology of Children and Childhood, Ethnography, ADHD (Psychology), and 16 moreChild and adolescent mental health, ADHD, STS (Anthropology), Chile, Medical Anthropology/ antropología médica, Global Mental Health, Anthropology of Pharmaceuticals, New Social Studies of Childhood, Educación, Agency, Etnografía, Sociologia da Infância, Post-Humanism, Medicalization, Stimulant medication, and Trastornos de la infancia y la adolescencia
El presente artículo reflexiona respecto a la articulación entre el psicoanálisis y las ciencias, relación marcada históricamente por un desencuentro fundamental. La ciencia establece una crítica al psicoanálisis, dudando de su valor,... more
El presente artículo reflexiona respecto a la articulación entre el psicoanálisis y las ciencias, relación marcada históricamente por un desencuentro fundamental. La ciencia establece una crítica al psicoanálisis, dudando de su valor, métodos y aportes debido a que lo considera una teoría alejada de lo empírico y la experimentación. Sin embargo, esto se debe a que suele olvidarse que algunas de las principales teorizaciones del psicoanálisis vienen de la lectura, observación y crítica a estudios científicos. Caso ejemplar de lo anterior es la teoría psicoanalítica de la constitución subjetiva, la cual encuentra correlato en los estudios de los psicólogos experimentales.
El presente artículo pretende mostrar algunas de las principales formas mediante las cuales el psicoanálisis, a lo largo de su constitución y de su historia, ha establecido contacto con la literatura. Dada la relevancia que el campo de... more
El presente artículo pretende mostrar algunas de las principales formas mediante las cuales el psicoanálisis, a lo largo de su constitución y de su historia, ha establecido contacto con la literatura. Dada la relevancia que el campo de las letras ha tenido históricamente como reflejo y modulador de las subjetividades de su tiempo, resulta pertinente observar como algunos de los principales psicoanalistas piensan el vínculo de esta disciplina con la literatura, y que tipos de uso le otorgan en la construcción teórica del psicoanálisis.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
In his first editorial as new editor of Childhood—a flagship journal for academics and scholars interested in childhood studies—Spyros Spyrou (2017) strongly argued for the necessity to reconsider some key notions and categories that, for... more
In his first editorial as new editor of Childhood—a flagship journal for academics and scholars interested in childhood studies—Spyros Spyrou (2017) strongly argued for the necessity to reconsider some key notions and categories that, for a long time, have been central for our current understanding of children and childhood. Mainly, he aimed at “decentering” childhood by incorporating, in a braver fashion, insights from emerging fields and theories that have been sensitive to the transformations carried on by the “ontological turn” in social sciences. This, as the need to “engage with real-life emerging concerns which escape the narrow confines of a ‘child-centered’ field of study” has become increasingly evident (Spyrou, p. 433).
The concerns and propositions made by Spyrou are not unknown for the field of psychosocial studies and social psychology. Attempts have been made by key scholars in this field to search for inspiration in other areas of expertise (Brown & Stenner, 2009; O’Doherty et al., 2019; Nichterlein 2021; Stenner, 2017), inasmuch they have perceived the urgent need to reconfigure these field’s methods and subjects of study. In the midst of a social world that is constantly changing, it becomes imperative to create renewed approaches, able to grasp the complexities of our current modes of existence, where the borders between the social, the natural, and the technological are becoming increasingly blurred (Prout, 2005). After all, as Stenner (2014, p. 206) has argued, “questions of psychology can be very poorly posed when abstracted from their cultural, societal and historical settings, and (…) these settings are poorly understood in abstraction
from the living, experiencing human beings whose actions make their reproduction and transformation possible.”
Although these new foundations for psychology and psychosocial studies have managed to inspire interesting alternatives to think about traditional topics in psychology (Brown, 2018; Brown & Reavey, 2015; Brown & Stenner, 2009; Cromby, 2015; Rojas, 2017; Tucker, 2012), its impact in reimagining childhood still requires further developing. Despite attempts made to reframe childhood (Lee & Motzkau, 2012; Rojas Navarro, 2018), “childhood” and “children” continue to be categories strongly embedded in modernist ideas about the human subject, which end up acting as shortcomings that prevent the development of a new theoretically and empirically informed imagination about childhood.
This chapter advances in the wake of the latter. To fully grasp the complexities and multiplicities (Law & Mol, 2002) of current children’s lives, we resign traditional conceptualizations of childhood that have pervaded child and social psychology during most of the twentieth century, offering an alternative port of departure. Inspired by current theoretical debates in social sciences and the humanities, and particularly on debates about posthumanism, the ontological turn, and the urgencies of the Anthropocene, we argue for the need to reconceptualize childhood in terms of entanglements, fragile assemblages produced in encounters that are open-ended and dependent on the heterogeneity of human and nonhuman agents (Prout, 2019; Savransky, 2016).
Such a post-essentialist approach demands us to be aware of the fundamental relationality of childhood. It also requests researchers to be attentive to the constant component of novelty in which children’s lives are enacted in different locations, times, and spaces.
The concerns and propositions made by Spyrou are not unknown for the field of psychosocial studies and social psychology. Attempts have been made by key scholars in this field to search for inspiration in other areas of expertise (Brown & Stenner, 2009; O’Doherty et al., 2019; Nichterlein 2021; Stenner, 2017), inasmuch they have perceived the urgent need to reconfigure these field’s methods and subjects of study. In the midst of a social world that is constantly changing, it becomes imperative to create renewed approaches, able to grasp the complexities of our current modes of existence, where the borders between the social, the natural, and the technological are becoming increasingly blurred (Prout, 2005). After all, as Stenner (2014, p. 206) has argued, “questions of psychology can be very poorly posed when abstracted from their cultural, societal and historical settings, and (…) these settings are poorly understood in abstraction
from the living, experiencing human beings whose actions make their reproduction and transformation possible.”
Although these new foundations for psychology and psychosocial studies have managed to inspire interesting alternatives to think about traditional topics in psychology (Brown, 2018; Brown & Reavey, 2015; Brown & Stenner, 2009; Cromby, 2015; Rojas, 2017; Tucker, 2012), its impact in reimagining childhood still requires further developing. Despite attempts made to reframe childhood (Lee & Motzkau, 2012; Rojas Navarro, 2018), “childhood” and “children” continue to be categories strongly embedded in modernist ideas about the human subject, which end up acting as shortcomings that prevent the development of a new theoretically and empirically informed imagination about childhood.
This chapter advances in the wake of the latter. To fully grasp the complexities and multiplicities (Law & Mol, 2002) of current children’s lives, we resign traditional conceptualizations of childhood that have pervaded child and social psychology during most of the twentieth century, offering an alternative port of departure. Inspired by current theoretical debates in social sciences and the humanities, and particularly on debates about posthumanism, the ontological turn, and the urgencies of the Anthropocene, we argue for the need to reconceptualize childhood in terms of entanglements, fragile assemblages produced in encounters that are open-ended and dependent on the heterogeneity of human and nonhuman agents (Prout, 2019; Savransky, 2016).
Such a post-essentialist approach demands us to be aware of the fundamental relationality of childhood. It also requests researchers to be attentive to the constant component of novelty in which children’s lives are enacted in different locations, times, and spaces.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
La idea de este libro comenzó a mediados del año 2014, cuando un grupo de estudiantes de la Universidad de Oxford quisieron contribuir y difundir lo aprendido durante sus estudios en el Reino Unido. Esta iniciativa responde a un... more
La idea de este libro comenzó a mediados del año 2014, cuando un grupo de estudiantes de la Universidad de Oxford quisieron contribuir y difundir lo aprendido durante sus estudios en el Reino Unido. Esta iniciativa responde a un diagnóstico compartido en torno a la falta de un espacio donde la difusión de ideas y/o propuestas relacionadas con Chile llegaran a un público más amplio que el académico, y cubriera temas que estuvieran fuera de la coyuntura.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Draft version. Original version available here http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.12430/full
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
This papers draws on my fieldwork experience with children aged 10 and 11, diagnosed with Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and under pharmacological treatment in a school in Santiago, Chile. ADHD is currently the most... more
This papers draws on my fieldwork experience with children aged 10 and 11, diagnosed with Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and under pharmacological treatment in a school in Santiago, Chile. ADHD is currently the most prevalent mental health disorder in children. Nevertheless, its existence has been challenged by critical approaches to the topic. In addition, the use of stimulant medication to treat the disorder has been publicly questioned, being contested by people arguing that its use correspond to a biological reductionism, whereas the origin of the problem is rather social and economically driven.
ADHD describes a symptomatic constellation which is supposedly disturbing to the well-being of the diagnosed child. Their school performance and difficulty to focus in one task has been described as problematic by specialized literature. Schools normally engages with diagnosed children in particular manners, attempting to boost their interest in school-related contents and topics. However, under the assumption that 'adults know best', both the definition of the problem -the idea of learning and behavioral difficulties- and the framing of the solution -biomedical and pedagogical approaches- leaves out of the picture the experiences and everyday lives of children themselves. In this paper I will explore to what extent are these problems and solutions really problematic or helpful to the diagnosed children. And if they are not helpful at all, how do children define what is problematic? How can adult researchers engage with this, and how can this become helpful when reflecting about research, and about potential solutions to these problems?
ADHD describes a symptomatic constellation which is supposedly disturbing to the well-being of the diagnosed child. Their school performance and difficulty to focus in one task has been described as problematic by specialized literature. Schools normally engages with diagnosed children in particular manners, attempting to boost their interest in school-related contents and topics. However, under the assumption that 'adults know best', both the definition of the problem -the idea of learning and behavioral difficulties- and the framing of the solution -biomedical and pedagogical approaches- leaves out of the picture the experiences and everyday lives of children themselves. In this paper I will explore to what extent are these problems and solutions really problematic or helpful to the diagnosed children. And if they are not helpful at all, how do children define what is problematic? How can adult researchers engage with this, and how can this become helpful when reflecting about research, and about potential solutions to these problems?
Research Interests:
En esta presentación, la cual se encuentra basada en parte de mi investigación doctoral, planteo que es necesario abordar los modos de articulación que permitieron configurar el estado actual del TDAH en Chile. En este proceso, los... more
En esta presentación, la cual se encuentra basada en parte de mi investigación doctoral, planteo que es necesario abordar los modos de articulación que permitieron configurar el estado actual del TDAH en Chile. En este proceso, los determinantes contextuales juegan un rol crucial, que configuran una versión bastante particular de dicho diagnostico en Chile. Sugiero que el TDAH es un diagnóstico global, pero que debe ser entendido a nivel local. Seguir estas trayectorias nacionales permite entender como las determinantes locales dan forma a versiones particulares del trastorno, las cuales se enraízan y articulan con los contextos educacionales, políticos y materiales de nuestro país. Las formas de diagnóstico y de tratamiento, el uso de psicofármacos y los especialistas autorizados a hablar respecto al TDAH, todo esto se ve influencia por características propias del imaginario nacional, que tiñen a esta categoría global del TDAH, produciendo una variante particular y única, nuestro propio TDAH.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
The issue of power has been a constant concern for social scientists working with children for the last 20 years. They have argued for the necessity of carefully considering how the child is conceptualized when conducting research,... more
The issue of power has been a constant concern for social scientists working with children for the last 20 years. They have argued for the necessity of carefully considering how the child is conceptualized when conducting research, particularly considering how power asymmetries in the encounter between and adult researcher and children have multiple facets. Children have historically been considered an incomplete version of an adult being, which heavily influences how attributions of expertise and knowledge are distributed not only in the research setting, but also in the everyday life. Children have traditionally been considered as passive, ignorant and incomplete versions of a human being, while adults represent the opposite qualities. Because of the previously mentioned, research with children normally tends to silence their opinions and perspectives, or consider them as merely secondary data to the adults’ point of view. Hence, childhood is normally explored as a reconstructed experience through adults’ eyes, which denies the possibility of children to actively engage in revealing the world they perceive and how they experience it.
In this presentation I aim to tackle how children engage with power asymmetries in relation to their own everyday experiences in accordance with their own reports. In order to do so, I will use some of the findings from my ethnographic fieldwork, which engaged children diagnosed with Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) inside a school. Children with a diagnosis have to deal not only with ‘being a child’, but also with living through a diagnostic label which alters how the school reflects upon and treats these children. Children however, are not passive individuals. My findings reveal that they resist these power asymmetries in a multitude of ways: ranging from how they interact with their teachers, to how they engage with medication given to target ADHD. Power, as it is revealed in my fieldwork, is much more heterogeneous than expected, and children are constantly, surreptitiously, and actively engaging with it.
In this presentation I aim to tackle how children engage with power asymmetries in relation to their own everyday experiences in accordance with their own reports. In order to do so, I will use some of the findings from my ethnographic fieldwork, which engaged children diagnosed with Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) inside a school. Children with a diagnosis have to deal not only with ‘being a child’, but also with living through a diagnostic label which alters how the school reflects upon and treats these children. Children however, are not passive individuals. My findings reveal that they resist these power asymmetries in a multitude of ways: ranging from how they interact with their teachers, to how they engage with medication given to target ADHD. Power, as it is revealed in my fieldwork, is much more heterogeneous than expected, and children are constantly, surreptitiously, and actively engaging with it.
Research Interests:
During the 20th century, biomedicine has become more and more influential on its relationships with multiple areas of everyday life. The introduction of new concepts, technologies and rationalities that have come entailed to this surge... more
During the 20th century, biomedicine has become more and more influential on its relationships with multiple areas of everyday life. The introduction of new concepts, technologies and rationalities that have come entailed to this surge has been closely examined by social scientists and different kind of experts, who have welcomed these news with expectation, and sometimes, with certain mistrust. On its relations with childhood, most of the analyses have been cautious when facing the potentialities that come along the hype of biomedicine, especially when it comes to psychiatry. This is driven mostly because they fear that biomedicine plays a normalizing role when it comes to human differences, especially in a group considered to be ‘vulnerable’, and socially located as closer to a state of nature, who might get compromised by these bio-scientific rationality. In this presentation, I will explore some of the results of my ethnographic work inside a school with children medicated with stimulant medication. By presenting excerpts of my ethnographic experience with the ‘quintos básicos’ (children aged 10 and 11), I aim to reveal mainly two core elements in order to re-locate the discussion about biomedicine and its relations with childhood. First, that biomedical knowledge and medications are a common element in children’s everyday lives, therefore there is no thing such a colonization or external invasion of their daily lives. Second, that in some cases the use of psychostimulant medication can enable new ways of agency on children consuming the medication. Using contributions from Science and Technology Studies, the anthropology of pharmaceuticals and the sociology of childhood, I propose that we are currently at a time where it is necessary to re-locate the discussion about the interaction between biomedicine, childhood and the use of medication, in an attempt to rescue the hybrid character of childhood, hence giving room to analyse the potential benefits that this interaction can entail.
Research Interests:
Historically, interactions between children and biomedicine have been framed in different ways. These interactions can be viewed as beneficial when biomedicine offers answers and treatments for illness, unease, and pain. But when it comes... more
Historically, interactions between children and biomedicine have been framed in different ways. These interactions can be viewed as beneficial when biomedicine offers answers and treatments for illness, unease, and pain. But when it comes to the relations between children and mental health the frame is often constructed as threatening. Social scientists, under the influence of the medicalization thesis, began to think that this relation is potentially hazardous: that children’s consumption of stimulant medication should be considered as potential harmful and unsafe, especially since it may affect ‘the child’s true self’. In this presentation I aim to explore how this discussion makes necessary our reflection upon not only children’s use of medication, but also what it is to be a child in Chile, and how biomedicine is perceived as a potential threat to what is considered ‘the natural state of childhood’. Medication, its ingestion, and its potential effects blur the boundary between the limits of the child, and the effects of the medication. In order to explore this subject, I draw upon my fieldwork with medicated children and their practices in the context of the classroom. My analysis is inspired by different theoretical backgrounds that have emphasized mutual determinations between medication and individuals, such as the anthropology of pharmaceuticals and science and technology studies
Research Interests:
Elaborating on some contributions made by different bodies of work, such as Science and Technology Studies, Anthropology of Pharmaceuticals, New Social Studies of Childhood, and empirical data obtained via ethnographic research in a... more
Elaborating on some contributions made by different bodies of work, such as Science and Technology Studies, Anthropology of Pharmaceuticals, New Social Studies of Childhood, and empirical data obtained via ethnographic research in a Chilean School, this presentation examines how children and psycho-‐stimulants, such as Ritalin, interact with and influence each other and how this effects
children’s interactions with other classroom actors.
In the last two decades Ritalin has become a major issue in the Chilean context, reaching high rates of consumption, which places Chile in the top ten consuming countries worldwide. However along with the increasing consumption
of medication, it is possible to find an increasing resistance
by different groups of actors who have become more visible
during the last years.
I claim that behind both positions, those in favour of children taking medication and those who oppose them,
what can be found is a different understanding of what
a child is, and how he/she should be treated and considered
by other social actors. Finally, I attempt to show how,
by taking into consideration some contributions made by
social scientists working in relation to biomedicine, it is
possible to consider children’s use of psycho‐stimulant
medication as something that allows the emergence of
both positive and negative effects, being necessary not
to dismiss medication as something ‘bad' in itself, but
rather to produce more nuanced analysis of why and
under what circumstances medication should be given
to a child.
children’s interactions with other classroom actors.
In the last two decades Ritalin has become a major issue in the Chilean context, reaching high rates of consumption, which places Chile in the top ten consuming countries worldwide. However along with the increasing consumption
of medication, it is possible to find an increasing resistance
by different groups of actors who have become more visible
during the last years.
I claim that behind both positions, those in favour of children taking medication and those who oppose them,
what can be found is a different understanding of what
a child is, and how he/she should be treated and considered
by other social actors. Finally, I attempt to show how,
by taking into consideration some contributions made by
social scientists working in relation to biomedicine, it is
possible to consider children’s use of psycho‐stimulant
medication as something that allows the emergence of
both positive and negative effects, being necessary not
to dismiss medication as something ‘bad' in itself, but
rather to produce more nuanced analysis of why and
under what circumstances medication should be given
to a child.
Research Interests:
Tal como ha sido denunciado por diversos actores del medio nacional, durante los últmos años Chile ha presenciando un incremento en lo concerniente a l consumo de psicoestmulantes por parte de niños y adolescentes. Este incremento en el... more
Tal como ha sido denunciado por diversos actores del medio nacional, durante los últmos años Chile ha presenciando un incremento en lo concerniente a l consumo de psicoestmulantes por parte de niños y adolescentes. Este incremento en el consumo ha sido observado con recelo y cautela por muchos, y directamente atacado por otros al considerarse que detrás del mismo, lo que se esconde son intentos de normalización y medicalización de niños que realmente no requieren tratamiento farmacológico. El
principal motor detrás de estos argumentos es el temor que produce la relación entre los niños y el uso de psicofármacos, los que se argumenta aplanan la subjetvidad de los mismos, incluso llegando a transformarlos en ajenos a ellos mismos. Sin embargo, existen otras formas de pensar esta problemátca
interacción entre los fármacos como el Ritalín y la infancia, que se ancla en la idea de que estas relaciones no son solamente restrictivas, sino que también potencialmente consttuyente de nuevos fenómenos que pueden ser positvos tanto para los niños como para su entorno
principal motor detrás de estos argumentos es el temor que produce la relación entre los niños y el uso de psicofármacos, los que se argumenta aplanan la subjetvidad de los mismos, incluso llegando a transformarlos en ajenos a ellos mismos. Sin embargo, existen otras formas de pensar esta problemátca
interacción entre los fármacos como el Ritalín y la infancia, que se ancla en la idea de que estas relaciones no son solamente restrictivas, sino que también potencialmente consttuyente de nuevos fenómenos que pueden ser positvos tanto para los niños como para su entorno
Research Interests:
"This research tried to examine the problem of the high prevalence of ADHD in Chile, not only from the perspective of an analysis of policy, documents and schemes of treatments and diagnosis. It also intend to tackle the issue of how do... more
"This research tried to examine the problem of the high prevalence of ADHD in Chile, not only from the perspective of an analysis of policy, documents and schemes of treatments and diagnosis. It also intend to tackle the issue of how do the actual subjects diagnosed with ADHD deal with their diagnosis, and with all the implications that it has in their everyday lives.
"
"
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Durante su transcurso, las ciencias sociales se han visto cautivadas, una y otra vez, por la pregunta acerca del sujeto y la subjetividad. Ya sea que esta fascinación fuera motivada por un afán de comprensión, de diferenciación, de... more
Durante su transcurso, las ciencias sociales se han visto cautivadas, una y otra vez, por la pregunta acerca del sujeto y la subjetividad. Ya sea que esta fascinación fuera motivada por un afán de comprensión, de diferenciación, de liberación o de intervención, diversas autoras y autores se han detenido en la pregunta por el sujeto y los efectos que sus diversas composiciones provocan en la vida social. De variados movimientos intelectuales y sociales hemos aprendido que el ser humano no es neutral. Creerlo neutral y universal es, de hecho, lo que ha limitado su problematización. Los mundos tecnocientíficos pero también vergonzosamente desiguales y distópicos que vivimos, nos demandan terminar con ese inmovilismo disfrazado de neutralidad. Por ello, en parte, seguir interrogando al sujeto se vuelve una tarea prioritaria para el ejercicio de unas ciencias sociales críticas y propositivas.