This volume aims at proposing a wide-ranging discussion of the philosophical-theological and philological-literary aspects that have made the Corpus Dionysiacum a milestone in Christian literature, assessing them in relation to the... more
This volume aims at proposing a wide-ranging discussion of the
philosophical-theological and philological-literary aspects that have
made the Corpus Dionysiacum a milestone in Christian literature, assessing
them in relation to the historical-doctrinal background that
took shape between the end of the fifth and the first half of the sixth
century in the area of the Christian East that includes Greece and
Egypt, Palestine and Syria, and has seen its nodal centres in the cities
of Constantinople, Athens, Alexandria, Antioch, and Edessa. The
work of the mysterious author who wrote under the fictitious identity
of the saint Paul’s Athenian disciple, Dionysius the Areopagite, is investigated
here in relation to the ecclesiastic and political questions
that shaped intellectual debates in this particular historical context,
recognizing behind it a theoretical elaboration aiming at responding
to the main problems that stirred the political, ecclesial and intellectual
panorama of the Eastern part of the Roman Empire in this time,
which was marked by profound doctrinal divisions and large-scale
ecclesiastical schisms. Pseudo-Areopagitical writings show in their
watermark precise references to the main theological and philosophical
debates of the time in which they appeared, from Christology to
Origenism; from the clash between Christian and pagan philosophy
to the religious ideologies entering from the neighbouring Persian
empire; from the spiritualistic and anti-hierarchical positions held by
extreme monastic factions to the conflicts existing between schools
and theological-exegetical trends issuing from different geographical
and ecclesiastical contexts. This study attempts at reconstructing the
complexity of these references and their goal, arriving at the conclusion
that the Corpus – by means of the pseudo-epigraphic fiction that
attributed to Pseudo-Dionysius an almost apostolic authority – was
designed as an instrument aimed at dictating solutions that could be
shared by the parties involved in the controversies and could lead
them to doctrinal agreement, revealing a concern that was no less political
than ecclesiastical. The outcomes of this reconstruction suggest
an entirely new and ground-breaking solution to the Areopagitical
question, which strives for the first time to take into account every facet
of the pseudo-Dionysian text – either theological, philosophical, ecclesiological, liturgical, or heortological – attributing them the proper
weight, as pieces that must find their place within a vast mosaic.
philosophical-theological and philological-literary aspects that have
made the Corpus Dionysiacum a milestone in Christian literature, assessing
them in relation to the historical-doctrinal background that
took shape between the end of the fifth and the first half of the sixth
century in the area of the Christian East that includes Greece and
Egypt, Palestine and Syria, and has seen its nodal centres in the cities
of Constantinople, Athens, Alexandria, Antioch, and Edessa. The
work of the mysterious author who wrote under the fictitious identity
of the saint Paul’s Athenian disciple, Dionysius the Areopagite, is investigated
here in relation to the ecclesiastic and political questions
that shaped intellectual debates in this particular historical context,
recognizing behind it a theoretical elaboration aiming at responding
to the main problems that stirred the political, ecclesial and intellectual
panorama of the Eastern part of the Roman Empire in this time,
which was marked by profound doctrinal divisions and large-scale
ecclesiastical schisms. Pseudo-Areopagitical writings show in their
watermark precise references to the main theological and philosophical
debates of the time in which they appeared, from Christology to
Origenism; from the clash between Christian and pagan philosophy
to the religious ideologies entering from the neighbouring Persian
empire; from the spiritualistic and anti-hierarchical positions held by
extreme monastic factions to the conflicts existing between schools
and theological-exegetical trends issuing from different geographical
and ecclesiastical contexts. This study attempts at reconstructing the
complexity of these references and their goal, arriving at the conclusion
that the Corpus – by means of the pseudo-epigraphic fiction that
attributed to Pseudo-Dionysius an almost apostolic authority – was
designed as an instrument aimed at dictating solutions that could be
shared by the parties involved in the controversies and could lead
them to doctrinal agreement, revealing a concern that was no less political
than ecclesiastical. The outcomes of this reconstruction suggest
an entirely new and ground-breaking solution to the Areopagitical
question, which strives for the first time to take into account every facet
of the pseudo-Dionysian text – either theological, philosophical, ecclesiological, liturgical, or heortological – attributing them the proper
weight, as pieces that must find their place within a vast mosaic.