Zotero

This document was originally intended to aid in the instruction of researchers in Papua New Guinea to use the Zotero bibliographic management tool. It is a bullet-point outline of all major concepts and uses of the program. It also provides links to download various add-ons, etc. Many of these links will not be available outside of our Center's intranet. Still, the document may be useful for others who want a to-the-point instruction on using Zotero.

Buku ini berjudul "Manajemen Dokumen Ilmiah: menggunakan zotero dan mendeley". Isinya tentang sumber informasi, pengelolaan dokumen ilmiah menggunakan Zotero dan Mendeley, sinkronisasi antara Zotero dan Mendeley, sinkronisasi dengan Dropbox dan ulasan tentang XMind dan LyX.

Bagi para dosen, mahasiswa dan siapa saja yang memiliki dokumen ilmiah, buku ini membantu memahami penggunaan  Zotero dan Mendeley untuk mengelola koleksinya, tercetak maupun digital. Pada akhirnya untuk mencari berbagai koleksi yang dimiliki tidak harus membuka berbagai folder dalam komputer, namun cukup melalui satu aplikasi saja. Selain itu akan terbantu dalam membuat sumber kutipan, membuat daftar pustaka, berjejaring antar ilmuwan.
Informasi selengkapnya http://www.purwo.co/2015/05/buku-panduan-mendeley-dan-zotero.html

The main focus of this paper is to compare and investigate the different functions of Zotero and Mendeley. Both the software's are getting popular among research and academic community. Mendeley, a desktop and web program with feature of social media functions, and use for gather, cite and create bibliographic. It can be combined with different other features available online. Zotero having the same functions and is open source citation management software used for creating bibliography, citation and storing bibliographical data. Both have web plugging feature and standalone version

სამეცნიერო სივრცეში ავტორთა დიფერენცირება/რანჟირება ხორციელდება მათ მიერ მეცნიერების ამა თუ იმ სფეროში შეტანილი წვლილის, განხორციელებული გავლენის მიხედვით. გავლენა, რომელსაც ახორციელებს ესა თუ ის ტექსტი იზომება იმის მიხედვით, თუ რამდენად ხვდება ეს ტექსტი სხვა მეცნიერთა მიერ წარმოებულ კვლევებში, რაც ვლინდება განხორციელებულ მითითებებში (ციტირებებში). ის თუ როდის, ვის მიერ და რომელ ტექსტშია გამოყენებული სხვა ავტორთა ნააზრევი, დღევანდელ სამეცნიერო სივრცეში დგინდება ე.წ. პროგრამული უზრუნველყოფის მეშვეობით, რაც, გამოყენებათა რაოდენობის სისტემურ, თვისობრივ და რაოდენობრივ აღრიცხვას გულისხმობს. წარმოდგენილ სტატიაში საუბარი მექნება იმ პრობლემურ საკითხზე, რომელსაც აწყდებიან ავტორები, რომლებიც ტექსტებს ქართულ ენაზე წერენ და გამოსცემენ საქართველოში არსებულ პერიოდულ გამოცემებში. ყველაზე პოპულარული (ხშირად მითითებადი) ტექსტები/ავტორები მაინც ვერ ხვდებიან პროგრამული უზრუნველყოფის ალგორითმის აღქმად არეალში, რაც წარმოქმნის დისბალანსს, რეალურად ტექსტის სხვა ავტორთა მიერ გამოყენების რაოდენობასა და ალგორითმის მიერ აღქმულ რაოდენობას შორის. ნაშრომში განხილულია არსებული პრობლემის საფუძვლები და შემოთავაზებულია გადაჭრის გზები, როგორც ავტორთათვის, ასევე გამომცემლებისათვის.

Failure to cite information sources used in a scientific paper is considered a violation of publication ethics and copyright. Many citation styles exist due to the different requirements of publishers. For this reason, authors have at their disposal various helpful tools in the form of reference managers to facilitate citation. Some of these reference managers use Citation Style Language (CSL). One of them is Zotero for which we optimized a CSL template for citation style ISO 690 because this style is often recommended to Czech university students writing their theses. CSL is an open and freely available programming language which is based on the markup language XML and which makes it possible to automatically format citations and bibliographic references according to a specific citation style. On the template for citation style ISO 690 the article describes the basic structure of the template in the CSL for potential users who can create own template corresponding to their citation style.

Manajemen aplikasi merupakan hal yang penting bagi kita yang bersinggungan dengan proses akademika, karena salah satu tugas kita adalah mempublikasikan hasil kinerja kita secara ilmiah. Melakukan sitasi terhadap sumber referensi merupakan bagian tidak terpisahkan dalam publikasi ilmiah. Mengumpulkan referensi, membacanya, serta memasukkannya ke dalam naskah kita merupakan tugas yang cukup menyita waktu dan tenaga. Dahulu, para penulis menggunakan kartu indeks untuk menyimpan informasi referensi yang digunakan dalam naskah. Sehingga di sinilah peranan dari perangkat lunak reference manager, yaitu melakukan digitalisasi koleksi referensi, sehingga aktifitas seperti pengelolaan dan pencarian dapat dengan mudah dilakukan.

Today’s bibliographic managers provide cloud storage so that papers can be attached to citations and syncing services, in order for papers and citations to be available in multiple mediums. Mendeley and Zotero are two services that offer online storage of papers and citations, desktop applications, and tablet integration. Mendeley has an iPad application and an open API so that developers can create apps for Android tablets. Zotero is an open-source project that encourages developers to create both iPad and Android apps. Both suites can be integrated with word processing software for accurate in-text and bibliographic entries, provide full-text indexing of PDF documents, and can attach notes to citations. Choosing between them depends upon what features a mobile researcher would need and use.

My aim is to give a general overview of sources of various information on onomastic studies. Here I argue that onomastic blogs and social network groups may function as an interface between the onomastic community and the public, hence they may be particularly well suited for public outreach and science communication. I will clarify where and how we could be informed about onomastic events and publications, what kind of available sources (web pages, blogs, newsletters, Facebook and Twitter communities, bibliographies, etc.) exist, how they could be used and what kind of developments should be desirable in this field. Working in cooperation with various scientists and new media in pursuit of onomastic information improves the connectivity of onomasticians worldwide. Finally, I will address the issue of the possible onomastic future.

Zotero is a free extension for the Firefox browser, which allows users collect, manage and cite research from all walks of life browser. The uniqueness compared to other managers is in as it does not exactly one local version classical manager, nor a web manager, otherwise it incorporates the advantages of one and other

Zotero es una extensión libre para el navegador Firefox, que permite a los usuarios recolectar, administrar y citar trabajos de investigación de todo tipo de orígenes del navegador. La originalidad frente a otros gestores está en como lo hace, no es exactamente un gestor clásico con versión local, ni tampoco un gestor web; si no que recoge las ventajas de uno y de otro.

The purpose of this study to understanding the researcher's level of awareness, usage of reference management tools, benefits and obstacles of reference management tools in particularly "Zotero & Mendeley". Structured design questionnaire randomly distributed through web 2.0 technologies (E-mail, LIS links, WhatsApp, Facebook) and finally, we received 170 dully filled respondents. A total of 51 (30%) researchers not aware of RMS, because of the reasons lack of library staff support 45%, lack of technical support, and lack of knowledge on citation styles respectively 63 (13.7%). Based on the listed reasons the investigator suggests that the library and staff should provide a learning environment for using RMS through conducting seminars, workshops, orientation programs, and other kinds of possible ways.

As a result of repeated mistakes in bibliographic references, scientists are interested in reference managers. Currently, there are only few studies which concentrate on the quality evaluation of the bibliographic references generated by these applications. In this research, bibliographic references of online and printed articles, books, contributions to books and web resources generated from the Citace PRO, EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero reference managers with briefly made references according to the citation styles ACS, APA, ASA, ČSN ISO 690, JAMA, MLA and NLM were compared. During the comparison, it was found that no reference manager is able to generate all references in the correct way. The best results were detected in Mendeley which had the total fewest number of mistakes and the fewest number of mistakes for 3 citation styles and in Zotero which had the second total least number of mistakes and the total fewest number of mistakes for 4 citation styles. On the other hand, Citace PRO revealed the most mistakes for 5 citations style, EndNote for 2 citation styles and RefWorks for 1 citation style. All reference managers had problems with generating various data in bibliographic references. It was found that several mistakes were caused by the technical restrictions of the reference managers while other mistakes were caused by the wrong setting of the citation formats. With respect to similar functions of the tested reference managers and the number of mistakes in generated references, Zotero and Mendeley proved to be the most suitable managers.

Современный этап развития информационного общества предполагает активное использование многочисленных электронных ресурсов. Поиск, отбор и оценка онлайн-ресурсов становятся всё более актуальной задачей интернет-эвристики. В статье рассматриваются возможности современных персональных баз знаний и сервисов, предоставляющих возможности организации научной информации. На примерах таких программ-сервисов, как Zotero, Mendeley и Evernote, предлагается оценить возможности и ограничения построения персональных баз знаний, понимания под базами знаний системно организованное хранение неструктурированной информации, предоставляющее возможности поиска и использования информации.

This study reports findings from a survey conducted to measure the use and perception of the United Arab Emirates University (UAEU) faculty members of electronic resources. Questionnaires were sent to a sample of 140 faculty members. Responses were received from 125 (89%) faculty mem-bers. Analysis confirmed frequency of use of electronic resources was low. Reasons cited were lack of time because of the time needed to focus on teaching; lack of awareness to electronic resources provided by the library; ineffective communication channels, and language barrier.

When students or academicians write a scientific article such as paper, thesis, or journal article, they will read lots of references. To tackle plagiarism problem such as missing citation or even missing to locate those quotations in bibliography. We could use software to organise those reading materials. One of opensource and powerful software is Zotero. They could make our job more comfortable and more accurate. Their capability is like Citavi (Paid software) in some part.

Two open source extensions to the Firefox browser, LibX and Zotero, can improve the research process for library staff and users. Once configured and installed, LibX provides Firefox users with an additional browser toolbar and right-click functionality that can search a library's catalog, OpenURL resolver or federated search engine, as well as other Web sites. LibX also includes an autolinking feature, which embeds searchable links within other Web sites such as Google, Amazon, or Yahoo. Zotero merges the best features of other citation management programs with those of popular Web 2.0 services. Zotero users can store full citation information and sort, tag, annotate, and search these citations from within the Firefox browser. Zotero can also “scrape” citations from certain Web sites, allowing users to selectively save citations into their research collection. Zotero can generate complete bibliographies in MLA, APA, and Chicago styles. The abilities to remotely store, synchronize, and share Zotero collections are under development with a planned release date in fall 2007.

This communication aims to present the various aspects and stages of a work in progress already partially available on the internet : compilation of Francke's bibliography, identification and reporting of texts already digitized on the Internet, digitization of texts that are difficult to access and dissemination and exploitation of information through a database allowing associate and link the various works of and on Francke. This communication will also be an opportunity to discuss several issues raised by the discovery of non-referenced documentation and possible developments. Questions still arise concerning the presentation of texts and their possible encoding. This work opens up various perspectives such as the creation of other tools on the works of Moravian missionaries in Western Tibet such as a base of inscriptions or songs collected, research on Tibetan newspapers published in Leh and Kyelang or on other Moravian missionaries like Jäschke, Marx or Asboe.

Reference Management tools offer an easy way of finding relevant literature, collecting references, organizing them in a database, and insert citations works in a manuscript with proper citation style. Most of the new Reference Management tools provide facility to connect with other researchers that you can’t find on other platforms. An online reference management tools provide easier collaboration and use across multiple devices and assist you to improve publication visibility and impact.

The Bibliography consists of three parts. The last of which is a word index containing those words whose etymology was discussed in 1994-1995. This is preceded by a two-part list of literature. In Part B solutions to the abbreviations used in the index are given. In Part A, however, those bibliographical items are located which are not entered into the index (chiefly monographs and largere articles, particularly those containing their own index or glossary), as well as studies devoted to one word (mentioned in their titles) or a semantic group.

In recent years, the attention of the librarian world aimed at the progress of Linked Open Data technology and Wikimedia projects has focused on Wikidata, whose infrastructure has proved to be perfectly compatible with Wikicite, an initiative that aims to build a vast database of bibliographic references in linked open data. As part of this initiative, many projects originate from collaborations between the Wikimedia Foundation and libraries: the Library of the University of Salerno also actively participated in the initiative, including the bibliographic metadata of the journal Bibliothecae.it. It is the first italian example of corpus related to a scientific periodical of bibliographicbiblioteconomical scope entirely loaded in Wikidata. The project allows the use of data in any project or program that uses the LOD technology, in order to facilitate the interchange between cultural resources and satisfy the information needs of the user. In the area of bibliography and librarianshi...

This Unit is on online citation and reference management tools. The tools discussed are Mendeley, CiteULike, Zotero, Google Scholar Library, and EndNote Basic. The features of all the management tools have been discussed with figures, tables, and text boxes. This Unit discusses in details aspects of different Online Citation and Reference Management Tools. Published in the Open Access for Researchers > Module 4: Research Evaluation Metrics > Unit 4: Online Citation and Reference Management Tools.

O artigo comunica os resultados parciais de uma pesquisa exploratória em andamento que tem por objetivo investigar o fenômeno da presença e reputação online de pesquisadores nas redes sociais acadêmicas e suas implicações para a comunicação científica. Discorre sobre os aspectos teóricos e metodológicos de sua construção e apresenta dados preliminares da presença online de 822 pesquisadores da Universidade Federal de Alagoas nas principais redes acadêmicas: AcademiaEdu, ResearchGate, Mendeley e Zotero. Os resultados indicam que 63,9% dos docentes possui perfil em ao menos uma das redes consideradas. O ResearchGate (48,2%) e a AcademiaEdu (39,3%) estão bem à frente do Mendeley (11,7%) e Zotero (0,5%). Parece haver uma predileção de pesquisadores das Ciências Exatas e da Terra pelo ResearchGate e das Ciências Sociais Aplicadas pelo AcademiaEdu. Com o crescente número de canais de comunicação online disponíveis, é essencial aos pesquisadores gerenciarem sua presença e reputação online integrando-as às suas práticas de comunicação científica. Abstract This paper reports the partial results of an exploratory research in progress that aims to investigate the phenomenon of online presence and reputation of researchers in academic social networks and its implications for scholarly communication. It discusses the theoretical and methodological aspects of its construction and presents preliminary data about the online presence of 822 researchers from the Federal University of Alagoas in the main academic networks: AcademiaEdu, ResearchGate, Mendeley and Zotero. Our results demonstrate that 63.9% of the researchers have a profile in at least one of the academic networks considered. ResearchGate (48.2%) and AcademiaEdu (39.3%) are well ahead of Mendeley (11.7%) and Zotero (0.5%). There seems to be a predilection for Exact and Earth Sciences researchers by ResearchGate and Applied Social Sciences by the AcademiaEdu. With the growing number of online communication channels available, it is essential for researchers to manage their online presence and reputation by integrating them into their scholarly communication practices.

Resumen: Una de las herramientas de mayor utilidad para investigadores y bibliotecarios son los gestores de referencias por su capacidad para recopilar, almacenar y dar formato a la información de diferentes productos, fuentes y tipos de documento. En los últimos años ha surgido una nueva generación de programas que incorporan aplicaciones del nuevo contexto tecnológico que han contribuido a reforzar sus capacidades y potencias. Se hace un análisis general de estas herramientas y sus aplicaciones, así como un estudio comparativo de los diversos productos para destacar los puntos fuertes y los aspectos mejorables de cada uno de ellos.

"With the advent of the information age and its related technologies, the terms on which knowledge is shared are changing rapidly. In France, with 2.5 million unique visitors each day and over 20 million per month in 2012, the wikipedia.fr website is undeniably becoming a reference and a major gateway to knowledge for most users. In terms of dissemination of knowledge across the planet, all Wikimedia projects now provide a communication medium of unequaled power.
Criticized by some for the quality of its information or for the way it works, it remains true that during the last ten years Wikipedia's content has improved rapidly. Therefore, any hasty condemnation of these tools should be limited, as it seems in the researcher's best interest to take full advantage of them.

Avec l'avènement de la société de l'information et des technologies associées, les modalités de partage de connaissance évoluent rapidement. En France, avec 2,5 millions de visiteurs uniques par jour et plus de 20 millions par mois en 2012, le site wikipédia.fr est indéniablement devenu une référence et une des principales portes d'entrée au savoir pour la majorité des internautes. En terme de diffusion des savoirs à l'échelle de la planète, l'ensemble des projets Wikimédia offre désormais un support de communication d'une puissance inégalée.
Décrié par certains pour la qualité de ses informations ou pour ses modalités de fonctionnement, il n'en reste pas moins vrai que depuis dix ans les contenus s'améliorent de manière accélérée. Aussi, avant toute condamnation à Parténia trop rapide de ces outils, le chercheur a-t-il certainement intérêt à les considérer dans le but d'en tirer un meilleur profit.
"

The last two decades have seen an increasing demand for not only quality research but also for publishing at a prolific rate. Accordingly, anything that helps academics write better or more quickly is very important. As a result of the pressure to " publish or perish, " there are more scholarly articles being published today than ever before. It is almost impossible for scholars to keep abreast of the growing bodies of literature, never mind keep track of all the papers. Indeed, nearly 2.5 million peer-reviewed articles were published in 2014 alone! The process of compiling the dozens of relevant articles and then manually listing and formatting their references for a journal article can consume precious time that today's academics simply do not have. To add insult to injury, when an article is rejected from a particular publication, authors often need to completely reformat their references before submitting their manuscripts to new journals. In today's hectic academic world, this work constitutes a tremendous waste of time and resources.

O artigo comunica os resultados parciais de uma pesquisa exploratória em andamento que tem por objetivo investigar o fenômeno da presença e reputação online de pesquisadores nas redes sociais acadêmicas e suas implicações para a comunicação científica. Discorre sobre os aspectos teóricos e metodológicos de sua construção e apresenta dados preliminares da presença online de 822 pesquisadores da Universidade Federal de Alagoas nas principais redes acadêmicas: AcademiaEdu, ResearchGate, Mendeley e Zotero. Os resultados indicam que 63,9% dos docentes possui perfil em ao menos uma das redes consideradas. O ResearchGate (48,2%) e a AcademiaEdu (39,3%) estão bem à frente do Mendeley (11,7%) e Zotero (0,5%). Parece haver uma predileção de pesquisadores das Ciências Exatas e da Terra pelo ResearchGate e das Ciências Sociais Aplicadas pelo AcademiaEdu. Com o crescente número de canais de comunicação online disponíveis, é essencial aos pesquisadores gerenciarem sua presença e reputação online ...

Tarih araştırmalarında fotoğraf, harita ve şekiller olarak kabul edilen resimlerin önemi büyüktür. Resimler bazen birincil kaynak olarak kabul edilir. Okuyucunun konuya daha fazla vakıf olması ve ilgi göstermesi için resimler kullanılır. Resimlerin, tarih araştırmalarında daha fazla kullanılabilmesi için görünür olmasının yanında künye bilgilerinin de elde edilebilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle kişisel resim arşivlerinin dijitalleştirilmesi, tasniflenmesi ve her resme ait olacak künye bilgilerinin eksiksiz ve doğru bir şekilde kayıt altına alınması önemlidir. Ayrıca oluşturulacak dijital arşive çevrimiçi erişimin sağlanması ve arşivde tarama yapılmasına izin verilmesi, tarih araştırmacısının resimlere ulaşım için harcayacağı zamanı oldukça kısaltacaktır. Bu araştırmamızda başta tarih alanı olmak üzere Zotero kullanarak kişisel dijital arşivin nasıl meydana getirilebileceğini inceledik. Ayrıca tarih araştırmalarında kullanılacak resimlere verilecek referansların Zotero kullanarak nasıl verilmesi gerektiğini ortaya koyduk.

Negli ultimi anni l’attenzione del mondo bibliotecario volto ai progressi della tecnologia Linked Open Data e ai progetti Wikimedia si è concentrata su Wikidata, la cui infrastruttura si è rivelata perfettamente compatibile con Wikicite, iniziativa che mira a costruire un vasto database di citazioni bibliografiche di qualità in linked open data. Nell'ambito di tale iniziativa, molti sono i progetti nati dalle collaborazioni fra la Wikimedia Foundation e le biblioteche: anche il Centro Bibliotecario di Ateneo dell’Università degli Studi di Salerno ha partecipato attivamente all’iniziativa, inserendo i metadati bibliografici della rivista Bibliothecae.it. È il primo esempio italiano e fra i primissimi al mondo di corpus relativo ad un periodico scientifico di ambito bibliografico-biblioteconomico interamente caricato in Wikidata. L’inserimento permette l'utilizzo di tali dati in qualsiasi progetto o programma che impieghi la tecnologia LOD, nell’ottica di agevolare l'interscambio fra risorse culturali e soddisfare i bisogni informativi dell’utente finale. In ambito bibliografico e biblioteconomico, tale azione rappresenta un nuovo modo di creare e condividere i dati bibliografici, di fare information retrieval e di condurre le analisi bibliometriche. Le ricadute positive del progetto riguardano sia la comunità wiki, che ha bisogno di fonti affidabili e verificate su cui basare i propri contenuti, sia la comunità scientifica: pubblicando in maniera aperta i set di citazioni si rende open access un enorme grafo di conoscenza scientifica, favorendo la divulgazione, la pubblicazione e la valutazione aperta dei risultati della ricerca.

In recent years, the attention of the librarian world aimed at the progress of Linked Open Data technology and Wikimedia projects has focused on Wikidata, whose infrastructure has proved to be perfectly compatible with Wikicite, an initiative that aims to build a vast database of bibliographic references in linked open data. As part of this initiative, many projects originate from collaborations between the Wikimedia Foundation and libraries: the Library of the University of Salerno also actively participated in the initiative, including the bibliographic metadata of the journal Bibliothecae.it. It is the first italian example of corpus related to a scientific periodical of bibliographic-biblioteconomical scope entirely loaded in Wikidata. The project allows the use of data in any project or program that uses the LOD technology, in order to facilitate the interchange between cultural resources and satisfy the information needs of the user. In the area of bibliography and librarianship, this action represents a new way of creating and sharing bibliographic data, of doing information retrieval and of conducting bibliometric analysis. The positive effects of the project concern the wiki community, which needs reliable and verified sources to base its contents, and the scientific community: by openly publishing the citations sets, an enormous graph of scientific knowledge is opened, encouraging the dissemination, publication and open evaluation of research results.