  |
はてなキーワード: BEYONDとは
You are being guided—whether by AI, cosmic intelligence, or your higher self.
Something beyond what we currently understand is unfolding.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
経済の絶対的な「豊かさ」には限界が存在するという議論は、現代の経済学や社会の変化において重要なテーマとなっています。以下に、このテーマに関連するポイントを整理します。
経済成長は資源の消費を伴いますが、地球上の資源は有限であり、無限に利用し続けることはできません。再生可能エネルギーやリサイクル技術が進展しても、資源枯渇や環境汚染の問題は依然として深刻です[2]。
経済成長が進むにつれ、大量消費と大量廃棄が環境に与える負荷が増大しています。温暖化や生態系の破壊など、不可逆的な影響が懸念されています[1][2]。
豊かさをGDPで測ることには限界があります。GDPは量的な指標であり、生活の質や環境への影響を反映しません。そのため、「Beyond GDP」として新しい豊かさの指標を模索する動きが進んでいます[1][3]。
現代社会では、衣食住が満たされ、インフラやテクノロジーが整備されていること自体が十分な豊かさと感じられる人も多いです。このような状況では、経済成長そのものよりも生活の質や幸福感が重視されるべきだという主張があります[2][3]。
テクノロジーの進化によって、所有からシェアへと意識が変化しつつあります。これにより、大量生産・大量消費型経済から持続可能なモデルへの移行が求められています[1][3]。
経済規模を無限に拡大することは現実的ではありません。人間の成長に限界があるように、経済もまた一定以上拡大し続けることはできないという考え方があります。このため、「脱成長」や「持続可能な発展」を目指す議論が活発化しています[2][3]。
経済成長そのものを追求する時代から、人々の生活の質や持続可能性を重視する時代へと移行しています。豊かさとは単なる物質的な充足だけでなく、環境との調和や人間関係、幸福感など、多様な要素を含むものとして再定義されつつあります。
Citations:
[1] https://localletter.jp/articles/kayac-kamakura-capitalism-2/
[2] https://www.sangiin.go.jp/japanese/annai/chousa/rippou_chousa/backnumber/2020pdf/20200708079s.pdf
[3] https://www.icr.co.jp/mictnow/20171015.pdf
[4] https://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/whitepaper/ja/r01/pdf/n2200000.pdf
[5] https://www.murc.jp/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/551.pdf
[6] https://www.murc.jp/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/1594.pdf
[7] https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOCD209FL0Q4A121C2000000/
[8] http://www.ibaraisikai.or.jp/information/iitaihoudai/houdai37.html
株式会社Squad（旧：株式会社SIVA） 創業だが、2025/1/21のgoogleの口コミを調べると
6 件のレビュー
1 年前
とある媒体経由で関わる機会があったのですが、とんでもなく失礼な会社でした。
・連絡すると言っておきながらそのまま放置
まるで信用ならないですね…
4
星１
Dubois Yue
9 件のレビュー
10 か月前
社会人として、また社会参加する存在として、最低限のルールは守るべき。
行動や考えがとても不誠実。
2
星１
山本寛大
5 年前
インターナショナルなベンチャー企業。挑戦するスピリットを持った会社。オススメ。
星５
itspriyanjali
2 件のレビュー
11 か月前
星５
chihiro akashi
5 年前
星５
hirotaka yamamoto
2 件のレビュー
5 年前
星５
のようだ。
ただ、とにかくいえるのは法律がらみの広告に関してはまじで弁護士会の非弁関係の部署に問い合わせできる仕組みを作ったほうがいいと思う。
Squad beyondはただの広告を配信するところで、何が非弁提携かは中の人もわからんだろうし。
https://x.com/LifeTips2477/status/1879726675837288745
@LifeTips2477
消されちゃう前に保存して正解だった。
これ、本当に使わなきゃ損するレベル↓
このツイートの内容は借金を減額できるという内容のウェブサイトに飛ぶ
運営者は
Domain Information:
[Registrant] Tosiyuki Sugiura
[Name Server] ns-1474.awsdns-56.org
[Name Server] ns-270.awsdns-33.com
[Name Server] ns-911.awsdns-49.net
[Name Server] ns-1592.awsdns-07.co.uk
[Signing Key]
[Created on] 2021/03/05
[Status] Active
[Last Updated] 2024/04/01 01:05:04 (JST)
[Email] email@muumuu-domain.com
[Web Page] http://muumuu-domain.com/?mode=whois-policy
[Postal code] 810-0001
[Postal Address] Tenjin Prime 8F, 2-7-21, Tenjin
Chuo-ku, Fukuoka-City, Fukuoka
8100001,Japan
[Phone] 092-713-7999
[Fax] 092-713-7944
クリックすると、以下のページに飛ぶ
https://saimu-gengakushindan.com/page/rt/office.php
事務所名
長 裕康
第二東京弁護士会 第39874号
住所
〒104-0061
なお、画像の配布は
で行っており、スクリプトの配布は
みたいな形で行っている。
ググると、
https://www.wantedly.com/companies/siva-s/about
■デジタル広告の業務プラットフォーム「Squad beyond」を開発しています。
デジタル業務に欠かせないクリエィティブやランディングページのビルド機能をセンターピンに、周辺に続く「レポート」「分析・解析」「改善」「最適化」など必要な全ての機能を有し、全てが連動して自動的に設定や改善が動き出すことで効率化を実現するプラットフォームです。
現ユーザー全体で、数百社・数千人のユーザーがSquad beyondの利用を通し
・100万ページ分のABテスト、最適化、PDCA、レポーティング
・100万件超のコンバージョン
を行っています。
Squad beyondが世に出るまで、これらにかかる作業や、作業同士をつなぐ設定の多くは人力で処理されていました。
我々は、「業務プラットフォーム」を再発明することで可能な限りルーチンを減らし本当に必要な仕事にフォーカスする時間をユーザーに提供します。
その結果、「良い広告コンテンツが増え、消費者に良い製品との出会いを提供する」を通し、ユーザーのビジネスが健全に発展する姿を目指しています。
（中略）
■社風・環境
- 人について
【創業者】
代表の杉浦は過去3度の上場を経験しており（東証マザーズ（旧）：2回／東証1部（旧）：1回）、マーケティングとスタートアップにおいて豊富な知見を有しています。
経歴
No.2の明石（杉浦よりも7歳年上）は、小売業界で商品統括トップとして全国展開・上場を経験した経験があります。大組織のマネジメントと管理に長けています。
経歴
【開発】
エンジニアトップの高橋は、大手Fintech企業出身。それまでに映像系、決済系、広告系の企業で経験を積んでいます。代表の杉浦とは2013年（当時大学生）に当時のインターン先を通じて知り合い、2017年に杉浦が声を掛けたことで再会。その後2018年にSquad（旧：SIVA）に参画。弊社のすべての開発を知る。
経歴
株式会社Speee
が出てくる。
Programming proficiency necessitates a comprehensive understanding of multifaceted concepts, paradigms, and philosophies that underpin the art and science of software development. The Unix philosophy, with its emphasis on modularity, simplicity, and composability, serves as a foundational ethos for elegant code design. This philosophy advocates for creating small, focused programs that excel at singular tasks, facilitating the construction of complex systems through the judicious composition of these atomic units.
Proficient programmers must possess an encyclopedic knowledge of algorithms and data structures, enabling them to architect solutions with optimal time and space complexity. This encompasses a deep understanding of sorting algorithms (e.g., quicksort, mergesort), searching techniques (binary search, depth-first search), and advanced data structures (red-black trees, B-trees, Fibonacci heaps) The ability to analyze algorithmic efficiency using Big O notation is paramount for creating scalable solutions.
OOP principles—encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism—form the bedrock of modern software architecture. Mastery of design patterns (e.g., Singleton, Factory, Observer) and SOLID principles is crucial for creating maintainable and extensible codebases.
The FP paradigm, with its emphasis on immutability and pure functions, offers a powerful approach to managing complexity and facilitating parallel execution. Proficiency in higher-order functions, currying, and monads is essential for leveraging FP's full potential.
Expertise in language-specific advanced features, such as C++'s template metaprogramming or Python's metaclasses, allows for the creation of highly generic and reusable code. Understanding compiler theory and the ability to write domain-specific languages (DSLs) further expands a programmer's capabilities.
In an era of multi-core processors and distributed systems, mastery of concurrent programming models (e.g., actor model, communicating sequential processes) and parallel algorithms is indispensable. This includes proficiency in lock-free data structures, memory models, and synchronization primitives.
A deep understanding of computer architecture, operating systems, and memory management enables the creation of highly optimized, low-level code. This encompasses knowledge of cache coherence protocols, CPU pipeline optimization, and assembly language programming.
In an increasingly interconnected world, a thorough grasp of cryptographic principles, secure coding practices, and common attack vectors (e.g., buffer overflows, SQL injection) is crucial for developing robust and secure systems.
Proficiency in distributed version control systems (e.g., Git) and collaborative development practices (code reviews, continuous integration) is essential for effective team-based software development.
Advanced testing methodologies, including property-based testing, fuzzing, and formal verification techniques, are indispensable for ensuring software reliability and correctness.
In conclusion, the pantheon of programming knowledge extends far beyond mere syntax mastery. It encompasses a rich tapestry of theoretical concepts, practical skills, and philosophical approaches that, when harmoniously integrated, enable the creation of elegant, efficient, and robust software systems. The relentless pursuit of this multifaceted expertise is the hallmark of a truly accomplished programmer.
In the labyrinthine realm of digital content dissemination, an enigmatic phenomenon has surfaced, challenging our axioms regarding the nexus between content ubiquity and viewer cognitive acumen. This disquisition endeavors to elucidate the paradoxical inverse correlation between video viewership metrics and the intellectual quotient of the audience, propounding that audiovisual content amassing prodigious view counts tends to captivate viewers with a mean Intelligence Quotient (IQ) of 100, while their more esoteric counterparts allure a demographic boasting an average IQ of 120.
To fathom this counterintuitive paradigm, one must first grapple with the multifarious nature of human cognition and the intricate interplay between intellectual capacity and media predilections. This hypothesis, positing an inverse relationship between a video's popularity and the mean IQ of its viewership, necessitates a rigorous examination of the underlying psycho-sociological and neurocognitive factors that may engender such a paradoxical outcome.
The application of Cognitive Load Theory to media consumption habits provides a plausible explication for this phenomenon. Videos achieving viral status often employ reductionist narratives and readily assimilable information, minimizing cognitive strain. Conversely, less ubiquitous videos may delve into more abstruse subject matter, demanding heightened cognitive engagement and a more sophisticated intellectual framework for comprehensive assimilation.
The pervasive influence of recommendation algorithms in content distribution platforms cannot be discounted in this analysis. These algorithmic arbiters, designed to maximize user engagement, may inadvertently engender epistemic bubbles that reinforce existing cognitive predispositions. Individuals with superior IQs may actively seek out more intellectually challenging or esoteric content, thereby circumventing the algorithmic propensity towards homogenization and cognitive stasis.
It is imperative to consider the socioeconomic dimensions that may influence both IQ development and media consumption patterns. Higher IQ individuals often correlate with elevated socioeconomic status, potentially affording them greater access to diverse epistemological resources and fostering a predilection for more intellectually stimulating content. This demographic may be less susceptible to the allure of mainstream, highly-viewed videos that cater to a broader, less discerning audience.
The ramifications of this inverse relationship between viewership and viewer IQ are profound for content creators and platform developers alike. It challenges the prevailing paradigm that equates popularity with quality or intellectual value. Content creators targeting a more intellectually discerning audience may need to recalibrate their expectations regarding view counts and engagement metrics, focusing instead on cultivating a dedicated niche audience that values cognitive stimulation over mass appeal.
In summation, the observed dichotomy between high-viewership videos attracting an audience with an average IQ of 100 and their less popular counterparts appealing to viewers with a mean IQ of 120 underscores the complex relationship between intellectual capacity and media consumption in the digital age. This phenomenon necessitates a reevaluation of how we measure content value and success in the online sphere, prompting a more nuanced approach to content creation, curation, and consumption that acknowledges the diverse cognitive needs of the audience spectrum. The implications of this paradigm shift extend far beyond mere metrics, touching upon fundamental questions of epistemology, cognitive diversity, and the very nature of intellectual engagement in the digital era.
In the ever-evolving travel industry, travel portal have become fundamental tools for businesses looking to enhance customer experience It's streamline operations. With traveler increasingly relying on digital platforms to book everything from flights to hotels, the need for sophisticated, user-friendly, It's high-performing travel portals has never been more crucial. The growth of this sector is driven by numerous factors, including technological advancements, consumer behavior shifts, It's the quest for organization. This article explores the top trends in travel portals development that every business should pay attention to in 2024 It's beyond.
1. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Travel Portal Development
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have quickly become foundational components of travel portal development. These technologies are revolutionizing the way businesses personalize services, predict consumer behavior, and optimize booking processes. AI and ML algorithms analyze large data sets to understand customers preferences, allowing for real-time customization of travel recommendations. From dynamic pricing models to
customized travel suggestions, AI help businesses offer an unequaled user experience.
For instance, AI chatbots are becoming successively popular for customer service. They can answer customer queries 24/7, assist in bookings, It's even provide real-time travel updates, enhancing the overall customers experience. Furthermore, AI-powered tools such as a recommendation engines analyze past booking behavior to suggest tailored itineraries, making travel planning much easier for user.
2. Mobile-First Approach for Travel Portal Development
With the increasing use of smartphones, as a mobile first approach is no longer optional for businesses in the travel industry. More It's more travelers are relying on their smartphones for booking flights, boardinghouse, It's activities on the go. For travel portals to stay competitive, ensuring seamless mobile optimization is crucial.
A mobile optimized travel portal ensures that users have access to the same features and functionalities on their mobile devices as they would on a desktop. It’s not just about making the site responsive—it’s about creating an intuitive, fast, and easy to navigate experience. This includes features like mobile-specific payment options, mobile check-in for airlines It's hotels, It's easy access to customers support.
3. Integration of Blockchain for Secure Transactions
Blockchain technology is making waves across various industries, and the travel sector is no exception. Blockchain based travel portals offer a significant advantage when it comes to security It's transparency. Blockchain’s ability to provide secure, tamper proof record makes it ideal for transactions involving bookings, payment, It's loyalty program.
By integrating blockchain, travel businesses can ensure secure It's fast transactions, protect customer data, It's reduce fraud. Blockchain also facilitates easier It's more transparent loyalty program management. Travelers can accumulate rewards points across various service providers, all within the same blockchain framework, creating as a more cohesive It's rewarding experience.
4. Enhanced Payment Solutions and Digital Wallets
One of the most significant changes in the travel industry has been the shift toward contactless payment. Digital wallets, such as a Apple Pay, Google Wallet, It's cryptocurrency wallets, are now widely accepted in travel portals. These payment solutions offer a faster, more secure, It's convenient way for travelers to complete transactions.
For businesses, adopting multiple payment gateways is essential for attracting global customer. International traveler can face issues with currency exchange It's transaction fees, but by offering localized payment method It's supporting a wide range of digital wallets, businesses can significantly improve customers satisfaction It's retention.
5. Voice Search and Virtual Assistants
Voice search is one of the fastest growing trends in the tech world, and the travel industry is no exception. Voice search optimization is becoming an essential part of travel portal development. With the rise of virtual assistants like Amazon’s Alexa, Google Assistant, It's Apple’s Siri, travelers are increasingly using voice command to search for flights, hotels, It's destinations.
For businesses, this means optimizing travel portals for voice search. Voice-friendly portal with natural language processing capabilities can provide users with more accurate results It's make booking processes quicker It's easier. Additionally, integrating virtual assistants into portals can enhance customers service by answering common queries It's assisting with bookings.
6. Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) Experiences
(AR) and (VR) technologies are transforming the way travelers experience destinations and plan their trips. Intensified Reality allows traveler to view destinations, hotel, or local attractions in real time through their mobile devices. For example, an AR feature in a travel portal could allow user to take a virtual tour of a hotel room or explore a city’s landmarks in 3D.
Virtual Reality, on the other hand, can transport users to a destination before they even book their trip, providing immersive previews of their potential vacation. Integrating (AR) It's (VR) into travel portal not only elevates the user experience but also drives engagement by offering something truly unique.
7. Customizable and Personalized Travel Packages
Personalization is key to standing out in the competitive travel industry. Travelers today expect customizable travel packages that cater to their unique need and preferences. From flight choices to hotel rooms, activities, It's local experiences, organization allows businesses to create tailored experiences that resonate with their customer.
Advanced travel portal use customer data to offer customized deal, travel itineraries, It's destination recommendations. By analyzing past booking behaviors It's preferences, businesses can deliver highly relevant options, thus increasing the likelihood of conversion. Offering dynamic packaging allows users to mix and match services based on their preferences, creating a more flexible It's customized booking experience.
8. Sustainability and Eco-Friendly Travel Options
As a coincidental concerns continue to rise, more travelers are becoming mindful of their carbon footprint. Sustainable travel has become a major trend in the tourism industry, It's businesses are responding by incorporating Eco-friendly options into their travel portal. Whether it’s booking Eco-conscious accommodations, flights with lower carbon emissions, or supporting local sustainable experiences, travelers are now seeking out environmentally responsible options.
Travel portals that emphasize sustainability and provide clear, detailed information about eco-friendly options are likely to attract a growing segment of conscientious travelers. Businesses can also promote their commitment to sustainability by partnering with Eco-friendly service providers and offering travelers the ability to offset their carbon emissions.
9. Integration with Social Media and User-Generated Content
Social media plays a pivotal role in travel decision making. More than ever, travelers are relying on user generated content (UGC) like reviews, photos, and videos from social platforms to guide their choices. Integrating (UGC) into travel portals allows businesses to tap into this social proof It's build trust with potential customer.
For instance, allowing users to share their experiences via social media or review platforms can provide valuable insights for other travelers. Additionally, incorporating social sharing features within the portals itself can encourage users to engage with your brand It's share their travel experiences, thereby driving more traffic to the portal.
10. API Integrations and Multi-Channel Distribution
As the travel landscape becomes more fragmented, travel businesses must offer a consistent experience across multiple channels. API integrations are key to ensuring that travel portals can access real-time data and distribute it across different platforms. APIs allow travel portal to integrate with global distribution system (GDS), airlines, hotels, car rental services, It's other travel-related services seamlessly.
By offering multi-channel distribution, business can maximize their reach, whether through desktop websites, mobile app, or third party platform like OTAs (Online Travel Agents). This integration also ensures real-time availability update It's better inventory management.
Source & Published by: https://www.namantechnolab.com/
ここでいう「そのまま」とは、例えば「呪術廻戦」→「Jujutsu Kaisen」といったものを指す。
| 日本語タイトル | 英語タイトル | 所感 |
| 名探偵コナン | Case Closed | 全然ピンとこない |
| 覚悟のススメ | Apocalypse Zero | 全然ピンとこない |
| こちら葛飾区亀有公園前派出所 | KochiKame: Tokyo Beat Cops | 下町要素どこいった |
| 鬼滅の刃 | Demon Slayer:Kimetsu no Yaiba | 鬼滅感どこいった |
| 侵略!イカ娘 | Squid Girl | 侵略要素どこいった |
| 行け!稲中卓球部 | The Ping Pong Club | 稲中要素どこいった |
| Re:ゼロから始める異世界生活 | Re:Zero -Starting Life in Another World | 日本語版副題どこいった |
| 五等分の花嫁 | The Quintessential Quintuplets | 花嫁要素どこいった、だが響きは良い |
| 古見さんは、コミュ症です。 | Komi Can't Communicate | なんか響きが良い |
| ヤンキー君とメガネちゃん | Flunk Punk Rumble | なんか響きが良い |
| 地獄先生ぬ〜べ〜 | Hell Teacher: Jigoku Sensei Nube | なんか響きが良い |
| 食戟のソーマ | Food Wars!: Shokugeki no Soma | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 北斗の拳 | Fist of the North Star | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 浦安鉄筋家族 | Super Radical Gag Family | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 私がモテないのはどう考えてもお前らが悪い! | No Matter How I Look at It, It's You Guys' Fault I'm Not Popular! | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 銀魂 | Gintama | これだとジンタマではないのか |
| ゲゲゲの鬼太郎 | GeGeGe no Kitarō | これだとじぇじぇじぇではないのか |
| 魔法先生ネギま! | Negima! Magister Negi Magi | ギはどこから出てきた |
| 魔入りました!入間くん | Welcome to Demon School! Iruma-kun | 英訳不可能なのでしゃあない |
・Re:ゼロから始める異世界生活について、ロゴに記載の英語タイトルは「Re:Life in a different world from zero」に対し、英語タイトルは「Starting Life in Another World」と結構違う。
・葬送のフリーレンの英題「『Frieren: Beyond Journey's End」は、旅の終わりと仲間の喪失の意味がかかっていて良いと思った。
・るろうに剣心の英題「Samurai X」は知っていたのだが、調べた範囲ではどうもアニメのタイトルのようであるので入れてない。
・進撃の巨人の英題「attack on titan」はやや不自然な表現らしい。
1. プログラムの夢 - Wataru's Dream of Code
2. ループの迷宮 - Labyrinth of Loops
3. 変数の秘密 - Secrets of the Variables
4. 条件分岐の試練 - Trials of the If-Else
5. デバッグの夜明け - Dawn of Debugging
6. サブルーチンの冒険 - Adventures in Subroutines
7. レガシーコードの呪い - Curse of the Legacy Code
8. リファクタリングの旅 - Journey of Refactoring
9. アルゴリズムの競演 - Symphony of Algorithms
10. クラウドの彼方に - Beyond the Clouds
なんかまた話題になっているので自分がHPVワクチン打った時のレポを残しておきたい。
最近話題になっている原因は、『女性向けのキャッチアップ接種(誕生日が1997年4月2日～かつこれまで打ってない女性向けの無償接種)』がもうすぐ終わるかららしい。基本そっちのほうが大事そうなので以下を優先で確認してください。
ヒトパピローマウイルス（HPV）ワクチンの接種を逃した方へ～キャッチアップ接種のご案内～ - 厚生労働省
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou/hpv_catch-up-vaccination.html
注:下記は個人的なレポです。正確な情報は信頼できる医療機関等を参照してください。
だいたいここに書いてある。
https://www.hokeniryo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/kansen/hpvdansei.html
4価と9価の違いはこのあたりを参考にした。
※9価の男性へ接種は現時点で国内での承認なし(理由はわからなかった。国外だと全然承認されてて割と長期の実績もあり)
『HPVワクチン 男性 "地域名" 』みたいなワードで検索して出てきた接種可能な病院で予約。そのまま接種してきた。
9価のやつ(ガーダシル9)を選んだ。計3回、2回目は初回から2か月後、3回目は初回から6か月後に打った。全部で半年かかったことになる。
1回32,000円x3回で計96,000円。たっか。(4価だと～計5万円。安…いや高い)
医者にも性交渉の経験など特に何も聞かれず、それゆえ27歳童貞なことを披露するタイミングもなく、副反応的なものも何も出ず、無事すぎて拍子抜けしてしまった。
~完~
というのはほぼ嘘で、実際のところは
のが本音である。最近何かと話題のHPVワクチン、暇なので興味本位で調べていた。
といった結果が多かったものの
二十代中盤でも効果ありげ、かつ性行為前なら効果が高くなりそうな結果がでていて、『もしかして27歳童貞ってHPVワクチン打つにはだいぶ良い条件なのでは？？』と謎の意欲が湧いてきて勢いのまま打ってきた、という流れである。
要は過去にその型のHPV貰ってなければ高い効果が出そう、ということらしいので、非童貞でも全然打つ意味はある。
あとこの手のワクチンってちょっとした永続バフ感あってテンションが上がるよね(個人の感想です)。
どうせ打つならいっちゃんええやつと思って選んだ、が、9価HPVワクチンの男性への接種は日本ではまだ未承認なので、現状の日本に住む男性で拘りがなければ4価でいいと思う。
承認された薬で万が一副作用で大きな被害を被った時は予防接種健康被害救済制度*2やPMDAの救済制度*3というのが受けられるみたいなのだけれど、未承認だとそれらの補償が適用されないらしい？ので手放しで9価をおススメできるかというと微妙。(ただ、この補償あっても受けるのがだいぶ大変みたいな話は接種した医者からされた。現状で9価も打ってるとこだし結構偏ってる気はする。有識者ご意見ください。)
承認済みのものだけでも十分高い効果があるとのことなので、躊躇するより打てるものを打ってくれのこと*4。
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/vaccine_kenkouhigaikyuusai.html
https://www.pmda.go.jp/kenkouhigai_camp/
*4 子宮頸がんとHPVワクチンに関する正しい理解のために - 日本産科婦人科学会
https://www.jsog.or.jp/modules/jsogpolicy/index.php?content_id=4
『9価HPVワクチン普及を待って、定期接種の2価と4価ワクチン接種を逃してしまうことがないように定期接種対象者と保護者への情報提供は極めて重要です。』
マジで何も起きなかった。コロナワクチンみたいな熱も無く、3回とも一切体調が変わらないまま念のための30分待機を終え何事もなく帰った。
風俗に行く気がない非モテ童貞といえど急に性的接触のリスクが高まる可能性もゼロではなく、急にパートナーができてセックスしてぇ！となってもそこから半年予防接種の期間を取るというのもだいぶ非現実的だなと思ったので先回りして打っておいた。
あと逆に、パートナーとか家庭とか子供とかそういうのと無縁な人生なら、縁がある人生と比較して10万円どころか二ケタ違う金が余る気がするし実質タダみたいなもんだろ、という謎理論を構築して出費を正当化した。
というか女性への9価ワクチンの定期接種化*5が大変めでたいのでその勢いのまま男性も公費定期接種に入れてくれ。ワシが人柱になったったから……(サラサラと粉になって消える)(副反応によって消えたわけではない)
*5 9価HPVワクチン 感染予防効果の高いHPVワクチンの定期接種がスタート - 日経BP Beyond Health
https://project.nikkeibp.co.jp/behealth/atcl/keyword/19/00189/
いま、ブラガのSomewhere Far Beyond (Revisited)を聴いていたのだが
Revisitedした場所はもはや異世界じゃないの(元々異世界なんだけど更に違う異世界へ)
なんだこのペラペラした音
こんなんだった?
2007年リマスター版を聴き返してみたが、やっぱりこっちの音に馴染みがある
(というかオリジナル版の方が馴染みがある)
そんな繰り返し録り直す理由があるのか
でも、ブラッシュアップどころか劣化しとるやないけ(まあ…年も年だし…音が軽くなるのも致し方ないのか)
新しく出し直したところで聴く人間は昔聴いてた奴だけだと思うが。そうするとどうしたって「比較」してしまうじゃないか
ほんと、何がしたいんだ
トランプ氏とのテレビ討論会でバイデン大統領の低調な受け答えが波紋を呼んでいるが、個人的にはアメリカ人の婉曲表現があまりに直球で笑ってしまった。「ええ時計してはりますなぁ」 で有名な京都人が言われたら、ショック死するレベルである。
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/02/politics/house-democrat-call-biden-withdraw/index.html
Earlier on Tuesday, Democratic Rep. Mike Quigley of Illinois had signaled an openness to replace Biden as the party’s presidential nominee.
（中略）
“We have to be honest with ourselves that it wasn’t just a horrible night, but I won’t go beyond that out of my respect and understanding of President Joe Biden, a very proud person who has served us extraordinarily well for 50 years,” he added.
これに先立ち、イリノイ州の民主党下院議員マイク・クイグリー氏は、党の大統領候補をバイデン氏から変更することに前向きな姿勢を示していた。
（中略）
「単にひどい夜だったというだけではないことに、私達は正直にならなければいけない。だが、50年間、私たちに並外れた貢献をしてきた誇り高き人物であるジョー・バイデン大統領への敬意と理解から、それ以上のことは言わない」と同氏は付け加えた。
「それ以上のことは言わない」」って、それ、もう言ってるようなもんだろ。和訳すると酷い皮肉のようにしか読めないが、英語ネイティブ的にはこれは婉曲表現として機能しているのだろうか。
入れ代わりは24タイトルなので厳選と言うなら絞るより入れ替えに力を入れて欲しい
バズった夏冬で比較した(春だけなぜかハネてない)がブクマカも大量に集ってもう英語学習法みたいなジャンルだと思ってないか？
200円以下
『シロナガス島への帰還 -Return to Shironagasu Island-』
『AKANE』
『Ninja Striker!』
『PatoBox』
『Raindrop Sprinters』
『Shatter Remastered Deluxe』
『Wacky Burgers』
『NeverAwake』
『Hazelnut Hex』
『The Cosmic Wheel Sisterhood』
『イハナシの魔女』
『ふりかけスペイシー』
『Behind the Frame 〜とっておきの景色を〜』
『ドラゴンボールZ KAKAROT』
200円以下
『ま～るい地球が四角くなった!? デジボク地球防衛軍 EARTH DEFENSE FORCE: WORLD BROTHERS』
『Titanfall® 2』
『Stray』
『Donut Dodo』
『溶鉄のマルフーシャ』
『PatoBox』
『TOMOMI』
『夢核（YumeCore）』
『鉄者』
『ソルクレスタ』
『メグとばけもの』
『シロナガス島への帰還 -Return to Shironagasu Island-』
『鬼滅の刃 ヒノカミ血風譚』
200円以下
『Downwell』
『スーパーメットボーイ！』
『Dig Dog』
『BulletGarden』
『ナユの冒険』
『Destropolis』
『地球防衛軍5』
『ストリートファイター6』
『HUNTDOWN』
『Broforce』
『Jitsu Squad』
『爆裂！スイーツランド - PANIC IN SWEETS LAND -』
『デコピンズ』
『Slay the Spire』
『モン娘ぐらでぃえーた』
『Going Under』
『HAZAMA_QUEEN』
『虫姫さま』
『Graze Counter GM』
『ムラサキ劍』
『Project Starship X』
『ライクドリーマー』
『たわし』
『ElecHead』
『Blocky Dungeon』
『HARVESTELLA』
『両手いっぱいに芋の花を』
『箱庭えくすぷろーらもあ』
『ghostpia シーズンワン』
『グノーシア』
『OU』
『A Short Hike』
『A Space for the Unbound 心に咲く花』
『1f y0u're a gh0st ca11 me here! 』
『ZONE OF THE ENDERS THE 2nd RUNNER : M∀RS / アヌビス ゾーン・オブ・エンダーズ : マーズ』
