Giuseppe Martinico

This book shines a light on the still unexplored relationships between federalism and disability rights. It investigates how the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is implemented by different federal systems around the world.

It analyses the effects that the obligations undertaken under the CRPD have on federal governance and on the constitutional division of powers within 14 federal systems, including those in Germany, Canada, Brazil, India, the UK and Italy. The book also considers the trends and patterns of disability rights governance in federal systems and looks at the future developments of comparative disability federalism.

Offering a fresh view on the EU constitutionalisation process, the new edition of The Tangled Complexity of the EU Constitutional Process presents three main points: the idea of constitutional complexity, the tension between constitutional evolutionism and constitutional constructivism in the process of European integration, and the functional nature of conflicts in the evolution of the EU. Because of its prodigiousness, European law produces consternation among constitutionalists accustomed to traditional patterns of power.

This book argues that while constitutional conflicts have frequently been depicted as elements of disturbance along the path towards legal coherence, they are physiological and might even be functional to the development of the European legal order, which should not be understood in a deterministic manner. The new edition will be of particular interest to academics and students in the disciplines of law, international relations, and political science.

The new wave of populism that has emerged over the last five years in Europe and in the US urgently needs to be better understood in a comparative and historical context. Using Italy – including the experiment of a self-styled populist coalition government – as a case study, this book investigates how populists in power borrow, use and manipulate categories of constitutional theory and instruments of constitutional law. Giuseppe Martinico goes beyond treating constitutionalism and populism as purely antithetical to dive deeply into the impact of populism on the activity of some instruments of constitutional democracy, endeavoring to explore their role as possible fora of populist claims and targets of populist attacks. Most importantly, he points to ways in which constitutional democracies can channel populist claims without jeopardizing the legacy of post-World War II constitutionalism. This book is aimed at academics and practicing lawyers interested in populism and comparative constitutional law.

This volume examines the relationship between central government and local institutions, taking Italy as a case study to present a comparative perspective on how the Italian experience has influenced the global developments of federal and regional states.

As the country with the longest standing regional system, Italy has a lot to tell countries that are dealing with similar issues in present times. Adopting a theoretical/analytical approach coupled with comparative analysis, this volume critically reflects on the changes brought to the Italian system of government by the reform of Title V of the Italian constitution, the reasons why further decentralisation has been resisted and offers a comparative overview of the place and contributions that the Italian experience has brought to the global debate on regionalism and federalism. The book is divided into two parts: Part I distils the essence of the evolution of Italian regionalism and the respective debate before and after 2001. While focusing on Italy, the various chapters situate it within the global framework of discussion. Part II reflects on how the Italian regional constitutional architecture contributes to the global debate, particularly focusing on the main innovations brought about by constitutional reform.

The book will be essential reading for researchers, academics and policy-makers working in the areas of constitutional law and politics, and federalism.

What does the Belt and Road Initiative mean for the existing multilateral organisations? What can it represent for the future of the European Union in the long run? What is the role of hard and soft law in the functioning of the Initiative? What does it represent from a legal theory perspective? This book aspires to contribute to the international debate by gathering scholars with different backgrounds (legal theorists, public international lawyers, comparative lawyers) in a way that they can offer their inputs and observations concerning the Belt and Road Initiative.

This volume purports to explore the legal and political issues triggered by the new wave of secessionism. More specifically, those issues concern the interplay between notions of democracy (and democratic ends and means) and law (and the rule of law and constitutionalism). Against this background, the editors use amorality in order to escape the terrain of the justification of secession by making a distinction between the democratic theory of secession and the theory of democratic secession. In the first section, the theoretical nexus democracy-secession has been approached both from a legal and political theory perspective. The second section of the book examines the instruments that the theory of democratic secession invokes in order to justify secession and presents both legal and political science contributions. The third section focuses on social movements and political actors. The fourth section focuses on two case studies due to the awareness of the importance of the difference between secession in a democratic occidental context (which call into play the discussion of the democratic theories) and separations in a non-democratic context (where the nexus between secession and democracy is not really central). https://www.routledge.com/Between-Democracy-and-Law-The-Amorality-of-Secession/Martinico-Margiotta-Closa/p/book/9780367145804

This book aimed at describing the silent process of constitutionalization that still underpins the activity of the ECJ, and at analysing its effects. To this aim, the volume focused on the rationalizing mission that the Court has undertaken. The work is divided into seven chapters and represented the outcome of a long research period and last year, Advocate General Colomer made a reference to its pages in his conclusions on the case C-205/08, when recalling how the use of the preliminary reference “shaped the Union’s legal system”. This book has been reviewed in many national and international legal journals (Common Market Law Review, Rivista Trimestrale di diritto pubblico, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, Civitas Europa, European Journal of Law Reform).

ccording to many scholars, the rejection of the Constitutional Treaty and the disappointment caused by the contents of the Lisbon Treaty –- defined by Somek (2007) as a mere post-Constitutional Treaty – mark the failure of any possible constitutional ambition for the European Union (EU). This book aims at challenging this point both from a theoretical point of view – by describing the EU as an example of “evolutionary constitutionalism” – and a pragmatic one (i.e., looking at the functioning of concrete constitutional experiences). My idea is that the latest attempts at amending the EU treaties – the period of the “Conventions” – can be traced back to the genus of mega-constitutional politics and starting from this parallelism I argue that the so-called constitutional “failure” of the EU is actually a confirmation of the current constitutional nature of the EU rather than the proof of the impossibility of transplanting the constitutional discourse to the EU level.

Despite the rejection of the EU Constitutional Treaty eventually leading to the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty, the debates concerning the European Union’s constitutional framework continue. This book builds on the discourse in European Union constitutionalism in order to offer a novel analysis of the EU’s constitutional developments.

Giuseppe Martinico sets out a unique account of EU constitutionalism which argues that the EU legal order is a complex entity which shares some features with natural systems. The book is soundly anchored in the theory and methodology of legal science and based on a deep knowledge of judicial practices. The author contends that Europe is still suffering from the failure of the Constitutional Treaty and is practicing the new institutional equilibrium afforded by the coming into force of the Reform Treaty. The book goes on to explore the methodological implications of such constitutional complexity for the study of EU law. The Tangled Complexity of the EU Constitutional Process will be of particular interest to academics and students in the disciplines of Law, International Relations and Political Science.

This book focuses on four challenges faced by the European Court of Justice: the Reform Treaty, the enlargement, the relationship with other courts and the recent threat to security represented by the rise of the international criminal network.

The book collects the proceedings of an international conference at the Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna of Pisa (16-17 January 2010). Do national judges start treating the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights the same way they treat the EC law’s norms? In order to answer this question the editors (Giuseppe Martinico and Oreste Pollicino) involved scholars from the countries that are members both of the EU and the Council of Europe

The process of fragmentation of the international legal order and the absence of constitutional devices governing the connections between the various legal regimes can be reduced to a rational picture only through the activity of the judges. Against this background, the judges play a crucial role in creating connections between legal regimes and proceedings. The metaphor of dialogue has been vastly used by the literature and this concept was variously understood in different meanings: vehicle for transplants, informal way of communication between judicial and political bodies, new paradigm of judicial relations between actors not belonging to the same legal order. Starting from this assumption we attempted to put together scholars belonging to different fields of research (Constitutional Law, EU Law, WTO Law, Public International Law, Jurisprudence) in order to carry out a comprehensive appraisal of this phenomenon, and to provide a wide picture of the latest development of the role of the judges in the international legal order

In this contribution, I shall explore the concept of 'functional federalism' as developed by Peter Hay in his book Federalism and Supranational Organizations: Patterns for New Legal Structures, a seminal work that should be rediscovered by scholars interested in EU law.

In this article, I shall focus on the legal consequences of one of the most obvious features of populisms: identity politics. In particular, I shall explore how populists in power use constitutional law to identify and fight the alleged enemy, thus confirming their Schmittian flavour. In Schmitt, public law becomes part of a constitutional narrative that represents the people as forged by a static identity that goes back to the mythological origin of the legal system. This reconstruction is based on an organicistic reading of the concept of the people. This identitarian public law makes instrumental use of the moral argument, the historical argument and the religious argument. Populists in government tend to militarise constitutional law in many ways and in this article I will focus on two strategies: one that looks backwards, consisting of the instrumentalisation of the argument of constituent power; and one that looks forward and leverages the use of constitutional amendment.

In this essay I shall attempt to explore the relationship of law and justice in Batman, seeing how he understands law and how he relates to law. To do so, an itinerary will be proposed, looking at comics and animated series (excluding, therefore, the film versions, except for a few "raids" in Nolan's trilogy).

In this essay I shall analyse the question of dual preliminarity in five legal experiences: France, Austria, Belgium, Germany, and Spain. The priority granted to one of the two preliminary questions, as we shall see, can have different origins. In the French and Belgian cases, the priority criterion is established by the legislative formant (to be understood in a broad sense, as it can also refer to super-primary legislation), while in the Austrian, German and Spanish cases the formant to be considered is the judicial one. After clarifying what is meant by dual preliminarity and analysing the case studies I shall offer some brief final reflections on the trends offered by comparative law.

From emergency to risk in comparative public law: an introduction-This article offers a reflection on the transition from the paradigm of emergency to that of risk regulation in public law. After recalling the terms of the question (with the distinction between exception and emergency), the contribution stresses the advantages that the perspective of risk presents in order to ensure rational management of persistent threats. These considerations are particularly relevant in the light of the pandemic situation.

The paper starts its investigation from the analysis of the recent \u2013 and by now landmark \u2013 decision of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in the Kadi case. After recalling the harshly criticised outcome of the Court of First Instance decision on the same matter, the paper underlines the constitutional implications of the new, pluralistic approach adopted by the European Court of Justice. In particular, it explores the nature of the new con\ufb02ict settlement patterns which seem to emerge from the reasoning of the European Judge. Finally, after pointing out the consequences of the decision, the paper discusses a prospective new scenario of interactions between interconnected legal orders in the new season of cooperative constitutionalism in Europe

Abstract: First Chapter of the Global Administrative Law Casebook (3rd ed., 2012). The book is an attempt to analyse global administrative law through the elaboration and examination of a number of different cases and case-studies. The architecture of its contents mirrors the characteristics of this field.

Legal comparison and forms of legal production in the thought of Alessandro Pizzorusso-This paper analyses the intellectual legacy of Alessandro Pizzorusso in the national and international debate on the topic of sources of law. In doing so, it focuses on four macrothemes: the relationship between comparison and the study of sources of law; transnational law; soft law and legal hybridisation; and European constitutional law.

Canada is and will for the foreseeable future be a peaceful and prosperous liberal democracy whose Constitution Act, 1867, now 150 years old as of 2017, has become a model for the modern world. The Constitution of Canada has exerted considerable influence on other countries, particularly since the coming into force of its Constitution Act, 1982, which included the celebrated Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Just as Canada drew from foreign and international experiences in drafting its Charter, the world has learned a great deal from Canada, not only as to rights protections but also as to the separation of powers, the judicial function, and the structure of government. In light of these impressive achievements, an international symposium on the Canadian Constitution was held in Pisa at the Scuola Sant’Anna under the auspices of the Sant’Anna Legal Studies project and with the support of the DIRPOLIS (Law, Politics and Development) Institute at the Scuola Sant’Anna, the Canad...

El objetivo de este artículo es presentar las principales tendencias de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional italiano en materia de derecho de la Unión Europea (UE) y del Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos (CEDH). El artículo se divide en tres partes: la primera parte ofrece una breve panorámica de las normas constitucionales principales con referencia al derecho internacional público; la segunda está dedicada a la jurisprudencia constitucional en tema de derecho de la UE, mientras que la tercera aborda la jurisprudencia relacionada con el Convenio europeo.

This article explores the figure of John Calhoun in two movies, The Gorgeous Hussy (1936), directed by Clarence Brown, and Amistad (1997), directed by Steven Spielberg. In both these movies, John Calhoun’s character had very few but significant scenes that portrayed him as one of those having moral responsibility for the forthcoming Civil War. This representation is in line with the traditional treatment reserved for Calhoun in American history and literature. Building on these cameos in this essay I shall try to reconstruct his thoughts on two matters: States’ rights and slavery.

The debate on EU constitutionalisation is at a crossroads: if constitutionalisation is conceived as a constructivist design characterised by a written document and led by a precise and linear political will, we are forced to concede that the EU constitutional process has failed. On ...

La apertura y la resistencia son palabras clave esenciales para comprender la esencia del llamado constitucionalismo post-totalitario. De hecho, según Carrozza, hay tres puntos críticos que marcaron la evolución del constitucionalismo occidental. Primero, la distinción entre poder constituyente y poder constituido; segundo, la noción de la constitución como «ley superior», que abre la posibilidad de una revisión judicial de la legislación; tercero, la tensión entre las aspiraciones universales y las identidades nacionales / territoriales. Este artículo tratará sobre la apertura constitucional entendida como uno de los pilares del constitucionalismo post-totalitario.Recibido: 11 mayo 2019Aceptado: 21 junio 2019Publicación en línea: 31 julio 2019

Recently the German Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court) knocked on the European Union's door with its impressive judgment on the Lisbon Treaty, recalling all the weight of the German scholarship tradition steeped in the German dogmatic flavor: the attention to the history of sovereignty and the attempt to catch all the European Union constitutional system's life revealed the systemic approach peculiar to the German dogmatic scholarship.

In this work I will try to analyse the latest trends of the European integration process in light of the notion of complexity, conceived as a bilaterally active relationship between diversities.This notion of complexity comes from a comparison among the different meanings of this word as used in several disciplines (law, physics, mathematics, psychology, philosophy) and recovers the etymological sense of this concept (complexity from Latin complexus= interlaced). The effort to find a common linguistic core could cause ambiguity but I would like to take the risk because only a multidisciplinary approach can “catch” the hidden dimension of the European process I argue that the European Union legal order is a “complex” entity that shares some features with complex systems in natural sciences: non-reducibility, unpredictability, non-reversibility and non-determinability.

This article addresses the role of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in possible scenarios of EU reforms. Despite its crucial role in the EU integration process the CJEU has been neglected in many of the proposals recently suggested to reform the EU. In this piece I shall try to explore some important issues that should be taken into account when advancing reform proposals with regard to this institution.

... | Ayuda. Trade in Food: Regulatory and Judicial Approaches to Food Risks in the EC and the WTO, Alberto Alemanno (ed.). Autores: Giuseppe Martinico; Localización: Legal issues of economic integration, ISSN 1566-6573, Vol. 35, Nº 4, 2008 , pags. 393-399. ...

Colleagues have already commented upon the response of the EU institutions to the outcome of the referendum held on 23 June, stressing the rushed and populist attitude shown by the Commission and the EU Parliament, referring, for instance, to the exclusion of the UK from the " informal " meeting of the European Council held on 29 June and to the way in which Juncker made a joke of Nigel Farage , asking why he was in the European Parliament after the UK vote. However, there is another episode which is very telling, about the respect shown by the " political class " towards Art. 50 of the TEU and, in general, other relevant norms to be taken into account independently from the activation of the exit procedure, like, for instance Art. 4.2 TEU demanding equal treatment of the Members States and respect of their national identity and constitutional structure. On 28 June 2016, the European Parliament adopted a short resolution on the consequences of the UK referendum held on 23 June. There is a passage which is based on an evident mistake therein: " …Warns that in order to prevent damaging uncertainty for everyone and to protect the Union's integrity, the notification stipulated in Article 50 TEU must take place as soon as possible; expects the UK Prime Minister to notify the outcome of the referendum to the European Council of 28-29 June 2016; this notification will launch the withdrawal procedure. " As Elliott pointed out this is deeply wrong. The notification will be (if carried out) represented by a further act, whose form is still unclear as the debate among our British colleagues and experts in Constitutional law demonstrates (is it a prerogative of the Prime Minister, will a vote of the Westminster Parliament be necessary? Is it a decision for the Government but under parliamentary scrutiny? Could Scotland pose a veto on that?). One could correct me by saying that de facto the UK has already made its choice, that the EU has the right to protect itself against what is sometimes perceived as a sort of tactical delay. It would not be a mistake then, but simply a linguistic choice of the EP which leaves no margin to the UK. A confirmation of this could be found in the EP resolution itself reporting that EP " will enact changes in its internal organisation to reflect the will of a majority of the citizens of the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union ". What does this mean? Are these lines referring to the possibility of removing UK Members of the EP from some senior roles (for instance chairmanship of committees)? And above all, is this, technically speaking, legal? In spite of the fact that from a formal point of view the UK referendum is not binding, in spite of the fact that the UK has not activated the procedure ex Art. 50 TEU and that the supranational institution may not oblige the UK to launch it, almost everybody is sure that the exit will almost certainly happen. Of course, from a political point of view it is quite clear that the chances of the UK remaining in the EU are quite low, especially for the political meaning of the vote expressed on 23 June. At the same time, in my capacity as a professor of law, I still think that this scenario is quite deplorable and also emblematic of a certain understanding of law. Against this background, law is represented as the mere

To curate this symposium on a recent piece of Professor Paolo Carrozza is a pleasure and a challenge. Professor Carrozza’s thinking is dense with suggestions: it is not a coincidence that it took us more than 100 pages to comment his 20-page article. Like holy texts and badly drafted law, his writing elicits endless commentary.

Besides being an exquisite thinker and an academic titan, Professor Carrozza is an amiable friend and a loyal mentor to us all. The colleagues and friends who joined this symposium have worked with Professor Carrozza, and we owe him a great deal of learning. This is a motley crew: the authors include comparative constitutional lawyers, public international lawyers, European Union lawyers, and several other subdivisions not worth listing. This is not a coincidence: the variety of our backgrounds (foregrounds?) is a confirmation of the extraordinary curiosity, intelligence, leadership and eclectic nature of our mentor, who guided us especially in the early years of our education, encouraging us to explore areas going beyond his vast comfort zone (not to mention ours).

This special issue of Perspectives on Federalism offers a multidisciplinary collection of pieces dealing with some (selected) issues in the field of citizenship studies.
In order to investigate how citizenship has been reconceived over the years, we decided to propose a multidisciplinary itinerary where scholars interested in political and legal theory, EU, international and constitutional law produced a contribution to defining the new boundaries of this concept.

This special issue of the journal is entirely devoted to subnational constitutionalism. To do so, it tries to adopt a comparative and interdisciplinary perspective and to identify constitutional patterns in those federal or regional contexts where subnational polities do not have a legal document formally called “constitution”. Some contributions have a national focus (on Belgium, Spain, Germany, Argentina, Ethiopia, and Macao). Other pieces, instead, consider the phenomenon from a comparative perspective, focusing on the external relations of subnational polities, the distinctive aspects of legislatures and legislative power at this institutional level, and the role of ordinary and constitutional judges.

This special issue is the result of a long project started within the activity of one of the working groups created at the Centre for Studies on Federalism, Turin, almost three years ago,
namely the working group on “the EU and its institutional reforms”
chaired by Prof. Antonio Padoa Schioppa, Emeritus Professor of Law at the University of Milan and former President of the Centre for Studies on Federalism.

VIDEO AL SEGUENTE LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmOpu_bB1jg&t=480s

Coordina
Nicola Lupo
(Università LUISS Guido Carli)
Relatori
Leonardo Pierdominici
(Università di Bologna
Francesca Martines
(Università di Pisa)
Oreste Pollicino
(Università commerciale Luigi Bocconi)
Giuseppe Martinico
(Scuola Sant’Anna)

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yOaK7Zz_D4&t=645s

And the winner is… Un commento ai risultati delle presidenziali americane del 2020

webinar STALS del 6.11.2020. Relatori: Guerino D'Ignazio e Angioletta Sperti. Coordina Giuseppe Martinico

THE FULL VIDEO IS AVAILABLE HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCeBhJRPb24&t=899s

Chair
Pasquale Annicchino
(Central European University and FBK)
Speakers
Susanna Mancini
(University of Bologna)
Pierluigi Consorti
(University of Pisa)
Marie-Claire Foblets
(Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology)
Marco Ventura
(University of Siena and FBK)
Giuseppe Martinico
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa)

S. Mancini (ed.), Constitutions and Religion, Edward Elgar, 2020, https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/constitutions-and-religion-9781786439284.html

Il link al video è disponibile al seguente URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmvnLO2jaUY&t=132s

l sistema costituzionale dopo Trump. Una riflessione a partire da un recente volume

12 marzo 2021,



Giuseppe Franco Ferrari
(Università commerciale L Bocconi)
Elisabetta Grande
(Università del Piemonte Orientale)
Leonardo Morlino
(LUISS Guido Carli)
Roberto Toniatti
(Università di Trento)

G. D'Ignazio (a cura di), Il sistema costituzionale degli Stati Uniti d'America, Padova, CEDAM, 2020, https://shop.wki.it/libri/il-sistema-costituzionale-degli-stati-uniti-d-america-s732346/

THE FULL VIDEO IS AVAILABLE AT THE FOLLOWING LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cb6KLHXrFtM&t=349s

EU CRISES AND POST-BREXIT INTEGRATION (CROSSROADS)
12 April 2021, 16-18 Round Table. Brexit and the British Constitution
J. Frosini (Bocconi/Johns Hopkins) & G. Baldini (Univ. Bologna). Chair: E.Bressanelli (Scuola Sant’Anna)

THE FULL VIDEO IS AVAILABLE AT THE FOLLOWING LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kEg_U13Y2Q&t=7s

EU CRISES AND POST-BREXIT INTEGRATION (CROSSROADS)
14 April 2021, Round Table. Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the EU
D. Kochenov (CEU Democracy Institute, Budapest, CEU
Department of Legal Studies, Vienna)- C. Closa (CSIC, Madrid) Chair: G. Martinico (Scuola Sant’Anna)

THE FULL VIDEO IS AVAILABLE AT THE FOLLOWING LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKzNsgRYBZE&t=10s

EU CRISES AND POST-BREXIT INTEGRATION (CROSSROADS)
13 April 2021, Round Table. The EU and Brexit
B. Laffan (EUI) & T. Christiansen (LUISS). Chair: E. Bressanelli (Scuola Sant’Anna)

LINK TO THE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KU-uWTbKtmo&t=525s

Speakers

Matej Avbelj (New University, Ljubljana)

Giacomo Delledonne (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa)

Cristina Fasone (LUISS Guido Carli, Rome)

Jernej Letnar Černič (New University, Ljubljana)

Giuseppe Martinico (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa)

Discussants

Paul Blokker (University of Bologna)

Roberto Castaldi (CesUE, EURACTIV Italia)

Armen Mazmanyan (American University of Armenia)

Giacomo Delledonne, Giuseppe Martinico, Matteo Monti, Fabio Pacini (eds.), Italian Populism and Constitutional Law. Strategies, Conflicts and Dilemmas, Palgrave, 2020, https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783030374006

Matej Avbelj, Jernej Letnar Černič, The Impact of European Institutions on the Rule of Law and Democracy. Slovenia and Beyond, Hart, 2020, https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/the-impact-of-european-institutions-on-the-rule-of-law-and-democracy-9781509915057/

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-07teD62sa8&t=596s

Coordina
Marta Simoncini
(Luiss “Guido Carli”)
Intervengono
Marco Bassini
(Università commerciale "L. Bocconi")
Matteo Monti
(Università di Pisa)
Fabio Pacini
(Università degli Studi della Tuscia)

M. Bassini, Internet e libertà di espressione. Prospettive costituzionali e sovranazionali, 2019, http://www.aracneeditrice.it/aracneweb/index.php/pubblicazione.html?item=9788825529180

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddpRhmTut9U&t=864s

Chassidismo e giustizia. Un dialogo multidisciplinare a partire da «L’uomo abitato da Dio» di Giancarlo Anello
Coordina
Chiara Lapi
(Università di Pisa)
Intervengono
Giancarlo Anello
(Università degli Studi di Parma)
Edoardo Chiti
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna/Università degli Studi della Tuscia)
Paolo Zanini
(Università degli Studi di Milano Statale)

G. Anello, L' uomo abitato da Dio. Chassidismo e giustizia, 2020, https://www.libreriauniversitaria.it/uomo-abitato-dio-chassidismo-giustizia/libro/9788869832673

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uFEoqo7NOA&t=429s

"Brexit: dalla sovranità del parlamento alla sovranità del popolo?"
12 maggio 2021, 11:00- 13:00
Intervengono
Justin O. Frosini
(Università Bocconi/Johns Hopkins)
Alessandro Torre
(Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro)
Elettra Stradella
(Università di Pisa)
Giuseppe Martinico
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)

Libro: J.O.Frosini, Dalla Sovranità del Parlamento alla Sovranità del Popolo. La rivoluzione costituzionale della Brexit, Cedam, Padova, 2020, https://shop.wki.it/libri/dalla-sovranita-del-parlamento-alla-sovranita-del-popolo-s731479/

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuzN3TwX7MY&t=53s

Intervengono

Paul Blokker
(Università di Bologna)
Luca Diotallevi
(Università Roma Tre)
Laura Guercio
(Università di Perugia)
Giuseppe Martinico
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)

P. Blokker, L. Guercio, Sociologia dei diritti umani, Mondadori, 2020,  https://www.mondadoristore.it/Sociologia-dei-diritti-umani-Laura-Guercio-Paul-Blokker/eai978886184790/

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHnDDt73Jr0&t=22s

Federalismo fiscale e responsabilizzazione politico-finanziaria

24 marzo 2021, 10:30-12:00
Coordina
Giuseppe Martinico
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Intervengono
Alice Valdesalici
(EURAC)
Luca Gori
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)

Alice Valdesalici, Federalismo fiscale e responsabilizzazione politico finanziaria. Comparazione giuridica ed esercizi di misurazione del diritto, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 2018, https://www.edizioniesi.it/pubblicazioni/libri/diritto_storia_filosofia_e_teoria_del_diritto_-_1/diritto_costituzionale_giustizia_costituzionale_e_diritto_pubblico_-_1_-_07/federalismo-fiscale-e-responsabilizzazione-politico-finanziaria.html?fbclid=IwAR2u3eJRUmj4AaUexy9mcHBg9GyoniNygA6NcI4bABftmepoUE94ESNAPgw

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqQX3epym7E&t=74s

Democrazia e disinformazione. Una conversazione a partire da due recenti volumi, 17 maggio 2021 (11:00-13:00)

Coordina
Giuseppe Martinico
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Intervengono
Alberto Mario Banti
(Università di Pisa)
Serena Giusti
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Elisa Piras
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)

A. M. Banti, La democrazia dei followers. Neoliberismo e cultura di massa; Laterza, Roma-Bari, 2020,https://www.laterza.it/scheda-libro/?isbn=9788858142431

S. Giusti-E. Piras (eds.), Democracy and Fake News. Information Manipulation and Post-Truth Politics, Routledge, Abingdon, 2020,
open access. https://www.routledge.com/Democracy-and-Fake-News-Information-Manipulation-and-Post-Truth-Politics/Giusti-Piras/p/book/9780367479541#sup

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUrWkdkPz2o

La democrazia partecipativa negli ordinamenti composti
18 giugno 2021

Coordina
Giuseppe Martinico
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)

Intervengono
Martina Trettel (EURAC)

Emiliano Frediani (Università di Pisa)

Martina Trettel, La democrazia partecipativa negli ordinamenti composti: studio di diritto comparato sull'incidenza della tradizione giuridica nelle democratic innovations, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, Napoli, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUrWkdkPz2o

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouAQnUurj7U&t=1519s

Introduce e coordina
Emanuele Rossi
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Relatori
Sergio Bartole
(Università degli studi di Trieste)
Josep Maria Castellà Andreu
(Universitat de Barcelona /Commissione di Venezia)
Lorenza Violini
(Università degli Studi di Milano Statale)

S. Bartole, The Internationalisation of Constitutional Law
A View from the Venice Commission, Hart, Oxford, 2020, https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/the-internationalisation-of-constitutional-law-9781509941476/

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQKLOBXI-SY&t=321s

La condanna di una pena. I percorsi verso l’abolizione della pena di morte, 18 maggio 2021, 17:00-18:30,

Coordina
Giuseppe Martinico
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Intervengono
Paolo Passaglia
(Università di Pisa)
Alberto di Martino
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Laura Montanari
(Università degli studi di Udine)

Paolo Passaglia, La condanna di una pena. I percorsi verso l'abolizione della pena di morte, Olschki, Firenze, 2021, https://www.olschki.it/libro/9788822267238

LINK TO THE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ru_gA1yCm2U&t=2708s

China and the WTO: Why Multilateralism Still Matters

16 June 2021. 17:00-19:00 (CET)

Chair
Filippo Fontanelli
(University of Edinburgh)
Speakers
Petros C. Mavroidis
(Columbia Law School)
Bernard Hoekman
(European University Institute)
Douglas Nelson
(Tulane University)
Julia Qin
(Wayne State University)
Luca Rubini
(University of Birmingham)
Ka Zeng
(University of Arkansas)

Petros C. Mavroidis, Andre Sapir, "China and the WTO: Why Multilateralism Still Matters", Princeton University Press, 2021, https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691206592/china-and-the-wto

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_PnLzjcYgA&t=13s

Presiede e introduce
Emanuele Rossi
Intervengono
Giorgio Resta, Orlando Roselli, Edoardo Chiti, Giuseppe Martinico e Caterina Sganga

Giorgio Resta (a cura di), L’armonia nel diritto. Contributi a una riflessione su diritto e musica, ROMATRE-PRESS, 2020, http://romatrepress.uniroma3.it/libro/larmonia-nel-diritto-contributi-a-una-riflessione-su-diritto-e-musica/

Orlando Roselli (a cura di) Le arti e la dimensione giuridica, Il Mulino, 2020,  https://www.mulino.it/isbn/9788815290366

LINK AL VIDEO:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0z-GRnwhRlY&t=137s


Etica per le istituzioni. Un lessico. Riflessioni su un recente volume
21 giugno 2021, 17:00-18:30


Coordina
Giuseppe Martinico
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Intervengono
Francesco Merloni
(Università degli Studi di Perugia)
Alberto Pirni
( Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Roberta Sala
(Università Vita Salute San Raffaele)

Francesco Merloni, Alberto Pirni, Etica per le istituzioni. Un lessico. Prefazione di Raffaele Cantone. Saggi. Storia e scienze sociali, Donzelli, 2021, https://www.donzelli.it/libro/9788855221337

LINK TO THE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMTJMv5bTak&t=371s

Gender Constitutionalism and National Identity. Reflections from Asia
29 June 2021, 12:00-13:30
In cooperation with ELaN (European Law and Gender) https://elan.jus.unipi.it/



Chair
Giuseppe Martinico
(Scuola Sant’Anna)
Speaker
Mara Malagodi (Chinese University of Hong Kong)

LINK AL VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyvmvIwZyoQ&t=545s

Il Regno Unito alla prova della Brexit. Riflessioni su un recente volume


20 luglio 2021, 09:00-10:30
Presiede
Marta Simoncini
(Luiss “Guido Carli")
Intervengono
Gianfranco Baldini
(Università degli Studi di Bologna)
Edoardo Bressanelli
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
David Natali
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)
Francesca Rosa
(Università di Foggia)

G: Baldini, E. Bressanelli, E. Massetti, Il Regno Unito alla prova della Brexit, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2021, https://www.mulino.it/isbn/9788815292780

LINK TO THE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PJmPohkX0U&t=301s

CHAIR
GIUSEPPE MARTINICO (SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT'ANNA, PISA)
SPEAKERS
MARCO GOLDONI (UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW)
MARIANO CROCE (UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA "LA SAPIENZA")
EDITORS OF THE BOOK SERIES “LAW AND POLITICS: CONTINENTAL PERSPECTIVES”
(ROUTLEDGE: HTTPS://WWW.ROUTLEDGE.COM/LAW-AND-POLITICS/BOOK-SERIES/LPCP)
DISCUSSANTS
LARS VINX (UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE)
GIOVANNI MARINI (UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PERUGIA)
CESARE PINELLI (UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA "LA SAPIENZA")
FINAL REMARKS
ALESSANDRA DI MARTINO (UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA “LA SAPIENZA”

LINK TO THE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxBGVXCR2fw&t=1900s

Chair
Raffaele Torino
(Università Roma Tre)
Speakers
Miguel Poiares Maduro
(School of Transnational Governance, EUI)
Antonia Baraggia
(State University of Milan)
Joelle Grogan
(Middlesex University London)
András Jakab
(University of Salzburg)
Giuseppe Martinico
(Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa)

On 4 April 2019 there will be a joint event coorganised by STALS and the University of Padova on “European Courts and Legal Reasoning” with many outstanding speakers, among others Andras Jakab, Arthur Dyevre, Giulio Itzcovich, Cristina Dallara, Costanza Margiotta, Damiano Canale, Joxerramon Bengoetxea, Eleanor Spaventa, Justin Frosini, Sara Pennicino, Giovanni Sartor.

An International Conference on "Political Constitutionalism and Constitutional Populism: What Do They Share" will be held at the Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies on 20 September 2019. The organizer is Prof. Giuseppe Martinico. The initiative is possible thanks to the support of the Jean Monnet Program. Join us in Pisa. Here the program

A conference on "TOWARDS A NEW SILK ROAD?
A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE " will be held at the Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies on 24 May 2019. The organizer is Prof. Giuseppe Martinico. The initiative is possible thanks to the support of the Confucius Institute of Pisa. Join us in Pisa. Here the program http://stals.sssup.it/files/confucio%20progamma.pdf