Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
26.05. 2022, Toboľsk, talk at "Sibir Tatar Language Situatin: Problems and Their Resolution"
Starostin Memorial Readings 2022, 25.03.2022
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
V рабочее совещание по языкам Волго-Камского языкового союза, 11 декабря 2020
Research Interests:
Starostin Memorial Readings 2021
Research Interests:
Starostin Memorial Readings 2019
Research Interests:
Oŗenburg, November 2018
Research Interests:
Oŗenburg, November 2018
Research Interests:
PoleFone 2018
Research Interests:
Дмитриевские чтения 2018
Research Interests:
XIV Старостинские чтения, 25 марта 2019
Research Interests:
Linguistic Forum 2019: Indigenous languages of Russia and beyond’, April 5 2019
Research Interests:
04.06.2019
Research Interests:
Ufa, 30.09.2020
Research Interests:
Documentation of Languages and Dialects of the Indigenous Peoples of Russia, St Petersburg,  October 16th, 2019
Research Interests:
III international Tungusic Congress, Blagoweščensk, 15th of June, 2019
Research Interests:
заседание Ностратического семинара,  27ое февраля, 2020
Research Interests:
Вторая конференция по уральским, алтайским и палеоазиатским языкам. 10.10.2020
Research Interests:
Вторая конференция по уральским, алтайским и палеоазиатским языкам. 10.10.2020
Research Interests:
Starostin memorial readings XV, 22.10.20. Traditionally in Tungus-Manchu linguistic studies there are a few questions left unanswered: what is exact genetic clusterisation of the idioms; what are the most reliable isoglosses to clusterise... more
Starostin memorial readings XV, 22.10.20. Traditionally in Tungus-Manchu linguistic studies there are a few questions left unanswered: what is exact genetic clusterisation of the idioms; what are the most reliable isoglosses to clusterise the most of the know TM idioms; and how each intermediary proto-language could look like
Research Interests:
segmental vowel pharyngalisation seemed to be historically isolated, lacking any obvious predicessing entity. comparision of Yakut 110-word lists with their Proto-Turkic and Proto-Altaic etymons shows, that any first syllable vowel of the... more
segmental vowel pharyngalisation seemed to be historically isolated, lacking any obvious predicessing entity. comparision of Yakut 110-word lists with their Proto-Turkic and Proto-Altaic etymons shows, that any first syllable vowel of the inherited vocabulary will be obligatory pharyngealised, if it descends from a Proto-Altaic root, containing initial *p- and *ŋ-. Such consistence is by now unic. While only a few languages possess segmental reflexes of  Proto-Turkic *h- < Proto-Altaic *p- )mainly Eastern Halaj, partially Azeri and Uzbek), only Yakut data are numerous and can be experementally re-analysed.
Research Interests:
Tomsk State University, 01.07.2017.
a table of all possible fricative consonants
Research Interests:
Tomsk Pedagogical University, international conference A.P. Dulson's Memorial Readings XXVIII, 26.08.2017
Research Interests:
different non-obstruent phones, which are historically connected with non-sibilant fricatives (through lenition, fortition etc) + a chart of fricated vowels + some consonants of interdental place of articulation (given to highlight the... more
different non-obstruent phones, which are historically connected with non-sibilant fricatives (through lenition, fortition etc) + a chart of fricated vowels + some consonants of interdental place of articulation (given to highlight the difference between traditional "interdentals", i.e. coronal non-sibilants, and interdentals sensu proprio)
Research Interests:
Institute for Philology of Siberian Department of Russian Academy of Science, Novosibirsk, 03.10.2017
Research Interests:
Moscow State University, N.K. Dmitriev's Memorial Readings 2017
Research Interests:
Sankt-Petersburg ,conference on typology and grammar at the Institute for Linguistic Studies of Russian Academy of Science, 23.09.2017
As is well known, the three Turkic dialectal continua — Tatar-Bashkir, Shor-Khakass-Chulym, and Karachay-Balkar ones — have developed quite distinctive reflexes of proto-Turkic palatal *j- and *č-, *-č(-). While compiling the... more
As is well known, the three Turkic dialectal continua — Tatar-Bashkir,
Shor-Khakass-Chulym, and Karachay-Balkar ones — have developed quite distinctive reflexes of proto-Turkic palatal *j- and *č-, *-č(-). While compiling the Dialectological Atlas of Russia’s Turkic Languages, the authors were able to compose exact isoglosses of *j- and *č change in members of the mentioned continua, which made it also possible to partially reevaluate genetic clusterization on the basis of this data. Materials and Methods. Apart from the available publications and archival sources on the three areas in question, the analysis is based on the authors’ extensive field work that involves the use of a set of lexical questionnaires compiled in accordance with known aspects of the Turkic linguistic history. The source recordings for every speaker were turned into idiolectal audio-dictionaries and are linked to an electronic etymological database of the Turkic languages, each elicitation analyzed both with the comprehension method and the software for experimental phonetics. Results. As it turns out, this methodology of field work and post-analysis provides information crucial for detailed linguistic clusterization of dialectal continua in particular and any dialectal system in general. Traditionally, subtle problems of divergence and convergence, problems of archaic and innovative phenomena receive their solutions. The results are as follows. Palatal *j- and *č in the languages of the Khakass-Shor-Chulym group have changed by a strict series of rules none of which could be simultaneous, nor could follow each other in a different order. Thus, the two Middle Chulym dialects — Melet and Tutal ones — prove to lack an immediate linguistic ancestor, the Tutal ‘dialect’
is an archaic version of Mrassu Shor, while Melet is closely related to Kyzyl Khakass. Reflexes of *j- and *č are also principal isoglosses for a previously undocumented Khakass dialect, which does not have any specific affinity with Saghai, Kyzyl and Kachin dialects. Areal analysis of Karachay-Balkar shows that dz < proto-Turkic *j- is a secondary development, while, on the other hand, it is finally proven that reflexes *j- > dz~dʑ and *j- > ʑ~z form a more significant isogloss. And for the Tatar-Bashkir dialectal continuum, there were identified three main types of proto-Turkic *j- reflexation; a chronology for these three types intermixing during the early period of the continuum is also proposed.
The article continues the discussion of isogloss types and their relevance for the Proto-Turkic reconstruction and reconstruction of the intermediate nodes of the Turkic family tree. Goals. The paper makes another attempt to reconstruct... more
The article continues the discussion of isogloss types and their relevance for
the Proto-Turkic reconstruction and reconstruction of the intermediate nodes of the Turkic family
tree. Goals. The paper makes another attempt to reconstruct the morphophonological appearance of
some affixes for intermediate languages-ancestors of the standard Turkic group (Oguz, ‘Kyrgyz’,
Altai, Karluk, Toba, Kypchak). The study draws into consideration not only the plural affix *-lar, but
in general inflectional and derivational affixes starting with *-l. Materials and Methods. Methods of
stepwise reconstruction are used simultaneously with morphophonological methods of identifying
classes of positions and distribution of classes of allomorphs. Field records of dialects, dialectological
publications, both modern ones and those of the 19 th century, as well as written monuments were used
as research material. Results. Both modern field data and classical sources, with the correct application
of the methods of stepwise reconstruction, point that affixal *-l has no alternants in proto-Oghuz, proto-
Karluk and proto-Qypchaq. All instances of alternation in modern idioms like dialectal Bashkir, dialectal
Kazakh, ‘Qyrghyz’ languages, Yakut-Dolghan and Toba languages are to be classified as recent areal
innovation. This is deduced due to the nature of morphophonological rules in these languages — neither
is applyable for the proto-Common-Turkic stem auslaut, but instead is limited to forms that are specific
to each separate group in question.
Research Interests:
due to absence of voiced stops fricativisation in Central Italian idioms (Tuscan, Lazziano, Umbrese, Romanesco, Nnapolitano) it is thought for Proto-Romance to lack this phenomen. Nevertheless detailed comparative and typological data... more
due to absence of voiced stops fricativisation in Central Italian idioms (Tuscan, Lazziano, Umbrese, Romanesco, Nnapolitano) it is thought for Proto-Romance to lack this phenomen. Nevertheless detailed comparative and typological data reveals the opposite to be true
Research Interests:
"Актуальные проблемы лингвистики и лингвокультурологии 9", "Прометей" Moscow, 2013 - paginæ 89-103
Research Interests:
the frist phonological description of Nani (Ulcha) language based on experimental data. The materials were  collected by A. Girfanova in 2015
Research Interests:
to appear in 'Ural-Altai studies'
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
a talk for the Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages of RAS, description includes Ola Ewen, Mǝnǝ – Armaņ Ewen, Karkuk Uzbek, Oghuz Uzbek, Qypchaq Uzbek, Qyrgyz, Hakassian, Western Sibir-Tatar, Baraba Sibir-Tatar,... more
a talk for the Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages of RAS,
description includes Ola Ewen,  Mǝnǝ – Armaņ Ewen, Karkuk Uzbek, Oghuz Uzbek, Qypchaq Uzbek, Qyrgyz, Hakassian, Western Sibir-Tatar, Baraba Sibir-Tatar, Trukhmen Turkmen, Standard Chuvash, Moksha, Erzya
Research Interests:
a talk for the Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages of RAS, description includes Veps, Seto Soutn Estonian of Pečora and Siberia, Võro South Estonian of Siberia, North Estonian of Ingermanland and Siberia, Skolt... more
a talk for the Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages of RAS, description includes Veps, Seto Soutn Estonian of Pečora and Siberia, Võro South Estonian of Siberia, North Estonian of Ingermanland and Siberia, Skolt Saami, Kildin Saami, Akkala Saami, Ter Saami
a talk for the Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages of RAS, description includes dialect of Sakhalin Nivkh language, dialect of Amur Nivkh language, Hill Mari, Meadow Mari, East Mari, Forest Enets (Pe-bai), Tundra... more
a talk for the Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages of RAS, description includes dialect of Sakhalin Nivkh language, dialect of Amur Nivkh language, Hill Mari, Meadow Mari, East Mari, Forest Enets (Pe-bai), Tundra Enets (Somatu)
a talk for the Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages of RAS, description includes Poligus Ewenki, Mordva-Karatai Tatar, Nugaibäk Keräşen, Pestrečinski district Keräşen, Azejewo Tatar, Tatarščino Tatar, Bastanowo... more
a talk for the Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages of RAS,
description includes Poligus Ewenki,  Mordva-Karatai Tatar, Nugaibäk Keräşen, Pestrečinski district Keräşen, Azejewo Tatar, Tatarščino Tatar, Bastanowo Tatar, Kasinow Tatar, Kostroma Tatar, Čipca Tatar
a talk held in 27.04.22 in RAS with a brief description of phonology of some languages in the Northern and Central parts of Eurasia (within the borders of Russia and Ukraine)
25.01.2022, Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages, ILing RAS
"dummies" edition, which includes Cyrillic hints to help students with poor command of the basic Latin script. Some articulatory peculiarities are intentionally excluded from the charts. Regretfully, to generate a 100% original image of... more
"dummies" edition, which includes Cyrillic hints to help students with poor command of the basic Latin script. Some articulatory peculiarities are intentionally excluded from the charts.
Regretfully, to generate a 100% original image of vocalism is beyond my computer skills.
Research Interests:
artistic representation of Altaic dendrograms: one with classical EDAL structure of the family and revisited one, including Eskimo subfamily (after O.Mudrak's Eskimo Etymologicon)
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
new dendrogram lists Eskimo languages among "core Altaic", following in this aspect result of Oleg Mudrak researches on Eskimo etymology, which were published in his Eskimo Etymologikon. Proto-Eskimo not only shows some extent of... more
new dendrogram lists Eskimo languages among "core Altaic", following in this aspect result of Oleg Mudrak researches on Eskimo etymology, which were published in his Eskimo Etymologikon.
Proto-Eskimo not only shows some extent of lexical congruence with Proto-Altaic, as it was reconstructed in EDAL, but in particular the Proto-Tungus-Manchu come to lexically the closest Altaic daughter language to the idion in question. Thus, Proto-Eskimo comes to be one of the later separated daughter languages and possesses more reliable laxical entities, than Proto-Korean and Proto-Joponic do
Research Interests:
based on Tsintsius 1982, Schmidt 1928, Lidija Sem 1986, Poppe 1958, Sunik 1958, Sunik 1949, Awrorin 1951, Doerfer 1956, Miščenko 2014, Zhang 1998, An 1986, Wasilewič 1949, Gerasimowa 2002, Wseurkajinskyj perepys naselennja 2001,... more
based on Tsintsius 1982, Schmidt 1928, Lidija Sem 1986, Poppe 1958,  Sunik 1958, Sunik 1949, Awrorin 1951, Doerfer 1956, Miščenko 2014, Zhang 1998, An 1986, Wasilewič 1949, Gerasimowa 2002, Wseurkajinskyj perepys naselennja 2001, Wserossijskaja perepis'naselenija 2010
Research Interests: