Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Cipaa 2012: An Overview: Ingenieur

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

INGENIEUR

CIPAA 2012: AN OVERVIEW


By Lam Wai Loon and Serene Hiew
Harold & Lam Partnership
COVER FEATURE

T
he Construction Industry Payment &
Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA 2012”),
for a fast, effective and cheaper option
to resolve payment disputes arising from a
contract for construction related works done
and services rendered, was introduced by way of
an Act of Parliament in 2012. This mechanism
is available to work and service providers in the
construction industry (including contractors, sub-
contractors, suppliers, architects, engineers,
quantity surveyors and the like) provided always
that there is a written construction contract and
the construction project is within the territory of
Malaysia. The main idea behind the introduction
of CIPAA 2012 is to help alleviate the prevailing
problems of non-payment or delayed payments
and under- certification in the Malaysian
construction industry. Although most disputes in
the construction industry revolve around payment
issues, there are some basic requirements that a
party seeking to resort to the mechanism would
have to consider before commencing a CIPAA
process namely:-
● Is there a written construction contract?
● Are there payments for work done —
certified or uncertified — left unpaid?
● Are these payments already due (to refer to
period for honouring certificate)?
● Are there supporting documents to verify
the claim?

16 VOL 78 APRIL-JUNE 2019


The entire CIPAA process takes about 3.5 For example, Contractor X claims for
to 5 months. A claim under CIPAA 2012 can be RM500,000.00 pursuant to an Architect’s
made during the course of the project or after the Payment Certificate. Employer Y disputes the claim
completion of the project works. This duration and states that it is entitled to   liquidated and
is short when compared with court litigation or ascertained damages (LAD) of RM800,000.00
arbitration. However, it is generally a documents- and counterclaims for RM300,000.00 against
only proceeding and as such, a party who wishes Contractor X. Even if the adjudicator finds that
to commence CIPAA proceedings should keep Employer Y’s defence is valid and it is entitled
good documentary records to support its payment to the deduction of LAD, the adjudicator cannot
claim. One of the appealing features of the CIPAA award the RM300,000.00 against Contractor
process is that the Courts have ruled that the X. The most the adjudicator can decide is that
defending party, also known as the non-paying Contractor X is not entitled to any money from
party, shall not be entitled to launch a counter- Employer Y.
claim against the claimant that is more than the The chart below briefly shows you the process
amount claimed by the claimant in the CIPAA of a CIPAA proceeding from the filing of a Payment
proceeding. At the very best, the defending party Claim until the delivery of the adjudication decision
can only zerorise the claimant’s claim through by the Adjudicator.
offsets or cross claims.

PAYMENT Payment Notice of


CLAIM Response Adjudication

Adjudication Adjudication Appointment


Response Claim of Adjudicator

Adjudication
DELIVERY
Reply
OF
DECISION

17

You might also like