Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Post-Weberian definitions see the state–individual relationship as a “do ut des” one. The state grants protection, education, medical care, and its citizens contribute labour, compliance, and taxes. When this does not occur, it is... more
Post-Weberian definitions see the state–individual relationship as a “do ut des” one. The state grants protection, education, medical care, and its citizens contribute labour, compliance, and taxes. When this does not occur, it is generally accepted that the citizens are deviating from state goals. However, there are cases where lack of compliance stems from the fact that society members do not feel protected by formal structures, and they rely on informal ones to replace, supplement, or even compete with state institutions. The starting point of this article is that this lack of support may result from enhanced labour mobility (and migration) across Europe, and may enhance the creation and persistence of informal practices. Taking advantage of two case studies, Romanian migrants to Spain and ethnic entrepreneurs in Croatia, we observe how governance is constructed and provide two novel interpretative frameworks. First, we explore the use of informality (informal practices) to sugge...
Our world today is experimenting a time of great power but also of tremendous resistances. Everywhere, people are brought together by similar burdens and frustration and creatively think about how to counter the forms of domination they... more
Our world today is experimenting a time of great power but also of tremendous resistances. Everywhere, people are brought together by similar burdens and frustration and creatively think about how to counter the forms of domination they are ascribed to. In academia as well there is an awakening among scholars to further investigate these multiple forms of resistance and equip the field with useful and empowering knowledge. This book aims at presenting some of these findings and reflecting upon the implications, social relevance, and ethical challenges of the growing field of Resistance Studies.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
Reflecting on the results of the shadow economy survey, as conceptualized by Putnis and Sauka and implemented in Ukraine in 2019 for the first time, the goal of the current article is twofold. First, it offers an overview of the results... more
Reflecting on the results of the shadow economy survey, as conceptualized by Putnis and Sauka and implemented in Ukraine in 2019 for the first time, the goal of the current article is twofold. First, it offers an overview of the results for the years 2017 and 2018 and estimates the shadow economy in the country at 38.3% of GDP for 2017 and 38.5% for 2018. Second, it suggests possible advantages in the use of direct methods to estimate the level of the shadow economy in a country and explore the motives pushing entrepreneurs to remain in the shadow. The discussion is then framed to conceptualize the distinction between shadow economy and informality. We conclude by suggesting that a better understanding of the entangled relations lying behind the reasons to stay in the shadow can help us better address the issue and propose measures that could help bring business out of the shadow.
This short piece represents an attempt to classify informal practices with the simple goal of testing their applicability to different contexts and situations. Although more "informalities" can be “discovered”, as a starting... more
This short piece represents an attempt to classify informal practices with the simple goal of testing their applicability to different contexts and situations. Although more "informalities" can be “discovered”, as a starting point, the four ‘flavours’ proposed in this editorial can point at the main directions informality studies have developed and provide ‘food' for some initial reflections.
People around the globe rely on informal practices to resist, survive, care and relate to each other beyond the control and coercive presence of institutions and states. In the EU, regimes of mobility at multiple scales affect various... more
People around the globe rely on informal practices to resist, survive, care and relate to each other beyond the control and coercive presence of institutions and states. In the EU, regimes of mobility at multiple scales affect various people on the move who are pushed into informality in order to acquire social mobility while having to combat border regimes, racialization, inequalities, and state bureaucracies. This text explores how mobilities and informality are entangled with one another when it comes to responding to the social, political, and economic inequalities that are produced by border and mobility regimes. Within this frame, the ethnographic articles in this special issue go beyond national borders to connect the production of mobility and informality at multiple interconnected scales, from refugees adapting to settlement bureaucracies locally to transit migrants coping with the selective external borders of the EU, or from transnational entrepreneurs’ ability to move be...
Dans cet article est analyse comme un phenomene social davantage que politique, ce qui a ete appele la « revolution orange ». Bien que les evenements politiques restent d'une grande importance, nous allons montrer comment les... more
Dans cet article est analyse comme un phenomene social davantage que politique, ce qui a ete appele la « revolution orange ». Bien que les evenements politiques restent d'une grande importance, nous allons montrer comment les protestations, leur organisation, la solidarite qu’elles ont generee et la maturation de la societe civile qui en derive, ont contribue a developper un sens d’appartenance a la « nation ukrainienne », base uniquement sur la participation politique et le desir d’un meilleur niveau de vie des citoyens. En particulier nous verrons comment, en parallele avec le projet de construction nationale porte par les elites, il existe un grand nombre de petits projets de construction nationale, en accord avec le projet de nation building (ou du moins qui ne s’y opposent pas), qui sont fondamentaux pour la creation, le developpement, et la conceptualisation d’une identite nationale a la mesure du citoyen. Cet article est issu d’une observation participante menee de longue...
Political debates on the Baltics, and in particular Estonia, have often pointed to “nationalisting” and exclusive narratives constructed at the institutional level. Accordingly, emphasis has been put on the lack of opportunities for... more
Political debates on the Baltics, and in particular Estonia, have often pointed to “nationalisting” and exclusive narratives constructed at the institutional level. Accordingly, emphasis has been put on the lack of opportunities for Russians to integrate into an Estonian context. While acknowledging the shortfalls of the Estonian political project, this article contrasts these views in two ways. By emphasizing people’s agency and their capacity to question, contrast, or even reject the identity markers proposed by Estonian official narratives, we maintain that the integration of Russians might be more advanced than insofar claimed by other studies. We then look at the way identities are lived in an everyday context by inhabitants of Estonia to counterpose national narratives proposed by the state and its political institutions, with the way people live and whether they accept these narratives. By doing this, we explore the role of the everyday in the reconstruction of national ident...
Avec une population de 1.4 million d’habitants et un territoire de 45 000 kilometres carres, l’Estonie dispose d’un repertoire d’action diplomatique limite dans le systeme europeen et sur la scene globale. Neanmoins, le pays a developpe... more
Avec une population de 1.4 million d’habitants et un territoire de 45 000 kilometres carres, l’Estonie dispose d’un repertoire d’action diplomatique limite dans le systeme europeen et sur la scene globale. Neanmoins, le pays a developpe une grande capacite a faire passer ses messages, meme informellement, a travers ce qu’on appelle le marketing national (nation branding), en particulier dans un certain nombre de secteurs. Cet article examine la capacite de l’Estonie a construire un recit national et a le promouvoir au niveau international, avec des messages bases sur la cuisine nationale, la culture, l’environnement des affaires et l’accent porte sur sa capacite a developper un systeme de e-gouvernance unique au monde. Ces messages permettent de s’engager avec une diplomatie du branding pour emmener a une serie de transformations qui, prises en charge seulement par l’Etat, se seraient produites plus lentement.
Whilst most accounts of nation branding emphasize the economic and diplomatic relevance of the phenomenon, this article examines the way Estonia has been proposing a nation “branding + building” strategy. Drawing from an empirical study... more
Whilst most accounts of nation branding emphasize the economic and diplomatic relevance of the phenomenon, this article examines the way Estonia has been proposing a nation “branding + building” strategy. Drawing from an empirical study of 1) evolving campaigns of Enterprise Estonia; 2) the leverage of the national e-Residency program in attracting foreign investment; and 3) tourist and marketing strategies based on the revisiting of ‘Estonian’ culinary tradition, we look at the way official narratives have been claiming, with the help of nation branding elements, that the country has quickly de-Sovietized and that there is a new understanding of the Estonian nation and “Estonianness”. This is intended to eventually prompt a reflection on the relationship between nation-building and nation branding, which can, in some circumstances, overlap and influence identity construction at the domestic and international level. 
While the importance of consumption of luxury goods as a mechanism accompanying upwards movement in a social hierarchy has been well acknowledged, attention to the role and perceptions of luxury in multicultural societies has been scarce... more
While the importance of consumption of luxury goods as a mechanism accompanying upwards movement in a social hierarchy has been well acknowledged, attention to the role and perceptions of luxury in multicultural societies has been scarce so far. It is nonetheless intriguing that ethnic groups inhabiting the same territory, and exposed to a same culture, might develop substantially different notions of luxury, which may end up affecting the integration, or isolation, of one of the groups. Our article addresses this deficiency in the literature by exploring the case of Estonia, a multi-ethnic society where Russians make up almost one-fourth of the population. Much has been written about the integration, and lack thereof, of ethnic Russians into Estonian society. We contrast these views by looking at inter-ethnic relations in the country from a different angle and by a) looking at consumption of luxury in the country through the concept of ‘conspicuous consumption'; b) endorsing Fo...
In post-socialist spaces, informal payments in educational institutions have often been at the centre of anti-corruption campaigns. A direct consequence, so far, has been that reforms in the public sector have largely been based on... more
In post-socialist spaces, informal payments in educational institutions have often been at the centre of anti-corruption campaigns. A direct consequence, so far, has been that reforms in the public sector have largely been based on attempts to eradicate, or at least minimize, the phenomenon of informal payments. Ukraine is no exception. According to several independent surveys, educational institutions are second only to health care providers for the number of informal transactions recorded. While more than two in three of Ukrainians claim to have engaged with informal exchanges in the past 12 months, almost half of them has made an informal payment in an educational institution, be this a university or a school. The goal of this paper is two-fold. First, we explore the nature and relevance of the phenomenon of informal payments in the educational sector. We rely for this on quantitative studies showing how widespread informal payments are. Second, we provide an alternative explanat...
While the so-called “end of public space” literature, focusing on encroachment of private interests and state surveillance, has contributed to critical thinking of access (or the lack thereof) to public space, and the loss of publicity of... more
While the so-called “end of public space” literature, focusing on encroachment of private interests and state surveillance, has contributed to critical thinking of access (or the lack thereof) to public space, and the loss of publicity of public space, the conceptual tools such literature offers to understand contestations in and over public space have remained underdeveloped or, at best, underexplored. This article builds on the above debates to provides further empirical evidence on the way actors of a country compete over, and negotiate, the use of public space and the way it should be regulated. Empirically, it illustrates competition and negotiation of the use of language in Odessa, the third largest city of Ukraine, where Ukrainian should be the official language but Russian is widely used. Theoretically, starting from the way public and private are negotiated, and the extent to which this happens, we will suggest that resistance to state measures, and policies, that do not su...
The Introduction sets the conceptual boundaries of the debate with which the whole collection of chapters engages. On the one hand, it refers to the different strands of literature which have dealt with notions of informality,... more
The Introduction sets the conceptual boundaries of the debate with which the whole collection of chapters engages. On the one hand, it refers to the different strands of literature which have dealt with notions of informality, licitness/illicitness, legality/extralegality, and criminalization. On the other, it defines the fil rouge weaving together the book contributions around three main axes: (1) the social morality of crime; (2) the “people versus state” opposition; (3) informality and resistance.
Abstract This article explores the role of informality among Uzbek construction workers in Russia. We start from a relationship that is based on economic reward and common interests and go on to explore the non-economic components of this... more
Abstract This article explores the role of informality among Uzbek construction workers in Russia. We start from a relationship that is based on economic reward and common interests and go on to explore the non-economic components of this relationship. Economically, the workers entrust their supervisor and agree to work for him for a given amount of money. However, this decision is also embedded in a non-economic dimension. All workers, and their master, come from the same village so that an additional layer of social obligations are involved. First, workers are able to receive a treatment that goes beyond economic relations, with favours or more mild attitudes when needed. Second, they are also able to put pressure on the line manager through their families in case things do not work out the way they expected. We use the case study to propose the existence of a non-monetary currency (or even currencies) that complement formal currencies. Money, its symbolism and the power attached to it still play a major role in the relationships and dependencies analyzed here. These points help us in suggesting that relations encompass a wide range of transactions and rituals that go beyond mere economic interest and that cannot be neglected when understanding informality.
This article surveys the official narrative on representation of Estonian identity and Estonianness through the tourism strategy implemented by Estonia from 2007 to 2015. Gathering material from brochures and documents targeting... more
This article surveys the official narrative on representation of Estonian identity and Estonianness through the tourism strategy implemented by Estonia from 2007 to 2015. Gathering material from brochures and documents targeting foreigners produced by the Estonian Institute and “Enterprise Estonia” (EAS) and analyzing the logic behind the interior design of Tallinn Airport, we engage with current debates on identity construction in post-Soviet spaces. In particular, we suggest that along with an established body of literature looking at the role of state actors in the construction of identity, studies should consider the role of nontraditional or non-state actors in identifying and promoting identity markers.
Introducing this special issue of Caucasus Survey, this article emphasizes the dual importance of studying informality in the South Caucasus: to reveal processes previously dismissed from the purview of academic enquiry, and to elaborate... more
Introducing this special issue of Caucasus Survey, this article emphasizes the dual importance of studying informality in the South Caucasus: to reveal processes previously dismissed from the purview of academic enquiry, and to elaborate the informality concept as an innovative prism through which to understand norms and regulations structuring social life and power relations. The special issue addresses two clear gaps in the existing literature: the dearth of research into informality in general, and the specific lack of informality studies that do not take a normatively negative view of their subject. In this introduction, we first give an overview of the current research field in the study of informality. Then we discuss research on post-socialist informality, indicating the absence of the Caucasian cases in this literature. Third, we elaborate further the purpose of this special issue and end by offering brief overviews of the contributions herein.
This article looks at the informal governance practice of Georgia’s post-revolution (2003-2012) reformers. Empirically, we argue that the deployment of informal governance strategies became necessary for the Georgian government precisely... more
This article looks at the informal governance practice of Georgia’s post-revolution (2003-2012) reformers. Empirically, we argue that the deployment of informal governance strategies became necessary for the Georgian government precisely because its official liberal reform course was politically constraining and incapacitated it from coping with the social costs of marketization and political-economic crisis. The analysed case, we submit, has major implications for theories of governance and informality. As it stands now, the literature is predominantly preoccupied with improvements in the state’s institutional quality. The Georgian case, in contrast, highlights the importance of institutional design. Utilizing perspectives from Polanyian institutionalist analysis, we problematise the ongoing propagation of market-enhancing institutional design and underline the importance of marketconstraining and social regulation. Arguing that reliance on informality cannot be reduced to profit s...
Research Interests:
Recent debates on informal economic activities have partially switched away from a pure monetary logic towards a more complex one, embedded in long term relations and reckoning with non materialistic paradigms. The role of informality in... more
Recent debates on informal economic activities have partially switched away from a pure monetary logic towards a more complex one, embedded in long term relations and reckoning with non materialistic paradigms. The role of informality in certain aspects of people's lives has however, remained largely unexplored. This article uncovers what happens when the state retires from (providing benefits and social services to) a geographic area and what kind of mechanisms, practices and institutions are created to make up for this. We suggest that, in the face of de facto abandonment by state welfare, and the absence of a private sector alternative, a myriad of transactions and actors can make up for this by replacing these forms of welfare informally. Our case study focuses on the nuclear landscapes around the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone in north–central Ukraine as we reveal the ways the excluded and abandoned, which we frame as post-nuclear “bare life” (Agamben, 1998), have created a mecha...
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Limits to human action and interaction are detectable everywhere in a state (and not only). The state does not necessarily have a direct role in setting them, but they exist nonetheless. A local trader, from a village or another city,... more
Limits to human action and interaction are detectable everywhere in a state (and not only). The state does not necessarily have a direct role in setting them, but they exist nonetheless. A local trader, from a village or another city, wishing to sell some products in another place must face a number of obstacles: finding the right place, entering a new zone, facing new competitors, finding new connections, affording travel costs etc. Likewise, somebody wishing to move from one city to another, temporarily or definitively, has to face a number of issues ...
Independence forced Ukraine to face a set of statehood and nationhood challenges. State and institution building progressed quickly and effectively. In 1996 the country adopted a constitution and based its institution building on... more
Independence forced Ukraine to face a set of statehood and nationhood challenges. State and institution building progressed quickly and effectively. In 1996 the country adopted a constitution and based its institution building on pre-existing ones. Having been a Soviet Republic, Ukraine's institutions were shaped well before 1991—if we exclude the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the diplomatic corps. The country also diligently quelled Crimean separatism by granting a high level of autonomy to the region, with Kiev retaining control of financial matters.

And 88 more

From the erosion of state legitimacy in Lebanon to the use of smartphones in Kyrgyzstan, from a Polish suburb to the music scene in Azerbaijan, this volume attempts to explain why, in a variety of world regions, a substantial number of... more
From the erosion of state legitimacy in Lebanon to the use of smartphones in Kyrgyzstan, from a Polish suburb to the music scene in Azerbaijan, this volume attempts to explain why, in a variety of world regions, a substantial number of people tend to ignore or act against state rules. We propose to look at informality beyond simplistic associations of the phenomenon with a single category such as "informal labour" or "corruption". By doing this, we propose to look for a correlation between the emergence, and persistence, of some informal practices and the quality of governance in a given area. We also suggest that a better understanding of the variety of informal practices present in a region can help conceptualising more adequate interventions and eventually improve the socio-economic conditions of its inhabitants.
Research Interests:
Our world today is experimenting a time of great power but also of tremendous resistances. Everywhere, people are brought together by similar burdens and frustration and creatively think about how to counter the forms of domination they... more
Our world today is experimenting a time of great power but also of tremendous resistances.
Everywhere, people are brought together by similar burdens and frustration and creatively think about how to counter the forms of domination they are ascribed to. In academia as well there is an awakening among scholars to further investigate these multiple forms of resistance and equip the field with useful and empowering knowledge.
This book aims at presenting some of these findings and reflecting upon the implications, social relevance, and ethical challenges of the growing field of Resistance Studies.

"From France’s gilets jaunes to the native pipeline blockades in North Dakota - numerous societies confronted with the impact and the decline of a certain political and economic order, see forms of protest and resistance that cannot be embedded in nor really connected to ‘classical’ political actors and civil society. This is why a comparative work on resistances like this one is timely."
— Bruno De Cordier, Associate Professor, Conflict Research Group, Ghent University, Belgium


"This work is an excellent contribution to our understanding of the complex issue of resistance in its different forms and shapes. It is a brilliant introduction to the new trends in resistances studies based on fruitful empirical research. Each chapter integrates a case study which highlights an ongoing debate commented by scholar-activists engaged in the movements they study."
— Firouzeh Nahavandi, Professor, Free University of Brussels


"Resistances is a rich illustration of the interdisciplinary range, empirical scope and theoretical depths of contemporary resistance studies. It articulates a new wave by scholar-activists combining theoretical analysis with activist concerns. It brings the field forward by critically discussing earlier work and suggesting new approaches. Importantly, it argues for our engagement with the "resistance-violence nexus" and domination within the academia."
— Stellan Vinthagen, Professor of Sociology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Though informed by case studies conducted in Ukraine, this book transcends its country-specific scope. It explains why informality in governance is not necessarily transitory or temporary but a constant in most political systems. The book... more
Though informed by case studies conducted in Ukraine, this book transcends its country-specific scope. It explains why informality in governance is not necessarily transitory or temporary but a constant in most political systems. The book discusses self-protective mechanisms, responses to incomplete or unfocused policy making, and strategies employed by individuals, classes, and communities to respond to unusual demands. The book argues that when state or company expectations exceed normative behavior, informal behavior continues to thrive. New tactics help cope with the reality of governance. Informality also challenges the values imposed by power through attitudes and behaviors that take place "beyond" or "in spite of" the state.
Research Interests:
This volume explores the continuous line from informal and unrecorded practices all the way up to illegal and criminal practices, performed and reproduced by both individuals and organisations. The authors classify them as alternative,... more
This volume explores the continuous line from informal and unrecorded practices all the way up to illegal and criminal practices, performed and reproduced by both individuals and organisations. The authors classify them as alternative, subversive forms of governance performed by marginal (and often invisible) peripheral actors. The volume studies how the informal and the extra-legal unfold transnationally and, in particular, how and why they have been/are being progressively criminalized and integrated into the construction of global and local dangerhoods; how the above-mentioned phenomena are embedded into a post-liberal security order; and whether they shape new states of exception and generate moral panic whose ultimate function is regulatory, disciplinary and one of crafting practices of political ordering.
How can academics cope with the 1000+ tasks they are expected to perform at work? Based on the author’s experience and stories collected from five continents, The SCOPUS Diaries is intended to change the way readers understand academia... more
How can academics cope with the 1000+ tasks they are expected to perform at work?

Based on the author’s experience and stories collected from five continents, The SCOPUS Diaries is intended to change the way readers understand academia and live their academic careers.

Not all the things you are asked to do are vital to your job. Indeed, thinking strategically of your career enables you to find the balance between what you need to do and what you enjoy doing (and that brought you to academic life in the first place).

Organized around short answers to crucial questions researchers ask themselves in the course of their career, The SCOPUS diaries will offer its readers practical tips to inform the daily choices that will eventually determine how they will life their professional and personal life.

The book sales at 5.99 euro here and because of the low price (and the fact that I support the publisher) I will not upload it here. You can buy it from:
http://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-scopus-diaries-and-the-illogics-of-academic-survival/9783838211992
https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/the-scopus-diaries-and-the-il-logics-of-academic-survival
https://www.amazon.com/SCOPUS-Diaries-logics-Academic-Survival/dp/3838211995
How can academics cope with the 1000+ tasks they are expected to perform at work? Based on the author’s experience and stories collected from five continents, The SCOPUS Diaries is intended to change the way readers understand academia... more
How can academics cope with the 1000+ tasks they are expected to perform at work?

Based on the author’s experience and stories collected from five continents, The SCOPUS Diaries is intended to change the way readers understand academia and live their academic careers.

Now that academics are required to be teachers, managers, media catalyzers, analysts, fundraisers, and social media animals: How do you strike a good balance between what is expected from you and what you want to do? What conferences to attend? How to find the money to go there? Is it worth it to act as a peer reviewer? What publishers are best to target? Is publishing a chapter in an edited book worth the work? This book is intended to help scholars to design and think strategically about their own career. Beginning with “How to get published in good journals,” it explores a number of questions that most academics encounter at various stages of their careers.
Introduction: Informal Economies as Varieties of Governance Why Read Informality in a Substantivist Manner? On the Embeddedness of the Soviet Second Economy Informal Economy: The Invisible Hand of Government Estimating... more
Introduction: Informal Economies as Varieties of Governance

    Why Read Informality in a Substantivist Manner? On the Embeddedness of the Soviet Second Economy

    Informal Economy: The Invisible Hand of Government

    Estimating the Size of the Croatian Shadow Economy: A Labour Approach

    Informal Employment and Earnings Determination in Ukraine

    Approaching Informality: Rear-Mirror Methodology and Ethnographic Inquiry

    Explaining the Informal Economy in Post-Communist Societies: A Study of the Asymmetry Between Formal and Informal Institutions in Romania

    Post-Socialist Informality Rural Style: Impressions from Bulgaria

    Exploring the Practice of Making Informal Payments in the Health Sector: Some Lessons from Greece

    Violent Pressure on Business and the Size of the Informal Economy: Evidence from Russian Regions

    Labor Informality in Mexico: An Indicator Analysis

    The Interplay Between Formal and Informal Firms and Its Implications on Jobs in Francophone Africa: Case Studies of Senegal and Benin

    Governing Informal Payments by Market in the Chinese Healthcare System

    Social Mechanisms of the Counterpublic Sphere: A Case of a Coffee Farmers’ Cooperative in LAO PDR

    Formalisation of Entrepreneurship in the Informal Economy in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Role of Formal Institutions: An Analysis of Ghana’s Experience

    Evidence on Corruption in Public Procurements in Healthcare and the Implications for Policy
Research Interests:
This book explores the function of the “everyday” in the formation, consolidation and performance of national, sub-national and local identities in the former socialist region. Based on extensive original research including fieldwork, the... more
This book explores the function of the “everyday” in the formation, consolidation and performance of national, sub-national and local identities in the former socialist region. Based on extensive original research including fieldwork, the book demonstrates how the study of everyday and mundane practices is a meaningful and useful way of understanding the socio-political processes of identity formation both at the top and bottom level of a state. The book covers a wide range of countries including the Baltic States, Ukraine, Russia, the Caucasus and Central Asia, and considers “everyday” banal practices, including those related to consumption, kinship, embodiment, mobility, music, and the use of objects and artifacts. Overall, the book draws on, and contributes to, theory; and shows how the process of nation-building is not just undertaken by formal actors, such as the state, its institutions and political elites.
Research Interests:
This book is a comprehensive collection of key scholarship on informality from the whole post-socialist region. From Bosnia to Central Asia, passing through Russia and Azerbaijan, the contributions to this volume illustrate the... more
This book is a comprehensive collection of key scholarship on informality from the whole post-socialist region. From Bosnia to Central Asia, passing through Russia and Azerbaijan, the contributions to this volume illustrate the multi-faceted and complex nature of informality, while demonstrating the growing scholarly and policy debates that have developed around the understanding of informality.

In contrast to approaches which tend to classify informality as ‘bad’ or ‘transitional’ – meaning that modernity will make it disappear – this edited volume concentrates on dynamics and mechanisms to understand and explain informality, while also debating its relationship with the market and society.

The authors seek to explain informality beyond a mere monetaristic/economistic approach, rediscovering its interconnection with social phenomena to propose a more holistic interpretation of the meaning of informality and its influence in various spheres of life.

They do this by exploring the evolving role of informal practices in the post-socialist region, and by focusing on informality as a social organisation determinant but also looking at the way it reshapes emergent social resistance against symbolic and real political order(s).

This book was originally published as two special issues, of Caucasus Survey and the Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe.
Research Interests:
THIS IS NOT THE FINAL VERSION - THERE ARE TYPOS Nation-building as a process is never complete and issues related to identity, nation, state and regime-building are recurrent in the post-Soviet region. This comparative, inter-disciplinary... more
THIS IS NOT THE FINAL VERSION - THERE ARE TYPOS
Nation-building as a process is never complete and issues related to identity, nation, state and regime-building are recurrent in the post-Soviet region. This comparative, inter-disciplinary volume explores how nation-building tools emerged and evolved over the last twenty years. Featuring in-depth case studies from countries throughout the post-Soviet space it compares various aspects of nation-building and identity formation projects. Approaching the issue from a variety of disciplines, and geographical areas, contributors illustrate chapter by chapter how different state and non-state actors utilise traditional instruments of nation-construction in new ways while also developing non-traditional tools and strategies to provide a contemporary account of how nation-formation efforts evolve and diverge.
Research Interests:
"This book examines the significance of the colour revolution regime-change process – popular shorthand for non-violent protests that overthrew post-communist authoritarian regimes – the Georgian Rose Revolution (2003), the Ukrainian... more
"This book examines the significance of the colour revolution regime-change process – popular shorthand for non-violent protests that overthrew post-communist authoritarian regimes – the Georgian Rose Revolution (2003), the Ukrainian Orange Revolution (2004) and the Kyrgyzstani Tulip Revolution (2005) being the most dramatic examples.
It covers the former Soviet republics comprehensively, including republics such as Russia where colour revolutions did not occur, despite apparently favourable conditions, and considers why some post-Soviet countries underwent a colour revolution and others not. Identifying the conditions for successful colour revolutions, it asks whether there is a revolutionary blueprint that has been exported and continues to be transferred to areas of the world under autocratic rule.
The book examines the ideologies of the post-Soviet ruling regimes, showing how political elites integrated nationalism, populism and authoritarianism into political debates; analyzes anti-regime opposition movements, discussing the
factors which led to the rise of such movements and outlining how the opposition movements were constituted and how they operated; and assesses the impact of external forces including the US, the EU and Russia. It evaluates the colour revolution phenomenon in its entirety, pointing out common features between different countries.
"
In spite of theoretical predictions by a number of scholars, and efforts by practitioners, laws, regulations and institutions to reach a high level of transparency in economic dealings, informality remains one of the most important... more
In spite of theoretical predictions by a number of scholars, and efforts by practitioners, laws, regulations and institutions to reach a high level of transparency in economic dealings, informality remains one of the most important socio-economic and, indeed, culturally inflected phenomena in the world. We refer here to informal payments, but not only to these. A (large) number of processes, procedures and habits are shaped according to and within practices that resist formalization or regulation from above. These include local terms for ‘connections’ in particular national cultures, such as štela and veze (Bosnia), guanxi (China), blat (Russia), tutvuste kaudu (Estonia) and vruzki (Bulgaria), a number of which feature in this book, as well as more amorphous and shifting informal unwritten rules of conduct and mutuality (Hann and Hart, 2009; Kovacs, 2014; Ledeneva, 1998, 2009; Morris, 2012; Stan, 2012; Wanner, 2005; Williams et al., 2013).

The starting point of this book is case studies which could be classified mostly as engaging with the micro scale. However, our choice to engage with a large territory, encompassing wide geographical diversity and tackling informality at several levels of the society, from a single citizen (Lithuania) to a whole sector (healthcare in Ukraine or companies in Bulgaria), as well as our previous argument that informality is used by both winners and losers of post-socialist transition (Morris and Polese, 2014, 2014b), gives an idea of the size, spread and depth of the phenomenon of informality.
Our goal here is show that informality has a systemic reality not only at the micro level but also, and more importantly, at the macro level. In this book, the authors attempt to move beyond functionalist or structuralist perspectives to propose that informality at the macro scale is nothing but another way of responding to policy-making, and its reality must inform policy decisions. Informality can start as a micro phenomenon, but often grows to such proportions that it must be considered a macro phenomenon rivalling the actions of the state. When this happens, its reality shows the failure of certain measures and perforce prompts a change in attitude or policy-making itself. The authors examine informality through the prism of state–society relations.

This book looks at the aspects of informality developed in all segments of a society. While agreeing that sometimes informality is a way to survive, the authors view informality within a critical realist frame, as a ‘normal’ response or set of tactics for individuals, classes and communities. Where expectations (of the state, of a company, of a commission) are too far from citizens’ existing models of normative behaviour, informal tactics continue and, indeed, new ones are adopted that are designed both to cope with the disjuncture between theory and reality and also to serve as a clear contrast to the imposed values of the centre (state/EU). This brings back into the purview the concept of social milieu, social networks and the moral economy, and at the same time speaks to the literature around civic development and the Habermasian public sphere.
Research Interests:
What is the best way to enjoy financial security after retirement in a country with an ineffective pension system? Is there a moral justification for under-the-table payments to a doctor? Is there a clear boundary between a gift and a... more
What is the best way to enjoy financial security after retirement in a country with an ineffective pension system? Is there a moral justification for under-the-table payments to a doctor? Is there a clear boundary between a gift and a bribe? Based on the undesrstanding that informality is “the space between two formal rules” this book seeks alternative and critical explanations to phenomena and behaviours that are often too quickly classified as corruption, bad governance, and absence of the rule of law. From bottom-up construction of welfare and security to responses to the construction of social and cultural habits challenging a state, it draws from a number of examples where individual and state morality do not overlap. Informality, it is argued, is not always informed by a monetary or rent-seeking logic but can be regarded as a mechanism by which citizens provide feedback on governement policies. Consequently, this book maintains that a more nuanced understanding of informality may represent a major step towards better and more inclusive governance.
Research Interests:
(if interested in reviewing I can send you a e-copy or a hard copy, just contact me) google book available online at... more
Research Interests:
During the first decade of the 21st century, a remarkable phenomenon swept through the former Soviet Union changing the political, social and cultural landscape. Popularly known as the ‘Colour Revolutions’, these non-violent protests... more
During the first decade of the 21st century, a remarkable phenomenon swept through the former Soviet Union changing the political, social and cultural landscape. Popularly known as the ‘Colour Revolutions’, these non-violent protests overthrew autocratic regimes in three post-soviet republics: the Georgian Rose Revolution (2003), the Ukrainian Orange Revolution (2004) and the Kyrgyzstani Tulip Revolution (2005). This book examines the significance of these regime-change processes for the post-soviet world in particular and for global politics in the 21st century.

Engaging comprehensively with the former Soviet republics, the contributors to this book ask why there wasn’t a revolution in a post-Soviet republic such as Russia, despite apparently favourable conditions. They also explore the circumstances that ensured some post-soviet countries underwent a successful colour revolution whilst others did not. Identifying the conditions for successful colour revolutions, this book asks whether there is a revolutionary blueprint that may be exported to other areas around the world that are under autocratic rule. Carefully considering the ideologies of the post-Soviet ruling regimes, this book demonstrates the manner by which political elites integrated nationalism, authoritarianism and populism into public debates. It analyzes the diverse anti-regime movements, discussing the factors that led to the rise of such factions and outlining how these opposition groups were constituted and operated. In addition, it assesses the impact of external forces including the influence of the USA, the EU and Russia. By examining the colour revolution phenomenon in its entirety, this book marks a significant contribution to both our micro and macro understanding of this tide of transformation.
During the first decade of the 21stcentury, a remarkable phenomenon swept through the former Soviet Union changing the political, social and cultural landscape. Popularly known as the Colour Revolutions ", these non-violent protests... more
During the first decade of the 21stcentury, a remarkable phenomenon swept through the former Soviet Union changing the political, social and cultural landscape. Popularly known as the Colour Revolutions ", these non-violent protests overthrew autocratic regimes in three post-soviet republics: the Georgian Rose Revolution (2003), the Ukrainian Orange Revolution (2004) and the Kyrgyzstani Tulip Revolution (2005). This book examines the significance of these regime-change processes for the post-soviet world in particular and for global politics in the 21stcentury. Engaging comprehensively with the former Soviet republics, the contributors to this book ask why there wasn "t a revolution in a post-Soviet republic such as Russia, despite apparently favourable conditions. They also explore the circumstances that ensured some post-soviet countries underwent a successful colour revolution whilst others did not. Identifying the conditions for successful colour revolutions, this book asks whether there is a revolutionary blueprint that may be exported to other areas around the world that are under autocratic rule. Carefully considering the ideologies of the post-Soviet ruling regimes, this book demonstrates the manner by which political elites integrated nationalism, authoritarianism and populism into public debates. It analyzes the diverse anti-regime movements, discussing the factors that led to the rise of such factions and outlining how these opposition groups were constituted and operated. In addition, it assesses the impact of external forces including the influence of the USA, the EU and Russia. By examining the colour revolution phenomenon in its entirety, this book marks a significant contribution to both our micro and macro understanding of this tide of transformation.
Im Mittelpunkt des Bandes stehen die aus autokratischen Vorläuferregimen mit totalitären Zügen resultierenden Belastungsfaktoren für die Etablierung und Konsolidierung demokratischer Verfassungsstaaten. Der Fall des Eisernen Vorhangs und... more
Im Mittelpunkt des Bandes stehen die aus autokratischen Vorläuferregimen mit totalitären Zügen resultierenden Belastungsfaktoren für die Etablierung und Konsolidierung demokratischer Verfassungsstaaten. Der Fall des Eisernen Vorhangs und der Zusammenbruch der Einparteiregime Mittel- und Osteuropas begünstigten in vielen Ländern demokratische Entwicklungen. Doch gingen sie unterschiedliche Wege, und einige verließen den anfänglich eingeschlagenen Pfad demokratischer Transformation bereits wieder nach kurzer Zeit. Die großen Unterschiede der östlichen Transformationen werfen die Frage auf, warum auf den ersten Blick sehr ähnliche Startbedingungen zu sehr unterschiedlichen Ergebnissen geführt haben. Welche Rolle spielte dabei die totalitäre Erblast des »real existierenden Sozialismus«?

Mit Beiträgen von: Uwe Backes (Dresden),
Josette Baer (Zürich), Stanislav Balík (Brno), Timm
Beichelt (Frankfurt/Oder), Joakim Ekman (Örebro),
Sergiu Gergina (Leiden), Jan Holzer (Brno), Tytus
Jaskulowski (Berlin), Jonas Linde (Örebro), Miroslaw
Mares (Brno), Wolfgang Merkel (Berlin), Donnacha
O’Beachain (Almaty), Abel Polese (Edinburgh), Gert
Pickel (Frankfurt/Oder), Pavel Pseja (Brno), Johnny
Rodin (Haninge), Dieter Segert (Wien), Paulina
Sekula (Krakau), Svend-Erik Skaaning (Aarhus) und
Stefan Troebst (Leipzig).
During the first decade of the 21st century, a remarkable phenomenon swept through the former Soviet Union changing the political, social and cultural landscape. Popularly known as the ‘Colour Revolutions’, these non-violent protests... more
During the first decade of the 21st century, a remarkable phenomenon swept through the former Soviet Union changing the political, social and cultural landscape. Popularly known as the ‘Colour Revolutions’, these non-violent protests overthrew autocratic regimes in three post-soviet republics: the Georgian Rose Revolution (2003), the Ukrainian Orange Revolution (2004) and the Kyrgyzstani Tulip Revolution (2005). This book examines the significance of these regime-change processes for the post-soviet world in particular and for global politics in the 21st century.

Engaging comprehensively with the former Soviet republics, the contributors to this book ask why there wasn’t a revolution in a post-Soviet republic such as Russia, despite apparently favourable conditions. They also explore the circumstances that ensured some post-soviet countries underwent a successful colour revolution whilst others did not. Identifying the conditions for successful colour revolutions, this book asks whether there is a revolutionary blueprint that may be exported to other areas around the world that are under autocratic rule. Carefully considering the ideologies of the post-Soviet ruling regimes, this book demonstrates the manner by which political elites integrated nationalism, authoritarianism and populism into public debates. It analyzes the diverse anti-regime movements, discussing the factors that led to the rise of such factions and outlining how these opposition groups were constituted and operated. In addition, it assesses the impact of external forces including the influence of the USA, the EU and Russia. By examining the colour revolution phenomenon in its entirety, this book marks a significant contribution to both our micro and macro understanding of this tide of transformation.
Full announcement at https://euraxess.ec.europa.eu/jobs/164985 Cfa: PhD scholarship: Informality and innovation: building post-pandemic resilient communities in Morocco (based at: University of Latvia, EPRC Georgia and UCD Morocco) This... more
Full announcement at https://euraxess.ec.europa.eu/jobs/164985

Cfa: PhD scholarship: Informality and innovation: building post-pandemic resilient communities in Morocco (based at: University of Latvia, EPRC Georgia and UCD Morocco)
This is part of an industrial doctorate project whose description is below. Also documents to apply are listed below in this call.
Your job in a nutshell:
1) you will be enrolled in a PhD programme under guidance of Prof Ilona Baumane-Vitolina and Dr Abel Polese, Dr Irina Guruli and Prof Kamal Labassi
2) you will be employed full time with a competitive salary calculated according to Marie Curie standards (a short description can be found here https://fastepo.com/phd-and-postdocs-salary/salary-of-phd-student-in-marie-sklodowska-curie-itn/)
3) your employment will be shared between a standard university research contract and a contract as an analyst at EPRC with data collection in Morocco
4) you will be part of a large network with 29 partners from Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America. The network will meet twice a year in different locations and you will have a chance to benefit from expertise of other professionals. A list of partners and participants can be found here
https://www.presilient-dn.eu/
5) you will be expected to conduct a research on informality in Morocco while contributing to practical tasks and develop a career plan, in consultation with your supervisors, leading you to be competitive on the job market (with both research and professional experience) as soon as you defend your PhD

We will be assessing applications on a rolling basis with last day to apply the 1 of December 2023. Starting date is 1 January 2024 or as soon as possible at a later agreed date.

Applications should be emailed to presilient.dn@gmail.com  cc-ed to Prof Ilona Baumane-Vītoliņa: ilona.baumane@lu.lv and abel.polese@dcu.ie

An application package must include:
1) a curriculum vitae (including explicit details of country / countries of residence for the past 3 years, this is needed for eligibility purposes);
2) an application letter no longer than 500 words;
3) a short (500-1000 words) summary of your doctoral project.
4) The grades achieved in your Master’s degree (certificates will be requested if you are shortlisted)
5) Name and contact of 2-3 references who can comment on your professional qualifications and abilities (they will be contacted only if you are shortlisted)
Research Interests:
We are looking for early-stage researchers who can complete a research on the informality of Kenya, Morocco, Chile, Vietnam, Kyrgyzstan, Colombia, the position is 3 years with possibility to extend upon successful completion
Research Interests:
call here https://euraxess.ec.europa.eu/jobs/67534 In addition to the almost 2bln workers already active in the informal sector, World Bank and ILO estimate that the pandemic might have put at risk of precarious employment 500mln-1.5bln... more
call here

https://euraxess.ec.europa.eu/jobs/67534

In addition to the almost 2bln workers already active in the informal sector, World Bank and ILO estimate that the pandemic might have put at risk of precarious employment 500mln-1.5bln more. These losses, and related consequences, are not evenly distributed given that Africa, Asia and Latin America is where 93% of the world’s informal employment is located and where post-pandemic crisis is likely to hit harder (especially women, migrants and young people). Yet, the concern is global. Indeed, besides vulnerability and precariousness at individual and community levels, informality also eventually reduces state capacity and the ability of institutions to design and implement policies that properly address social, economic and environmental issues (i.e. SDGs) in a long term perspective. Accordingly, informality-related challenges have been devoted a great deal of attention and political statements. But seldom have these statements been followed by concrete instructions, guidelines or evidence-based policies to tackle informality across the world. Starting from this gap, PRESILIENT is a large network comprising 14 partners (of which 7 nonacademic) and 15 associated partners located in Africa, Asia-Pacific and Latin America committed to delivering the a world class cross-regional training on informality in the Global South to: measure it, address it, find viable and sustainable alternatives. By doing this, we have committed to four main objectives: O.1 train the next generation of experts on informality in the global south. O.2 carry out a research spanning 15 different countries and to produce novel data and significant theoretical advancements in the field. O.3 produce strategic intelligence that can be used to provide practical policy recommendations O.4 enable multi-directional knowledge transfer through network events, pairing of academic and non-academic partners (who will jointly supervise each fellow), secondment and task-based teamwork.
Research Interests:
Full text here https://www.dcu.ie/lawandgovernment/news/2023/jan/call-phd-fellowships Call for 4 PhD fellowships in the frame of the PRESILIENT Industrial Doctorate project. Post-pandemic resilient communities: is the informal economy a... more
Full text here
https://www.dcu.ie/lawandgovernment/news/2023/jan/call-phd-fellowships

Call for 4 PhD fellowships in the frame of the PRESILIENT Industrial Doctorate project.

Post-pandemic resilient communities: is the informal economy a reservoir for the next generation of digitalized and green businesses in Africa, Asia and Latin America?

(HORIZON-MSCA-2021-DN-01, GA 101073394)

Starting date: 1 September 2023

Deadline: 7 March 2023 (instructions on how to apply are below)

Dublin City University has been awarded a €3.9m grant from the European Union to fund a Doctoral Network named PRESILIENT: Post-pandemic resilient communities: is the informal economy a reservoir for the next generation of digitalized and green businesses in Africa, Asia and Latin America?

The consortium involves seven academic and seven non-academic partners and will produce 15 PhD holders featuring both theoretical and empirical knowledge of the topic – this includes an experience of 18 months working in a non-academic partner as specified below.

PhD researcher 1; Focus: Vietnam
Partners: Dublin City University and Development Perspectives (www.developmentperspectives.ie)
PhD researcher 2; Focus: Colombia
Partners: Dublin City University and Development Perspectives (www.developmentperspectives.ie)
PhD researcher 3; Focus: Kyrgyzstan
Partners: Dublin City University and Transition (www.tol.org)
PhD researcher 4; Focus: Chile
Partners: Dublin City University and Economic and Policy Research Center (www.eprc.ge)
What is an Industrial Doctorate?

An MSCA – Industrial Doctorate is a programme funded by Horizon Europe thanks to which Junior Researchers can enroll in a PhD programme while being employed 18 months by a university and 18 months by a non-academic partner (think tank, company, NGO, see list below). Successful fellows will receive a salary for three years, at the EU early Stage Researcher rate – substantially above the level of PhD scholarships in most countries (total amount depending on the country where they will be based in) and an allowance for mobility, research, family in line with EU guidelines that can be viewed via the MSCA actions page.

The programme aims to produce PhD holders with strong work experience, who are therefore already competitive on the job market.

Main objectives of the programme

If successful, you will be enrolled in a PhD programme in one of the universities below and work in a team of academic and non-academic specialists to conduct a multi-level study on informality in one of the 15 target countries (Africa, Asia, Latin America, see list below) involving a) Horizon Scanning; b) Delphi Survey; c) Construction of Case Studies to identify the sectors of the economy that have been most affected by the pandemic, the sectors that could lead economic recovery and the policies needed to make this recovery durable and sustainable in the long term; the final goal is the training of a junior expert on informality in the Global South with exposure to both academic and non-academic sector opportunities; Database, PhD thesis, scientific publications, policy publications, communication activities.

Short description of the project and its focus

In addition to the almost 2bln workers already active in the informal sector, World Bank and ILO estimate that the pandemic might have put at risk of precarious employment 500mln-1.5bln more. These losses, and related consequences, are not evenly distributed given that Africa, Asia and Latin America is where 93% of the world’s informal employment is located and where post-pandemic crisis is likely to hit harder (especially women, migrants and young people). Yet, the concern is global. Indeed, besides vulnerability and precariousness at individual and community levels, informality also eventually reduces state capacity and the ability of institutions to design and implement policies that properly address social, economic and environmental issues (i.e. SDGs) in a long term perspective. Accordingly, informality-related challenges have been devoted a great deal of attention and political statements. But seldom have these statements been followed by concrete instructions, guidelines or evidence-based policies to tackle informality across the world. Starting from this gap, PRESILIENT is a large network comprising 14 partners (of which 7 non-academic) and 15 associated partners located in Africa, Asia-Pacific and Latin America committed to delivering the a world class cross-regional training on informality in the Global South to: measure it, address it, find viable and sustainable alternatives. By doing this, we have committed to four main objectives: O.1 train the next generation of experts on informality in the global south. O.2 carry out a research spanning 15 different countries and to produce novel data and significant theoretical advancements in the field. O.3 produce strategic intelligence that can be used to provide practical policy recommendations O.4 enable multi-directional knowledge transfer through network events, pairing of academic and non-academic partners (who will jointly supervise each fellow), secondment and task-based teamwork.

Project partners and regional focus

You can apply for one or more positions but we would be grateful if you could state this in your application to avoid the risk of recruiting the same candidate twice. The selection process is decentralised so you need to prepare a separate application for each of the universities to which you want to apply. Note that entry requirements, deadline and procedures may differ so check what is needed in the specific announcement issued by each partner.

Practical details

Financial conditions (including salary levels) and background documents are available via the MSCA actions page.

Your salary will be calculated according to MSCA rules and your personal + family situation. More information can be found at the financial section of the above MSCA document. If selected, you will be expected to familiarise yourself with these rules also to be aware of your formal rights and obligations towards the donor.

Eligibility: there are no nationality limitations (anyone can apply); applicants must hold a degree enabling them to enroll into doctoral studies by September 2023 (usually a MA or MSc). They cannot have more than 4 years full time research experience (or hold a doctorate already, even if they worked less than 4 years to complete it) at the time of recruitment.

Mobility requirement: applicants can be of any nationality but cannot have been resident (or have had their main activity i.e. work or study) in the country where you will be enrolled in PhD studies for more than 12 of the 36 months prior to recruitment. This means that if you spent less than 12 months in the country where you are going to start your PhD you are eligible.

NB: this is a very intensive programme. Each selected candidate will be enrolled into a PhD programme, work as junior researcher and will be seconded to the target region for data collection and gain a hands-on work experience on how research skills can be used beyond academia for the benefit of the governmental, private or international development sector. There will also be workshops of 4 to 5 days duration approximately every 6 months at which attendance is essential. Therefore a willingness and ability to undertake these international mobilities is a core requirement.

Any informal enquiries about research topics or the process (that are not already addressed in this call or in the MSCA guide for applicants, see link above), should be addressed to the relevant contact person

Applications should be emailed to presilient.dn@gmail.com and cc-ed to abel.polese@dcu.ie and must include:

a curriculum vitae (including explicit details of country / countries of residence for the past 3 years, this is needed for eligibility purposes);
an application letter no longer than 500 words;
a short (500-1000 words) summary of your doctoral project.
the grades achieved in your Master’s degree (certificates will be requested if you are shortlisted)
name and contact of 2-3 references who can comment on your professional qualifications and abilities (they will be contacted only if you are shortlisted)
Please send all the documents together in one PDF file and use, as subject of your message, “PRESILIENT-DN-2023 Application” + the country you want to focus on (Vietnam, Columbia, Kyrgyzstan, Chile).

Failure to do this might result in your application ending up in the wrong folder. Deadline 7 March 2023, 5pm (Brussels time).
Research Interests:
Call for 2 PhD fellowships in the frame of the Industrial Doctorate project Post-pandemic resilient communities: is the informal economy a reservoir for the next generation of digitalized and green businesses in Africa, Asia and Latin... more
Call for 2 PhD fellowships in the frame of the Industrial Doctorate project
Post-pandemic resilient communities: is the informal economy a reservoir for the next generation of digitalized and green businesses in Africa, Asia and Latin America?
(HORIZON-MSCA-2021-DN-01, GA 101073394)

Starting date: 1 September 2023
Deadline: 28 February 2023
Research Interests:
our workshop has a three-fold goal. First, it will expand the scope of theoretical research on informality beyond its economic understanding at the national level, something pointed out in the above studies by Dixit, Helmke and Levitsky... more
our workshop has a three-fold goal. First, it will expand the scope of theoretical research on informality beyond its economic understanding at the national level, something pointed out in the above studies by Dixit, Helmke and Levitsky and Stone as something necessary, but not yet systematically approached. We will look at the role of informal practices in the redefinition and renegotiation of business environments and how entrance and exit barriers are created, causing the reversal that state-led measures were intended to bring about. Second, it will apply this interpretative framework to look at the way policy making, and development policies, are affected by informality in the transitional world. This will eventually allow us to engage with worldwide debates in a comparative perspective. Our starting point is, indeed, the post-socialist region, where informality has been widely studied. However, with this workshop we intend to upscale the scope of our inquiry to Southeast Asia, Africa, Latin America. Third, inasmuch as this has been timidly attempted so far. Our event represents a chances to shed the basis and the social capital to establish and develop a research group on informality that can work together to funding applications and publication projects as outlined below.
Research Interests:
From September 17-19 the University of Lund will host an international conference on the role of informality in international development. The conference FROM ECONOMIC TO POLITICAL INFORMALITY: EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN SHADOW PRACTICES,... more
From September 17-19 the University of Lund will host an international conference on the role of informality in international development. The conference FROM ECONOMIC TO POLITICAL INFORMALITY: EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN SHADOW PRACTICES, POLICY MAKING AND DEVELOPMENT will feature Prof Alena Ledeneva (University College London) as keynote speaker. For three days, 40 specialists on corruption, informality and development  (Prof Steven Sampson, Prof Arnis Sauka) will working on the topic.
Research Interests:
The study is the first attempt to survey perception and understanding of the SDGs among Vietnamese youth. Over a third of the 169 SDG targets highlight the role of youth, implying their critical role in achieving the SDGs. With people... more
The study is the first attempt to survey perception and understanding of the SDGs among Vietnamese youth. Over a third of the 169 SDG targets highlight the role of youth, implying their critical role in achieving the SDGs. With people aged 16 – 30 comprising a quarter of the population in Viet Nam, the study focuses on Vietnamese youth perceptions of the SDGs and how they relate the SDGs to the Vietnamese context. For the purpose of the study, an online survey was designed and circulated among young people (16 – 30) from all the 63 administrative provinces of Viet Nam. More than 7,000 answers to the survey were collected and analysed.

The study aims to explore the level of knowledge and understanding of the adopted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) among Vietnamese young people aged 16 – 30. It identified trends and priority issues and Goals among young people, generally as well as depending on different gender groups and on different geographical bases.

At the same time, the study interpreted the data collected to produce intelligence and recommendations on how to: 1) better inform young people to increase their understanding of the SDGs and 2) identify modes of intervention that take into account preferences and priorities of young people to bring about greater participation of young people in SDG implementation.

The study's results have informed the Voluntary National Reviews on SDG implementation of Vietnam presented in July 2018 by Vice Minister of MPI- Mr. Nguyen The Phuon
Research Interests:
Informality, informal or shadow economies, with a specific focus on the former USSR region (Southern Caucasus or Central Asia) Dublin City University (www.dcu.ie) is a research-intensive, globally-engaged, dynamic institution... more
Informality, informal or shadow economies, with a specific focus on the former USSR region (Southern Caucasus or Central Asia)

Dublin City University (www.dcu.ie) is a research-intensive, globally-engaged, dynamic institution consistently positioned in the rankings of the world’s top young universities.  Dublin City University is ranked in the top 150 in the world for politics and international relations by both the QS and Shanghai world rankings.


DCU Home | DCU
www.dcu.ie
Active engagement with stakeholders and partners is a cornerstone of DCU’s unique identity. We are the antithesis of the ‘Ivory Tower’ university and believe ...

Dublin City University Institute for International Conflict Resolution and Reconstruction invites applications from students for a PhD studentship in Politics and International Relations, valued at between €21,000 and €27,000 pa, for up to four years.

We welcome high quality applications from those interested in working within the following topic area

Informality, informal or shadow economies, with a specific focus on the former USSR region (Southern Caucasus or Central Asia)

The student will be working together with the research group from our recently started project SHADOW: An exploration of the nature of informal economies and shadow practices in the former USSR region

SHADOW is a research and training programme with the goal of producing strategic intelligence on the region and train a generation of specialists on informality in post-Soviet spaces. Our goals are two-fold: 1) we intend to construct an index to provide an accurate measurement of the level of shadow activities in our target countries; 2) we aim to conceptualise a taxonomy of shadow practices in the post-USSR region in a cross-country and cross-regional perspective.

Criteria

Applicants must have a Masters Degree, fluent English and excellent academic grades.  International students will need to meet the university’s English language requirements.  http://www.dcu.ie/registry/english.shtml

English Language Requirements for Non-Native Speakers of ...
www.dcu.ie
English Language Requirements for Non-Native Speakers of English | RegistryregistryEnglish language requirements for non-native speakers of EnglishIn the case of all ...

Informal Enquiries are welcomed and can be made to:

Dr Abel Polese

abel.polese@dcu.ie

We are happy to facilitate discussion on draft research proposals and to make connections with potential supervisors.

Further information:

This PhD scholarship has a value of up to €21,000 to €27,000 (full fees, plus €16,000pa (usually tax free), for up to 4 years, subject to satisfactory progress.
Institute for International Conflict Resolution and Reconstruction website http://iicrr.ie/
General Information on PhD’s at Dublin City University https://www4.dcu.ie/graduatestudies/postgrad-research.shtml#ProspectivePGRinfo
Closing date for receipt of applications:      22 March 2018

Applications should be made to IICRR@dcu.ie and they should include

a cv, including 2 academic referees
a one page letter of application
the grades achieved in your Masters degree with copies of transcripts
a 2000 word research proposal, setting out your research question, how the research relates to existing academic literature and a brief description of your proposed methodology.
Research Interests:
Conference programme 14-15 December 2016, Universite libre de Bruxelles

Keynote speakers: James Scott and Stellan Vinthagen
Research Interests:
Youth in the EU and China: Working Together to Common Challenges is a project funded by the EACEA of the European Commission together with the Guanghua Foundation in Beijing (2011-2014). It brings together 16 youth organisations operating... more
Youth in the EU and China: Working Together to Common Challenges is a project funded by the EACEA of the European Commission together with the Guanghua Foundation in Beijing (2011-2014). It brings together 16 youth organisations operating in Europe, China and South East Asia and is intended to foster cooperation between European and Chinese youth organisations by engaging in actions aimed at asserting the positive role of volunteering in curbing youth unemployment.
Research Interests:
Special issue of Nationalities Papers
Research Interests:
Workshop: Unorthodox Approaches to Eurasian Studies I A Joint Workshop by CARSI / ESCAS / MARMARA University Marmara University, Istanbul 11-13 October 2024 (deadline 31 July 2024) The organisers The European Society for Central Asian... more
Workshop: Unorthodox Approaches to Eurasian Studies I
A Joint Workshop by CARSI / ESCAS / MARMARA University
Marmara University, Istanbul 11-13 October 2024 (deadline 31 July 2024)


The organisers
The European Society for Central Asian Studies http://www.escas.org/about-escas/ in collaboration with the project CARSI (Central Asian Research on Social Innovation) https://www.carsi-se.eu/
is planning to hold cozy and friendly workshop at Marmara University in October


Rationale
This small workshop, and possibly book project that will result, is intended as a platform for reflection about how far research on Central Asia and its neighbourhood has gone so far. We welcome papers with virtually any focus and spacing from societal, political to economic dynamics of contemporary Central Asia as long as they propose a novel focus (be this an underexplored topic, an innovative methodology or novel theorisation of existing phenomena). We are particularly interested in topics and approach that sound unorthodox or unusual. On the other hand, we are not obsessed with having to discuss only extremely unorthodox or unusual topics. We rather seek to stimulate a conversation to look at mainstream and alternative topics through some different lenses or framework for interpretation.


Expected sessions
This presential (no online presentations) workshop will host a small amount of papers so to leave space for discussions and reflections but also socialisation, networking and building up new collaborations across the region. There will be space for social events (i.e. dinner, a walking tour) and for training sessions (i.e. publication strategies, fundraising). Each session will be chaired by a specialist to promote constructive discussions and offer suggestions


Geographical scope
The geographical focus is also flexible. We are open to comparisons with other regions (as long as Central Asia is in the picture) and to the broader Eurasian region, spacing from Turkey and the Caucasus to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Mongolia and Western China in addition to the five Central Asian post-Soviet republics.


Follow-up plans
We plan to share plans for a joint publication (special issue of a journal or edited book, or both if there are enough good papers) and the event shall also be an occasion to discuss possible future workshops in the region


Submissions
If interested, please send, by the 31th of July, a 300 word abstract and a short biographical statement to escastudies@protonmail.com
please also cc to: melanie.sadozai@zea.uni-regensburg.de and abel.polese@dcu.ie


Financial conditions
- there is no workshop fee
- meals will be provided to all participants
- it is not possible to take care of travel but for those with limited funding we can cover accommodation for 2-3 nights
Research Interests:
This interdisciplinary colloquium explores the social dynamics of the 1990s through the period’s changing material culture. Everyday “stuff” was transformed by the disappearance of the Soviet system, the irruption of the market, and the... more
This interdisciplinary colloquium explores the social dynamics of the 1990s through the period’s changing material culture. Everyday “stuff” was transformed by the disappearance of the Soviet system, the irruption of the market, and the opening to the world.  The aim is to investigate the long disintegration of the Soviet system by looking at how populations which are caught in a state of uncertainty react with material inventiveness in order to adapt.

The imprint left by people on things inherited from the Soviet past or newly introduced by the economic and political opening of the system generates a human-material interplay. This transforms social relations over time and fulfills a structuring role in societies. The choice of a material approach combines the universe of things (objects, consumer goods, but also real estate and technical infrastructures) with the space of social relations. It also opens a door on the ordinary intimacy of material arrangements that make everyday life “liveable” in unsettled times.  The event is planned as a multidisciplinary dialogue between history, sociology, anthropology and economics.

A lost decade? Ordinary perceptions and academic analyses 

The 1990s have left such a negative mark that the period has been either pushed into oblivion as a repressed memory or put forward as a political scarecrow. In post-Soviet societies, the 1990s were met with disappointment with soaring democratic and liberal expectations, hopes for widespread prosperity, and modernization through the market. "The 1990s" were so turbulent and feverish, so equivocal and uncertain for many post-Soviet societies that their popular and political narratives are torn between dichotomous representations: an era of moral and legal decay ("Lykhie 90"), on the one hand, and a liberal experience ("ostrov svobody") on the other. The narrative also varies by country: it can be one of nation-building as in Ukraine, or one of exit (from communism) and entry (European) as in the Baltic countries. These years – the chronological boundaries remain fuzzy - were experienced in a variety of ways by societies of the former USSR: it is a period of social, political, and economic production that cemented the political dynamics of the 2000s in Russia, Belarus, the Baltic countries, Central Asia, and the Caucasus.

There is one experience that binds these societies across the region in the immediate post-Soviet aftermath: a shared loss of certainty in the broadest sense of the word. Whether by the trauma of war or otherwise violent social collapse, populations lost their points of reference and of visibility in daily life, they saw their horizons of expectation contracted to address the immediate present. In short, the world had become unpredictable and unreadable. 

Numerous works of economic and cultural anthropology dealing with the post-Soviet space explore the management of these states of uncertainty from the point of view of adapting practices and strategies of economic survival, cultural practices, consumption, state regulation, and property (Morris 2016, Verdery 1999 and 2013, Allina-Pisano 2008, Hann & Gudeman 2015a 2015b). As for the political science perspective, it draws a connection between the 1990s and the legitimization of authoritarian and statist regimes. The existential uncertainty of populations has been commonly identified as the generator of a social demand for "order" and as the foundation of the Putinist social contract (Garrigues, Rousselet 2004, Cook and Dimitrov 2011, Feldmann and Mazepus 2017). 

Academic research has brought nuance to the understanding of the 1990s, in particular by analyzing the weight of legacies from the past and adaptations in a context of social collapse (see bibliography and references). However, the 1990s have not yet been put into historical perspective. We frame the experience of the 1990s as one of populations caught in a state of " permanent liminality" (Szakolczai 2014) where they are forced to reinvent in a continuous loop a "new normality" through the mediation of practices but also of everyday objects (Maček,2016).

Reinventing the 1990s? Creativity and revolution in social relations with things

Looking at the"1990s" through the concept of liminality underlines the dimension of creativity that such a state of permanent uncertainty embodies:  actors invent and create in order to ensure a semblance of control over their situation and their horizon of expectation (Thomassen et al. 2015). The anthropologist K. Verdery described the introduction of market relations and private property as a period of possible innovation. The 1990s signified a revolution in the way of thinking and interacting to the point of touching the "foundations of what constitutes a person", through the new relationship it establishes between the person and the thing owned (Verdery 2013). The materialized and starkly visual and aesthetic expression of the break with the past is striking: it can be the sudden irruption of new things like imports of consumer goods, experiences of urban transformation (degradation or aestheticization), social differentiation, the abandonment of Soviet rituals or public practices and the introduction of new ones. Social dynamics of the 1990s such as the transformations of firms, of the relationship to the urban or natural environment, of the management of new private property or that of the public good also deserve a fresh eye through a material approach. Some scholarship has shown how, in a context of shortages, the practices of "home-made" and DIY created a particular relationship to things, constitutive of the "Soviet subject" (Golubev 2020, Gerasimova 2004). One may wonder how material creativity in Soviet everyday life interacts with one forged in market conditions.

We take as a vantage point material objects to build an argument that things lost, repaired, shared, invented or adapted during the 1990s constitute windows on the Soviet social orders, rooted in the past but transformed and continued. The 1990s are treated as a time-space of social creativity, where present mix with an in-depth historical investigation. Through materiality, the colloquium offers the opportunity to throw a fresh look on the research done on informality, entrepreneurship, the market, civil society but also the media, culture ... to go further in seeking to understand what new where new social ties and interactions are made around the material "novelties" in the entire post-Soviet space. 

Call for papers 

With historical hindsight of nearly thirty years, this conference opens the floor to a less normative, more empirical rereading, closer to people and their material culture. The aim is to approach the 1990s as a field of transformation of social ties resulting from the Soviet order around material and technical innovations. These marked the era, contributing to the de-fabrication of old networks and the development of new ones. Materiality represents, through new or transformed objects, social universes. They establish a connection with the contemporary- or fail to do so.  Proposals can address – but are not limited to- the following aspects:

Defecting: breakdowns of things, neglect, shutdowns, degradation, accidents, breakage, destruction, deindustrialization, depopulation, management of new commons and their failure (for example, the pod’’ezd, water and electricity supply, distribution and power cuts, life in darkness -Tbilisi, Alma-Ata, Dushanbe, etc.).

Repairing: objects and their reconversion, re-use, sharing; managing shortages and mutual aid (in the light of examples as diverse as the renovation of children's playgrounds, the distribution of clothing to refugees or the proliferation of pawnshops (“lombard”)

Exploring: new places, new consumer and capital goods, new equipment and how to use it, the invention, circulation and consumption of goods and products, the chelnok/shuttle trade (from the arrival of Turkish and then Chinese everyday consumer products (hygiene, clothing, utensils) to the first computers and the use of drugs and adulterated products). These explorations also concern the revolution of intimacy, the relationship to the body and the relationship to gender (feminine intimate hygiene, sexuality, sensuality...), new aesthetics (video-show, media and advertising) and experiences of the senses (songs, smells, tastes).

Conflicting: objects caught in conflicts of claim, appropriation, or expropriation (around coveted apartments or production assets, industrial resources or security assets).

The visual dimension of the conference can be expanded by the use of video, photo or audio contributions.  With regard to the debate around historicizing the recent past, the conference organizers welcome papers on sources (public and private archives, testimonies, interviews...) as a subject of contributions.



Submission guidelines:

Abstract submissions are due on 1 May 2021. They should include the following elements:

·      Title

·      Abstract (500 words)

·      Author’s name, affiliation and short bibliographical note (150 words) (in the body of the email)

Authors will be notified within approximately a month of the abstract submission deadline as to the status of their contributions.

Authors of the selected submissions will be invited to confirm their participation in the conference (planned in Paris on 8 - 9 March 2022) in mid-October 2021.

They will be invited to submit the draft of their paper proposals (7000-10000 words) by 15 December 2021.

Abstract submissions shall be sent to Dr. Sophie Lambroschini (sophie_lambro@yahoo.com) and Prof. Françoise Daucé (dauce@ehess.fr) with “Submission Making1990s” as your email subject.

The conference will take place in Paris on 8-9 March 2022. Upon request, funding will be made available, if necessary, to cover the travel costs of participants whose proposals have been selected.
EU funded European Training Network – (MSCA-ETN-2020 GA no: 861034) Two Early Stage Researcher positions (with enrollment into a PhD programme) to start in January 2021 deadline 20 November 2020 MARKETS: Mapping Uncertainties,... more
EU funded European Training Network – (MSCA-ETN-2020 GA no: 861034)

Two Early Stage Researcher positions (with enrollment into a PhD programme) to start in January 2021
deadline 20 November 2020


MARKETS: Mapping Uncertainties, Challenges and Future Opportunities of Emerging Markets: Informal Barriers, Business Environments and Future Trends in Eastern Europe, The Caucasus and Central Asia


Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) is part of a consortium that was awarded a €3.9m grant from the European Union to fund a European Training Network entitled MARKETS - a world-leading politics, business and policy oriented Early Career Training programme which will equip 15 fellows, across a range of 9 international partners (University of Bremen, University of Helsinki, Catholic University Leuven, University College London, Maastricht University, Stockholm School of Economics in Riga, Tallinn University of Technology and the Center for Social Sciences in Tbilisi). with theoretical knowledge, analytical skills and complementary training to understand and deal with emerging markets in the Eastern Europe, The Caucasus and Central Asia regions.

Two positions will be based in Tallinn, Estonia, at the Faculty of Business and Economics of Tallinn University of Technology. Successful fellows will receive a salary for three years, at the EU early Stage Researcher rate, including social benefits (pension scheme, medical insurance). The fellow will be expected to enroll also into a PhD programme in the School of Business and Governance at TalTech. Subject to satisfactory progress a national level scholarship may be available in year 4.  Fellows will also benefit from international summer schools, international mentors in universities and non-university partners and funding for tuition fees, field research, conference travel, language classes. The 15 Fellows and the supervisors meet up for joint workshops approximately every six months – ensuring that fellows graduate not only with a PhD but with a well established international network.   

Fellows will conduct their research on one of the topics listed below. 

The overall goal of the project is to compare countries that had fully opened to foreign investors by the early 2000s – Estonia, Latvia (now EU members), Georgia (considered by many as an example of best practice in reforms), and Kyrgyzstan (where markets are stable but no major economic leap is expected in the next immediate future) – with what have been identified as significant prospective post-USSR markets for the next ten years - Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan (all of which have shown a more concrete desire for economic dialogue in the past three years), Russia (its eastern region and, in particular, Siberia, which has remained largely unexplored by EU companies), and Azerbaijan, a country that has finally started interacting in more concrete terms with the EU.


Project topic
Project focus
Entrepreneurial behaviour, informality and the construction of social norms: a cross-regional perspective
Use behavioural game theory to explore the interplay between social norms and informal economies; provide a model of why actors engage with informality beyond simple financial motives, contribute to policy debates
Ethics, principles, state vs. individual morality, and the construction of new or diverging moralities in EU eastern neighbours
Identify the role of national and international external actors in shaping the notion of state morality;  inquire into the nature of gaps between official (state) morality and accepted moral values or ‘the norm’ among citizens



Practical details
Financial conditions (including salary levels) and background documents are available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/topic-details/msca-itn-2020 NB: select guide for applicants. The financial conditions in the call will the one that apply to you.

Your salary will be calculated according to MSCA rules and your personal + family situation. More information can be found at the financial section of the MSCA ITN guide for applicants that you can find in section 5 (Financial Aspects) of the document. These are worth checking before you decide to apply since, if selected, you will be expected to familiarise yourself with these rules also to be aware of your formal rights and obligations towards the donor.

Eligibility: applicants must hold a degree enabling them to enroll into doctoral studies by December 2020 (usually a MA or MSc). They cannot have more than 4 years full time research experience (or hold a doctorate already, even if they worked less than 4 years to complete it) at the time of recruitment.

Mobility requirement: applicants can be of any nationality but cannot have been resident (or have had their main activity i.e. work or study) in the Republic of Estonia for more than 12 of the 36 months prior to recruitment. This means that if you spent less than 12 months in Estonia (including if you have never been there) you are eligible.

NB: this is a very intensive programme. Each selected candidate will be enrolled into a PhD programme, and will be seconded to the target region for data collection and will subsequently be seconded to a non-academic partner to gain a hands-on work experience on how research skills can be used beyond academia for the benefit of the governmental, private or international development sector. There will also be workshops of 4 to 5 days duration approximately every 6 months at which attendance is essential. Therefore a willingness and ability to undertake these international mobilities is a core requirement. 


Any informal enquiries about research topics or the process (if you have questions about issues that are not already addressed in this call or in the guide for applicants) should be addressed to Lawschooleu@gmail.com

Applications should be sent to Lawschooleu@gmail.com (cc shugyla.kilybayeva@gmail.com) and must include:
1) a curriculum vitae  (including explicit details of country / countries of residence for the past 3 years, this is needed for eligibility purposes);
2) an application letter no longer than 500 words;
3) a short (500-1000 words) summary of your doctoral project.
4) The grades achieved in your Masters degree (certificates will be requested if you are shortlisted)

Please send all the documents together in one PDF file named after your name and surname and use, as subject of your message, “MARKETS-ETN-2020 Application”. Failure to do this might result in your application ending up in the wrong folder and, in a worst case scenario, ignored.

Deadline 20 November 2020, 23.59h (Estonian time)
Research Interests:
Dublin City University has been awarded a €3.9m grant from the European Union to fund a European Training Network entitled MARKETS - a world-leading politics, business and policy oriented PhD programme which will equip 15 fellows, across... more
Dublin City University has been awarded a €3.9m grant from the European Union to fund a European Training Network entitled MARKETS - a world-leading politics, business and policy oriented PhD programme which will equip 15 fellows, across a range of 9 international partners (University of Bremen, University of Helsinki, Catholic University Leuven, University College London, Maastricht University, Stockholm School of Economics in Riga, Tallinn University of Technology and the Center for Social Sciences in Tbilisi). with theoretical knowledge, analytical skills and complementary training to understand and deal with emerging markets in the Eastern Europe, The Caucasus and Central Asia regions.

Three positions will be based in Dublin City University.  European Training Networks are among the best supported PhD programmes in the world.  Successful fellows will receive a salary for three years, at the EU early Stage Researcher rate – substantially above the level of PhD scholarships in most countries. Subject to satisfactory progress a national level scholarship may be available in year 4.  Fellows will also benefit from international summer schools, international mentors in universities and non-university partners and funding for tuition fees, field research, conference travel, language classes etc.  If required a standard PhD scholarship will be available in year  The 15 Fellows and the supervisors meet up for joint workshops approximately every six months – ensuring that fellows graduate not only with a PhD but with a well established international network.   

Students will conduct their PhD research on one of the topics listed below.
Research Interests:
Cfp: Informality, development and the state I am preparing a panel for the Central Eurasian Studies Society Regional Conference (Tashkent, June 25-28, 2020)... more
Cfp: Informality, development and the state

I am preparing a panel for the Central Eurasian Studies Society Regional Conference (Tashkent, June 25-28, 2020) https://www.centraleurasia.org/conferences/regional/?fbclid=IwAR3EUiBfLE6kp_coH0os4f4119SI3oQ_vAoeEpTrIFxcQOU2L7s-sGs4XHo

NB: Deadline for submission is very soon (29 February 2020) so if you are interested and want to discuss your contribution please contact me as soon as possible at ap@tlu.ee 

You would then be required to send an abstract by the 27th of February so that I can complete the panel.

Participants will be responsible for their own travel to the conference. If you are interested in the topic but cannot attend, be aware that I am preparing an edited volume with the same title so. Just write to discuss or send an abstract.
Research Interests:
Studies of Transitions States and Societies is an open access, APC-free, bi-annual journal published by Tallinn University. Published since 2009 it is already indexed in Scopus, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), EBSCO,... more
Studies of Transitions States and Societies is an open access, APC-free, bi-annual journal published by Tallinn University. Published since 2009 it is already indexed in Scopus, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), EBSCO, ProQuest, Central and Eastern European Online Library (CEEOL) and the International Political Science Abstracts (IPSA).

You can look at our authors and their contributions here: http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/

We are currently looking for contributions for our June 2020 issue. Any topics within the scope of the journal would be welcome. But we would particularly welcome contributions discussing the relationship between informality and development (ideally, based on recently-collected empirical material). If interested, please submit a paper through the website. If you have an abstract and you are not sure whether your research will fit, you are welcome to write a (short and clear) message to the co-editor in chief at ap@tlu.ee
Research Interests:
INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP: FROM ECONOMIC TO POLITICAL INFORMALITY: EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN SHADOW PRACTICES, POLICY MAKING AND DEVELOPMENT University of Lund, Sweden, 17-19 September 2019 (Deadline 15th May 2019) Rationale and main aims... more
INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP: FROM ECONOMIC TO POLITICAL INFORMALITY: EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN SHADOW PRACTICES, POLICY MAKING AND DEVELOPMENT
University of Lund, Sweden, 17-19 September 2019 (Deadline 15th May 2019)

Rationale and main aims of the workshops
While early works on informality mostly explored its economic aspects (shadow economies, informal sector), recent studies have unveiled the multi-faceted nature of informality. From ways to get things done at the top political level (Ledeneva 2013) to everyday resistance (Scott 1985, 2012), informality has been regarded as an integral part of governance structures and mechanisms (Polese et al. 2017). For this workshop, we give continuity to the classification of the four "flavours of informality" (Polese 2019) to regard informal practices as an act of deliberate, if unorganised, non-compliance with formal instructions. At the everyday level, these actions may remain isolated and sterile. However, once they are embraced regularly by a significant portion of a given population they may come to renegotiate, or even reject, policy measures that are regarded, consciously or unconsciously, as inappropriate for a given situation context.

Footing on these assumptions, with this event, we propose to shift attention away from informality perceived, especially at the everyday level, as a mere survival strategy to think in a different direction. When people produce similar, or even the same, patterns of behaviour, informality can acquire political significance and reshape the way policies are implemented in a given context.

Starting from the above assumptions, our workshop has a three-fold goal.

First, it will expand the scope of theoretical research on informality beyond its economic understanding at the national level, something pointed out by studies by Dixit (2007), Helmke and Levitsky (2005) and Stone (2010) as necessary, but not yet systematically studied. We will look at the role of informal practices in the redefinition and renegotiation of business environments and how entrance and exit barriers are created, causing the reversal that state-led measures were intended to bring about.

Second, it will apply this interpretative framework to look at the way policymaking, and development policies, are affected by informality in the transitional world. This will eventually allow us to engage with worldwide debates from a comparative perspective. Our departure point is the post-socialist region, where informality has been widely studied. However, with this workshop, we intend to upscale the scope of our inquiry to Southeast Asia, Africa, Latin America.

Third, inasmuch as this has been timidly attempted so far, our event represents a chance to establish and develop a research group on informality that can work on further conceptualizations of the relationship between informality, policy-making and development at a global scale. We anticipate some of the contributions to be invited into an edited volume (we have a preliminary agreement with Routledge). In addition, should we have enough papers with a profound theoretical engagement, we will consider pulling together a special issue of a journal

As a result, we welcome contributions focusing on the following list of topics:
NB the list is non-exhaustive and we are open to considering further perspectives and foci

1) Measuring informality: novel and mixed methods for the measurement of informal practices, their effects and the rationale behind the desire (active or passive) to engage with informal practices in different contexts and with different ends
2) Informality and policymaking: studies on the relationship between the formal and the informal; how informal practices affect policymaking at the top level (negotiations of laws and rules, power relations between parties, groups, economic actors); how individuals, groups and non-state actors react, oppose, renegotiate policy measures at the everyday level
3) Informality and international development: explorations on the role of informal practices in a North-South development context; how instructions by international and development organizations are filtered, renegotiated or opposed when going against the interests of powerful individuals, interest groups, lobbies; how individuals (especially the weak, the marginalized, the poor) react to measures that they do not perceive as necessary, useful or beneficial

Given our initial specialization, our starting point has been the post-socialist world. However, we would like to use this workshop to expand the upscale the scope of our inquiry to a global scale in an attempt to construct comparisons with other world countries and regions.

Technical information
– You will be notified by the 1st of June 2019 on whether your abstract has been accepted. Please note that the dates might slightly change (1-2 days later) but we will send the final dates along with the acceptance letter
– Meals and accommodation during the workshop is covered for all accepted speakers
– There is limited availability of funds to cover travel to and from Lund. If you expect to be unable to get support from your institution, please add this information in your abstract

How to apply
If interested, please send by the 15th of May 2019 in a single word document named after your surname containing:
1) An abstract and your contact details (300 words)
2) A short biographical statement (300 words)
3) if you need financial support for your travel

to Sevara Usmanova at usmanova.c@gmail.com and cc your message to ap@tlu.ee and Rustamjon.Urinboyev@soclaw.lu.se
Research Interests:
Call for papers for an edited book Encountering Deceptions of Development(s): Exploring the Practices and Knowledge in Central Eurasia NB: Our definition of Central Eurasia includes a variety of regions from the Caucasus to India, see... more
Call for papers for an edited book
Encountering Deceptions of Development(s):
Exploring the Practices and Knowledge in Central Eurasia
NB: Our definition of Central Eurasia includes a variety of regions from the Caucasus to India, see http://cesww.fas.harvard.edu/ces_definition.html

Editors
Amiya Kumar Das, Tezpur University, India
Abel Polese, Dublin City University and Tallinn University
Anna Romanowicz, Jagiellonian University Poland

Rationale
Development, or better a normative understanding of what development should be, has been uncritically considered as a panacea for a range of social and political problems throughout the world. Critical views, often grounded on empirical studies showing the limits of this approach (Escobar 1994), have shifted attention towards resistances and counter-narratives from both the Global South and the Global North, which pose a series of challenges to traditional understandings of development.
Persuasive neoliberal agendas have shifted attention away from the social responsibility of the state, with citizens left to struggle to cope despite or beyond the state (Polese et al 2017). This proposed volume comes in response to the above tendency. We invite contributors to explore local knowledge in development practice and to examine how it encounters hegemonic notions of development and the developmental paradigm.
With this book, we seek to understand both formal and informal approaches to produce nuanced knowledge that can help develop critical ideas on how to better engage with development practice in various areas of the world, especially in the Global South. We expect, with this proposed volume, to foster a dialogue on development ideas and practice encountered by various communities in the global south. Contributions may also delve into issues pertaining to people in their everyday lives in encountering with the promise and deception of development in the developing world.
We welcome case-study informed chapters fostering the understanding of issues including (but not limited to):
Contemporary Development discourse in southern countries
Resistance and alternatives to developmental projects and planning
Challenges to Neoliberal Regimes and Policies
Countering the state through informal governance
Limits to urbanism and planned cities
Ecological and environmental critiques of Development
Epistemological and ontological critiques of Developmentalism
Politics of Poverty, Hunger and  (De)Growth
Performative development in the socio-cultural sphere

If interested, please send an abstract by the 5th of March 2019 to amiyadas@gmail.com; tunelmb@gmail.com
Selected authors will be notified by the beginning of April. First drafts are due by the 31st of August,  2019
Research Interests:
We are preparing an edited volume to be published in the Palgrave-International Political Economy series (series editor Timothy Shaw, University of Massachussets, Boston). This call is part of a multi-annual project that started with a... more
We are preparing an edited volume to be published in the Palgrave-International Political Economy series (series editor Timothy Shaw, University of Massachussets, Boston). This call is part of a multi-annual project that started with a workshop on migration and informality (March 27-28 2018, Lund University) and will continue with a conference possibly in summer 2019. With this book we are also gathering expressions for follow-up initiatives. If interested send an abstract by 30 June 2018 to Email: mobilities_informality2018@gmx.de Rationale Traditionally seen as " exporting " migrants to Western Europe and North America, the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, along with the former USSR ones, have recently become important mobility hubs. We start with an understanding of mobility that includes migratory processes to and from these countries. However, and this is the reason we prefer " mobility " to " migration " , we intend to take into account processes that go beyond migratory flows and include, inter alia, consequences of increased mobility for business activities (when mobility of capitals, people, services or items generates revenues, without necessarily resulting from temporary or permanent migrations), or seeking healthcare or other services in places other than your hometown. We believe that a large share of mobility-related activities generates informality, here defined as activities that happen outside the controlling, or coercing, presence of one or more states, or their institutions. There is a good body of literature dealing with migration, mostly from the region. This volume is, in our view, a way to complement existing literature in at least two ways. First, initial trends tended to see the region as strategic for outsourcing. However, the improvement of the economic conditions, along with the recent refugee crisis has added a second category of migrants to the region. This has meant that, in addition to the skilled workers, the region has also witnessed an increasing amount of immigration from people with either low qualifications, no legal right to work or stay or simply missing the skills to quickly integrate into local job markets. The issue of legality is only a marginal one. Indeed, the International Organisation for Migrations warns that only 10% of the migrants worldwide are formally illegal, leading us to think that the most important barriers to socioeconomic and legal integration are not formal but informal. In this respect, a number of studies have pinpointed at the contrast between the – de jure-existence of norms to deal with migrants against a de facto (partial or total) state incapacity to deal with migration flows and integration of foreign citizens in a number of cases.
Research Interests:
We are looking for reviewers for the following volumes: Identity and Nation Building in Everyday Post-Socialist Life and Informal Nationalism After Communism: The Everyday Construction of Post-Socialist Identities we can offer guidance... more
We are looking for reviewers for the following volumes:

Identity and Nation Building in Everyday Post-Socialist Life
and
Informal Nationalism After Communism: The Everyday Construction of Post-Socialist Identities

we can offer guidance on where to send the review and a hard copy of the book

link here
https://www.routledge.com/Identity-and-Nation-Building-in-Everyday-Post-Socialist-Life/Polese-Morris-Pawlusz-Seliverstova/p/book/9781138736412

http://www.ibtauris.com/books/society%20%20social%20sciences/politics%20%20government/political%20ideologies/nationalism/nationbuilding%20in%20the%20postsocialist%20region%20the%20everyday%20construction%20of%20identity%20after%20communism
Research Interests:
We invite paper proposals for the panel ‘OP 068. Encountering Deceptions of Development(s): Exploring the Practices and Knowledge in the Global South’ to be held at the 18th World Congress of the International Union of... more
We invite paper proposals for the panel 

‘OP 068. Encountering Deceptions of Development(s): Exploring the Practices and Knowledge in the Global South’

to be held at the 18th World Congress of the International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil, on 16-20 July 2018.

Abstract submission:  http://www.inscricoes.iuaes2018.org/trabalho/view?ID_TRABALHO=375
Deadline: 28 February 2018
Since long development, or better a normative understanding of what development should be, has been uncritically considered as panacea to all sorts of social and political problem in various parts of the world. Critical views, often grounded on empirical studies showing the limits of this approach (Escobar 1994), have shifted attention on the fact that resistances and counter narratives, from the Global South as well as from the Western world itself, feed a series of challenges to the initially understanding of development.
In particular, a possible effect of neoliberal persuasive agendas has been to shift attention away from the social responsibility of the state and citizens have to struggle to find a way to survive despite of beyond the state (Polese et al 2017). This panel comes in response to the above tendency and we invite contributors to explore the local knowledge in development practice and to examine how it encounters the hegemonic notion of developmental paradigm.
With this panel we seek to understand various formal and informal approaches to produce nuanced knowledge that can help develop critical ideas on how to better engage with development practice in various areas of the world. We expect, with this panel, to foster a dialogue on the development ideas and practice encountered by various communities in the global south. This would also delve into issues pertaining to people in their everyday life in the developing world.
Research Interests:
Call for papers: Deconstructing unitary statehood: hybrid security in Africa and the Middle East Special issue of Small Wars and Insurgencies http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fswi20/current Guest editors: Abel Polese (Dublin City... more
Call for papers: Deconstructing unitary statehood: hybrid security in Africa and the Middle East
Special issue of Small Wars and Insurgencies
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fswi20/current

Guest editors: Abel Polese (Dublin City University and Tallinn University of Technology),
Ruth Hanau Santini (University of Naples, L’Orientale)
Rob Kevlihan (Kimmage Development Studies Centre)

Deadline for abstracts: 30 June 2017
Deadline for first draft of papers: 30 September 2017

We are editing a guest issue of Small Wars and Insurgencies that will come out in 2018 and is intended to investigate the synergies generated by the co-existence, competition and conflict between competing actors of security governance.

Our main focus is on the multi-actor and multi-level nature of security governance across the Middle East and Africa, sidestepping the application of fictitious notions of state unitary actorness and absolute monopoly of violence. In particular, we expect to investigate, through a number of empirical case studies with strong conceptual components, the interplay between the mixed nature of security actors and the creation of specific security orders.

Theoretically, by building on critical literature on statehood and sovereignty we intend to challenge two main paradigms: the Westphalian and the Weberian. The former emphasizes borders’ sanctity as prerogative of modern states, while commonly used understandings of the latter emphasize a static conceptions of states as sole possessors of monopolies of violence. . The idealized “Westphalian state”, which has distinct boundaries and emphasizes the right of nonintervention and borders’ inviolability, has arguably been under attack since the end of the Cold War (Kaldor, 1999; Thakur, 2016). We intend to push the boundary further to enrich debates on the importance of historicizing and contextualizing the different forms and shapes statehood and governance can take  (Bierstecker 2013).

We would also like to test the notion of ‘areas of limited statehood’, to be understood as more than geographical spaces, but rather spaces where non-state actors can either compete or cooperate with the state depending on the circumstances (Risse 2013). The result can include different forms of hybrid governance, including, but not limited to the coexistence of modern and traditional practices of the exercise of power (Bacik 2008). While the clash between different sources of authority and claims of legitimacy can generate tensions and conflicts, the presence of competing actors can lead to a variety of outcomes. We will explore cases from stratified and yet peaceful systems of authority to cases where the competition is less peaceful, leading to violent struggles between a central authority and insurgent groups. Within heterarchical orders, characterized by multiple rankings of power and multiple actors possessing coercive power, we will distinguish different degrees of intensity of these non-anarchic and non-hierarchical orders.

We are interested in papers analysing relations among actors possessing  power (including but not limited to coercive power) over given territories, be they state, non-state, public, private, national and trans-national actors. We seek to explore these forms of power, including the manner in which relations between centralized authorities and social actors create, reflect and reproduce power relations. We seek to understand the implications these dynamics have for populations in terms of human security, conflict management and experiences of violence.  Regional and international actors are included in the plethora of security or insecurity generating actors and will be analysed according to the principal-agent relations they enjoy with local state actors, as well as with local populations and the other coercive wielding actors in a given area. Sources of legitimacy for each category of security actor will be particularly scrutinized: a traditionally neglected but increasingly relevant aspect includes local populations’ dynamics of interaction, negotiation and/or resistance vis-à-vis both state and non state actors exercising coercive power over their territories.

Abstracts of 300 words must be sent by June 30th, 2017 to both addresses

Ruth Hanau Santini rhanausantini@johnshopkins.it
and Abel Polese ap@tlu.ee

The selection outcomes will be communicated by July 30th, 2017. Paper givers will be invited to a workshop in Naples in early December and expected to submit their final version by the 15th of January 2018.
Research Interests:
Deconstructing unitary statehood: hybrid governance in comparative perspective 5-6 May 2017, Naples, Italy Joint Workshop Università L’Orientale di Napoli, Universite’ Libre de Bruxelles and Tallinn University of Technology... more
Deconstructing unitary statehood: hybrid governance in comparative perspective

5-6 May 2017, Naples, Italy

Joint Workshop

Università L’Orientale di Napoli,

Universite’ Libre de Bruxelles and

Tallinn University of Technology


Deadline to submit abstracts: 17 March 2017

The main aim of this workshop is to investigate the synergies generated by the co-existence, competition and conflict between competing actors of governance.

While governance is traditionally a function performed by the state, and formal institutions, recent empirical evidence has shed light on the capacity of informal structures and institutions in a variety of world regions to fulfill similar functions (often referred to as: informal, rebel, real or insurgent governance). For this workshop, our main focus is on the Middle East and North Africa but we are keen to see comparative approaches engaging with other regions (i.e. the post-Soviet spaces or Sub-Sahelian Africa).

We are keen to attract contributions exploring empirical evidence that allows us to test the notion of ‘areas of limited statehood’, to be understood as more than geographical spaces, but rather spaces where non-state actors can either compete or cooperate with the state depending on the circumstances (Risse 2013). This can produce different forms of hybrid governance, and can possibly go to the extent of foreseeing the coexistence of modern and traditional practices of the exercise of power (Bacik 2008). While the clash between different sources of authority and claims of legitimacy can generate tensions and conflicts, the presence of competing actors can lead to a variety of outcomes. We are keen to explore cases from stratified and yet peaceful systems of authority to cases where the competition is less peaceful, leading to violent struggles between the central authority and insurgent groups.

Theoretically, by building on critical literature on statehood and sovereignty we intend to challenge two main paradigms: the Westphalian and the Weberian. The former emphasizes borders’ sanctity as prerogative of modern states, while the latter stands for a static conception of states as the only form of political organization. The idealized “Westphalian state”, which has distinct boundaries and emphasizes the right of nonintervention and borders’ inviolability, has been under attack in recent years (Kaldor, 1999). We intend to push the boundary further to enrich debates on the importance of historicizing and contextualizing the different forms and shapes statehood and governance can take, even with regard to the territory and the fluidity of borders (Bierstecker 2013).

We are also keen to redefine informal practices as “varieties of governance” (Polese et al. 2017) to explore a wide range of options covering informal, invisible and unrecorded forms of action, be they deliberate manifestations of resistance to state power, or alternative, bottom-up informal practices compensating for public authorities’ inaction or absence. Even if they are rarely regarded as acts of resistance against the state but as compensation for what the state fails to deliver, we see that in the case of power vacuums, local actors will emerge and create new political economy of survival, a web of informal structures able to create opportunities and generate economic activities for the local populations, creating new patron-client relations, located in the grey area between the legal, illegal and extra legal.

We would be keen to receive contributions that engage with the (non exhaustive) list of topics:

The relationship between civil society and formal institutions in an empirical and/or comparative perspective
Societal demands and bottom-up visions of statehood 
Hybrid governance, hybrid sovereignty, hybrid statehood, examined in their different theoretical underpinnings but with reference to empirical cases
Frozen conflicts, sub-levels of state governance
Forms of insurgent and rebel governance
Formal governance vs real governance
Theoretical exploration and/or empirical illustration of examples of political economy of resistance versus political economy of survival
How invisible or unperceived forms of resistance transform into visible ones (for instance the genesis of social movements)


If interested please send an abstract (300 words) and short biographical statement to
by the 17 of March 2017 to gc.giuliacimini@gmail.com

back-up addresses: ap@tlu.ee and rhanausantini@johnshopkins.it

There is no participation fee. If selected, we might be able to cover your board and lodging in Naples for 2 days (2/3 nights)
Research Interests:
Doctoral workshop: the state of post-socialist studies Wednesday, 1st of March, 9:30 – 13:00 Tallinn University 29 Narva mnt, Tallinn Room: TBA Call for abstracts (deadline 18 February 2017) “Tensions” is an international PhD... more
Doctoral workshop: the state of post-socialist studies

Wednesday, 1st of March, 9:30 – 13:00
Tallinn University
29 Narva mnt, Tallinn
Room: TBA

Call for abstracts (deadline 18 February 2017)


“Tensions” is an international PhD programme in post-Soviet affairs, and in particular post-Soviet tensions. The project aims at developing a team of early career researchers, who will become experts on the region. It offers a rigorous methodological training and three years experience of working in an international and intercultural environment.

The project involves junior and senior staff from six leading research centres (Dublin City University, University of Oslo, University of Warsaw, Research Centre for East European Studies at the University of Bremen, University of St Andrews and Tallinn University). More information can be found at www.postsoviet.eu

In the frame of our last meeting (see website: postsoviet.eu) we invite doctoral students (at any stage of their PhD studies, from beginners to first year or even recently defended) to join us and discuss their progress findings in a friendly setting. You will have the chance to receive constructive feedback and discuss your research with some of the leading specialists on the post-Soviet region, including: 

Prof Rick Fawn (University of St Andrews)
Prof Pål Kolstø (University of Oslo)
Prof Donnacha Ó Beacháin (Dublin City University)
Prof Heiko Pleines (Research Centre for East European Studies, University of Bremen)

If interested, please send an abstract of your PhD research (up to 300 words) by February 15th 2017 to Abel Polese (ap@tlu.ee) and Emilia Pawłusz (emilia.pawlusz@tlu.ee) .

We have only space for 12 presentations and early application will be prioritised. We will give you the opportunity to present your research to an audience of leading specialists and interact with other scholars working on the region.

The event will be followed by a public screening of a movie on the region and a short public discussion with academics and experts (15.30 – 17.30)

We welcome PhD students from any of the social sciences and cognate disciplines. We will prioritise students from Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian universities but interested scholars from outside the Baltic region are also welcome. If accepted, you will be requested to prepare a 10-minute presentation.

Please note that we do not offer travel or accommodation support. Lunch can be provided, if needed.
Research Interests:
IR, and political sciences debates at large, have been evolving around the central role of the state in domestic and international affairs. This has resulted in a limited academic exploration of sub-national and trans-national phenomena... more
IR, and political sciences debates at large, have been evolving around the central role of the state in domestic and international affairs. This has resulted in a limited academic exploration of sub-national and trans-national phenomena such as networks, individuals, movements, institutions, enterprises, which have become central to international affairs. There are, in our view a whole variety of forces operating not only alongside, across, beneath and above the state but also in dimensions that exist 'in spite of' or 'beyond' the state. Traditional state concerns have been challenged by transnational issues, such as the environment, migrations, human rights, religion, and terrorism, among others, prompting a variety of reflections on the transformation of the role of the state, and a variety of other actors that can be considered equally relevant. Many of these challenges have become qualitatively differentiated, demanding the definition and conceptualisation of novel theoretical and methodological approaches for better understanding the variety of actors and their strategies, complementing or competing with a state in the political field.

Our goal of integrating a non-state perspective into Political Science and IR debates has prompted us to construct this section across three main points: the changing nature of power and agency in IR and International Studies; theorising IR and IS beyond the state; conceptualising relevant global political action to contemporary challenges. We are interested in proposals that address, from any perspective, one or more of the points below:

Agents of power in IR and IS
Emerging fields of global action
Economic management structures and non-state actors
Global arenas of violence
Individual mobilisation and international action
Traditional, human and informal security: intersections between traditional and new security actors
Market vs non market institutions: dynamics, mechanisms and actors providing various kinds of security and social justice
Informal market institutions and their impact on the local governance processes
State and non-state actors and their role in redefinition of security and securisation
Main challenges and threats to individual and collective security in a cross regional and cross country perspective
Critical security perspectives on the state and non-state actors
Perspectives and directions in critical political economy
Interdisciplinary dialogues in IR: benefits and limitations
Critical conceptualisations of governance
Economic inequalities and insecurity in the Global North and South

Submissions to

http://eisa-net.org/sitecore/content/be-bruga/eisa/events/11th-pan-european-conference.aspx
Research Interests:
XXXII Italian Geography Congress, Rome 7-10 June 2017 In spite of Hobsbawm and Rude’s warning that phenomena tend to be ignored until they make headlines (1968), a large number of scholars have tended to concentrate on phenomena that are... more
XXXII Italian Geography Congress, Rome 7-10 June 2017

In spite of Hobsbawm and Rude’s warning that phenomena tend to be ignored until they make headlines (1968), a large number of scholars have tended to concentrate on phenomena that are highly visible, neglecting whatever was not easily visible. However, recent reflections on the construction of the political and on political actors has shown that there is no real boundary between the political and non-political. Indeed, key concepts such as ‘politics’, and the ‘political’, continue to be an essentially controversial and yet crucial matter in both geography and international studies.
A recent critical reflection by scholars rooted in various disciplines has, however, sparked a debate on the production of politically-relevant phenomena. and Scholars are increasingly focusing on actors and dynamics that have so far been under-reported, under-studied, or have remained invisible. Examples include, but are not limited, to:

informality, or informal practices, as a feedback mechanism towards political decisions;
consumption patterns as a symbolic political spaces that redefine interethnic relations;
the way elites stretch their space of appearance to redefine their political space.
the role of rural / urban communities and associations in the production of political spaces and power reconfigurations.
Centred on the above issues, this panel will engage with the notion of the political, exploring the causes that lead some social phenomena to pass unperceived, and discussing how the situatedness of scholars, civil society actors, decision makers and ordinary citizens interact with their imaginative world to define the importance of a given phenomenon. Featuring empirically grounded works, embedded in critical theoretical reflections, panelists will discuss how the political is affected by spatial assumptions and representations that stretch beyond fixed notions of border and of formal administrative divisions.
Contact: Abel Polese ap@tlu.ee; filippo.menga@manchester.ac.uk
Research Interests:
One author dropped from the collection below. We can manage but we also thought that it might be worth to check if someone is interested, since in summer many have more time to write. Time is short but, on the bright side, the volume will... more
One author dropped from the collection below. We can manage but we also thought that it might be worth to check if someone is interested, since in summer many have more time to write. Time is short but, on the bright side, the volume will come out quickly (early 2017)


If interested contact me at


ap (at) tlu.ee  or just reply to this message


by the 20 of August at latest (better earlier). We would need the paper as soon as possible but we might be able to negotiate a bit



The national in everyday life. Identity and nation­-building in post­-socialist spaces

Editors: Abel Polese, Jeremy Morris, Emilia Pawlusz and Oleksandra Seliverstova






Overview and rationale

With this work we intend to explore, from a variety of perspectives and disciplines, how everyday practices become a meaningful and useful site for understanding socio-political engagements in the nation-building processes. The meaning of ‘everyday’ encompasses any kind of quotidian and ‘banal’ practices. These could be related to consumption, kinship, embodiment, mobility, games, clothing, Although there is a growing body of literature on informality and everyday practices in the post-socialist context, most of them do not sufficiently connect the micro and the macro or, in other words, do not necessarily explore the way micro processes at the local and/or everyday level may come to affect macro transformations and policy making at the national or regional level.



By complementing current works on identity construction from a bottom-up perspective, the current volume will focus on how, through everyday practices, individuals establish, negotiate and embed references to concepts of citizenship, statehood and national self-definition. Developing earlier insights into the study of everyday nationalism, initiated by Michael Billig (1995) and critically updated by Skey (2009) to encompass the need to take account of globalization, the editors are seek empirically-based studies of nationhood that emerge not from the state level, but in practices of everyday life among ordinary people and serve to 'materialize' the nation.



Questions perspective authors might want to engage with include (but are not limited to):



·        How national identity could be explored through everyday acts, like consumption, leisure, food procurement and cooking, education of children, handcraft and arts, fashion, tourism, organisation of household.

·        What are the dispositions and habituses that reveal shared or conflicting understandings of national identity.

·        Perception and understanding of national belonging by ordinary people.

·        How national characteristics are revealed in organization of public/private space, and movement through that space.

·        Informal or spontaneous nation-building.

·        The contrast between ‘hot’ and banal forms of everyday nationalism.

·        The long durée effect of post-socialist transformation on nationalism.
Research Interests:
We are looking for 2-3 contributions to complete a volume to be published in late 2017. If interested please send an abstract to alessandra.russo@sssup.it by the 15th of October 2016. “The good, the bad and the ugly” Exploring... more
We are looking for 2-3 contributions to complete a volume to be published in late 2017. If interested please send an abstract to alessandra.russo@sssup.it by the 15th of October 2016.


“The good, the bad and the ugly”
Exploring boundaries between the informal, the criminal and the immoral

The primary goal of this volume is to explore the complexity of informality and variety of forms informal transactions and practices may take, from the extra legal to illegal and immoral activities.
Recent empirical works have drawn attention on the range of activities happening out of the control of a state (see for example Schroeder, Chappuis and Kocak 2014; Knudsen and Frederiksen 2015). Although concepts like informality and illegality have been used to define them, we know that the abovementioned activities are quite different in nature, and they need to be investigated via a further deconstruction. They can be illegal – that is, going against legal codes, informal – that is legal in their nature but concealed from the state, immoral – going against either public morale or morality defined by one or several groups embedded in state structures.

The interplay and interactions among actors, institutions and networks involved in these activities, are still under-explored and under-conceptualised: this volume has been conceived as an attempt to fill this gap.

Details in the PDF file
Research Interests:
Full call at http://www.ulb.ac.be/fsp/cecid/index-Activites.html Rationale: This conference is intended to stir an international debate on the concept and understanding of " resistance " in its various meanings. In this respect, the use... more
Full call at http://www.ulb.ac.be/fsp/cecid/index-Activites.html

Rationale: This conference is intended to stir an international debate on the concept and understanding of " resistance " in its various meanings. In this respect, the use of the word resistance in its plural form for the title of this conference is not incidental. It emphasizes our will to explore the complexity and multi-faceted forms, locations, aims, and outcomes inherent to the concept of resistance. We see resistance(s) not only as a concept that can be engaged with from various angles. It is also an approach that can help a dialogue between academia and other sectors, a thing that this conference seeks to explore in broad temporal and geographical perspectives. From mass public protests during the Arab Springs and the Indignados and Occupy movements, to individual disobedience from whistle blowers (Assange, Snowden), resistance (to domination, oppression, or simply mainstream political power) has been manifesting itself in a variety of modes. This newly available empirical evidence rapidly generated numerous, rich accounts and encountered studies of social movements and contentious politics. What have remained largely understudied are the accounts of non
Research Interests:
One author dropped from the collection below. We can manage but we also thought that it might be worth to check if someone is interested, since in summer many have more time to write. Time is short but, on the bright side, the volume will... more
One author dropped from the collection below. We can manage but we also thought that it might be worth to check if someone is interested, since in summer many have more time to write. Time is short but, on the bright side, the volume will come out quickly (early 2017)


If interested contact me at


ap (at) tlu.ee  or just reply to this message


by the 20 of August at latest (better earlier). We would need the paper as soon as possible but we might be able to negotiate a bit



The national in everyday life. Identity and nation­-building in post­-socialist spaces

Editors: Abel Polese, Jeremy Morris, Emilia Pawlusz and Oleksandra Seliverstova






Overview and rationale

With this work we intend to explore, from a variety of perspectives and disciplines, how everyday practices become a meaningful and useful site for understanding socio-political engagements in the nation-building processes. The meaning of ‘everyday’ encompasses any kind of quotidian and ‘banal’ practices. These could be related to consumption, kinship, embodiment, mobility, games, clothing, Although there is a growing body of literature on informality and everyday practices in the post-socialist context, most of them do not sufficiently connect the micro and the macro or, in other words, do not necessarily explore the way micro processes at the local and/or everyday level may come to affect macro transformations and policy making at the national or regional level.



By complementing current works on identity construction from a bottom-up perspective, the current volume will focus on how, through everyday practices, individuals establish, negotiate and embed references to concepts of citizenship, statehood and national self-definition. Developing earlier insights into the study of everyday nationalism, initiated by Michael Billig (1995) and critically updated by Skey (2009) to encompass the need to take account of globalization, the editors are seek empirically-based studies of nationhood that emerge not from the state level, but in practices of everyday life among ordinary people and serve to 'materialize' the nation.



Questions perspective authors might want to engage with include (but are not limited to):



·        How national identity could be explored through everyday acts, like consumption, leisure, food procurement and cooking, education of children, handcraft and arts, fashion, tourism, organisation of household.

·        What are the dispositions and habituses that reveal shared or conflicting understandings of national identity.

·        Perception and understanding of national belonging by ordinary people.

·        How national characteristics are revealed in organization of public/private space, and movement through that space.

·        Informal or spontaneous nation-building.

·        The contrast between ‘hot’ and banal forms of everyday nationalism.

·        The long durée effect of post-socialist transformation on nationalism.
Research Interests:
Ignorance has always existed. But when did it became so fashionable? And powerful? In the early days of the war in Ukraine, I often heard the “but what about the [allegedly neo-Nazi] Azov Battalion?” refrain even by (allegedly) fellow... more
Ignorance has always existed. But when did it became so fashionable? And powerful?

In the early days of the war in Ukraine, I often heard the “but what about the [allegedly neo-Nazi] Azov Battalion?” refrain even by (allegedly) fellow scholars. How did the Azov argument get so strong? Yes, there are ultra-nationalists enrolled in the battalion. Yes, its ideology is partly inspired by far-right ideas. But would the alleged extremism of some of its 1,000 soldiers outbalance Russian mass killings, torture, and rape of civilians, and, in general, a full-scale invasion of a country? (Would you expect members of any military brigade to read Gandhi as a bedtime story, by the way?).
Research Interests:
Once again, this week, I was asked to replace someone for a presentation. After the session, my colleague said "Wow, you were [unexpectedly?] good, we should have thought of you earlier". A similar scenario occurred earlier this year when... more
Once again, this week, I was asked to replace someone for a presentation. After the session, my colleague said "Wow, you were [unexpectedly?] good, we should have thought of you earlier". A similar scenario occurred earlier this year when I replaced a superstar in my field at a conference where ministers and government officers were present.
While I could have just cherished the good words that I heard about me, my primary question was what I had done to earn such low expectations. My answer is possibly because I use no packaging. No fuss, no advertisement about how cool I am, no liaison with policymakers. I simply deliver and leave. I am aware that this contradicts most books on how to be successful, but I believe there is nothing wrong with it. It is a way to position yourself: let deeds speak rather than words. You will get fewer requests to speak but people will eventually notice you.

I therefore dedicate this post to my introverted (or simply PR-reluctant) colleagues, along with anyone who has ever taught me that it’s harder to be in high demand if you do not have high social skills.

https://researchwhisperer.org/2023/09/05/introvert-networking/
Research Interests:
After wars end, declarations of "never again" may soothe our consciences, until the next preventable conflict flares. The grounds of the Genocide Memorial in Kigali, Rwanda are the resting place of around 250,000, mostly nameless, bodies... more
After wars end, declarations of "never again" may soothe our consciences, until the next preventable conflict flares. The grounds of the Genocide Memorial in Kigali, Rwanda are the resting place of around 250,000, mostly nameless, bodies and an exhibition that many find disturbing to the utmost. Local guides say it's fine to feel bad, to skip a room that makes you feel uncomfortable or to leave if images are too distressing.
https://tol.org/client/article/hard-earned-lessons.html Last month, in Taiwan, it was a struggle to get used to the noise of jet fighters waking me up in the morning. I asked my friend whether this was normal. “Not normal, but still... more
https://tol.org/client/article/hard-earned-lessons.html

Last month, in Taiwan, it was a struggle to get used to the noise of jet fighters waking me up in the morning. I asked my friend whether this was normal. “Not normal, but still fine” was her answer.

I wondered what it must be like to live every day with the thought that your country might be invaded. A week was enough for my nerves. I was not keen to repeat my last escape from a war zone. It turned out it was just a signal to China, whose planes were then trespassing into Taiwanese aerospace, that Taiwan was ready to rebuff them.

But how much did this “signal” cost? Were it not for the threats, perhaps an equivalent amount could be used to build roads, modernize hospitals, upgrade schools? Humans seem to be willing to spend money to identify solutions for problems that they have themselves created out of nothing.

Apart from politicians boosting their egos, and a few businessmen hoping to upgrade to billionaire (from modest millionaire), would the average Taiwanese, or Chinese, gain if this island “moved” into China?

Another disturbing thought struck me. Those concerned with climate change (and I include myself) sometimes engage in a perverse exercise of gently blaming one another for their CO2 emissions to try and make themselves feel less guilty about their own footprints. I bike everywhere, my neighbor goes vegan, and so on. But how much would I need to bike to compensate for a single supersonic jet ride in Taiwan or the umpteenth rocket that Putin distractedly drops onto the next Ukrainian building?

So here we go, enjoying the sound of supersonic jets in the early hours or alarms telling Ukrainians to run to the metro station, all because of someone’s desire to decide what country deserves to live, which people deserve to be free and which do not.

(continues in the text)
It may be time to draw a line between Russian culture and culture produced in Russian I wonder how many people still use the term “post-Soviet.” Until last February, I admit, I used it a lot. Force of habit, perhaps inertia, one could... more
It may be time to draw a line between Russian culture and culture produced in Russian

I wonder how many people still use the term “post-Soviet.” Until last February, I admit, I used it a lot. Force of habit, perhaps inertia, one could say. Perhaps also attempts to “defend my territory” when debating with specialists on other regions.
Yet, since February, I no longer feel comfortable with the term. A war is a war and I feel like I was suddenly awoken and pushed out of my comfort zone. In retrospect, the end of “post-Soviet” was in the air already. Perhaps I did not want to notice how diverse the region had grown, how different ordinary Russians and Ukrainians had become.
Escaping your first war is harder than you may think. You hear the bombs from a distance, you see the blast of the explosions and your brain still thinks “it’s far away, it won’t get all the way here”. It is the first step of a shock:... more
Escaping your first war is harder than you may think. You hear the bombs from a distance, you see the blast of the explosions and your brain still thinks “it’s far away, it won’t get all the way here”. It is the first step of a shock: denial, when you simply think “this can’t be true. I am dreaming”. After all, you grew up in a safe society, do not know war or have never seen a killed person.

You look at yourself from the side and it feels like watching a bombing on TV. The danger is just “out there” but definitely not here, you think. Denial could continue until eventually, a blast takes your life or, hopefully, until you finally make the association: bombing may lead to death, just go. You make a mental note for the next war and you eventually decide to flee.

available here also
https://iicrr.ie/ukrainian-personal-odyssey/
Research Interests:
A voice in the dark – “wake up, we need to go.” You cannot think where you’re supposed to go at 5 a.m., you’ve worked in war zones but you were never there when the bombing started. This is how it feels you think, while finding it hard to... more
A voice in the dark – “wake up, we need to go.” You cannot think where you’re supposed to go at 5 a.m., you’ve worked in war zones but you were never there when the bombing started. This is how it feels you think, while finding it hard to believe that around you there’s a war.

And if this is just a false alarm? If you’re just being too prudent? Maybe there’s no need to go anywhere. After all, working until 3 a.m. the previous night turned out not to be such a good idea. You need time to connect your brains.

You stop for a moment to remember the fake explosions during the Yugoslav war. You hope it’s the same but do you really want to take a chance? Putin has announced a massive “special operation” to demilitarize Ukraine. It will be hell, it’s just a matter of time.

Your ex-wife has already left the city when you have your family council with (ex) parents in law, babushka, and dog. For you it’s easier since you just need to go home but for them? They need to decide in 10 minutes whether to abandon everything they’ve constructed in the course of their life. You can’t blame babushka’s naivety when she says Putin will never dare to kill Ukrainians, a brother nation.

full text also here

https://tol.org/client/article/how-to-become-a-refugee-in-3-days.html
If you are in the humanities or social sciences, you may regard a monograph or book, especially your first one, as a milestone in your career. Let’s assume that you have patiently collected and processed your data, interpreted them and... more
If you are in the humanities or social sciences, you may regard a monograph or book, especially your first one, as a milestone in your career. Let’s assume that you have patiently collected and processed your data, interpreted them and found good theoretical paradigms to engage with. Now it’s time to write a proposal and choose a publisher to approach.

How to choose one? Well, it is usually a matter of trial and error. Send your proposal here and there, get a few rejections, and eventually stumble into a publisher interested in your book. Submit and enter academic adulthood.

Often your choice of a publisher will be based on the answer to “Who is the first publisher available?” rather than “Who is the best publisher for my work at this stage?” Once published, you will start reflecting on whether what you got was what you needed or deserved. The more you publish after that, the better you will understand your priorities and career necessities.

All that said, however, choosing one publisher over another for your first book could have a major impact on your early career. A vanity press will be a spot on your CV difficult to wash off, but a too-demanding publisher will take some of the time and effort you need to devote to other things to get your first job. If you are trying to identify the best publisher for your work, as a starting point, I suggest you consider your position with regard to four variables: pricing policy, prestige, speed and marketing.

https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2019/11/05/four-variables-consider-when-choosing-publisher-opinion
Finally, the message came. Friends had warned you but you couldn’t help feeling disappointed when the request finally arrived. The dean of your school has asked you (and everyone else) to apply for external funding in the next few... more
Finally, the message came. Friends had warned you but you couldn’t help feeling disappointed when the request finally arrived. The dean of your school has asked you (and everyone else) to apply for external funding in the next few months.

You have nowhere to hide – stress and sleepless nights loom ahead. Maybe if you submit a few bids that are not funded, you can claim that you are doing your job. But the ice under your feet will eventually get thin. Is the alternative scenario any better? If you win, it will count to your next promotion (or tenure), but it will also mean more work. Evenings spent writing reports and expenditure claims instead of being with your family or friends.

You ask around. Many colleagues say that this is just the way things are. Others admit that they don’t fancy it but they fancy the risk of losing their job even less.

Unenthusiastically, you start gathering information on where and how to apply. You are already doing many things for free – this is just one more. After all, new academics must endure these things to get stronger. At least, that is what you have been told.
Research Interests:
Between September 2018 and April 2019, my team submitted, mostly to European Commission calls, 12 funding applications totalling €20m. Of these, only one was funded straight away. Two more, worth €3.9 and €1.5m are first and second on... more
Between September 2018 and April 2019, my team submitted, mostly to European Commission calls, 12 funding applications totalling €20m. Of these, only one was funded straight away. Two more, worth €3.9 and €1.5m are first and second on their respective reserve lists, whether they are funded or not is beyond my control.

In terms of money raised, target amounts can vary a lot, depending on the fundraiser and the research projects involved. But, in percentages, this equates to an 8% success rate, calculated as total applications vs funded ones and 5%, if one compares the amount requested vs the amount received. Are these figures any good?

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/08/19/reflections-on-academic-fundraising-the-art-of-getting-there/
Research Interests:
At a new exhibition on Soviet Estonia, some of the reminders of the past are “remainders” – still in use today. You have more than an hour before your train leaves Tallinn's central railway station. It is a surprisingly warm and sunny... more
At a new exhibition on Soviet Estonia, some of the reminders of the past are “remainders” – still in use today.

You have more than an hour before your train leaves Tallinn's central railway station. It is a surprisingly warm and sunny day, for Estonia, so you wander across the road to the old railway station bazaar (balti jaama turg). Dating from the Soviet period, it has been “modernized,” with posh shops and cafes replacing the shabby old kiosks. At the entrance, you get caught up in the stands selling summer fruits – ripe and colorful to the eye. You make your contribution to global warming by buying cherries from Poland and strawberries from Greece, all the time wondering where all the Estonian products are.

You return to the station, still with an hour to go before your train leaves. While speculating about where would be the best place to sit down and get some work done, you notice a sign: “Leap into the Past: Exhibition on Soviet Estonia.” The sign is in Russian, in Futurist font. The post-Soviet scholar in you suddenly wakes up. Coincidentally (or not) at the entrance to the exhibition, an old yellow truck is selling draught kvass (a lightly-fermented rye drink). Just like in the good old times ... only this is Estonia in 2019.

https://www.tol.org/client/article/28463-where-your-grandmas-kitchen-belongs-in-a-museum.html?fbclid=IwAR0UbDCVvSm-C1nOVn8jB5_whil1nDfozRoUJtazsPaL9aEtpReLikKRKdo
Research Interests:
http://www.in-formality.com/wiki/index.php?title=Informality_in_Ukraine_and_beyond:_one_name,_different_flavours...with_a_cheer_for_the_Global_Encyclopaedia_of_Informality

I find it difficult to locate a precise moment in time when research on informality gained such a momentum. But I can at least recall my own starting point. When I got inspired by the Odessa-Chisinau ''elektrichka'' to write a paper for a workshop at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle in 2005, I was advised to use "survival strategies" instead of "informality" in the title because few would understand the latter word. I remember how relieved I was, a couple of years later, to find Colin Williams devoting a great deal of his time and efforts to informality and to Ukraine.

A few years after that things had radically changed. After a short break from academia, I was back in November 2013, parachuted into the largest event on informality in the post-socialist world I have ever seen. Thanks to a series of generous grants, my friend Nicolas Hayoz invited around 120 scholars working on informality in the Balkans, Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asian regions to Fribourg. Informality seemed to have gone big and has since become a catchword decorating academic articles, books and special issues from a variety of regions.

At the conference I was introduced to the idea of the Global Encyclopaedia of Informality (Ledeneva 2018) that was being developed at the time and that eventually brought scholars from the four corners of the world to the launch of its two volumes in London in March 2018.

In spite of the autobiographic introduction to the term informality, I have no intention to deny the long history of debates developed around it well before this. If we take a mostly economistic view on informality, we could look at least back to post-WWI debates on economic development. Explorations of the informal sector, as the topic was called at that time, informed a variety of economic and economistic positions (Lewis 1955, 1959) eventually evolving into several other directions: from ultra-liberal views on corruption (Leiff 1964) to the work of anthropologists shifting attention from monetary to non-monetary transactions (Hart 1973), from the tangible and measurable to the symbolic and allegedly intangible.
Beyond Official Statistics: Re-classifying “Informality” in Ukraine “Informality” in its many forms – from outright corruption to showing gratitude for going above and beyond the call of duty – has something to teach us, and could even... more
Beyond Official Statistics: Re-classifying “Informality” in Ukraine

“Informality” in its many forms – from outright corruption to showing gratitude for going above and beyond the call of duty – has something to teach us, and could even serve as a feedback mechanism for public policy.
by Abel Polese 11 December 2018

When talking about corruption – or, more generally, about practices that are considered illegal or unlawful according to some international standards – the normative positions of state, society, and other main stakeholders do not always fully overlap. Indeed, not all practices considered harmful by international organizations are necessarily noxious, nor are they perceived as such by state or society. By the same token, not all practices which are considered good ones – according to international standards or some other normative position – bring about the desired results.
Research Interests:
This short piece illustrates how a significant number of Turkmen current members of the presidential entourage found alternative paths for their development (study in Iran, Egypt, Turkey) in the turmoil of the 1990s... more
This short piece illustrates how a significant number of Turkmen current members of the presidential entourage found alternative paths for their development (study in Iran, Egypt, Turkey) in the turmoil of the 1990s

http://www.laender-analysen.de/zentralasien/pdf/ZentralasienAnalysen125.pdf
Research Interests:
How far can an elite go in its efforts, voluntary and involuntary, to foster a national identity in a given context? From mega-events and massive public projects to national singing and tourism brochures, a team of scholars, myself... more
How far can an elite go in its efforts, voluntary and involuntary, to foster a national identity in a given context? From mega-events and massive public projects to national singing and tourism brochures, a team of scholars, myself included, have been exploring a number of ways to boost national identity in post-Soviet countries.

We’ve looked at identity markers perpetuated by non-political actors – a new fashion or habit that goes viral nationally, or a social movement with which a large portion of the population identifies. We’ve studied political measures conceived for other purposes that end up affecting the identity of a large percentage of a national population.

But we had never considered nation-building through terrorism – or, more specifically, through an anti-terrorist narrative. 

Until a few weeks ago, at least.
Research Interests:
Short article on Baltic World
Research Interests:
Why would a country that has never held multi-party elections, or elections in the proper meaning of the world, all of sudden decide to hold presidential elections, allow candidates, and parties, to register and move towards political... more
Why would a country that has never held multi-party elections, or elections in the proper meaning of the world, all of sudden decide to hold presidential elections, allow candidates, and parties, to register and move towards political pluralism – all for no apparent reason?

From democratic audit blog
Research Interests:
Even tourism brochures can help construct a nation’s identity.
Research Interests:
Georgia has now full access to Horizon 2020: a great opportunity for research and innovation but also a challenge for scientists and academia... more
Georgia has now full access to Horizon 2020: a great opportunity for research and innovation but also a challenge for scientists and academia

https://www.balcanicaucaso.org/eng/Areas/Georgia/Diplomacy-and-change-on-Georgia-s-recent-access-to-H2020-funds-176997
Research Interests:
The question, however, is if today’s universities – populated by underpaid staff who are under constant pressure to generate income, given the scarce support from the state – are the right place to train future citizens of Ukraine in... more
The question, however, is if today’s universities – populated by underpaid staff who are under constant pressure to generate income, given the scarce support from the state – are the right place to train future citizens of Ukraine in civic values, and whether there's a need to spend so much money and time to get through this phase.
A dysfunctional higher education sector, on the other hand, erodes state legitimacy and runs the risk of alienating even more a state from its citizens. Now, citizens will survive somehow and so will the state. It is just easy to imagine that a happy marriage would work better than living separated under the same roof.
Research Interests:
Действительно ли в Украине слишком высокий уровень коррупции или же слишком много разговоров о коррупции? Да и что вообще считать коррупцией? .............. Я считаю, что существуют два вида неформальности. Позитивная — работает как... more
Действительно ли в Украине слишком высокий уровень коррупции или же слишком много разговоров о коррупции? Да и что вообще считать коррупцией?
..............

Я считаю, что существуют два вида неформальности. Позитивная — работает как механизм социального перераспределения. И негативная — заражающая систему. Разница между ними не только в финансовой природе трансакций. Если государство уходит из определенного сектора, допустим, не выделяя достаточного количества средств, возникает саморегулирование, и говорить там о коррупции становится бессмысленным.
Research Interests:
Чи справді в Україні надто високий рівень корупції або ж забагато розмов про корупцію? Та й що взагалі вважати корупцією? ------------- Я вважаю, що існують два види неформальності. Позитивна — працює як механізм соціального... more
Чи справді в Україні надто високий рівень корупції або ж забагато розмов про корупцію? Та й що взагалі вважати корупцією?

-------------

Я вважаю, що існують два види неформальності. Позитивна — працює як механізм соціального перерозподілу. І негативна — що заражає систему. Різниця між ними не лише у фінансовій природі трансакцій. Якщо держава йде з певного сектора, припустімо, не виділяючи достатньої кількості коштів, виникає саморегулювання, і говорити там про корупцію безглуздо.
Research Interests:
According to the inquiry, 84% of the respondents disagreed with the idea that the state is acting in their interest. A 79% of respondents thought that the current government is not doing what is best for the country and 76% did not feel... more
According to the inquiry, 84% of the respondents disagreed with the idea that the state is acting in their interest. A 79% of respondents thought that the current government is not doing what is best for the country and 76% did not feel that the state is protecting them.

These results, and lack of trust towards the state, are contrasted by a growing trust towards fellow citizens or at least a feeling of solidarity. In some regions (Vinnitsa, Ivano-Frankivsk, Kirovograd) up to 100% of our respondents considers it important to help one other.

Can informal payments in higher education be interpreted as an expression of social solidarity? Is it possible to claim that citizens, although unhappy with having to embark in informal payments and considering it a shameful practice, in the end comply with it as they understood that they are needed to keep the system going?
Research Interests:
I maintain that there are two informalities. One, which can be named “positive,” helps a society function in areas where the state fails to operate (beyond the state) or where state institutions and rules are not sufficient to manage a... more
I maintain that there are two informalities. One, which can be named “positive,” helps a society function in areas where the state fails to operate (beyond the state) or where state institutions and rules are not sufficient to manage a sphere of societal life (in spite of the state). “Negative” informality, on the other hand, tries to replace state structures, institutions, and rules even when they are effective in regulating citizens' lives.

In other words, positive informality complements the state, while negative corrupts the system.
Research Interests:
And determination is what can now be seen here, on the streets of Kiev. Hundreds of thousands have come out day after day despite the cold. The mood is more upbeat than perhaps any of the opposition leaders might have expected. There... more
And determination is what can now be seen here, on the streets of Kiev. Hundreds of thousands have come out day after day despite the cold. The mood is more upbeat than perhaps any of the opposition leaders might have expected. There seems no sign of yellow-ness, of ...
Ukraine's public-sector services are constantly under attack for being inadequate, out-of-date, and, mainly, corrupt. Transparency International, an anti-corruption watchdog, ranks Ukraine 107th out of 158 countries it analyzed in... more
Ukraine's public-sector services are constantly under attack for being inadequate, out-of-date, and, mainly, corrupt. Transparency International, an anti-corruption watchdog, ranks Ukraine 107th out of 158 countries it analyzed in its Corruption Perception Index for 2005, ...
Research Interests:
In our years of research on Ukraine, we have often encountered reports showing low trust in state institutions, and a lack of dialogue between the state and its citizens. Some years, and several “revolutions” later, we decided to test for... more
In our years of research on Ukraine, we have often encountered reports showing low trust in state institutions, and a lack of dialogue between the state and its citizens. Some years, and several “revolutions” later, we decided to test for ourselves how much trust there is in Ukrainian institutions.



The results were striking and beyond our expectations, but not necessarily in a positive way. Not only were 84 percent of Ukrainians reluctant to believe that the state is acting in their personal interests, but 79 percent of them also expressed doubt that the government is doing anything positive for their country as a whole.
Research Interests:
Der Artikel untersucht einige der neuesten Tendenzen im Bereich informeller Zahlungen im ukrainischen Gesundheitswesen. Wir betrachten die quantitativen und qualitativen Aspekte von Informalität, um zu zeigen, wie weit verbreitet das... more
Der Artikel untersucht einige der neuesten Tendenzen im Bereich informeller Zahlungen im ukrainischen Gesundheitswesen. Wir betrachten die quantitativen und qualitativen Aspekte von Informalität, um zu zeigen, wie weit verbreitet das Phänomen ist, was die möglichen Ursachen sind und in welchen Situationen die informellen Zahlungen am häufigsten vorkommen. Wir nutzen das Phänomen Informalität als Ausgangspunkt, um einige der wichtigsten Mängel im ukrainischen Gesundheitswesen zu untersuchen.
Research Interests:
A recent USAID study showed that more than 2/3 of Ukrainians had encountered corruption in some form in 2015. About 1/5 of them had also come across some corrupted practices every month. The same study shows that 69% of the respondents... more
A recent USAID study showed that more than 2/3 of Ukrainians had encountered corruption in some form in 2015. About 1/5 of them had also come across some corrupted practices every month. The same study shows that 69% of the respondents had somehow engaged in informal practices, mostly cash payments, in state healthcare institutions. How did we get this far?
Research Interests:
In Search of a Turkmen Nation How the bizarre eccentricities of the country’s leaders and a wealth of new customs are contributing to the creation of ‘invented traditions To the minority of people for whom Turkmenistan is not “just... more
In Search of a Turkmen Nation

How the bizarre eccentricities of the country’s leaders and a wealth of new customs are contributing to the creation of ‘invented traditions

To the minority of people for whom Turkmenistan is not “just another country ending in –stan,” its notoriety rests on an original combination of characteristics...

http://www.tol.org/client/article/26191-in-search-of-a-turkmen-nation.html
Research Interests:
Korruption wird in der Ukraine genauso wie in den meisten ehemaligen Sowjetrepubliken als großes Problem angesehen. Häufig sind informelle Zahlungen eher die Regel als die Ausnahme. Der vorliegende Beitrag illustriert diese Situation am... more
Korruption wird in der Ukraine genauso wie in den meisten ehemaligen Sowjetrepubliken als großes Problem angesehen. Häufig sind informelle Zahlungen eher die Regel als die Ausnahme. Der vorliegende Beitrag
illustriert diese Situation am Beispiel des Studiums und diskutiert die gesellschaftlichen Folgen.
Research Interests:
this paper presents a case study of a border region, the L’viv, where dozens of people cross the Polish-Ukrainian border every day to make a living. The aim is to examine some of the issues related to business in border crossing from a... more
this paper presents a case study of a border region, the L’viv, where dozens of people cross the Polish-Ukrainian border every day to make a living. The aim is to examine some of the issues related to business in border crossing from a closer perspective. We will look at them as forms of resistance, political participation but also as starting points to try to further blur the dividing line between legal and illegal, lawful and unlawful, to distinguish the legal and social approach to restrictions
This chapter is intended to illustrate practices on the boundary between legality and illegality in order to shed a different light on some of those engaging in diverse transactions. Challenging the vision of a "culture of corruption"... more
This chapter is intended to illustrate practices on the boundary between legality and illegality in order
to shed a different light on some of those engaging in diverse transactions. Challenging the vision of a "culture of corruption" (Miller et al 2001) and that “no discount” should be applied to corrupt practices (Papava and Khaduri 2001), the starting question of this chapter is: what makes a practice “corrupt” or
illegal? In this respect I suggest the need to contextualise and de-normativise illegal practices, since they depend on both social and legal norms. From a juridical standpoint a law is a law, but the value and applicability of a law is ultimately decided by people in social practice. What if there is a law and
the state is unable to enforce control or punish anyone because a substantial number of citizens do not follow it? There is a growing body of literature challenging the very significance of a written law in a context where other rules may apply. For instance, Wanner has remarked how a new moral order may
be applied to some spheres of Ukrainian life where the state’s protection is felt to be lacking. How illegal or immoral is it to try to bribe a court if the same court is issuing an order on the basis of false evidence produced against you? (Wanner 2005)

The present chapter raises questions about the validity of international reports and policy analysis on Ukraine, and possibly on the rest of the former Soviet world, that see illegal practices only as a social evil to eradicate. This is the position of a number of strands of developmentalist thought which
uncritically reject possible alternatives (Nederveen Pieterse 2006), positing that it is only a matter of time before transitional countries will adopt a functioning neoliberal model. In contrast to this, it has been argued that that monetary transactions do not encompass or explain economic activity – this is evident from the work of the growing school of diverse economies (Community Economies Collective 2001, Gibson Graham 1996, 2008). In addition, economic effectiveness might not mean the end of non-market oriented transactions (Williams 2005), which may also serve to partially challenge the de-personalisation of power relations in the labour market and the separation between the social and economic sphere predicted by Polanyi (1946, see also Hann and Hart 2009). Empirical evidence has showed that ‘success’ may also be measured by satisfaction of spiritual obligations, being active in social life (Pardo 1996) and that even the meaning of money differs depending on the social and
economic norms of a society (Parry and Bloch 1989).
In the night between 7 and 8 August 2008 Georgia launched a military operation to regain the territory of South Ossetia, de facto under separate rule since 1992. As a first step the Georgian side contacted the Russian peacekeepers to... more
In the night between 7 and 8 August 2008 Georgia launched a military operation to regain the territory of South Ossetia, de facto under separate rule since 1992. As a first step the Georgian side contacted the Russian peacekeepers to inform them that they were planning a military operation to re-establish 'constitutional order'in the 'Tskhinvali Region'(the Georgian term for South Ossetia)(www. spiegel. de 25 August 2008). Shortly afterwards Georgian troops started bombing several areas of the South Ossetian capital Tskhinvali, ...
Research Interests:
Dans cet article est analysé comme un phénomène social davantage que politique, ce qui a été appelé la « révolution orange ». Bien que les événements politiques restent d'une grande importance, nous allons montrer comment les... more
Dans cet article est analysé comme un phénomène social davantage que politique, ce qui a été appelé la « révolution orange ». Bien que les événements politiques restent d'une grande importance, nous allons montrer comment les protestations, leur organisation, la solidarité qu’elles ont générée et la maturation de la société civile qui en dérive, ont contribué à développer un sens d’appartenance à la « nation ukrainienne », basé uniquement sur la participation politique et le désir d’un meilleur niveau de vie des citoyens. En particulier nous verrons comment, en parallèle avec le projet de construction nationale porté par les élites, il existe un grand nombre de petits projets de construction nationale, en accord avec le projet de nation building (ou du moins qui ne s’y opposent pas), qui sont fondamentaux pour la création, le développement, et la conceptualisation d’une identité nationale à la mesure du citoyen. Cet article est issu d’une observation participante menée de longue date en Ukraine et d'un grand nompbre d'entretiens informels conduits entre 2004 et 2006.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Высказывая сомнение относительно содержания большинства материалов, где коррупция рассматривается как зло, которое в Украине необходимо искоренить, автор этой статьи предлагает проанализировать и разобрать случаи мелкой коррупции, которая... more
Высказывая сомнение относительно содержания большинства материалов, где коррупция рассматривается как зло, которое в Украине необходимо искоренить,
автор этой статьи предлагает проанализировать и разобрать случаи мелкой коррупции, которая скорее помогает людям выжить, чем обогатиться, — в рамках
теории обмена подарками, предложенной Марселем Моссом (Marcel Mauss).
Основное внимание в статье сосредоточено на наиболее «коррумпированных» местах в Украине: высшее учебное заведение, больница, пост дорожно-патрульной службы,
что имеет целью подробный анализ того, что лежит в основе этих сделок. Помимо этого, рассматриваются роли, которые играют действующие лица этих механизмов, что позволяет распознать так называемую переходную зону между разными видами коррупции, — как это видно из примеров, рассмотренных по ходу статьи.
Research Interests:
Recientemente, el debate sobre el fenómeno de las actividades económicas informales se ha ido alejando, por lo menos parcialmente, de aquellas lógicas estrictamente monetarias, desplazándose hacia esquemas más complejos donde, dentro de... more
Recientemente, el debate sobre el fenómeno de las actividades económicas informales se ha ido alejando, por lo menos parcialmente, de aquellas lógicas estrictamente monetarias, desplazándose hacia esquemas más complejos donde, dentro de perspectivas a largo plazo, se asumen paradigmas no materialistas. Sin embargo, el papel de la informalidad en numerosos aspectos de la existencia individual sigue sin ser verdadero objeto de estudio. Este artículo desvela qué ocurre cuando el Estado se retira (véase el fin de la garantía de prestaciones y servicios sociales) de una determinada área geográfica y qué tipo de mecanismos, prácticas e instituciones surgen en su lugar. Sugerimos que en el contexto de la desaparición de un Estado de bienestar y en ausencia de alternativas por parte del sector privado una miríada de transacciones y de actores logran colmar el vacío y ofrecer así una cobertura de carácter informal. Nuestro caso de estudio se centra en la Zona de Exclusión de Chernóbil en el noreste de Ucrania, afectada por el accidente nuclear homónimo, revelando con ello cómo todos aquellos que han quedado excluidos y abandonados, y a quienes identificamos como inmersos en la "nuda vida" post-nuclear (Agamben, 1998), han logrado crear mecanismos de seguridad social independientemente de los esquemas estatales, ofreciendo un papel complementario, y ello hasta hoy en día. Arreglos informales, locales y no oficiales en un espacio nuclear resultan cruciales para la supervivencia en un entorno marginal y peligroso como es este.
Research Interests:
ცოტა რამ თუ მოიძებნება ისეთი ოდესა-კიშინოვის მატარებელზე უკეთესად წარმოაჩენდეს პოსტ-საბჭოთა ტრანზიციის დრამას. ესაა დამოუკიდებელი სამყარო, თავისი ეკონომიკური სისტემით, რომელიც სახელმწიფო დახმარების დეფიციტის შე-სავსებად სპონტანურ... more
ცოტა რამ თუ მოიძებნება ისეთი ოდესა-კიშინოვის მატარებელზე უკეთესად წარმოაჩენდეს პოსტ-საბჭოთა ტრანზიციის დრამას. ესაა დამოუკიდებელი სამყარო, თავისი ეკონომიკური სისტემით, რომელიც სახელმწიფო დახმარების დეფიციტის შე-სავსებად სპონტანურ ინსტიტუტებს აყალიბებს. ოდესა-კიშინოვს შორის მოძრავი მა-ტარებელი, ე.წ. “ელექტრიჩკა”, არის პოსტ-საბჭოთა საზოგადობებისთვის დამახა-სიათებელი ასპექტების მომცველი მიკრო სამყარო, რომელიც ასახავს  ყველაფერს პოლიტიკური ძალაუფლებისათვის ბრძოლიდან დაწყებული, კორუფციით და ეთნოპოლიტიკური შეჯახებებით, ჩრდილოვანი ეკონომიკის პრაქტიკითა და საზღვ-რის პრობლემებით დამთავრებული. მატარებლს უამრავი თავისებურება გააჩნია. პირველყოვლისა ესაა რკინიგზის ხაზის გეოგრაფიული მდებარეობა, რომელიც უკრაინასა და მოლდოვას ტრანსდნისტრიის სეპარატისტული რესპუბლიკის (სა-ერთაშორისო დონეზე არ აღიარებული, თუმცა დე-ფაქტო არსებული სახელმწიფო, მოლდოვასა და უკრაინას შორის) მეშვეობით აკავშირებს. მეორე, საზღვრის გადა-კვეთა: ადმინისტრაციული ცვლილებების მიუხედავად, კვლევის პერიოდში საბჭოთა დროის მსგავსად, ოდესა, შავი ზღვის უდიდესი საპორტო ქალაქი, მოლდოველები-სათვის მნიშვნელოვან სავაჭრო ადგილად რჩებოდა. და ბოლოს, მაშინ როცა სა-ხელმწიფო ვერ უზრუნვეყოფს მოქალაქეებს უსაფრთხო და სტაბილური შემოსავ-ლით, მიზერული ან საერთოდ უხელფასობის პირობებში არაფორმალური ეკონო-მიკა საგულისხმო როლს თამაშობს.
Research Interests:
Survey with 7116 respondents conducted in Vietnam in December/January 2018 on perception, among young people, of the Sustainable Development Goals
Research Interests:
on what criteria to build and sustain an academic career and reputation and how this book was conceived “If you want to measure academic outputs by results, but measure results through indicators, then academics are just numbers.”... more
on what criteria to build and sustain an academic career and reputation and how this book was conceived

“If you want to measure academic outputs by results, but measure results through indicators, then academics are just numbers.” (thanks to Artem)

For some time already, academics from a number of regions of the world have been put under increasing pressure to publish in SCOPUS-indexed journals. “Is it a good thing or a bad thing?” I was asked once.
It is neither, it is simply the result of a long change in the higher education sector that has been happening for some time now. When the higher education sector was such a scarcely populated world that you did not even need a PhD to be hired as a professor there was little necessity to ask who was better than whom. It was another world back then, romantically slow, less mobile and where word of mouth had functions that have been taken over by the internet now. It was generally assumed that whoever was in the profession, was someone more educated than the others and thus, almost automatically producing smart and quality outputs.
Much has changed since then. The number of people willing to enroll in a university has been constantly growing, a thing that significantly expanded the higher education sector, pushed academic entrepreneurs to establish new universities, expand departments and make higher education a mass phenomenon. If one compares the number of people who had potentially access to higher education fifty years ago and now results are likely to be astonishing. We now work in a sector and there is a necessity to ensure quality control.

One of the consequences of this change is that public funding for the universities is shrinking and not necessarily because budgets are dwindled. Not necessarily budgets are being cut everywhere. With a budget for higher education growing at a certain speed and higher education growing at twice that speed, money becomes simply not enough. We need some criteria to decide whether to give money to that or that university, to that or this discipline. Some criteria have to be used to allocate (limited) funds. The easiest, and possibly most logic, one is quality. Universities, or disciplines, that deliver more quality deserve more money. This faces us with at least two issues. First, how to objectively measure quality? And second, what happens with the universities, or disciplines, that do not make it into the Olympus of state-funded universities?
Research Interests:
A short guide to design your own strategy and survive bibliometrics, conferences and unreal expectations in academia Foreword: on what criteria to build and sustain an academic career and reputation and how this book was conceived " If... more
A short guide to design your own strategy and survive bibliometrics, conferences and unreal expectations in academia

Foreword: on what criteria to build and sustain an academic career and reputation and how this book was conceived " If you want to measure academic outputs by results, but measure results through indicators, then academics are just numbers. " (thanks to Artem) For some time already, academics from a number of regions of the world have been put under increasing pressure to publish in SCOPUS-indexed journals. " Is it a good thing or a bad thing? " I was asked once. It is neither, it is simply the result of a long change in the higher education sector that has been happening for some time now. When the higher education sector was such a scarcely populated world that you did not even need a PhD to be hired as a professor there was little necessity to ask who was better than whom. It was another world back then, romantically slow, less mobile and where word of mouth had functions that have been taken over by the internet now. It was generally assumed that whoever was in the profession, was someone more educated than the others and thus, almost automatically producing smart and quality outputs. Much has changed since then. The number of people willing to enroll in a university has been constantly growing, a thing that significantly expanded the higher education sector, pushed academic entrepreneurs to establish new universities, expand departments and make higher education a mass phenomenon. If one compares the number of people who had potentially access to higher education fifty years ago and now results are likely to be astonishing. We now work in a sector and there is a necessity to ensure quality control. One of the consequences of this change is that public funding for the universities is shrinking and not necessarily because budgets are dwindled. Not necessarily budgets are being cut everywhere. With a budget for higher education growing at a certain speed and higher education growing at twice that speed, money becomes simply not enough. We need some criteria to decide whether to give money to that or that university, to that or this discipline. Some criteria have to be used to allocate (limited) funds. The easiest, and possibly most logic, one is quality. Universities, or disciplines, that deliver more quality deserve more money. This faces us with at least two issues. First, how to objectively measure quality? And second, what happens with the universities, or disciplines, that do not make it into the Olympus of state-funded universities? The quest for academic quality The first question is the main reason why I am publishing this book and I will try to give an overview here. I have added a short digression on the second question at the end of the section but, as fascinating as the topic is, that should be the subject of a separate book, or at least chapter. How to measure quality? As a general rule you need a controller or evaluator, a benchmark and some indicators, be these qualitative or quantitative. However, at the pace the higher education sector is developing quality control is indeed a challenge. Academia was born as a small circle of people working on things that were unintelligible for the rest of the world. Controlling quality was easier, not least because some criteria that we have now were absent. However, controlling quality
Academics are under pressure to publish more, better, find money and engage in dissemination activities...how to cope with all this in addition to your daily teaching and administrative work. How to cope with this? In this book I share... more
Academics are under pressure to publish more, better, find money and engage in dissemination activities...how to cope with all this in addition to your daily teaching and administrative work. How to cope with this?

In this book I share my experiences hoping that it will be useful. Comments and feedback are welcome.

I would also be grateful if anyone could do the final copy-edit before going to the print. I plan to publish it with an independent publisher and have to take care of everything myself
Research Interests:
How do the 'sharing economies' relate to the long history of informal economic practices as understood in the social sciences? This article examines conceptions of the sharing economy in terms of its relation to scholarship on... more
How do the 'sharing economies' relate to the long history of informal economic practices as understood in the social sciences? This article examines conceptions of the sharing economy in terms of its relation to scholarship on informality. By using two case studies of informal economic practices that originated in socialist-era societies and continue to the present day in modified forms we critique the notion that sharing economies are significantly novel in form or logic, other than technologically. We draw attention to the variety of informal economy practices to discuss how they may be socially embedded or disembedded. The main focus on global technological leveraging of productivity and connectivity in sharing economy practices would suggest that many aspects are akin to disembedded forms of informality. Scholarship needs to address the ongoing disciplinary parallelism on prefixed 'economies' – in doing so it would provide a better contextual and theoretical understanding of 'sharing economies'.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Abritant les plus grandes communautés de russophones et de Russes ethniques au sein de l’Union européenne, les républiques baltes ont attiré l’attention de nombreux universitaires et spécialistes du sujet de l’intégration des minorités... more
Abritant les plus grandes communautés de russophones et de Russes ethniques au sein de l’Union européenne, les républiques baltes ont attiré l’attention de nombreux universitaires et spécialistes du sujet de l’intégration des minorités nationales et leur capacité limitée d’intégrer les minorités russes. Pourtant, le point de départ de cet article est que les dimensions politiques et celles relevant des interactions économiques du quotidien peuvent être considérées séparément. Par conséquent, la limitation des droits politiques pour une partie de la population ne se reflète pas expressément dans la vie quotidienne, en tout cas pas dans celle de tous les russophones, qui sont peut-être mieux intégrés que l’on le présente habituellement. Particulièrement dans la jeune génération, il n’y a pas de sentiment de retourner « chez soi » quand ils visitent la Russie, mais plutôt celui d’appartenir à un entre-deux. De façon intéressante, cette attitude semble s’accompagner d’un rapport biaisé à l’État qui est à la fois brimant en termes politiques et peu respectueux de la langue et de la culture russe, mais aussi reconnaissant des opportunités économiques qu’il offre par rapport à la Russie.
How high should you target for your next book? or..why (not) publish with Cambridge University Press? Virtually everyone knows Cambridge University Press and its value, in academic terms. In the past years, a new publisher has been... more
How high should you target for your next book?
or..why (not) publish with Cambridge University Press?

Virtually everyone knows Cambridge University Press and its value, in academic terms. In the past years, a new publisher has been emerging using the Cambridge label. Cambridge Scholars Publishers (CSP) is a company based in Newcastle founded by a group of Cambridge graduates. They solicit books from a number of different people and have been printing quite a lot of titles in the last five or six years. Their entrepreneurial approach has eventually been prized and there are a large number of academics now publishing with them. A few colleagues and I were contacted with the request to consider them for a next book we might be writing, or editing, or to publish the proceeding of a conference we were organizing.

What do you do when this happens? Should you publish with them? My answer is that it depends on your national evaluation system and on your ambitions. In a number of national evaluation exercises, CSP, like many others, is considered a decent publisher. You publish with them and you get credits for your book. While there are some extremely selective evaluation systems (i.e., Hong Kong), colleagues from other countries have told me that they can claim credit as long as their book is in English, with little difference on who is the publisher. If so, why not to go with CSP? 

What becomes a bit more complicated is to claim credit not from your national evaluation system but by the academic community. If you go to a major conference and sign your book off with a publisher like CSP, I am not sure of the amount of credit you will get from your audience and colleagues but definitely less than you would get if your book was with Cambridge University Press. 

At a lower level on the scale of academic prestige, there are a number of vanity or predatory publishers that have been growing in the past years. Predatory can be considered any publisher that goes around soliciting manuscripts for the simple reason to make a profit out of it with no interest whatsoever in the quality of the final output. This eventually affects the quality of the manuscripts both academically (since there is no peer review) and technically (often copy editing is not performed or even the layout is of low quality). Vanity publishers move on the same territory and they mainly target scholars, or in general people, who are happy by simply having their name on a manuscript that might then be printed or printed on demand only. When I finished my PhD, I was contacted by a publisher named Presses universitaires europeennes. The name of the company sounded not too bad and they proposed to publish my dissertation. Is there any greater joy for a recent graduate to have their PhD thesis published, and with little effort? In addition, one of the weak points of my thesis was that the chapters (that I had already published in English as separate articles) made little sense as a whole. I then thought that a monograph, published with little effort, might still add something to my CV, especially because the name of the company was not (yet) in the list of vanity or predatory publishers. 
The deal breaker, however, came relatively quickly. I warned them that French was not my native language and the manuscript had to at least go through some copy editing before publication, a thing that had been suggested even at my defense. The answer of the publisher was that, after their experts had checked the manuscript, they trusted me as an author and they would publish my manuscript as it was, since they were sure I was delivering the best possible quality. Why would they trust that my quality is the best one? Everyone makes typos and little mistakes and the work of a publisher is usually to spot them. I did some research on the Internet and found out that I had been contacted by a publisher that printed on demand. You send your manuscript and they work out a layout, perhaps even a basic cover, but will not print it until someone orders it. Would I then be able to use my book to thicken my list of publications and get a job? Or would this actually be seen as a minus on my CV. I quickly realized that the situation was similar to Groucho Marx’s joke: “I would never enter a club that accepts me among its members.” I would not be willing to publish with a publisher that was willing to accept the quality of my thesis as top quality. I then stopped replying to their emails and never published my dissertation, which I think was a good choice. 

The lesson I learned from that enlightens my position on academic publishing, is, first, that efforts and results should be proportionate. The higher you target, the better the quality you need to deliver, the harder you need to work. But if your national evaluation system does not credit you for a book with the best publisher, and you just need a monograph to confirm your position, maybe targeting the best publisher ever is not worth the effort. Second, even if where and how to publish is a personal choice, you should try to be aware of what you are doing and make choices that you can then defend, at a later stage of your career. Some evaluation systems might allow you to publish with a vanity publisher and even claim credit for it. But if you plan to go international and claim credits for your work beyond your national evaluation system, or to move to another country, it is worth checking what the international academic community, or the one of the countries you are targeting, values as a publisher for your work. In the end, the best manuscript in the world, published with the "wrong" publisher, might be credited less than it deserves or not be credited at all.
Research Interests:
(from the blog, soon book) https://www.facebook.com/thescopusdiaries/posts/1798180793600332 In my ideal world, the perfect abstract is composed by 4 elements Goal of the paper Debates Methodology Conclusion It sounds straightforward... more
(from the blog, soon book)
https://www.facebook.com/thescopusdiaries/posts/1798180793600332

In my ideal world, the perfect abstract is composed by 4 elements

Goal of the paper
Debates
Methodology
Conclusion

It sounds straightforward but it is not. In my experience, only a very small fraction of abstracts that I have examined meets, even loosely, these criteria.
Research Interests:
Panel on the anthropology of development at IUAES with Amiya Kumar Das and Anna Romanowska Development, in any and each of its forms, consists of applying techniques, tools, approaches that have worked somewhere into a new environment... more
Panel on the anthropology of development at IUAES with Amiya Kumar Das and Anna Romanowska

Development, in any and each of its forms, consists of applying techniques, tools, approaches that have worked somewhere into a new environment with the expectation, or better hope, that it will somehow work.

Nobody can predict the way the new environment will react to this implantation and, as it was widely argued, "geography matters" but the outcome is a result not only of the choice of a right measure or instrument. It mostly depends on the way two or more parts can deal with a conflict. 

Change (and innovation) is met with resistance in virtually every environment and situation. The level of resistance depends on how badly a person, a community, a country is in dire straits. How much they perceive change as necessary, or even desirable.

Pulling out a bad tooth is painful, no matter how necessary you see it...we first have to assume that the tooth we plan to pull out is the right one (sometimes in development, the wrong tooth is pulled...then people ask why a community or country becomes more reluctant to innovation…)

This means that whatever innovation you want to introduce, to maximise your potential effects, you need to get some kind of agreement by the local community, council, political elites and whoever else is involved in the decision.

This means not only to reckon with the formal structures and declarative wishes of a community "of course we want innovation, modernity, change" they will say. But change is disruptive, as Robertson and Acemoglu have argued and few gatekeepers will welcome it easily. 

This, in addition to the ethical question “I want to help you...but do you want to be helped?”

What is the ideal balance between your and a community perceived needs? You, as an expert, might think to know what some people need. They, as the target group, think they know what is best for them

As Jobs said “people do not know what they want until they see it”...this might be true for marketing and nicely packaged and assembled laptop might tempt many

But do people really know what they want? And what happens if you see that what people feel they need is only a short-term need but in the long term will kill or harm them? How many interventions have brought short-term benefits but in the long run contributed to the destruction of an environment or a community? I am thinking of the documentary Darwin's Nightmare where the introduction of a new species of fish brought fishermen to catch larger fishes but mortally altered the local ecosystem with mostly predators surviving and no fishes left to eat small plants and insects…

This is difficult in an era where donors (and consequently development workers and organizations) are under pressure to show results already from the first years of an intervention…

and if a community does not see benefits immediately they will increase resistance to the innovation that you are bringing…

and, if you plan to have long-term effects, what should be your timeframe? More reasoned and perhaps beneficial interventions usually need a longer incubation time to maximize the outcomes and minimize the effects on an environment...but interventions usually happen in a situation of (relative) emergency...who has time to wait? And how much can we wait?

No answers today, only questions...but happy to be surrounded by people and situations challenging many of my beliefs….
Research Interests:
INFORMAL AND EVERYDAY NATIONALISM AFTER COMMUNISM: BOOK PRESENTATION (books available on my profile, post available on FB) Does your book take into account the role of middle range actors, such as intellectuals, in nation building... more
INFORMAL AND EVERYDAY NATIONALISM AFTER COMMUNISM: BOOK PRESENTATION (books available on my profile, post available on FB)

Does your book take into account the role of middle range actors, such as intellectuals, in nation building processes? Intriguing question by Peter Rutland during the conference “Nationalism and the Market” at Universita La Sapienza, CERU

Time to reflect and give a more complex answer was short so I am uploading it here

Studies on nation building have extensively examined statist perspectives on nation building, which is what we initially tried to move away from with Isaacs and our “New tools and approaches” and that include the work of some middle actors.

However, intellectuals, civil society and other actors can still sign petitions, suggest interpretations and narratives on national identities that eventually make it to the headlines or national narratives.

With the current books we put at the centre of our inquiry events that will not make any noise and remain, in other words, invisible. Think of when a product becomes popular - Gangnam style in Korea or Turkish Cola some years ago, or unpopular - such as boycott of Russian products in Ukraine after the 2014 events. Even if they can be considered expression of national sentiments, their impact on a society will not be easy to grasp.

Companies will have figures and can estimate how much they have gained, or lost but they are not passive actors. Based on these figures they will have to decide on whether to stop, or keep on, selling a product. They might want to rebrand it or replace with some other product that suits the market better at some point.

But these choices can also embed a symbolic choice. Ethnic rebranding (see Zsombor Csaba’s paper) can contribute to reinforce a sense of national pride and thus, eventually, have a macro effect on identity construction. The message, in such case, would not use state official channels or middle actors but commercial ones. However, a simple marketing strategy might end up affecting the perception of national identity and various ethnic groups in a country might choose to consume, or not, a given product based on whether they support a given idea or not, on whether they try to integrate, or reject a national idea by ideologically consuming (or not) the nation (see Fox 2007).

We believe that it is worth paying attention at these phenomena, at the agency of common citizens and the way it creates synergies with market forces broadly defined (consumption, the culture industry, tourism) to be able to better understand some nuances in the construction of national identity in an era when these forces have become, symbolically or economically, as powerful as a state, at least in some cases.
Research Interests:
https://www.fu-berlin.de/en/sites/academicsinsolidarity/news/QM11.html MAXIMISING (YOUR) ACADEMIC OUTPUT, VISIBILITY AND IMPACT: A The Scopus diaries and the il-logics of academic survival workshop with Academics in Solidarity at Frei... more
https://www.fu-berlin.de/en/sites/academicsinsolidarity/news/QM11.html

MAXIMISING (YOUR) ACADEMIC OUTPUT, VISIBILITY AND IMPACT: A The Scopus diaries and the il-logics of academic survival workshop with Academics in Solidarity at Frei Universität, Berlin
1-2 July 2021 (deadline 22 June)
Academics in Solidarity is a peer-mentoring program that connects exiled researchers and established scholars in Germany, Lebanon and Jordan. For this workshop we especially invite displaced scholars/refugees/scholars at risk to attend the workshop but feel free to apply as the workshop is open to everyone

Academic careers are changing. With the “metricization” of science, researchers are increasingly under pressure to publish more, get more citations and boost their h-index. This is often requested mechanically, with little interest on whether more publications also means better science or a deeper impact on the society or the research community at large. Footing on the experience of The SCOPUS Diaries and the (il)logics of Academic Survival the current training’s goal is two-fold. First, it builds the capacity of the participants to publish in the “right journals”, “more”, “faster” so to help you perform the way your national evaluation system requires from you. However, it frames the sessions in a critical reflection on the role of the scientist, what is “better science” and what is the role of a scientist in the society. This includes a reflection on “why we do what we do” and how to strike a good balance between what is expected from you and what you want to do. This ultimately means how to look after your mental health, which is the basic pre-requirement to be able to perform well at work. Finding the balance between “I have to” and “I like to” takes years to master but a 1000 km journey begins with one step. In this training we will be starting with a focus on publication strategies:

• Journal choice beyond (but taking into account) the impact factor

• Anti-predatory session on how to identify and avoid predatory journals

• Article structuring and tailoring to the targeted journal

• Communication with journals and responding to peer review

To apply, please send to AiS your most recent academic CV and a short motivation statement (max. 250 words) specifying your previous experiences in academic publishing and how you expect the workshop would help you to improve your publication skills. Applications should be sent in PDF format to ais@fu-berlin.de with a subject line: Application – Workshop "Publication Strategy" by 22 June 2021.

Those selected for participation will be expected to commit to both days of the workshop (1 and 2 July 2021, 9.00-13.00 CEST).
Research Interests:
Workshop Strategic thinking in academic careers: publication and tenure obligations, private and professional life 4 September 2018 14.00 – 20.30 Tallinn University (Room A-242), Narva mnt 29 Under the auspices of: SOGOLAS Doctoral... more
Workshop
Strategic thinking in academic careers: publication and tenure obligations, private and professional life

4 September 2018 14.00 – 20.30
Tallinn University (Room A-242), Narva mnt 29


Under the auspices of:
SOGOLAS Doctoral School at Tallinn University
MSCA-ETN CASPIAN (www.caspianet.eu)
The Scopus diaries and the (il)logics of academic survival

Attendance is free of charge. To register please write to marleen.allemann@tlu.ee

Programme

14.00 – 16.00 Session 1
Where to publish, when to publish, how to publish to maximize the impact of your work

16.30 – 18.30 Session 2
Staying healthy in your head while developing an academic career: why you need not to do all the things that you are supposed to do

18.30 – 20.30 (sponsored by SOGOLAS Doctoral School)
Networking standing dinner (Astra Hall)


Speakers and topics

Dr Rob Kevlihan – Kimmage Development Studies Center (Ireland)
From Academia to International Development: Keeping your foot in two shoes
Prof Rico Isaacs – Oxford Brookes University (UK)
Mental health, lack thereof and academia
Ms Diana Lezhava – Center for Social Sciences (Georgia)
Dissemination approaches
Ms Helleka Koppel and Ms Keiu Telve – Antropoloogia.ee (Estonia)
How to tell stories in the world that asks for numbers?
Dr Abel Polese – author of “The Scopus Diaries”
Publication strategies: how to choose and approach journals and minimize the chances of rejection
Prof John Doyle – Dublin City University (Ireland) TBA
Prof Bruno De Cordier – Ghent University (Belgium)
Looking back at a hybrid career: was it worth it?
Prof Daniela Nascimento – Coimbra University (Portugal) TBA
Research Interests:
Plan S is clear: science must be public and publicly funded research must be accessible by anyone. Like many colleagues, I am keen to see this happening. https://researchwhisperer.org/2021/06/22/open-access-at-no-cost/ How to make it... more
Plan S is clear: science must be public and publicly funded research must be accessible by anyone. Like many colleagues, I am keen to see this happening.

https://researchwhisperer.org/2021/06/22/open-access-at-no-cost/

How to make it happen is, however, a different story. In an effort to liberalise the market, Plan S asked the publishers to disclose the price for open access publication of an article. Once the market becomes transparent, it is assumed, competition and new business models should bring prices down.

So, recently, Springer Nature has candidly responded – just give us US$9,500 per open access article.  “My brother bought a used car for $10K. What a fool, he could have been published open access on Nature” was probably the best response I saw putting things in perspective.

My problem is not even Springer’s selling price. As a for-profit company, their goal is to squeeze as much money out of people and organisations as they can.

My problem is that many of us are ready to buy it and may even consider it a fair price. OK, Springer journals are the iPhone of academia but for someone who runs an open access journal on a budget of less than $5K a year (a refurbished old phone, in comparison), that’s quite some money. The same can be said for academics from countries where $10K is their annual salary.

Unsurprisingly, Open Science is moving at two speeds with scholars based in Austria, UK the Netherlands, in Sweden and the like being much more likely to publish open access than the rest of the world.

All this at a time when scholars are encouraged to publish more. Ironically (or not), profit margins by commercial publishers are similar to those declared by Apple ranging around 30-40%. So, exactly as with iPhones, those who can afford it will say “Yes, it’s expensive. But we can’t wait to get more of that”.
Full text at: https://coffeeandcocktails1.wordpress.com/2020/07/15/did-your-productivity-under-lockdown-increase-nope-i-was-busy-staying-alive-but-i-learned-a-lesson-or-two-on-mental-health/

Raise your hand if you ever thought at the beginning of the pandemic: “With lockdown, there is plenty of time to rest, learn a new language, pick up an instrument, and take care of myself”. I now wonder if anyone managed these things. In a climate of utmost uncertainty about the future, remaining in good mental health should already be regarded as a major achievement.

For me, the biggest challenge has been the lack of personal interaction. I initially welcomed the idea of reduced interaction, and less social pressure, but humans (myself included) live off scents, body language and face-to-face contact. In the long run, this lack of social interaction has become more of a curse than I expected.

I remember pre-lockdown spending time reading posts and tweets to make sense of all that was happening to see if I would be allowed into the next country where I had a meeting or just call it a day (well, a year). My initial plan was to complete fellowships that I had been delaying for years: Helsinki, then Almaty, followed by Chisinau until I landed in February in Daegu (the Korean epicenter of the outbreak); a sort of jackpot, just the other way around. In the end, I had to evacuate.

I frightfully saw borders closing after me like in an action movie. Fearing refoulement at any stop, I made it to my “arrival point”, Kiev, Ukraine, in March – 4 days before its international borders were sealed. By the end of the month, walking sober in a park in Ukraine would cost you more in fines than being caught completely drunk driving your car.

Logistically this location was a good choice. Supermarkets were never ravaged by “buy-it-all” shoppers, and toilet paper and home delivery food were widely available. My kids were also there this year. They are old enough to be autonomous during online schooling but small enough to be tickled during breaks. In addition, I share 50% custody with their mother (one week each) so I have had some free time. To maintain being socially active, during “her” week I visit them. My affective life was not really “interrupted” like others. But being “better off” than others does not mean “feeling good”. You still need to make efforts to preserve your mental health. I have seen many around me sink into their gloomiest thoughts. I have thus tried to make up for the lack of social interaction by doing the following:

Set a deadline: It is impossible to change your life indefinitely. But you can tell yourself “for the next 30 days, I will live like this”. After 30 days you can just renew this period. Gradually sliding into a new reality will make it easier for your brain to adapt.

Be compassionate with yourself: A pandemic is an outstanding event. If you want to procrastinate more, sleep, or watch a movie, just do it. Do not feel guilty because you are not as productive as you imagined. You are unique and your reaction to a crisis situation may differ.

Get some fresh air and some sunlight: I rented a room 15 minutes’ walk from the river and 20 minutes from the woods. I walked up to 3-4 hours per day alone and in respect of the nation’s lockdown rules to make up for the lack of communication.

Eat well: Under stress, I tend to eat sweets and gain weight. Setting “losing weight” as a goal gave me something to work towards to get a sense of achievement and feel comfortable in my body, which is important when the rest of the world is falling apart.

Make going out an excuse to take care of yourself: The temptation to stay in my pajamas was high but I was well aware of its long-term risks. Going to the shop to buy that missing ingredient, or just to do some reading on a bench was an excuse to leave the house and exchange a word with the grocery store security clerk.

Reduce internet activities: Interaction with other people gives you energy, but internet interaction can suck more energy out of people than it gives, so I decided to concentrate on writing, reading and working.
Research Interests:
What to do when your supervisor does not believe in you? Years on, I still can’t understand why she accepted to supervise me. Had she been a much younger professor, eager to get her first PhD student, I would have understood her desire to... more
What to do when your supervisor does not believe in you? Years on, I still can’t understand why she accepted to supervise me. Had she been a much younger professor, eager to get her first PhD student, I would have understood her desire to enter academic adulthood. But a full professor? Even at this stage of my career, I would not take someone whose topic falls so far from my own interests. If the person seems talented, I’d suggest a couple of doors to knock on, hoping that my colleagues have time to supervise them.
Research Interests:
My principle is that, in theory at least, all studies might merit publication. But some deserve to be prioritized because they are baked almost to the “publication point” whereas some others need much more work. With a limited amount of... more
My principle is that, in theory at least, all studies might merit publication. But some deserve to be prioritized because they are baked almost to the “publication point” whereas some others need much more work. With a limited amount of resources, our team can devote themselves only to a limited number of articles. Those with potentials but still raw are sent back with suggestions on how they could be improved and perhaps considered for review at a later stage. But after some discussions, I decided to introduce desk rejection and this post is about why.

What articles deserve consideration?
https://academic-chatter.com/blog/why-was-my-article-desk-rejected/
Research Interests:
I asked AcademicChatter about the best software and advice to prepare a poster for a conference. The document attached summarises the 80+ useful answers I received
Research Interests:
is public engagement just a nightmare? True, dissemination is not proper science, to frame it snobbishly, but it’s like whiskey. Once you identify the flavours you like, you will enjoy it.... more
is public engagement just a nightmare?
True, dissemination is not proper science, to frame it snobbishly, but it’s like whiskey. Once you identify the flavours you like, you will enjoy it.

https://patthomson.net/2020/02/10/is-public-engagement-just-a-nightmare/
Research Interests:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ii13p6jClMU&feature=youtu.be

Is it "bad" to pay to publish your article?
According to what criteria choose a target journal?
How to structure your article to please an "empirical" or "theoretical" journal?
Research Interests:
While in lab-based disciplines co-authorship is the norm, there are “individual(istic)” disciplines where it is sometimes still frowned upon. In general, co-authorship is not bad per se, and there is nothing negative in being the 4th or... more
While in lab-based disciplines co-authorship is the norm, there are “individual(istic)” disciplines where it is sometimes still frowned upon. In general, co-authorship is not bad per se, and there is nothing negative in being the 4th or even the 99th author, especially if we are talking about a highly cited paper. But co-authorship does say something about you. If you are always the 1st author, it might look like you have the prima donna syndrome. By contrast, if you are always the 5th author in a publication, at some point someone might ask why you are not leading any studies.

Co-authorship is tricky to manage and interpret. Some universities now ask you, in case of co-authorship, to specify what parts of the paper you have written or contributed. Some committees will ask your co-authors to sign a statement declaring how much of an effort (30%, 50%?) they have put into a paper with you as a co-author, to be clear what was your contribution to a study.

Read the whole post here
https://www.echer.org/what-can-co-authorship-bring-to-your-academic-career/
Research Interests:
In May 2011 I woke up, for the first time in my life, in the grip of a panic attack. My 3-year fellowship in Edinburgh was ending and I had no concrete employment perspectives. Out of 60 applications I submitted in 2010/2011, only two... more
In May 2011 I woke up, for the first time in my life, in the grip of a panic attack. My 3-year fellowship in Edinburgh was ending and I had no concrete employment perspectives. Out of 60 applications I submitted in 2010/2011, only two were followed up by an invitation to an interview but, in no case, I was offered a job.

People kept telling that my profile was strong and I would eventually find a job...
post here

https://thesiswhisperer.com/2019/09/11/fail-again-fail-better-and-then-write-a-book-about-it/
Research Interests:
Being an assessor, evaluator or peer reviewer for articles is time-consuming: why to bother? What are the perks of becoming an evaluator or assessor for projects? Some people might see it as an extra income opportunity and in some... more
Being an assessor, evaluator or peer reviewer for articles is time-consuming: why to bother?

What are the perks of becoming an evaluator or assessor for projects? Some people might see it as an extra income opportunity and in some cases, it is true. You are paid extra. But the cost-benefit analysis is “not the same” for everyone. It basically depends on how fast you are at reading, digesting, commenting. I know people who need 1-2 days to do a peer review for a journal. They still do reviews, but then they lose almost half of the working week to give comments to someone they do not know and, in general, do something they cannot claim any credit for. The same can be said for assessing books or projects. You are often paid but if you are a slow reader, or meticulous thinker, the money is not enough to buy out the time you lose. You ultimately know how fast you read, think and assess so you know how to decide how much you can take on. But in a long-term perspective, evaluations and assessments are an investment in your career.

Peer reviews of articles
There is somehow an expectation that you need to perform a given number of peer reviews per year. They are not formally required but you will be looked at like an alien if you declare that you have never done one, or one for a good journal. There is also a tacit reciprocity expectation: if you want your articles to be reviewed (and get people to spend time thinking of constructive comments for you), you should do the same for other, anonymous, scholars.
Besides, a top journal contacting you to perform a review may be regarded as evidence of the fact that you are visible or sufficiently established in your field to be contacted as an expert on a topic, or area.
Sometimes peer review is also a way to see where research in your area is going, learn about a paper on similar topics submitted. In addition, by spotting mistakes and imperfections, and in general by looking critically at someone’s work, might help you to better identify your own mistakes or understand what are the (potential) weakest points of an article.
Because it is unpaid, a peer review is, in some respects, a favor that you do for a journal. Once you submit an article to that very journal the editor might know your name. At any rate, you lose anonymity and you could simply mention that you reviewed for them when contacting one of the editors to discuss a possible submission and if the topic is suitable. Sometimes this could end up a win by you being invited to be on the editorial board (for instance if you have done many reviews and the journal is happy with your work).

Peer reviews of book proposals
Similar considerations apply to peer review of books: it is a sign that you are becoming established and a contact point with a series editor (sometimes, if the process is managed by an academic; there are cases where you are just in touch with an editorial assistant). The main difference is that you are paid some token that might be worth the effort, or not, depending on how fast you are able to write a review.

Peer reviews of funding applications
This is a much more a complex market and a proposal evaluator might become a full-time job. But, to become an evaluator for jobs that are paying well, you need to show previous experience in evaluation. You might thus want to start from the bottom, that is from donors that offer little or no money just to later claim that you are an experienced evaluator.
From a more strategic perspective, you will have a chance to see how projects are evaluated and, once you want to submit your own proposals, you will know more than a newcomer. You can also see how, and what, other people write, what are the most common mistakes in a project, thus becoming more skilled in spotting your own possible shortcomings.
In some cases, you might be given projects in your area, or topic, so to better understand what the tendencies are. Of course, it is illegal – or at least considered a conflict of interest – to submit your own project to a foundation for which you are doing evaluations for at the same time. But you could still assess one year and submit the next one, when you will be more knowledgeable, or more inspired.
Research Interests:
ARE YOU A MEMBER OF ANY ACADEMIC PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION? WHY AND WHY NOT? One, two, or (too) many memberships? How many is too much? The Scopus Diaries and the (Il)logics of Academic Survival... more
ARE YOU A MEMBER OF ANY ACADEMIC PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION? WHY AND WHY NOT?

One, two, or (too) many memberships? How many is too much?
The Scopus Diaries and the (Il)logics of Academic Survival
https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-scopus-diaries-and-the-illogics-of-academic-survival/9783838211992



Perhaps I am not the most relevant person to explain how to choose a professional organization since I am a polygamous nomad of associations. I mean that I have been a member of many but never followed one regularly or dogmatically. I have colleagues who, more faithfully, attend the same conference(s) every year or refer to the same association all the time. However, my experience might also inspire some to do the same, or to avoid my path.

My strategy has been to go where the wind took me. Sometimes a colleague invited me into a panel, some other times I just decide to test an association or an event. Obviously, I cannot attend all conferences and be involved as a member all the time. But one can alternate. A colleague I met at a conference said, "This is a fine one if you come once every other year, not every year."
In the end, I am not very active in any of the organizations I gravitate towards, but I converse with people from various disciplines, areas and spend a bit of time with this group of people and a bit with that one. The advantage is that I constantly broaden my view on things, I can see my own research from a variety of perspectives, get useful and less useful feedback from a variety of disciplines and I somehow “befriend everyone.” The disadvantage, if I may call it so since I do not miss it, is that I am not progressing in status within any association. Nobody entrusts me with an important task or asks me to join a board or working group within the organization.

There is no best strategy but once a friend told me, and I agree, that people who become good at one thing reach success, or some kind of status, faster than people who invest into several things at the same time. But the latter, in the long run, are more likely to achieve more.

By the same token, I see two ideal-types of patterns of professional development, when it comes to membership and activeness in professional associations.

If you choose an association and start attending all of the meetings, chances are that you will end up mingling with the "right people." You will be asked to perform some tasks, help with organizing events, chair sections and will gain the trust of fellow members. You might eventually also move up to the board or be a part of the organizing committee for some larger events.
People within the association will come to know your name and at least get curious about what you are doing. Now, most associations have members based in several departments, and countries. Because the academic world is relatively small, chances are that within 4-5 years your name will sound familiar to a number of people, and departments, that are somehow related to the association.
But, once your professional life starts rotating around a particular association and you have a certain level of status there, why would you want to try something else? Why try and join another association that could give you a different perspective, and contacts within a different professional milieu, but where you would start from zero? It is still possible that you will be introduced to some key person from another association who already knows your work, so you do not really start from zero. But the general rule is that, if you feel too comfortable in a given environment, you tend to stay and have little incentives to explore the world beyond it.

A "nomadic" lifestyle, that is choosing to experience several conferences and test several associations without really finding a home, will allow you to explore several environments at the same time. But your interaction is likely to be less profound, or intense, than in the case where you invest yourself into one or two associations. You will find yourself often starting from the beginning at a conference, knowing only those who have invited you. You will also have to take part in a number of “graveyard panels” and start from zero again and again at each event.1

Chances are that you will eventually follow the pattern above and settle down with one or two associations. You will get there later than someone who has joined the association five years before but with some understanding of other associations and possibly more confident that this is what you want.

I see a strong analogy with the situation where you want to choose a partner. You can meet someone and think that you feel comfortable enough to commit for some years or you can go on and try several options for some time, before eventually making your choice. If you stop immediately you will have more time to build up and consolidate your relationship. At some point, you might ask yourself if the decision was too rushed, or how would you interact with different people. If you make your decision after trying a few partners, you will become more aware of what the alternatives are. Eventually, once you make your choice, you will start building a relationship "later," compared to those who have started a few years before you.

Making a decision about your position concerning a professional association is a strategic choice that you will have to deal with at some point in your career and it might be influenced by your desire to get a job in a particular place. If there is a university, or better a department, where you would like to work, try to figure out at what conferences, or around which journals, your potential colleagues tend to associate themselves with and try and join them. An informal conversation with a colleague from that department, at a conference dinner, sometimes is worth 1000 recommendation letters when you apply for a position.

#scopusdiaries #strategy #career #academia
Pros and cons of involving co-authors in your publications Is it “good” or “bad” to have co-authors? https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-scopus-diaries-and-the-illogics-of-academic-survival/9783838211992 Co-authorship is tricky. I know... more
Pros and cons of involving co-authors in your publications

Is it “good” or “bad” to have co-authors?

https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-scopus-diaries-and-the-illogics-of-academic-survival/9783838211992

Co-authorship is tricky. I know that some universities now ask you, in case of co-authorship, to specify what parts of the paper you have written or contributed. Some other committees will ask your co-authors to sign a statement declaring how much of an effort (30%, 50%) they have put into a paper with you as co-author so to be clear what was your contribution to a study.
I also see the fear in some of the seminar participants' eyes (usually from the humanities) when I suggest that they could co-write, or co-edit, with some other colleagues. It seems like they are afraid of sharing the merits, or purity, of their ideas and that single authorship should be the norm. On the other extreme, there is a wide amount of disciplines acknowledging that multi-authorship is a reality in academia and is, in many respects, well regulated. There are unwritten but established rules to decide on the order of authors, and negotiations to decide who should be inserted where, in a given paper.
There are several possible attitudes towards co-authorship but, in general, co-authorship is not bad per se. There is nothing bad in being the 4th or even the 99th author, especially if we are talking about a highly cited paper. But if you are always the 5th or more author in a publication then someone, at some point, might ask why you are not leading any studies. 

As a bottom line, one could take the definition of an independent scholar by the European Research Council. To be eligible for an ERC grant, you need to have at least one paper not jointly written with your supervisor. I have heard of some committees minimizing merits of applicants for a paper if they are listed as the 4th (or further) co-author of a paper. I would also avoid flagging too many papers for which you are listed as the 4th or the 5th author unless you can prove that the order of authors was alphabetical.
I have two principles that I use, with some flexibility, to determine the order of authors of a paper. One is that the person in charge of the paper, to coordinate the work, identify the journal, take the lead in addressing the comments, should go as a first author. The other is that, even if I am inserted as second or later co-author in many influential papers, I should still publish at least once a year a paper of which I am the first author. In my view, the first author is the one who somehow takes the lead in the research group and going as first author demonstrates some kind of initiative, leadership skills and the capacity to remain active (or pro-active, since you bring together authors, manage them and actively look for solutions to issues that arise during the submission process).

For many people that I have met, and who come from disciplines where you claim your credits alone, co-authorship sounds exotic, at best. To some extent, I would tend to agree. If you are an anthropologist who has spent 12 months in the field and want to share your findings, and reflections, you have no room for a second, let alone third, author. But you could first publish a paper based on your novel data and then try and compare them with those by other scholars for a comparative paper. When, how and whether to engage with co-authorship is ultimately your choice. But in an academic sector where citations and h-indexes are crucial to survival, co-authorship is strategically vital to most, not to say all, of us.
As a scholar, you will have to compete with other scholars from cognate disciplines. If many of them take advantage of co-authorship to enhance their profile, then the problem is yours. You might get penalized for a fellowship, a promotion or your department might be put under pressure because it has had not “enough impact” once impact is measured, by the number of citations faculty have.
If you are in science and are used to multi-authored papers perhaps you already know it, but for the social sciences and humanities this is an open market and deserves some reflections. Think about co-authoring with 15 more colleagues and its advantages. At the very basic level, each time one of your co-authors cite themselves you earn a citation that does not count as self-citation. By contrast, if you cite yourself 15 times, it might look as you are the sole person reading yourself. For some grant applications, you are asked to provide the number of citations you attracted but exclude self-citations, which could bring the number significantly down in case few other people cite you. In addition, the more you have co-authors, the more it is likely that some of them might be more known than you and will attract citations and readership to a paper you co-authored.

I was sometimes questioned since, I was told, in the social sciences and humanities it is not a usual thing to have co-authors. But then I still remember my shock when I realized that in my department (when I was in geography) colleagues from medical geography could gather as many as 10-15 co-authors and attract hundreds of citations very quickly. And they would still be competing with other (single-authored, undercited) social scientists. I also remember a friend working in biology complaining about his low number of citations. When I went to check, he had many more than most of the people I knew, at the same career stage, in the social sciences.
Research Interests:
(Allegedly) Everyone needs to deliver guest lectures...what to do if they do not invite you to deliver one? In my dream world I am sitting in my room reflecting on some fundamental questions about science and then I receive a call.... more
(Allegedly) Everyone needs to deliver guest lectures...what to do if they do not invite you to deliver one?

In my dream world I am sitting in my room reflecting on some fundamental questions about science and then I receive a call. Someone needs me to deliver a lecture on something and are ready to arrange everything for me to be there. I am not excluding that, at some stage of your career, you will fit into this superhero-like scenario. But it might be a long way off before that happens.

Until then, guest lectures are usually the result of chance. A paper that you have published at the right moment in the right journal, a casual encounter at a conference or on the Internet. I once saw on LinkedIn someone looking for guest speakers and I contacted her. To my surprise, she invited me to deliver a speech at her department's lunch seminar series and paid for everything. 

As a scholar, you need guest lectures for at least three reasons.

First, in a number of cases, you are requested to mention on your CV where you have delivered speeches (the higher the university ranks, the better it looks on your CV)
Second, a guest lecture is the equivalent to word of mouth in academia: you engage with a relatively small public (smaller than your potential readers if you published on an Internet blog) but interaction is more intense and engaging
Third, it allows you to get feedback from different publics, scholars from other disciplines or individuals simply unfamiliar with your work. If they like you as a person, it is more likely that they will retain your name and read, or at least notice, your next publications.

A guest lecture has no standard format. At one extreme of the spectrum, there is you delivering a speech in front of ten thousand people at a major event where you are flown in in business class and everything is arranged around you. At the other extreme, you just walk next door from your university (for instance, if your city has two universities) and talk in front of 10-15 colleagues who have never heard of your work (except, perhaps, the one who has invited you to their university). 

A guest lecture can be arranged easily and the only pre-requisite is to have someone in the guest institute who thinks it is a good idea to have you over. They can be arranged in the frame of a fellowship you are holding at another university, in a neighboring town, after a conference you have attended at a university, if you stay one or two extra days. They can, of course, result from an invitation from a colleague who has found you through an Internet search and who has funds to invite you. But they can also be done in the course of a journey or a holiday (but make sure the people you are going on holiday with are not against that). You have a colleague working in a city that you need to visit anyway. Your colleague could find a room, some snacks and circulate the message throughout their university.
Virtually everyone knows Cambridge University Press and its value, in academic terms. In the past years, a new publisher has been emerging using the Cambridge label. Cambridge Scholars Publishers (CSP) is a company based in Newcastle... more
Virtually everyone knows Cambridge University Press and its value, in academic terms. In the past years, a new publisher has been emerging using the Cambridge label. Cambridge Scholars Publishers (CSP) is a company based in Newcastle founded by a group of Cambridge graduates. They solicit books from a number of different people and have been printing quite a lot of titles in the last five or six years. Their entrepreneurial approach has eventually been prized and there are a large number of academics now publishing with them. A few colleagues and I were contacted with the request to consider them for a next book we might be writing, or editing, or to publish the proceeding of a conference we were organizing.

What do you do when this happens? Should you publish with them?