- YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE RESTORATION DEPARTMEN, 34349, Yıldız Istanbul TURKEY
zeynep gül ünal
Yildiz Technical University, Architecture/Restoration Unit, Faculty Member
- Disaster Risk Management on Cultural Heritageedit
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
PurposeThe destruction of armed confrontations – ranging from chronic armed conflicts to full-scale wars – leads to enormous loss of human lives and causes wide-scale devastation. They also leave deep and lasting traumas in the minds of... more
PurposeThe destruction of armed confrontations – ranging from chronic armed conflicts to full-scale wars – leads to enormous loss of human lives and causes wide-scale devastation. They also leave deep and lasting traumas in the minds of those whose lives are torn apart because of a conflict. Memorialisation of conflict-affected sites plays an invaluable part in post-trauma recovery and can contribute to the reconciliation of different groups involved in a conflict as these sites are representatives of communities' collective memory, identity and a source of unity and resilience. This paper aims to investigate post-trauma recovery and reconciliation processes through the phenomena of memorialisation. It aims to answer how and if the memorialisation of sites of pain can contribute to the recovery and reconciliation of affected communities and serve as examples for other people around the world.Design/methodology/approachThe documentation of such processes and the lessons learnt ca...
Research Interests:
Struck Cities and Choice of Humanity: “Collective Despair” or “Collective Struggle” By Zeynep Gül Ünal As the Russia-Ukraine war proceeds with all its violence, it is critical to think about gaining control over cities’ destruction and... more
Struck Cities and Choice of Humanity: “Collective Despair” or
“Collective Struggle”
By Zeynep Gül Ünal
As the Russia-Ukraine war proceeds with all its violence, it is critical to think about gaining control over cities’ destruction and reversing the cities into the boundaries of safe venues. The author highlights that the continuity can be sustained only if the script of “struck
cities” is changed.
“Collective Struggle”
By Zeynep Gül Ünal
As the Russia-Ukraine war proceeds with all its violence, it is critical to think about gaining control over cities’ destruction and reversing the cities into the boundaries of safe venues. The author highlights that the continuity can be sustained only if the script of “struck
cities” is changed.
Research Interests:
Turkey is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in Europe. In the past, many destructive earthquakes occurred in Turkey, in which numerous historical structures were damaged seriously or even collapsed. In spite of the high seismic... more
Turkey is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in Europe. In the past, many destructive earthquakes occurred in Turkey, in which numerous historical structures were damaged seriously or even collapsed. In spite of the high seismic hazard in Turkey, unfortunately there exists no technical document regarding the seismic assessment and rehabilitation of historical structures. Considering this issue, efforts to prepare an advisory guideline document for architects and engineers regarding seismic risk assessment and strengthening of historical structures in Turkey were initiated. The guideline document under preparation is intended to follow the principles of the Venice Charter and the ICOMOS Guidelines. The guideline will be composed of different sections including the ways to collect data about the building, the selection of appropriate non-destructive or semi-destructive techniques, assessment of the existing building damage, the structural modeling strategies and types of inter...
Research Interests:
Turkey is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in Europe. In the past, many destructive earthquakes occurred in Turkey, in which numerous historical structures were damaged seriously or even collapsed. In spite of the high seismic... more
Turkey is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in Europe. In the past, many destructive earthquakes occurred in Turkey, in which numerous historical structures were damaged seriously or even collapsed. In spite of the high seismic hazard in Turkey, unfortunately there exists no technical document regarding the seismic assessment and rehabilitation of historical structures. Considering this issue, efforts to prepare an advisory guideline document for architects and engineers regarding seismic risk assessment and strengthening of historical structures in Turkey were initiated. The guideline document under preparation is intended to follow the principles of the Venice Charter and the ICOMOS Guidelines. The guideline will be composed of different sections including the ways to collect data about the building, the selection of appropriate non-destructive or semi-destructive techniques, assessment of the existing building damage, the structural modeling strategies and types of inter...
Research Interests:
With its city walls which reached until today, Serapis temple, shipyard, port, madrasa, tomb, fountain and various architecture structures, Sinop includes many historical values. In early periods it was conquered by different states as it... more
With its city walls which reached until today, Serapis temple, shipyard, port, madrasa, tomb, fountain and various architecture structures, Sinop includes many historical values. In early periods it was conquered by different states as it was an international port and trading city. Therefore it is an important data that structures from different periods and with different functions can be found in the lower layers of the ground. With the Sinop Balatlar Church excavation initiated by Prof. Dr. Gulgun Koroglu in Sinop in 15th of July 2010, with the permission of ministry of culture and tourism and cabinet, the aim is to reach those values. In excavation regions which are urban archeological areas, thesis study named “Sinop Balatlar Construction Group Analytical Resolution and Protection Methods” was conducted in direction of wholistic protection and synchronized archeological excavation‐protection approach. The structure group known as Balatlar Church or Mitridates Palace in literature with history back to Late Roman – Early Byzantium period is located in Sinop city center, Ada neighbourhood, 24 section, 251 map section, 2 parcel and one of the most important ruins within the city. This structure group which is spread to a very wide area, is partially within new accomodation today due to city development and its physical integrity is interrupted. Excavation studies starting in July 2010, the previous studies being few and most of the structure group being ruinous, the singular functions of the structures have not been properly defined yet. Balatlar structure group is considered to be “gymnasium‐Roman bath”. Depending on the changes of accomodation starting from 3.century until 20.century, different functions were attributed to the structure group which is examined under the scope of this study. In the first part of the study, literature abstract, aim of the thesis and hypothesis was explained. In the second part, the history and geographical location of Sinop was investigated and the cult and beliefs and important structures that effect physical locality formation was researched. In the third section, the place and importance of Balatlar structure group in history was explained and then gymnasium‐bath structures were examined in direction of unique function of the structure group. The water heating systems of bath structures and classification of bath structures were explained. In addition, the legend which I determined to form the spatial‐functional analysis of the Roman bath structure groups in the world was used to finalize the study. After that the evaluation of analytical relief in context of analysis was made, restitution trial studies were made and evaluation of nearby cistern structure and other ruined walls was concluded. In fourth and last section, the study made so far was synthesized and the general approach for protection of archeological area and preventive precautions to be taken for especially Balatlar structure group were introduced. Özet Günümüze kadar ulaşmış olan kent surları, Serapis tapınağı, tersane, liman, medrese, cami, türbe, çeşme ve mimari yapılar ile Sinop birçok tarihi değeri barındırmaktadır. Erken dönemlerde uluslararası liman ve ticaret kenti olması sebebiyle farklı devletler tarafından birçok kez alınmıştır. Bu yüzden toprağın alt katmanlarında farklı dönemlere ait farklı işlevlere sahip yapıların burada yer alması durumu önemli bir veridir. Bakanlar Kurulu ve Kültür‐Turizm Bakanlığının izinleriyle 15 Temmuz 2010 yılında Prof. Dr. Gülgün Köroğlu tarafından Sinop’ta başlatılmış olan “Sinop Balatlar Kilisesi Kazısı” ile bu değerlere ulaşılabilmeye çalışılmaktadır. Kentsel arkeolojik alan olan kazı çalışmasının sürdürüldüğü bölgede “bütüncül koruma” yaklaşımı doğrultusunda eş zamanlı arkeolojik kazı‐koruma yaklaşımı ile “Sinop Balatlar Yapı Topluluğu Analitik Çözümlemesi ve Koruma Yöntemleri” adlı tez çalışması sürdürülmüştür. Sinop il merkezinde, Ada Mahallesi, 24 pafta, 251 ada, 2 parselde bulunan ve literatürde ‘Balatlar Kilisesi’ ya da ‘Mitridates Sarayı’ olarak bilinen Geç Roma‐Erken Bizans dönemlerine tarihlenen yapılar topluluğu, kent içinde yer alan en önemli kalıntılardan biridir. Oldukça geniş bir alana yayılan bu yapı topluluğu, kentin gelişmesiyle kısmen yeni yerleşim içinde kalarak fiziksel bütünlüğü kesintiye uğramıştır. Kazı çalışmalarının Temmuz 2010’da başlaması, daha önce yapılmış araştırmaların azlığı henüz tam olarak tanımlanamamıştır. Balatlar Yapı Topluluğunun özgün halinde “gymnasium‐roma hamamı” olduğu düşünülmektedir. 3. yy.dan 20. yüzyıla ulaşana kadar yerleşimin geçirdiği değişikliklere bağlı olarak farklı işlevler verilen yapı topluluğu bu çalışma kapsamında ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın birinci bölümünde, literatür özeti, tezin amacı ve hipotez açıklanmıştır. İkinci bölümde, Sinop’un tarihi ve coğrafi konumu araştırılarak, buradaki kült ve inanışlar, fizik mekan oluşumunu etkileyen önemli yapılar anlatılmıştır. Üçüncü bölümde ise, Balatlar Yapı…
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Abstract Al-Khalil, also known as Hebron, is a settlement hosting different belief groups. Al-Haram Al-Ibrahimi or Abraham's Tomb or Tombs of the Patriarchs, names of the same historic sacred site, is the focal point of this... more
Abstract Al-Khalil, also known as Hebron, is a settlement hosting different belief groups. Al-Haram Al-Ibrahimi or Abraham's Tomb or Tombs of the Patriarchs, names of the same historic sacred site, is the focal point of this settlement. Since this site represents the identity of different belief groups, this condition has indeed initiated conservation problems. In particular, the research puts forward main problems related with the mutually worshipped and used pattern of Al-Haram Al-Ibrahimi/Tombs of the Patriarchs. It further seeks to discuss alternative ways of its structure-oriented conservation. Al-Haram Al-Ibrahimi/Tombs of the Patriarchs is considered to be a holy site located in Al-Khalil/Hebron. Its history dating back to the Middle Bronze Age, Al-Haram Al-Ibrahimi/Tombs of the Patriarchs witnessed Roman, Byzantine, Umayyad, Ayyubid, Mamluk and Ottoman periods, respectively. Above the tombs of Ibrahim/Abraham as well as his prophets and their wives who have religious significance in Islam, Christianity and Judaism; at some point in the Islamic period, a mosque was added and this sacred complex was transformed over time by different civilizations. After the establishment of the Israeli state in 1948, the conditions changed for using Al-Haram Al-Ibrahimi/Tombs of the Patriarchs. Due to the tensions between Israel and Palestine, the building complex, according to the Hebron Protocol, was divided into two to host Jews and Muslims in 1997. This condition created some problems for the sacred site in terms of its sustainable conservation. Since this kind of a division creates difficulties in studying within the section of the “other” belief group, surveying the building complex as a whole, which is the initial stage of conservation process, is prevented. Thereby, the holistic approach of conservation cannot be applied for this building. Within this context, this research aims to discuss possible solutions for the protection and risk management of Al-Haram Al-Ibrahimi/Tombs of the Patriarchs, as well as evaluate the role of international organization related with heritage conservation.
Research Interests:
As the Russia-Ukraine battle proceeds with all its violence, it is critical to think about gaining control over cities’ destruction and reversing the cities into the boundaries of safe venues. The author highlights that the continuity can... more
As the Russia-Ukraine battle proceeds with all its violence, it is critical to think about gaining control over cities’ destruction and reversing the cities into the boundaries of safe venues. The author highlights that the continuity can be sustained only if the script of “struck cities” is changed.
Research Interests:
This study aims to define mass forced migration resulting from human induced disasters such as war and armed conflict in the past 25 years of the turn of the 21st century; along with the arising problems pertaining to the conservation of... more
This study aims to define mass forced migration resulting from human induced disasters such as war and armed conflict in the past 25 years of the turn of the 21st century; along with the arising problems pertaining to the conservation of tangible and intangible cultural heritage that is associated with its users. Furthermore, the study aims to propose solutions via an established methodology. The working bodies of the United Nations demonstrate that the number of people who have had to migrate due to human-induced or natural disasters in recent times is constantly fluctuating, and every 20 minutes 1 person is displaced according to the data from 2017. According to the 2016 Global Trend Study of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the number of people who migrated across the world due to security concerns reached 65.5 million by the end of 2016. According to the Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction (GAR-Global Assessment Report) prepared by the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), between 2008 and 2012: 120 million people were displaced due to disasters related to the weather (climate related, hydrological, meteorological) and 24 million people were displaced due to geophysical happenings (earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanos). International organizations working on the elimination of the effects of war and armed-conflict, assess the intensity of the conflict based on its physical and human impact. While the physical effects of war or conflict are defined in terms of human resources, infrastructure, housing, the economy and cultural values; the human impact is defined in terms of the number of affected, injured, lost, harmed and displaced people along with refugees . The forced mass migration that these disasters indirectly lead to, accelerates the loss of both tangible and intangible cultural heritage. The significant increases in the frequency and magnitude of disasters occurring at the turn of the 21st century, are severely damaging cultural heritage. The significance of protecting the heritage sites physically along with their users, comes to the forefront once again with the migrations resulting from disasters. Research indicates that migration is as old as human history and it progressed in proportion to technological developments and escalated with the industrial revolution. Especially in the 1990s, the globalization movement rapidly increased the speed and capacities of information and communication technologies and thus impacted events all over the world. Moreover, this situation changed the way disaster management was perceived and approached. The process evaluated within the scope of this study encompasses the national and international forced mass migrations resulting from human induced disasters in the 21st century, within the context of current protection issues. The mitigation of all negative situations caused by human induced disasters can only be possible with the protection of cultural heritage, disaster risk mitigation studies with a holistic approach, and proper risk management. In situations of war and armed-conflict, cultural heritage is damaged both by selective / targeted destruction and by general destruction (historical environment). Thirdly, the fact that legal procedures do not function due to the conflict, leads to the escalation of illegal excavations and the smuggling of antiquities. Moreover, it is one of the most salient risks that damages tangible and intangible cultural heritage in the event of forced mass migration due to major disasters such as war, armed-conflict and internal turmoil. In the case of forced mass migration due to disasters in historical settlements, it is not merely a case of people migrating but due to this migration the rites, rituals, traditional productions associated with the space and the cultural values related to the space are also abandoned. Some of the losses in disasters occur immediately and some occur after a certain amount of time. When the physical spaces that constitute the tangible cultural heritage are protected together with the original user, then the intangible cultural heritage is also indirectly preserved. The proper management of the crisis situation that emerged with disasters, the planning of return, the trainings to be provided to migrants and other implementations are discussed in the thesis in line with the protection of tangible and intangible cultural heritage in its place of origin and flourishing. Intangible cultural heritage has a cultural and social value for society. Trying to protect these values in the aftermath of the disaster will make it easier for the disaster victims to overcome the trauma they have experienced. The protection of monumental structures of the area, elements of civil architecture, and local productions in the workshops during and after the disaster, facilitate the return process of societies to daily life after the disaster and also help…
Research Interests:
Anitsal yapilar insa edildikleri donemin sosyo kulturel ve ekonomik yapisini, zaman-mekan cizgisi icinde yansitan simgesel eserlerdir. Bu nedenle de anitsal nitelik tasiyan mimari eserler insa edildikleri donemden itibaren fizik yapilari... more
Anitsal yapilar insa edildikleri donemin sosyo kulturel ve ekonomik yapisini, zaman-mekan cizgisi icinde yansitan simgesel eserlerdir. Bu nedenle de anitsal nitelik tasiyan mimari eserler insa edildikleri donemden itibaren fizik yapilari uzerinden okunabilen izler yoluyla bize toplumun gelisim ve degisimi hakkinda somut veriler sunarlar. Tarih oncesi caglardan itibaren Anadolu’da pek cok kultur ve medeniyete ev sahipligi yapmis Gaziantep kentinde yer alan ve kentin ozellikle 19. Yuzyildaki yapilanmasinda onemli bir yeri olan Kendirli (Terra Santa) Kilisesi ve Latin Okulu (Saint Joseph Okulu) yapildigi donemin ozelliklerini gosteren, var oldugu cevrede yasanan toplumsal olaylari gunumuze aktaran onemli anitsal yapilar olarak kent dokusu icinde degismez bir oneme sahiptir. Bu bildiride, soz konusu anitsal yapilarin olusturdugu mimari kompleksin koruma sorunlari ve surdurulebilir korumasinin saglanabilmesi icin gerekli verilerin derlenerek degerlendirildigi bir calisma hedeflenmistir. ...
Research Interests:
Afetlerin hemen sonrasında “0. saniye” olarak anılan “olayın oluş anı”ndan itibaren acil müdahale ekiplerinin dışında sahada gerçekleştirilen çalışmalarda bilimsel verileri derleyecek uzmanların da yer almasının en önemli getirilerinden... more
Afetlerin hemen sonrasında “0. saniye”
olarak anılan “olayın oluş anı”ndan
itibaren acil müdahale ekiplerinin dışında
sahada gerçekleştirilen çalışmalarda
bilimsel verileri derleyecek uzmanların
da yer almasının en önemli getirilerinden
biri sebep sonuç ilişkisi üzerinden afete
dönüşen bir doğa olayının anatomisini
çıkarabilmek ve sonrasında bu bilgiyi
zarar azaltma ve hazırlık aşamalarına
taşıyabilmek.
Kentlerin sürdürülebilir korunma ve
kalkınması konusunda çalışan meslek
insanları için afet risklerinin yönetiminde
ana odak ve öncelik, hazırlık ve zarar
azaltma evreleri için olsa da meydana
İ gelen olayların acil müdahale evresinde;
yapıların ve çevrenin daha fazla hasar
almasını önleyecek ilk müdahalenin
yapılması, hasarın ve oluş sebebine
ilişkin bilimsel verilerin hasarın delilleri
yok olmadan toplanması ve kurumsal
kapasitesi afet dolaysıyla kesintiye
uğrayan kurumlara sahada destek
sağlanması gibi çalışmalar hem iyileşme
aşaması için hem de durumu afete
çeviren risklerin azaltılabilmesi için büyük
önem taşıyor.
olarak anılan “olayın oluş anı”ndan
itibaren acil müdahale ekiplerinin dışında
sahada gerçekleştirilen çalışmalarda
bilimsel verileri derleyecek uzmanların
da yer almasının en önemli getirilerinden
biri sebep sonuç ilişkisi üzerinden afete
dönüşen bir doğa olayının anatomisini
çıkarabilmek ve sonrasında bu bilgiyi
zarar azaltma ve hazırlık aşamalarına
taşıyabilmek.
Kentlerin sürdürülebilir korunma ve
kalkınması konusunda çalışan meslek
insanları için afet risklerinin yönetiminde
ana odak ve öncelik, hazırlık ve zarar
azaltma evreleri için olsa da meydana
İ gelen olayların acil müdahale evresinde;
yapıların ve çevrenin daha fazla hasar
almasını önleyecek ilk müdahalenin
yapılması, hasarın ve oluş sebebine
ilişkin bilimsel verilerin hasarın delilleri
yok olmadan toplanması ve kurumsal
kapasitesi afet dolaysıyla kesintiye
uğrayan kurumlara sahada destek
sağlanması gibi çalışmalar hem iyileşme
aşaması için hem de durumu afete
çeviren risklerin azaltılabilmesi için büyük
önem taşıyor.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Disaster Risk Management in Heritage Sites: Reduction of Grey Zones Sendai new frame which has been signed by 187 UN countries during WCDRR 2015 designates seven goals and four priorities for disaster risk reduction until 2030. The frame... more
Disaster Risk Management in Heritage
Sites: Reduction of Grey Zones
Sendai new frame which has been signed by
187 UN countries during WCDRR 2015
designates seven goals and four priorities for
disaster risk reduction until 2030. The frame
could be defined as continuation of 2005 Hygo
Frame signed by 168 countries in 2005.
ICOMOS ICORP was working for a long time on
designating of tangible/intangible heritage for
the city/place and its users/community
members. This goal was reached by definition
of integrity of historic sites and their users to
the city itself in the articles of the frame. As a
result of these works, “cultural heritage” has a
place in aims and priorities of risk reduction/
mitigation tasks until 2030. Positive effect of
this definition is clearly seen in one of the aims
of Turkey Disaster Management Strategic
Document which includes protection of cultural
heritage from disasters.
Preparedness before disaster and emergency
interventions during disaster are the most
important tasks needed to be done for
mitigating risks to the cultural heritage.
Earthquake stroke Nepal in April 25th, 2015
and caused severe damages mostly in
Katmandu Valley was the occurrence of a long
countdown. This fact clearly shows that
countdown for possible earthquake and post
disasters in Istanbul is still in progress and it
is necessary to define and realize the risks
immediately.
According to the frequency of occurrence of
disasters flood, hurricane and earthquake are
the first three events. Sequence of disasters
caused loss of life turns to earthquake,
hurricane and high heat. If disasters and loss
of life and injuries are considered cultural
heritage is affected mostly by the earthquakes.
The aim of this paper is not only “recall” of
anniversary of 1999 earthquake but also
“evoke” once more again the fact of ongoing
disaster alert for Istanbul.
Sites: Reduction of Grey Zones
Sendai new frame which has been signed by
187 UN countries during WCDRR 2015
designates seven goals and four priorities for
disaster risk reduction until 2030. The frame
could be defined as continuation of 2005 Hygo
Frame signed by 168 countries in 2005.
ICOMOS ICORP was working for a long time on
designating of tangible/intangible heritage for
the city/place and its users/community
members. This goal was reached by definition
of integrity of historic sites and their users to
the city itself in the articles of the frame. As a
result of these works, “cultural heritage” has a
place in aims and priorities of risk reduction/
mitigation tasks until 2030. Positive effect of
this definition is clearly seen in one of the aims
of Turkey Disaster Management Strategic
Document which includes protection of cultural
heritage from disasters.
Preparedness before disaster and emergency
interventions during disaster are the most
important tasks needed to be done for
mitigating risks to the cultural heritage.
Earthquake stroke Nepal in April 25th, 2015
and caused severe damages mostly in
Katmandu Valley was the occurrence of a long
countdown. This fact clearly shows that
countdown for possible earthquake and post
disasters in Istanbul is still in progress and it
is necessary to define and realize the risks
immediately.
According to the frequency of occurrence of
disasters flood, hurricane and earthquake are
the first three events. Sequence of disasters
caused loss of life turns to earthquake,
hurricane and high heat. If disasters and loss
of life and injuries are considered cultural
heritage is affected mostly by the earthquakes.
The aim of this paper is not only “recall” of
anniversary of 1999 earthquake but also
“evoke” once more again the fact of ongoing
disaster alert for Istanbul.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Disasters are leading factors that threaten the existence of cultural heritage. As much as architectural and natural heritage, intangible heritage like rituals, traditions and languages that are becoming extinct, too are affected by... more
Disasters are leading factors that threaten the existence of cultural heritage. As much as architectural and natural heritage, intangible heritage like rituals, traditions and languages that are becoming extinct, too are affected by disasters. All disasters, whether they are natural disasters like floods, earthquake and volcanic explosion, or man-made disasters like war, armed conflict, terrorist acts and arson, threaten the existence of cultural heritage and people living in the vicinity, and at the same time cause irreplaceable physical and economic loss, and lead to loss of cultural and social memory that coexists with the cultural heritage.
1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake, 1997 Marmara Earthquake, 2005 Hurricane Katrina and Sri Lanka Tsunami, 2009 Haiti Earthquake and Pakistan Flood, and 2011 Tōhuku Earthquake have been recorded as important natural disasters of the last 25 years. Historic settlements and their inhabitants have suffered great damage as a result of these disasters.
The stream of history has not changed in man-made disasters like war, terrorist acts, and armed conflict during the same period. Selective destruction; conscious targeting and destruction of cultural heritage, as opposed to the general destruction in natural heritage, have continued at full speed. Demolition of Mostar Bridge (Stari Most- Old Bridge) in 1993 during the Bosnian War, and demolition of Bamiyan Valley Buddha Statues in Afghanistan in 2001, were only some of the great losses that cultural heritage suffered during the last 25 years.
Number of examples of the damage that man-made disasters cause for the cultural heritage increasingly continues in 21st century as well. Looting of Iraq National Museum in Bagdad during invasion of the USA of Northern Iraq in 2003, civil unrest that absorbed many countries in the Middle East which is named as the “Arabic Spring”, which caused destruction of many heritage, including Museum of Cairo, were the uppermost examples. Even as these words are written, many historic structures in Syria are continued to be damaged. Africa has become the setting of one of the bitterest examples of selective destruction directed to cultural heritage. In Mali-Timbuktu, World Heritage buildings (1988) Sidi Mahmoud, Sidi Moctar and Alpha Moya Mausoleums have been completely destroyed under attacks during June and July 2012.
Threats to important architectural and natural heritage sites by natural events that turn into disasters have lead many institutions, which expertise on this issue, to start studies on disaster risk mitigation in heritage sites. As a result of studies that date back to 1974, United Nations has summoned a World conference on Disaster Reduction in 2005, bringing experts together, and has drawn attention on the subject matter. An article stating that cultural heritage should also be preserved was added to the resolutions of the conference. (1)
The resulting key document of the world conference held in Kobe Hyogo- Japan in 2005 is known as the Hyogo Framework of Action (HFA). It is the first plan to explain, describe and detail the work that is required from all different sectors and actors to reduce disaster losses. It covers a 10 year plan. The framework was developed and agreed on with many partners with the need to reduce disaster risk - governments, international agencies, disaster experts and many others - bringing them into a common system of coordination.
1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake, 1997 Marmara Earthquake, 2005 Hurricane Katrina and Sri Lanka Tsunami, 2009 Haiti Earthquake and Pakistan Flood, and 2011 Tōhuku Earthquake have been recorded as important natural disasters of the last 25 years. Historic settlements and their inhabitants have suffered great damage as a result of these disasters.
The stream of history has not changed in man-made disasters like war, terrorist acts, and armed conflict during the same period. Selective destruction; conscious targeting and destruction of cultural heritage, as opposed to the general destruction in natural heritage, have continued at full speed. Demolition of Mostar Bridge (Stari Most- Old Bridge) in 1993 during the Bosnian War, and demolition of Bamiyan Valley Buddha Statues in Afghanistan in 2001, were only some of the great losses that cultural heritage suffered during the last 25 years.
Number of examples of the damage that man-made disasters cause for the cultural heritage increasingly continues in 21st century as well. Looting of Iraq National Museum in Bagdad during invasion of the USA of Northern Iraq in 2003, civil unrest that absorbed many countries in the Middle East which is named as the “Arabic Spring”, which caused destruction of many heritage, including Museum of Cairo, were the uppermost examples. Even as these words are written, many historic structures in Syria are continued to be damaged. Africa has become the setting of one of the bitterest examples of selective destruction directed to cultural heritage. In Mali-Timbuktu, World Heritage buildings (1988) Sidi Mahmoud, Sidi Moctar and Alpha Moya Mausoleums have been completely destroyed under attacks during June and July 2012.
Threats to important architectural and natural heritage sites by natural events that turn into disasters have lead many institutions, which expertise on this issue, to start studies on disaster risk mitigation in heritage sites. As a result of studies that date back to 1974, United Nations has summoned a World conference on Disaster Reduction in 2005, bringing experts together, and has drawn attention on the subject matter. An article stating that cultural heritage should also be preserved was added to the resolutions of the conference. (1)
The resulting key document of the world conference held in Kobe Hyogo- Japan in 2005 is known as the Hyogo Framework of Action (HFA). It is the first plan to explain, describe and detail the work that is required from all different sectors and actors to reduce disaster losses. It covers a 10 year plan. The framework was developed and agreed on with many partners with the need to reduce disaster risk - governments, international agencies, disaster experts and many others - bringing them into a common system of coordination.
Research Interests:
A powerful earthquake hit Turkey’s Eastern Anatolia region, 20km North of Van city center (38.68-N43.47E) with a depth of 19km, on 23 October 2011. According to the data from Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management... more
A powerful earthquake hit Turkey’s Eastern Anatolia region, 20km North of Van city center (38.68-N43.47E) with a depth of 19km, on 23 October 2011. According to the data from Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD) Department of Earthquake Seismologic Observations Network, earthquake with M6.7 and MW7.0 occurred at 13.41, local time.
Van earthquake was an exception for many aspects of countries’ ‘well known earthquake facts’. Turkey’s landscape’s majority is under 1st degree earthquake risk; therefore powerful earthquakes occur quite often in country. However, although being used to powerful earthquakes and its aftershocks, 23 October earthquake had significant differences compared to previous ones. One of the most important points was the magnitude and intervals of the aftershocks. Within first week of the earthquake, 114 aftershocks measuring between M4.0-M4.9 and 7 aftershocks greater than M5.0 was recorded in the region.
Although these exceptional behavior of the fault line, all aftershocks were considered normal by authorities and experts, thus humanitarian relief efforts and rehabilitation projects started immediately for the sake of affected people…until another unexpected earthquake occurred on 9 November, 2011.
A second earthquake of M5,6 hit the town of Edremit, 10km south of Van city on 9 November 2011, right next to Lake Van.
Everyone underestimated the effects of this earthquake in the beginning. However, an excessive number of buildings either collapsed of heavily damaged, lives and properties were lost. Infrastructures such as transportation, water, electrical lines were cut and hampered. Cold weather conditions (average of 0 °C) and snow affected search and rescue operations and relief efforts in the region.
Van earthquake was an exception for many aspects of countries’ ‘well known earthquake facts’. Turkey’s landscape’s majority is under 1st degree earthquake risk; therefore powerful earthquakes occur quite often in country. However, although being used to powerful earthquakes and its aftershocks, 23 October earthquake had significant differences compared to previous ones. One of the most important points was the magnitude and intervals of the aftershocks. Within first week of the earthquake, 114 aftershocks measuring between M4.0-M4.9 and 7 aftershocks greater than M5.0 was recorded in the region.
Although these exceptional behavior of the fault line, all aftershocks were considered normal by authorities and experts, thus humanitarian relief efforts and rehabilitation projects started immediately for the sake of affected people…until another unexpected earthquake occurred on 9 November, 2011.
A second earthquake of M5,6 hit the town of Edremit, 10km south of Van city on 9 November 2011, right next to Lake Van.
Everyone underestimated the effects of this earthquake in the beginning. However, an excessive number of buildings either collapsed of heavily damaged, lives and properties were lost. Infrastructures such as transportation, water, electrical lines were cut and hampered. Cold weather conditions (average of 0 °C) and snow affected search and rescue operations and relief efforts in the region.
Research Interests:
The Military Perspective and Special Units Established in Various Armies in the framework of the Armed Conflict and Protection of Cultural Properties Silahlı Çatışma ve Kültür Varlıklarının Korunması Çerçevesinde Askeri Bakış Açısı... more
The Military Perspective and Special Units Established in Various Armies
in the framework of the Armed Conflict and Protection of Cultural Properties
Silahlı Çatışma ve Kültür Varlıklarının Korunması Çerçevesinde
Askeri Bakış Açısı ve Çeşitli Ordularda Kurulan Özel Birimler
Mehmet PALAZ - Zeynep Gül ÜNAL
It is possible to observe measures or attempts to preserve the cultural properties throughout history.
The cultural property combines the society, holds it together, is transferred to generations, and continues
as a living memory. During the wars and armed conflicts, limited attacks or collateral damage to cultural
properties were observed. Respective bodies try to get measures against these harms to cultural
property through agreements, conventions, and institutions. However, deliberate attacks against cultural
property in the time of rising discussions about hybrid war(fare) have escalated. This article aims to
examine the reasons for deliberate attacks against cultural property, provide a military perspective, and
inform about the special military units established to protect cultural property.
Tarih boyunca kültür varlıklarının korunması olgusuna her dönem rastlamak mümkündür. Kültür
varlığı toplumu bir araya getiren, onu bir arada tutan ve kuşaklar boyu aktarılarak yaşayan hafızadır.
Savaşlar ve silahlı çatışmalar esnasında kültür varlıklarına yönelik sınırlı saldırılar ya da yan zararlar
oluşmaktadır. Bu tür zararlara karşı uluslararası anlaşmalar, sözleşmeler ve kurumlar yoluyla önlem
alınmaya çalışılmaktadır. Buna karşılık hibrit savaş(ım)ın tartışıldığı günümüzde kültür varlıklarına
yönelik kasıtlı saldırılar önemli ölçüde artmıştır. Bu makalede söz konusu saldırıların artmasının
nedenleri, buna yönelik askeri bakış açısı ve çeşitli ordularda kültürel varlıkların korunmasına yönelik
özel olarak oluşturulan birimler incelenmiştir.
in the framework of the Armed Conflict and Protection of Cultural Properties
Silahlı Çatışma ve Kültür Varlıklarının Korunması Çerçevesinde
Askeri Bakış Açısı ve Çeşitli Ordularda Kurulan Özel Birimler
Mehmet PALAZ - Zeynep Gül ÜNAL
It is possible to observe measures or attempts to preserve the cultural properties throughout history.
The cultural property combines the society, holds it together, is transferred to generations, and continues
as a living memory. During the wars and armed conflicts, limited attacks or collateral damage to cultural
properties were observed. Respective bodies try to get measures against these harms to cultural
property through agreements, conventions, and institutions. However, deliberate attacks against cultural
property in the time of rising discussions about hybrid war(fare) have escalated. This article aims to
examine the reasons for deliberate attacks against cultural property, provide a military perspective, and
inform about the special military units established to protect cultural property.
Tarih boyunca kültür varlıklarının korunması olgusuna her dönem rastlamak mümkündür. Kültür
varlığı toplumu bir araya getiren, onu bir arada tutan ve kuşaklar boyu aktarılarak yaşayan hafızadır.
Savaşlar ve silahlı çatışmalar esnasında kültür varlıklarına yönelik sınırlı saldırılar ya da yan zararlar
oluşmaktadır. Bu tür zararlara karşı uluslararası anlaşmalar, sözleşmeler ve kurumlar yoluyla önlem
alınmaya çalışılmaktadır. Buna karşılık hibrit savaş(ım)ın tartışıldığı günümüzde kültür varlıklarına
yönelik kasıtlı saldırılar önemli ölçüde artmıştır. Bu makalede söz konusu saldırıların artmasının
nedenleri, buna yönelik askeri bakış açısı ve çeşitli ordularda kültürel varlıkların korunmasına yönelik
özel olarak oluşturulan birimler incelenmiştir.