Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
This article provides an analysis of Galen’s attitude towards philosophy and philosophers as manifested in two of his moral writings, namely, the letter- essay entitled Avoiding Distress (De indolentia) and the treatise on The Diagnosis... more
This article provides an analysis of Galen’s attitude towards philosophy and philosophers as manifested in two of his moral writings, namely, the letter- essay entitled Avoiding Distress (De indolentia) and the treatise on The Diagnosis and Treatment of the Affections and Errors Peculiar to Each Person’s Soul (De animi cuiuslibet affectuum et peccatorum dignotione et curatione). While Galen’s engagement with various philosophical schools of his time has been extensively explored in the literature of the past few decades, with an emphasis on his Platonic and Aristotelian affiliations, his critique of philosophy and philosophers has only  occasionally  been  discussed. However, a closer look at the polemical intent of the  works referred to above can help us not only to illuminate more fully their content and purposes but also to locate them more accurately within the cultural milieu in which they were  written.  Along with an attempt to  understand  the reasons underlying Galen’s criticism of philosophy  and  philosophers, and the sources of his critique, particular attention will be given to the self- image Galen projects in these two writings. As I intend  to  show,  by  critically reviewing some philosophical therapeutic techniques (mostly Stoic and Epicurean), Galen seeks not only to debunk the philosophers’ claim of being an authoritative voice in matters pertaining to practical  ethics but  also to cast himself in the role of a true moral adviser or physician of the  soul, one that actually has expertise in treating moral distress, anguish or anxiety.
Gregory Thaumaturgus has only occasionally been discussed in relation to early Christian apologetics. The paper provides a new step in this direction by exploring the points of contact between Gregory's Address to Origen and previous... more
Gregory Thaumaturgus has only occasionally been discussed in relation to early Christian apologetics. The paper provides a new step in this direction by exploring the points of contact between Gregory's Address to Origen and previous apologetic literature. As the analysis below will indicate, the Address shows parallels with several apologetic texts from the second and early third century, both in terms of content and style. By discussing the apologetic topics and strategies found in the Address, I will argue that Gregory intended to respond, at least indirectly, to some of the main charges raised against Christians by their pagan opponents. Such an approach not only sheds light on the content and purposes of the Address, but also illuminates the historical and literary background against which Gregory wrote his text.
Gregory Thaumaturgus’s Address to Origen has alternatively been read as a speech of thanksgiving (λόγος χαριστήριος), as a panegyric (πανηγυρικός), as a laudatory address (προσφωνητικός) or as a farewell speech (συντακτικός). The present... more
Gregory Thaumaturgus’s Address to Origen has alternatively been read as a
speech of thanksgiving (λόγος χαριστήριος), as a panegyric (πανηγυρικός), as a
laudatory address (προσφωνητικός) or as a farewell speech (συντακτικός). The
present paper offers a new approach to the genre of Gregory’s text by reading
it as a protreptic (λόγος προτρεπτικός) addressed to a pagan audience. Such an
approach sheds new light not only on the genre of the Address, but also on
its content, structure, and intended audience. It also allows us to readdress the
controversial issue of Gregory’s sparing use of specifically Christian terminology
in his speech. After a short overview of the solutions proposed by various
scholars to this question, I suggest that the avoidance of an explicit Christian
vocabulary can be reasonably explained by taking into account the protreptic
aim of this text.
Aristotle's Protrepticus shows traces of a long-standing dispute concerning the hierarchy of different technai. In this paper I argue that the Protrepticus stages an agon between philosophy and medicine, both of which strove for the... more
Aristotle's Protrepticus shows traces of a long-standing dispute concerning the hierarchy of different technai. In this paper I argue that the Protrepticus stages an agon between philosophy and medicine, both of which strove for the status of a techne of cognitive and intellectual authority. By making reference to several medical methods and concepts, Aristotle tried to reveal the preeminence of philosophy in the knowledge of human nature and, thereby, debunked the claims of medicine for a rightful and unerring arbiter of the best way of life. Through my analysis I try to illustrate that a large part of Aristotle's polemic with medicine was directed against several statements made in Hippocratic literature. Finally, I suggest that in his polemic against medicine Aristotle envisaged a particular type of opponent which is to be identified with the rigoristic medical practitioners and writers whose methods of inquiry and viewpoints were exposed by the Hippocratic author of Ancient Medicine.
Abstract: Cicero’s Hortensius, undoubtedly the most famous exhortation to philosophy from the whole of Latin literature, has survived only in fragmentary form, as quotations or paraphrases in the works of different writers of Antiquity,... more
Abstract: Cicero’s Hortensius, undoubtedly the most famous exhortation to philosophy from the whole of Latin literature, has survived only in fragmentary form, as quotations or paraphrases in the works of different writers of Antiquity, including Seneca, Tacitus, Nonius Marcellus, Lactantius and Augustine. Despite the cautious attempts of different scholars to reconstruct this dialogue, we still do not have a definitive edition of it. Since only a small number of the known fragments can be certainly assigned to one particular place, the attempts to re-establish the plan of the dialogue and the proper order in which the fragments should be arranged still remain a source of quarrel between scholars. In this paper I propose a new arrangement of the frag. 43 from Grilli’s edition of the Hortensius, in an attempt to establish more adequately its place and meaning in the structure of the dialogue.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
This article explores Plato‘s relation to medicine as documented in his early dialogues by taking into account the historical and cultural context of the fourth century BC. In Plato‘s time, medicine and philosophy often interfered and... more
This article explores Plato‘s relation to medicine as documented in his early dialogues by taking into account the historical and cultural context of the fourth century BC. In Plato‘s time, medicine and philosophy often interfered and competed with each other for cognitive and moral authority in matters concerning human nature, health, and happiness. To increase philosophy‘s public recognition, Plato challenged medicine‘s claims of being the rightful arbiter of the best modus vivendi and argued for philosophy‘s moral and intellectual preeminence over all other technai. As I intend to show, Plato‘s rivalry with medicine is often supported by a protreptic rhetoric, which aims both to highlight medicine‘s limits and to illustrate philosophy‘s primacy in defining the conditions for a temperate, ordered, and happy life. Along with a critique of different approaches to bodily health and happiness taken by Hippocratic writers, Plato emphasizes the soul‘s invaluable superiority over the body and describes philosophy as a genuine medicine of the soul. The explicit references to therapeutic techniques and vocabulary also function as rhetorical devices to demonstrate the useful and necessary character of philosophy.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
This article explores some aspects of Clement of Alexandria's use of moral exhortation (or protreptic), a genre widely practiced both by Greek philosophers and early Christian writers. While modern scholars have commonly limited the... more
This article explores some aspects of Clement of Alexandria's use of moral exhortation (or protreptic), a genre widely practiced both by Greek philosophers and early Christian writers. While modern scholars have commonly limited the analysis of Clement's use of this genre to his Protrepticus to the Greeks, I will try to take a step further by pointing to some protreptic elements found in the first book of the Paedagogus. Along with discussing some biblical and philosophical topoi, I will focus my analysis on the medical language and imagery found in that book. As I intend to show, the use of medical imagery was a rhetorical device Clement made use of to reinforce his protreptic appeal to the Greeks to convert to Christianity. Reading Clement's Paedagogus in light of the categories of the protreptic genre is important as it allows us to readdress not only the question of its purpose, but also that of its sources and intended readership. Against the communis opinio that the addressees of this book were only the already-converted Christians, I will try to argue that Clement's intended audience also encompassed the Alexandrian pagan intellectuals of his day.
Vă invităm să participați la cea de-a XVII-a ediţie a Simpozionului național "Antichitatea şi moştenirea ei spirituală", care se va desfășura în perioada 12-13 noiembrie 2021, la Universitatea "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iași, prin... more
Vă invităm să participați la cea de-a XVII-a ediţie a Simpozionului național "Antichitatea şi moştenirea ei spirituală", care se va desfășura în perioada 12-13 noiembrie 2021, la Universitatea "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iași, prin intermediul platformei digitale ZOOM. Tematica propusă spre dezbatere priveşte Antichitatea greco-romană şi iudeo-creștină, ereditatea, transmiterea şi receptarea acesteia de-a lungul timpului, în diferite contexte istorice, geografice sau lingvistice. Domeniile de interes sunt: limbă, literatură, istorie, filosofie, teologie, drept, arte plastice, numismatică, psihologie şi pedagogie. Detalii despre edițiile anterioare ale simpozionului pot fi consultate accesând pagina simpozionului (http://media.lit.uaic.ro/?page_id=7410). Propunerile de comunicări (titlul și un scurt rezumat) pot fi trimise până la data de 1 noiembrie 2021, la adresa: simpozion.antichitatea@gmail.com. Durata unei comunicări va fi de 20 de minute, dintre care 5 minute vor fi rezervate discuţiilor. Lucrările simpozionului vor fi editate de organizatori într un volum publicat la Editura Universităţii „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iaşi. Normele redacţionale vor fi comunicate participanţilor ale căror contribuţii vor fi reţinute pentru publicare.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests: