Controle judicial de políticas públicas

Este artigo é produto de pesquisa desenvolvida por alunos da Escola de Direito do Rio de Janeiro da Fundação Getulio Vargas durante o segundo semestre do ano de 2017. O objetivo central do trabalho foi verificar o nível de deferência do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ) às decisões proferidas pela Agência Reguladora de Energia e Saneamento Básico do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (AGENERSA). Foram adotados três parâmetros distintos: (i) a deferência pelo discurso; (ii) a deferência pelo resultado; e (iii) a deferência pela amplitude de controle. Ao final, tais variáveis foram conjugadas para indicar possíveis tendências do TJRJ no controle judicial da AGENERSA.

O artigo realiza uma análise do potencial da Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental (ADPF) nº 527 em promover uma transformação na condição precária de pessoas LGBTI+ encarceradas, sob o referencial da teoria de Judith Butler. O trabalho se desenvolve com o emprego das técnicas de análise documental, para exame da ação referida em curso no Supremo Tribunal Federal, e revisão sistemática de literatura, para a obtenção de dados empíricos secundários a serem considerados na análise da ação. Diante disso, o trabalho conclui pelo baixo potencial transformador da ação judicial, considerando, em especial, a limitação do campo jurídico em acessar a complexidade do sofrimento e violência vivenciados por pessoas LGBTI+ encarceradas, conforme constatado na revisão dos dados empíricos. Desse modo, o trabalho apresenta uma contribuição original por traçar análise de uma ação ainda não profundamente explorada nos estudos publicados e também por sistematizar um grande conjunto de dados empíricos disponíveis, por meio de revisão sistemática.

Palavras-chave: LGBTI+; Direitos Humanos; Encarceramento; STF; Condição precária.

The paper presents the contours of the research being developed by the members of the research group New Perspectives in Constitutional Jurisdiction (NPJURIS) linked to PPGD / UNESA / RJ. The discussions will be held within the framework of the Teleology Constitutional of the Planned Public Function research project. The research develops from the critical dialectical method, based on bibliographical research. The discussion points out that the emphasis given to the 1988 Constitution as an instrument of social transformation directed much of the legal doctrine reflection to fundamental rights theory, and to the proclamation of judicial syndicability of the choices and actions of power organized. The debate is therefore about the purposes of public action, hence the Executive and Legislative functions are teleologically
oriented; neglecting the way of forming the choices made in these same spheres. On the other hand, the analysis of the legitimacy of decision is still formulated from a criterion that takes into account predominantly the agent - it would have been legitimate to choose because it was the administrator or the legislator who formulated it; without prejudice to the review by the Judiciary. The result is a permanent
tension between these agents, all claiming legitimacy of their action, when it will often not be possible for the coexistence of the various choices. State action is thus converted into a priority dispute - each power structure understood to be legitimized purely by the criterion of the subject; each wanting to see its own option prevail. This tension, transferred to the control field, induces a risk of paralysis of the public action - result in itself always undesirable. The present research proposes to resume and harmonize these components from the analysis of the actual constitutional attempts when signaling a planned public duty of action. The architecture power of CF / 88, plus
than to distribute powers, refers to the fundamental objectives of the Republic - and this is reflected in the exercise of that power itself structure. This structuring option must be taken on board, either in the internal decision-making practice of the Administration or in the legislative function, or with regard to the controlling intervention of other structures of power. Reconfigured the logic of a legitimacy conferred solely on the presence of the subject, it is necessary to seek criteria for public action control that a sign of planning and teleological orientation of this same act, without completely closing the possibility of control, which is inherent to the
Democratic State. The partial results of the analysis point to the next steps in the development of the research, indicating the way to investigate the identification of possible legal effects of the planned administrative action, especially when taking care the exercise of control, the observance by each of the structures of power, the duty of planning drawn from the constitutional charter. At its extension, it is pertinent to inquire as to the applicability of this same sign (planning) even in the development of the public control function. The purpose of the investigation will be to draw a picture of the legal effects of observing the planned public action, especially in the field of control. After all, if it is in the reciprocal interference in the ordinary exercise of each
specialized functions of power that identify the areas of tension; it is in the control that it is necessary to reflect on the legal effects of the action power developed from a given institutional framework.