See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/325283850

Seismic Analysis and Design of G+9 RCC Residential Building in STAAD.PRO

for Zone II Region

Research · May 2018

DOI: 10.15680/IJIRSET.2018.0705052

CITATIONS READS

0 3,553

2 authors, including:

Sitesh Singh
Lingaya's University
39 PUBLICATIONS   25 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Traffic Planning for Mid-sized cities View project

Review paper View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Sitesh Singh on 22 May 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,

Engineering and Technology
(A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)
Visit: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 7, Issue 5, May 2018

Seismic Analysis and Design of G+9 RCC

Residential Building in STAAD.PRO for Zone
II Region
Rajat Srivastava1, Sitesh Kumar Singh2
M.Tech. Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Career Point University, Kota, Rajasthan, India1
Asst. Professor& H.O.D., Department of Civil Engineering, Career Point University, Kota, Rajasthan, India2

ABSTRACT: Today, tall structures have turned out to be overall engineering wonder. From past earthquakes, it is
demonstrated that a significant number of structure are absolutely/somewhat harmed because of earthquake and now-a-
days it has turned out to be important to decide seismic reactions over such structures. Structural analysis is a branch
which includes in the assurance of structures with a specific end goal to foresee the reactions of genuine structures, for
example, structures, spans, trusses and so on. Basic outlining requires basic investigation and seismic examination of
any structure before development. All together satisfy the prerequisite of this expanded populace in the constrained
territory; the stature of building has turned out to be medium to tall structure. In this way, to guarantee wellbeing
against seismic powers of multi-storied working, there is need of seismic examination study and planning quake
protection structures. Amid earthquake, disappointment of structure begins from the purposes of a shortcoming. By and
large, shortcoming happens because of geometry, mass brokenness and solidness of structure. That is the reason;
structures fizzle amid earthquakes generally, because of vertical abnormality. The principle target this thesis is to think
about the seismic investigation of structure for static and dynamic examination in standard minute opposing casing. We
have thought about the private building, a G+9 storied structure for the seismic investigation and it is situated in Zone
II district in India. The base necessities relating to the basic security of structures are being secured by the method for
setting out the base plan loads which must be accepted for dead loads, forced burdens, and other outside loadings. Total
structure was analysed by computer with using STAAD.PRO software.

KEYWORDS: Earthquake-resistance Building, G+9 Storied-structure, Seismic Analysis, Structure Analysis,

Staad.pro.

I. INTRODUCTION
Earthquake has turned into a danger to human progress from the day of its reality, wrecking human lives, property and
the man-made structures. Mass of a building being intended to controls seismic outline, notwithstanding building
firmness, as earthquake initiates latency compel that winds up corresponding to the building's mass. Outlining
structures ought to act flexibly amid the seismic shaking without harm may render the undertaking monetarily un-
reasonable? This paper is presented to improve the efficiency of real time earthquake risk mitigation methods and its
capability of protecting structures, infrastructures and people, to investigate a multistorey RCC building (G +9 Story)
for Zone 2, to look at seismic conduct of multistorey RCC building for specific shaking power regarding reactions, to
contemplate the impacts of various Seismic zones on execution of multi-story working as far as seismic, to know the
connection between various techniques for seismic investigation and their seismic reactions, to accomplish functional
learning on basic investigation, seismic examination, outlining and specifying of auxiliary segments utilizing standards
of Earthquake Resistant Design.
1.1. MOMENT RESISTING FRAMES
The structure whose members and joints resist the forces principally caused by flexure is Moment Resisting
Structure.

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2018.0705052 4763

 ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,

Engineering and Technology
(A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)
Visit: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 7, Issue 5, May 2018

1.1.1. Ordinary Moment Resisting Frame (OMRF): The moment resisting frame which are designed
withno uncommon consideration towards malleable nature of the frame are called ordinary moment
resisting frames.
1.1.2. Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF): The moment resisting strucuture which are intended to
have malleable nature are called as special moment resisting frames. The design is done according to
the requirements specified in IS-13920. The earthquake resistant designs of structures are considering
the accompanying magnitudes of a earthquake.
1.2. Design Basis Earthquake (DBE): The earthquake whose likelihood of event is no less than one during the
structure design life is called design basis earthquake.
1.3. Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE):The earthquake whose expected intensity is most extreme that
can occur in a specific zone or region is called maximum considered earthquake. The maximum values are
considered according to code. The design approach recommended by IS: 1893-2002 is depends on the
accompanying standards (clause 6.1)
i. The structure ought to have the quality to withstand minor earthquakes less than DBE without any
damage.
ii. The structure should have the capacity to oppose quakes equivalent to DBE without significant structural
damage though some non-structural damage may occur.
iii. The structure should withstand an earthquake equivalent to MCE without fall.

II. LITERATURE SURVEY

Sayyed O.et al. (2017) [1], concentrated his examination on the impact of infill and mass inconsistency on various
floor in RC structures. The outcomes were presumed that the block infill upgrades the seismic execution of the RC
structures what's more, poor seismic reactions were appeared by the mass sporadic building, thusly it ought to be
maintained a strategic distance from in the seismic defenceless districts.
Khan et al.(2016) [2], featured the impact of mass inconsistency on various floor in RCC structures with as Reaction
Spectrum investigation utilizing STAAD-Pro V8i programming. In the undertaking work seismic investigation of RCC
structures with mass abnormality at various floor levels were done. Models are contrasted and each other for reaction
regarding float and redirection.
Reddy A. et al. (2015) [3], directed diagnostic examination for customary and sporadic structures to break down
reaction of structures in seismic zone V.15 story building is considered and ETABS programming is utilized to
show also, recreate building reaction. Examination is performed for static and dynamic techniques for investigation.
Paper finished up conduct of unpredictable structures when contrasted with general structure.
Mukundan H. et al. (2015) [4], discovered shear divider arrangement in building has been successful and efficient.
A 10 story working in Zone IV is tried to diminish the impact of seismic tremor utilizing fortified solid shear
dividers in the building. The outcomes are introduced subsequent to breaking down model utilizing ETABS
programming and RSA strategy is utilized. Scientists additionally examined outcomes fluctuating thickness of
shear dividers. It is presumed that shear dividers are more impervious to parallel loads in customary/Irregular
structure and for more secure plan, the thickness of the shear divider ought to go between 150mm to 400mm.
Mayuri D. Bhagwat et al.(2014) [5], G+12 multi-storeyed RCC building considering Koyna and Bhuj tremor is
completed by utilizing time history examination and reaction range investigation. Seismic reactions of such
building are nearly considered and displayed with the assistance of ETABS programming. Two time accounts (i.e.
Koyna and Bhuj) have been utilized to create distinctive satisfactory criteria (base shear, story uprooting, story
floats).
T.Mahdi et al. (2012) [6], contemplated seismic conduct of three solid moderate minute opposing space outlines
with unsymmetrical arrangement in five, seven and ten stories. In every one of these three cases, design
arrangements of the structure contained re-entrant corners. Nonlinear static and direct unique systems had been
utilized to dissect these structures. To quantify the precision of these two techniques, the non-straight powerful
investigation had been utilized. In spite of the fact that the contrasts between the consequences of these two
techniques with the nonlinear dynamic system were very wide, the direct powerful examination indicated
marginally preferable outcomes over nonlinear static investigation.
Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2018.0705052 4764
 ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,

Engineering and Technology
(A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)
Visit: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 7, Issue 5, May 2018

Williams Ryan J. et al. (2009) [7], considered the financial advantage of a given retrofit method utilizing the
system subtle elements. A parametric investigation was directed to decide how certain parameters influence the
attainability of a seismic retrofit. A contextual investigation was performed for the illustration structures in
Memphis and San Francisco utilizing an unassuming retrofit methodology. The consequences of the parametric
investigation and contextual investigation advocate that, for most circumstances, a seismic retrofit of a current
building is more fiscally practical in San Francisco than in Memphis.

III. METHODOLOGY

If the structure not properly designed and constructed with required quality they may cause large destruction of
structures due toearthquakes. Response spectrum analysis is a helpful procedure for seismic examination of structure
when the structure indicates linearresponse.
 Extensive literature survey by referring books, specialized papers did to comprehend essential idea of subject.
 Selection of an appropriate plan of G+9, story building.
 Computation of loads and selection of preliminary cross-sections of different structural members.
 Geometrical modelling/demonstration and structural analysis of building for various loading conditions as per
IS Codal provisions.
 Interpretation of results incorporate base shear, story float and story diversion.
 In the present work it is proposed to complete seismic investigation of multi-story RCC structures utilizing
Response Spectrum Analysismethod considering mass irregularity with the help of STAAD PRO software.

IV. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BUILDING

S. Description of S. Description of
Values Values
No. Structure No. Structure

Concrete (M25) and

1 Material 7 Floor Height 3m
Reinforcement (FE415)

Zone 2 (Table 2, IS 1893

2 No. of Storeys G+9 (10 storey’s) 8 Seismic zone
(Part I): 2002)

Member Load: (-
3 Size of Beam 600 x 300 mm 9 Dead Load 14KN/m)
Floor Load: 0.4KN/mm2
4 Size of Column 300 x 600 mm 10 Live Load 3 KN/m2
Table 1. Building Data for Analysis

Step – 1: Creation of nodal points. In view of the columns situating of plan we entered the node points into the STAAD
file.
Step – 2: Assigning the property of beams and columns. Fix the dimension and apply to direction in X, Y or Z.
Step – 3: Assign the support which is fixed and then go to seismic definitions (IS1893 Part 1:2002) and punch the
value we had taken out above in particular section respectively in +X, -X, +Z, -Z directions.
Step – 4: Apply types of weight ie, self-weight, floor weight etc. Take the value we have taken out by calculation done
above. Figure 2 & 3 shows the structure after live load and dead load is applied.

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2018.0705052 4765

 ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,

Engineering and Technology
(A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)
Visit: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 7, Issue 5, May 2018

Step – 5: Adding all the load mixes. After that, the load combinations are given with suitable factor of safety as per IS
875 Part 5.
Step – 6: Then, analysis after the completion of all the above advances we have played out the examination and
checked for errors using run analysis command.

Fig. 1. 3D View of Structure Fig. 2. When Live Load is applied Fig. 3. When Dead Load is applied

V. RESULT

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Resultant Rotational

Node L/C X mm Y mm Z mm Mm rX rad rY rad rZ rad
Max X 162 1 EQX 89.113 1.372 0 89.123 0 0 0
Min X 166 3 D.L -0.088 -6.014 0 6.015 0 0 0.001
Max Y 162 1 EQX 89.113 1.372 0 89.123 0 0 0
Min Y 164 3 D.L 0 -10.195 0 10.195 0 0 0
Max Z 54 2 EQZ 0 1.306 48.766 48.783 0 0 0
Min Z 274 3 D.L 0 -6.383 -0.133 6.385 0 0 0
Max Rx 19 2 EQZ 0 0.776 16.362 16.381 0.002 0 0
Min rX 274 5 R.L. 0 -0.816 -0.059 0.818 0 0 0
Max rY 107 1 EQX 87.24 1.343 0.009 87.251 0 0 0
Min rY 217 1 EQX 87.24 1.343 -0.009 87.251 0 0 0
Max rZ 161 3 D.L -0.013 -5.972 0 5.972 0 0 0.001
Min rZ 127 1 EQX 32.113 0.822 0 32.124 0 0 -0.002
Max Rst 162 1 EQX 89.113 1.372 0 89.123 0 0 0
Table 2. Nodal Displacement

Nodal displacements are referredin above table in X, Y and Z directios; by underlying arrangement in the aggregate
Lagrangian definition in horizontal and vertical directions and to the last met setup in the refreshed Lagrangian plan.
This exploration likewise proposes a relative nodal migration technique to address to the position and introduction for a
node in framed structures. Since the proposed techniques measures the relative nodal relocations in respect to its
adjoining nodal reference outline, they are still little for a framed structure experiencing huge damage for the little size
components. As a result, component details created under the little distortion suspicion are as yet substantial for
structures experiencing vast disfigurements, which altogether disentangle the conditions of harmony. A basic

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2018.0705052 4766

 ISSN(Online): 2319-8753
ISSN (Print): 2347-6710

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,

Engineering and Technology
(A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)
Visit: www.ijirset.com
Vol. 7, Issue 5, May 2018

framework is spoken to by a diagram to deliberately build up the overseeing conditions of harmony for general
frameworks. Two computational successions are characterized in the table above. One is the forward way grouping that
is utilized to regain the Cartesian nodal removals from relative nodal uprooting sand navigates a chart from the node
hub towards the terminal hubs. The other is the regressive way succession that is utilized to recuperate the nodal
powers in the relative facilitate framework from the known nodal controls in evidently the mastermind structure and
crosses from the terminal hub towards the base hubs.

VI. CONCULSION

The research paper enables to consolidate the knowledge of analysis and design of structure during seismic effects.
Since, the project building is located at Delhi (Zone 2) region, we have given more emphasis on earthquake load rather
than others. The building is more practically analysed over Staad.Pro software which is nowadays a helpful tool in the
analysis of frame for various loading condition. In the paper, design and detailing of all require element of building
were calculated manually and values were kept in required field in the software.
Detailed structural design of building is important aspect of construction procedure. Practically an engineer employed
must have knowledge on designs, construction procedures, site study etc. The project work was only related with the
practical application of the studied courses in the field. Finally, I hope that efforts and coordination for the project work
will prove much useful in our career and project will be helpful in providing information on the earthquake resistant
design and its safe practice.
REFERENCES

[1] Sayyed O., Kushwah S.S., and Rawat A., “Effect of Infill and Mass Irregularity on RC Building under Seismic Loading”, IRJET Vol: 04,
Issue: 02, pp.176-181,2017
[2] Khan, P. I., and Dhamge, N.R., “Seismic analysis of multistoried RCC building due to mass irregularity”, IJEDR, Vol:14, Issue: 03 pp.65-69,
2016
[3] Reddy A., and Fernandez R.J., “Seismic analysis of RC regular and irregular frame structures.” IRJET, Vol: 02, Issue: 05, pp.115-119, 2015
[4] Mukundan H., and Manivel S.,“Effect of Vertical Stiffness Irregularity on Multi-Storey Shear Wall-framed Structures using Response
Spectrum Analysis”, IJIRSET, Vol: 04, Issue: 03, pp.58-62, 2015.
[5] Mayuri D. Bhagwat, Dr. P.S.Patil, “Comparative Study of Performance of RCC Multistory Building For Koyna and Bhuj Earthquakes” in
IJATES, Vol: 02, Issue: 07, pp.67-72, 2014.
[6] Mahdi T, and Soltangharaie V., “Static and Dynamic Analyses of Asymmetric Reinforced Concrete Frame” in Lisboa: the 15th World
Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2012.
[7] Williams Ryan J., Gardoni Paolo, and Bracci Joseph M., “Decision analysis for seismic retrofit of structures”. Structural Safety 31, pp. 188–
196, 2009.
[8] IS: 1893 (Part-1)-2002”Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures”. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2002.
[9] IS: 875 (Part 1)-1987 “Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than earthquake) for Buildings and Structures”. Bureau of
Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1997.

Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2018.0705052 4767

View publication stats