Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
  • David Lay Williams is professor of political science at DePaul University. He received a Ph.D. from the University of... moreedit
  • T. K. Seungedit
Economic inequality is one of the most daunting challenges of our time, with public debate often turning to questions of whether it is an inevitable outcome of economic systems and what, if anything, can be done about it. But why,... more
Economic inequality is one of the most daunting challenges of our time, with public debate often turning to questions of whether it is an inevitable outcome of economic systems and what, if anything, can be done about it. But why, exactly, should inequality worry us? The Greatest of All Plagues demonstrates that this underlying question has been a central preoccupation of some of the most eminent political thinkers of the Western intellectual tradition.

David Lay Williams shares bold new perspectives on the writings and ideas of Plato, Jesus, Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, and Karl Marx. He shows how they describe economic inequality as a source of political instability and a corrupter of character and soul, and how they view unchecked inequality as a threat to their most cherished values, such as justice, faith, civic harmony, peace, democracy, and freedom. Williams draws invaluable insights into the societal problems generated by what Plato called “the greatest of all plagues,” and examines the solutions employed through the centuries.

An eye-opening work of intellectual history, The Greatest of All Plagues recovers a forgotten past for some of the most timeless books in the Western canon, revealing how economic inequality has been a paramount problem throughout the history of political thought.
What is freedom? What is equality? What is sovereignty? Few texts have offered more influential answers to these questions than Rousseau’s Social Contract, and in this new Cambridge Companion, a multidisciplinary team of contributors... more
What is freedom? What is equality? What is sovereignty? Few texts have offered more influential answers to these questions than Rousseau’s Social Contract, and in this new Cambridge Companion, a multidisciplinary team of contributors provide new ways to navigate a masterpiece of political philosophy— and its animating questions.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Fundamental Political Writings includes the Social Contract, Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts, Discourse on the Origins of Inequality, and “Preface to Narcissus.” Each text has been newly translated, and... more
Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Fundamental Political Writings includes the Social Contract, Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts, Discourse on the Origins of Inequality, and “Preface to Narcissus.” Each text has been newly translated, and includes a full complement of explanatory notes. The editors’ introduction offers students diverse points of entry into some of the distinctive possibilities and challenges of each of these fundamental texts, as well as an introduction to Rousseau’s life and historical situation, from his early years in Geneva to his final years in relative solitude. Each text is accompanied by images from the original editions. The volume also includes annotated appendices that help students to explore the origins and influences of Rousseau’s work, including excerpts from Hobbes, Pascal, Descartes, Mandeville, Diderot, Voltaire, Madame de Staël, Benjamin Constant, Joseph de Maistre, Kant, Hegel, and Engels.
Although its origins stem from theological debates, the general will would ultimately become one of the most celebrated and denigrated concepts emerging from early modern political thought. Jean-Jacques Rousseau would make it the central... more
Although its origins stem from theological debates, the general will would ultimately become one of the most celebrated and denigrated concepts emerging from early modern political thought.  Jean-Jacques Rousseau would make it the central element of his political theory, and it would take on a life of its own during the French Revolution before being subjected to generations of embrace or opprobrium.  James Farr and David Lay Williams have collected for the first time a set of essays that track the evolving history of the general will from its origins to recent times.  These essays include attention to the general will’s theological, political, formal, and substantive dimensions with a careful eye to the concept’s virtues and limitations as understood by its expositors and critics, among them Pascal, Malebranche, Locke, Spinoza, Montesquieu, Constant, Tocqueville, Adam Smith, and John Rawls.
If the greatness of a philosophical work can be measured by the volume and vehemence of the public response, there is little question that Rousseau's Social Contract stands out as a masterpiece. Within a week of its publication in 1762 it... more
If the greatness of a philosophical work can be measured by the volume and vehemence of the public response, there is little question that Rousseau's Social Contract stands out as a masterpiece. Within a week of its publication in 1762 it was banished from France. Soon thereafter, Rousseau fled to Geneva, where he saw the book burned in public. At the same time, many of his contemporaries, such as Kant, considered Rousseau to be “the Newton of the moral world,” as he was the first philosopher to draw attention to the basic dignity of human nature. The Social Contract has never ceased to be read in the 250 years since it was written. Rousseau's “Social Contract”: An Introduction offers a thorough and systematic tour of this notoriously paradoxical and challenging text. David Lay Williams offers readers a chapter-by-chapter reading of the Social Contract, squarely confronting these interpretive obstacles, leaving no stones unturned. The conclusion connects Rousseau's text both to his important influences and those who took inspiration and sometimes exception to his arguments. The book also features a special extended appendix dedicated to outlining his famous conception of the general will, which has been the object of controversy since the Social Contract's publication.
Although many commentators on Rousseau’s philosophy have noted its affinities with Platonism and acknowledged the debt that Rousseau himself expressed to Plato on numerous occasions, David Williams is the first to offer a thoroughgoing,... more
Although many commentators on Rousseau’s philosophy have noted its affinities with Platonism and acknowledged the debt that Rousseau himself expressed to Plato on numerous occasions, David Williams is the first to offer a thoroughgoing, systematic examination of this linkage. His contributions to the scholarship on Rousseau in this book are threefold: he enters the debate over whether Rousseau is a Hobbesian (in rejecting transcendent norms) or a Platonist (in accepting them) with a decisive argument supporting the latter position; he tackles from a new angle the ever-challenging question of unity in Rousseau’s thought; and he explores the dynamic metaphor of the chain throughout Rousseau’s writings as a key to understanding them as inspired by Platonism.

The book is organized into three main parts. The first sketches the background of Platonism and materialist positivism in modern European metaphysics and political philosophy that provided the context for Rousseau’s intellectual development. The second examines Rousseau’s choice of Platonism over positivism and its consequences for his philosophy generally. The third addresses the legacy of Rousseau’s thought and its appropriation by Kant, Marx, and Foucault, suggesting that in an age where materialism and relativism are rife, Rousseau may have much to teach us about how we view our own society and can engage in constructive critique of it.
A short essay on Rousseau's relationship with Spinoza
Rousseau has long been understood as a theorist of inequality – though attention to Rousseau has been largely directed to his 1754 Discourse on the Origins of Inequality. While scholars are, naturally, right to address this central work,... more
Rousseau has long been understood as a theorist of inequality – though attention to Rousseau has been largely directed to his 1754 Discourse on the Origins of Inequality.  While scholars are, naturally, right to address this central work, they would do well to consider what can be learned from other works, including The Social Contract (1762).  In this text, readers often neglect a passage that Rousseau himself highlights: that “the end of every system of legislation . . . comes down to the following two principal objects, freedom and equality” (SC, 2.11).  In this essay, I explore Rousseau’s understanding of freedom and equality with special attention to the latter as manifested in the problem of economic inequality.  In doing so, further, I detail how his thinking about freedom and equality were shaped by the ancient sources of Plato and Plutarch – his two favorite ancient thinkers.  In both ancient sources, it turns out that economic equality is essential to achieving either political freedom or civil harmony.  This essay, thus, not only details the centrality of economic equality to Rousseau’s political thought, but also provides a serious account of how he came to this position.
A short exposition of Founding documents (Federalist Papers and Letters of Brutus) on the theory of human nature underlying the US Constitution.
This essay outlines the distinctive features of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's conception of sovereignty as the general will.
While Thomas Hobbes is not typically cited as a philosopher concerned with economic inequality, there is a great deal of evidence in his writings to suggest that he was aware of inequality and worried about its effects on the... more
While Thomas Hobbes is not typically cited as a philosopher concerned with economic inequality, there is a great deal of evidence in his writings to suggest that he was aware of inequality and worried about its effects on the commonwealth. This essay first contextualizes Hobbes in the development of the 17th-century English political economy to understand the mercantilist milieu that might have shaped Hobbes’s thoughts. Second, it then explores Hobbes’s thoughts on wealth, poverty, and inequality, as outlined in his major political works – revealing  distinctively Hobbesian grounds for understanding these phenomena. Third and finally, it explores Hobbes’s constructive political philosophy for means by which he might offer prescriptions for addressing them.
This essay explores Rousseau's relationship with truth through an exposition of his autobiographical works, especially his Reveries of the Solitary Walker, as well as its implications for understanding the intended role of his Lawgiver in... more
This essay explores Rousseau's relationship with truth through an exposition of his autobiographical works, especially his Reveries of the Solitary Walker, as well as its implications for understanding the intended role of his Lawgiver in the Social Contract.
The tradition of the political lie infamously commences with Plato's Noble Lie in the Republic. It is woven with great care into his utopian state on the premise that Philosopher-Rulers are incorruptible wielders of political power.Most... more
The tradition of the political lie infamously commences with Plato's Noble Lie in the Republic. It is woven with great care into his utopian state on the premise that Philosopher-Rulers are incorruptible wielders of political power.Most treatments of the Noble Lie understand this and then proceed to dismiss Plato on the basis of his unrealistic assumptions about human nature. But when consideration is extended to the Laws, one finds a far more nuanced and relevant Plato uncomfortable with the > practice of political deception. This article elaborates on the Noble Lie and its assumptions, and then explains how the later Plato's increased scepticism about human nature informed a different policy in his Laws.
Research Interests:
Rousseau's Reveries of a Solitary Walker is enigmatic. It reveals many influences and addresses even more themes. For these reasons and others, political theorists have tended to ignore it in favour of his more overtly political works.... more
Rousseau's Reveries of a Solitary Walker is enigmatic. It reveals many influences and addresses even more themes. For these reasons and others, political theorists have tended to ignore it in favour of his more overtly political works. Yet to dismiss his last work is to neglect what might be a useful tool in unlocking his political theory. This article argues that the Reveries confirm what many have recently suggested-- that Rousseau is a Platonist in many important respects. Further, it holds that his particular brand of Platonism as espoused in the Reveries provides essential epistemic information necessary to carry out his democratic politics--indeed, one far more democratic than Plato's, yet consistent with a Platonic metaphysics.
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Metaphysics, Political Philosophy, Moral Psychology, and 46 more
This essay clarifies Patrick Riley’s account of G. W. Leibniz by placing Leibniz’s moral and political doctrines in historical perspective. By understanding Leibniz’s practical philosophy as a solution to the same problems confronted by... more
This essay clarifies Patrick Riley’s account of G. W. Leibniz by placing Leibniz’s moral and political doctrines in historical perspective. By understanding Leibniz’s practical philosophy as a solution to the same problems confronted by Thomas Hobbes, one can appreciate the originality and appeal of Riley’s Leibniz — with its emphasis on benevolence and Platonic ideas. By drawing attention to Leibniz’s practical works, Riley has resurrected an important voice in the history of political thought that had been long neglected. The essay concludes with some personal remarks about Riley’s own Leibnizian charity.
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Philosophy Of Religion, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, and 72 more
The general will has traditionally been associated with the early modern Platonists, such as Malebranche and Leibniz. Yet careful examination of Benedict Spinoza’s works reveals a prototype of the general will predating the constructions... more
The general will has traditionally been associated with the early modern Platonists, such as Malebranche and Leibniz. Yet careful examination of Benedict Spinoza’s works reveals a prototype of the general will predating the constructions of his famous successors. This is significant not only in reordering the narrative of the general will’s history, but also in revealing an entirely different and original strain that anticipates twentieth-century attempts to forge a post-metaphysical general will.
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Free Will, Moral Responsibility, Moral Psychology, and 46 more
Historians of political thought have been puzzled by Montesquieu's simultaneous appeals to the diversity of human practices and eternal norms of justice. Isaiah Berlin famously referred to this as an impassable “contradiction” burdening... more
Historians of political thought have been puzzled by Montesquieu's simultaneous appeals to the diversity of human practices and eternal norms of justice. Isaiah Berlin famously referred to this as an impassable “contradiction” burdening his work. Careful examination of Rousseau's appropriations from and developments on Montesquieu, however, reveal that these observations are not merely reconcilable—they provide a fruitful way to approach legislation and constitution drafting. This is accomplished by understanding his employment of the principle of transcendent constrained indeterminacy.
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Metaphysics, Ontology, Political Philosophy, Ethics, and 46 more
Research Interests:
Terrorism is perhaps the greatest challenge of the contemporary age. Of all the canonical figures in political theory, Thomas Hobbes is the most likely candidate to offer genuine insight into this problem. Yet although his analysis of the... more
Terrorism is perhaps the greatest challenge of the contemporary age. Of all the canonical figures in political theory, Thomas Hobbes is the most likely candidate to offer genuine insight into this problem. Yet although his analysis of the state of nature is immediately relevant to the diagnosis of this problem, his metaphysics cannot sustain his politics. His aspiration to “immutable” natural laws grounded in the universal motivation of the fear of death crumble when this fear is no longer universal. When terrorists are inspired by a religious ideology that makes them willing to die for their beliefs—and when they benefit from other asymmetries with the civilian populations against which they are arrayed—Hobbes the theorist of war and international relations becomes less relevant than Hobbes the prescriber of “rational” (fearfully pacific) human nature.
Research Interests:
Philosophy, Political Philosophy, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, Terrorism, Political Theory, and 34 more
A.P. Martinich's interpretation that in Leviathan Thomas Hobbes believed that the laws of nature are the commands of God and that he did not rely on the Bible to prove this has been criticized by Greg Forster in this journal (2003).... more
A.P. Martinich's interpretation that in Leviathan Thomas Hobbes believed that the laws of nature are the commands of God and that he did not rely on the Bible to prove this has been criticized by Greg Forster in this journal (2003). Forster uses these criticisms to develop his own view that Hobbes was insincere when he professed religious beliefs. We argue that Forster misrepresents Martinich's view, is mistaken about what evidence is relevant to interpreting whether Hobbes was sincere or not, and is mistaken about some of Hobbes's central doctrines. Forster's criticisms are worth discussing at length for at least three reasons. He takes the debate about Hobbes's sincerity to a new level of sophistication; his misinterpretations of Hobbes may become accepted as correct; and his criticisms raise issues about the proper method of interpreting historical texts.
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Philosophy Of Religion, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, and 40 more
Patrick Riley has argued that Immanuel Kant was the 'most adequate' of the social contractarians. This reputation was built on Kant's reliance on ideas rather than actual consent to give the contract its legitimacy. The greatest advantage... more
Patrick Riley has argued that Immanuel Kant was the 'most adequate' of the social contractarians. This reputation was built on Kant's reliance on ideas rather than actual consent to give the contract its legitimacy. The greatest advantage in his so doing was to limit the potential of tyrannical or despotic regimes. A danger resides in this approach, however: by ignoring actual consent, one may not get the compliance required to achieve these standards. In this respect, by interpreting Rousseau as likewise committed to ideas, Kant may be bettered by his Genevan predecessor, since Rousseau incorporates both ideas and actual consent. This combination serves the dual function of promising compliance to high ideas -- and in this respect Rousseau might actually be the 'most adequate' of social contract theorists.
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Kant, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, and 38 more
From the public burnings of the Social Contract occurring immediately following its publication, to Isaiah Berlin's condemnation of Rousseau as "the most sinister and most formidable enemy of liberty in the whole history of modern... more
From the public burnings of the Social Contract occurring immediately following its publication, to Isaiah Berlin's condemnation of Rousseau as "the most sinister and most formidable enemy of liberty in the whole history of modern thought," Jean-Jacques Rousseau has rarely held universal favor among his commentators. The most common charge against him was, and remains, that he provided the essential philosophic tools for the modern tyrant. While this position has numerous and illustrious advocates, I argue that it fails to take into account the whole of Rousseau's thought. Specifically, it ignores his extensive attention to the problem of political power and his attempts to control it with checks and balances. In focusing on Rousseau's specific proposals in his Government of Poland, it is evident that the purpose of his system is to prevent tyranny, rather than to promote it.
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Ethics, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, and 68 more
I argue that the positivist reading of Rousseau is flawed. Indeed, my thesis is that he is among the greatest and most thorough Platonists of the modern era. His rejection of Hobbes is not merely rhetorical. In fact, it represents the... more
I argue that the positivist reading of Rousseau is flawed. Indeed, my thesis is that he is among the greatest and most thorough Platonists of the modern era. His rejection of Hobbes is not merely rhetorical. In fact, it represents the true impetus of his social contract. This contract is designed explicitly to counter Hobbesian positivism. In the same way that Plato responds to Protagoras' positivism with his theory of the Forms, Rousseau responds to Hobbes's brutish Leviathan with a morally grounded social contract. To this extent, he is following in the footsteps of Locke who through his theory of natural law also hoped to avoid the problems associated with Hobbes's positivism. Unlike Locke, however, he appeals to the abstract Idea of Justice, rather than a determinate set of rules. To do this, he necessarily rests upon a later version of Platonic Forms—one that is both transcendent and indeterminate.  He does this, I argue, by placing the idea of Justice prior to the General Will itself. In understanding Rousseau this way, we are able to make new sense of the standards to which the General Will must conform and his frequent references to the Idea of Justice.
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Metaphysics, Political Philosophy, Ethics, and 50 more
This paper argues that contemporary theories of deliberative democracy, as exemplified in Jürgen Habermas and James S. Fishkin, falsely claim to operate free from metaphysical assumptions. Rather than do as they purport, they smuggle in... more
This paper argues that contemporary theories of deliberative democracy, as exemplified in Jürgen Habermas and James S. Fishkin, falsely claim to operate free from metaphysical assumptions.  Rather than do as they purport, they smuggle in a "hidden ontology" of substantive values.  The author argues that deliberation is honest and enhanced when these values are explicit and properly labeled.
Research Interests:
Critical Theory, Philosophy, Metaphysics, Ontology, Political Philosophy, and 38 more
Ronald Dworkin was among the most important and influential Anglo-American philosophers of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, standing at the intersection of legal and political thought. Dworkin published numerous books, articles,... more
Ronald Dworkin was among the most important and influential Anglo-American philosophers of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, standing at the intersection of legal and political thought. Dworkin published numerous books, articles, and essays on a wide variety of topics related to legal, political, and moral philosophy, including civil disobedience, rights, community, abortion, constitutional law, democratic theory, pragmatism, terrorism, taxation, religion, and pornography. While influential in all these realms, however, his greatest impact and influence came through his contributions to jurisprudence and the philosophy of justice.Keywords:equality;justice;legal theory;liberal theoryequality;justice;legal theory;liberal theory
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Philosophy, Metaphysics, Political Philosophy, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, Political Theory, and 35 more
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Political Philosophy, Kant, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, History of Ideas, and 33 more
Book Review of John P. McCormick's "Reading Machiavelli"
A review of Ryan Patrick Hanely's "Love's Enlightenment: Rethinking Charity in Modernity"
A draft version of a review essay forthcoming in Perspectives on Politics
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Forthcoming in Political Theory: An International Journal of Political Philosophy
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Free Will, Moral Responsibility, Moral Psychology, and 67 more
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Book Review for Political Studies Review, forthcoming, vol. 14, no. 4 (Fall 2015).
Research Interests:
A review of "Parasite" and interpretation of the film's "scholar's stone."
Op-ed outlining the prescribed role of virtue in republican constitutions and how it is increasingly endangered in contemporary political practice.
A critique of David Brooks's dismissal of economic inequality, employing some of Brooks's favorite books. This essay reveals that inequality and class war have long been considered one of the most serious problems of politics, not an... more
A critique of David Brooks's dismissal of economic inequality, employing some of Brooks's favorite books. This essay reveals that inequality and class war have long been considered one of the most serious problems of politics, not an easily dismissed inconvenience.
Insights from Rousseau's general will on why the impeachment charges matter for republican governments.
Reflections on 25 years of teaching The Federalist, especially in light of the current presidential administration.
Contribution to the Washington Post's Monkey Cage series
Drawing on the ancient Greeks for thoughts about the rule of law as people contemplate whether or not the president should be vulnerable to indictment.
A retort to Jason D. Hill's "call to shut down our nation's universities," focusing on his association of canonical texts with conservative orthodoxy.
Research Interests:
A eulogy to the liberal arts in Stevens Point, Wisconsin -- on what is lost with their elimination in institutions of higher learning.
Research Interests:
A treatment of Steven Pinker's "Enlightenment Now" with regard to his discussion of economic inequality.
Research Interests:
Understanding Louise Linton's "Let them eat cake" moment via the moral psychology of Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
A response to Michael Gerson's suggestion that Trump embodies the philosophy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and his general will.
Research Interests:
Earlier this week, a heavily armed man stormed a popular family restaurant in Washington, DC on the theory that it harbored child sex slaves. He discharged his weapon on an interior door and pointed his assault rifle at one of the pizza... more
Earlier this week, a heavily armed man stormed a popular family restaurant in Washington, DC on the theory that it harbored child sex slaves. He discharged his weapon on an interior door and pointed his assault rifle at one of the pizza chefs before surrendering to police – but not before completing his search for the telltale signs of an elaborate sex slave scheme at the pizzeria. Of course, there was no such insidious scheme. Its purported existence was a fabrication that gained traction in social media as the latest chapter in an increasingly alarming trend of fake news stories.
Research Interests:
A discussion of Donald Trump through the lens of Thrasymachus and Plato's understanding of pleonexia
Research Interests:
A response to the argument by Deidre McCloskey and others that poverty, and not inequality, is the real social problem with an appeal to Adam Smith and Plato, among others.
Research Interests:
On Wednesday, President Obama fulfilled his constitutional duty of nominating Merrick Garland to replace the recently deceased Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia. And now many Republican senators have affirmed their intention... more
On Wednesday, President Obama fulfilled his constitutional duty of nominating Merrick Garland to replace the recently deceased Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia. And now many Republican senators have affirmed their intention of refusing to hold confirmation hearings on two grounds. The first is that the Constitution does not require that the Senate vote on presidential nominees. The second is that the office can be vacant until after the November presidential election, when the national popular will declares itself at the ballot box and an appointment can be made consistent with that will.
Research Interests:
An op-ed explaining Donald Trump's popularity via the insights of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith
Research Interests:
A short piece outlining the reasons Adam Smith thought economic inequality to be a serious problem in commercial societies.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Political Philosophy, Kant, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, History of Ideas, and 49 more
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Political Philosophy, History of Ideas, Political Theory, Social Contract Theory, and 28 more
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Ethics, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, and 57 more
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Metaphysics, Political Philosophy, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, and 38 more
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Metaphysics, Political Philosophy, Ethics, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, and 34 more
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Metaphysics, Political Philosophy, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, and 48 more
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Political Philosophy, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, Political Theory, Early Modern History, and 34 more
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Political Philosophy, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, History of Ideas, and 45 more
Research Interests:
An account of my debts to my recently departed and beloved undergraduate mentor, Gregg Franzwa (1944-2016), who taught Philosophy at Texas Christian University.
Research Interests:
A tribute to my dissertation supervisor, T. K. Seung, who taught Philosophy, Government, and Law at the University of Texas at Austin from 1966-2015, on the occasion of his retirement.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Intellectual History, Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Kant, 17th Century & Early Modern Philosophy, and 32 more
An introduction to the subfield of political theory for undergraduate students
Research Interests:
A discussion my academic background, as well as my interests in Rousseau, Spinoza, fraternity, and economic inequality.
Research Interests:
A talk delivered on the occasion of Constitution Day at Manchester University (Indiana) on September 19, 2019. It outlines some of the central principles sketched by Madison and Hamilton in the Federalist with some reflections on how... more
A talk delivered on the occasion of Constitution Day at Manchester University (Indiana) on September 19, 2019.  It outlines some of the central principles sketched by Madison and Hamilton in the Federalist with some reflections on how these principles are threatened in the contemporary political context.
Remarks on the occasion of the TCU Political Science Department
Celebration of Achievement
May 1, 2019
My remarks at Chicago's Seminary Co-op Bookstore in honor of the release of John P. Mccormick's "Reading Machiavelli" (Princeton, 2018)
This paper traces thought on the rule of law in Ancient Athens through Sophocles and Plato
Research Interests: