Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

DLL - Romeo and Juliet

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

School: Grade Level: IX

GRADES 1 to 12
Teacher: Learning Area: English
DAILY LESSON LOG
Teaching Dates: January 7-11, 2019 Quarter: Fourth
Time
I. OBJECTIVE
A. Content Standards: LT, RC

B. Performance Standards: LC, R

C. Learning Competencies  Remember lessons from past discussions


 Analyze literature as a means of connecting to the world
 Recognize faulty logic, unsupported facts, and emotional appeal
 Answer questions from past lessons
SESSION 1 SESSION 2 SESSION 3 SESSION 4
II. CONTENT Review Logic, Facts or Appeal
Romeo and Juliet Quiz

III. RESOURCES
IV. PROCEDURES
A. Pre (Give Example) Enumerate pointers to Orient students on their Ask questions regarding Recapitulate the past
review performance task for this decision-making lessons
quarter. Connect students’
opinions from the past to
modern times to evade
making decisions at fast
pace.
B. During ( Name the activities) Review the following: Divide class into two Solicit students’
 Critical vowel sound /a/ groups. opinions/ideas about Give students 5 minutes
and /e/ First group works on logic, facts or appeal. to scan their notes
 The Telephone “Act 2, scene 4” up to Discuss similarities and
 Sorry, Wrong number “Act 4, scene 1” differences of the 3.
 Adverbs of time and Second group works on
place “Act 4, scene 2” until
 Gerund “Act 5, scene 2”.
C. Post ( Have samples of questions Ask questions from the Assign Group leaders Activity
or activities) texts discussed and secretaries in each LM page 282 Quiz
Examples of the grammar group.
awareness and structure
discussed.
V. EVALUATION Activity for gerund on Read and collaborate on the Checking of activity Checking of answers
( Optional) LM page 256 B&C. given scenes in order to get
the gist of it.
VI. AGREEMENT Summarize he given scenes
and acts.
REMARKS
A. Are objectives attained?
Why?/ Why not?
B. What went well?
What went wrong?
C. Mastery Level of the Learner
 % of those who did not master the
competency/ies
(80% below)
 % of those averagely mastered the
competency/ies
(81% - 90%)
 % of those who proficiently
mastered the competency/ies
(91% - 100%)

Prepared by: Checked by:

You might also like